Yes, AI was always destined to fail.

[mcmentalonthemic]

" GPT-4, released in March 2023, builds upon the foundation laid by GPT-3 with significant enhancements. It introduces multimodal capabilities, allowing it to process both text and images and has a longer context window, handling up to 128,000 tokens in its Turbo variant. "

I always knew AI was destined to fail from the time GPT-4 came out. When I found out GPT-4 was literally just 8 GPT-3 instances in a trenchcoat, I realised OpenAI, the main AI giant, can't scale it's model much higher. Hours a̶r̶g̶u̶i̶n̶g̶ ̶a̶g̶a̶i̶n̶s̶t̶ educating people with actual studies and proof that AI just cannot continue much longer, and that it's going to turn into a bubble, and just receiving cope back.

Serious question to the AI-tards, how could you not forsee this since 2023?

---

​

 

[mcmentalonthemic]

There is a reason Computing has never been in a bubble. Because there are papers written in the 1970s by Computer Scientists using actual empirical maths/science to show/prove how much Computers can/will improve by. They literally predicted how much better computers will be in 10 years, every year.

Investors knew exactly where it was going, and so did the companies.


AI on the other hand has always been "I promise a new breakthrough is gonna come out that's gonna make us scale just another % higher!!! Give us a few more billion!!"

Open-AI literally loses 2 and a half dollars for every dollar they make btw

 

[mcmentalonthemic]

@PsychoDsk @SecularIslamist thoughts?

 

[SecularIslamist]

@PsychoDsk @SecularIslamist thoughts?

I got bored of this but this is one of the founders behind Open AI and Tesla's ADAS systems. He basically pours cold water on LLMs and says they are overhyped and we are really continuing the same trajectory as humanity has continued since the industrial revolution.

@Jason Voorhees

 

[Jason Voorhees]

I got bored of this but this is one of the founders behind Open AI and Tesla's ADAS systems. He basically pours cold water on LLMs and says they are overhyped.

@Jason Voorhees

I've been saying this for months but because now some person with credentials and posh sounding accent says it everyone believes him

 

[a1ad3nn]

" GPT-4, released in March 2023, builds upon the foundation laid by GPT-3 with significant enhancements. It introduces multimodal capabilities, allowing it to process both text and images and has a longer context window, handling up to 128,000 tokens in its Turbo variant. "

I always knew AI was destined to fail from the time GPT-4 came out. When I found out GPT-4 was literally just 8 GPT-3 instances in a trenchcoat, I realised OpenAI, the main AI giant, can't scale it's model much higher. Hours a̶r̶g̶u̶i̶n̶g̶ ̶a̶g̶a̶i̶n̶s̶t̶ educating people with actual studies and proof that AI just cannot continue much longer, and that it's going to turn into a bubble, and just receiving cope back.

Serious question to the AI-tards, how could you not forsee this since 2023?

---

View attachment 4284801

​

I don't see it as a bubble because unlike the .com bubble ai has an actual use but it is definitely over hyped and I can see smaller companies falling but tech giants will stay

 

[mcmentalonthemic]

I don't see it as a bubble because unlike the .com bubble ai has an actual use but it is definitely over hyped and I can see smaller companies falling but tech giants will stay

I don't agree, .com served an amazing purpose. the .com bubble was just businesses shifting to the internet which succeeded alot, literally no business except a select few can survive without putting their business online whether it's having a website, putting their physical business on google, advertising. Look at amazon, it's entire business lives on the internet, and it's like top 5 companies in the world beating Saudi Aramco.

AI money on the other hand isn't really going to the types of AI that optimize engine shape or are used for missiles, AI money is going to LLMs. AKA, better google?

 

[a1ad3nn]

I don't agree, .com served an amazing purpose. the .com bubble was just businesses shifting to the internet which succeeded alot, literally no business except a select few can survive without putting their business online whether it's having a website, putting their physical business on google, advertising. Look at amazon, it's entire business lives on the internet, and it's like top 5 companies in the world beating Saudi Aramco.

AI money on the other hand isn't really going to the types of AI that optimize engine shape or are used for missiles, AI money is going to LLMs. AKA, better google?

Most .com sites made absolutely no revenue and weren't real business before like pets.com and Amazon and YouTube built off of the structure left behind from .com. now I'm not a AI boot licker but it does have some legitimate uses. I do think it's over valued right now but it legitimately is the future.

As long as your not buying actually AI company stock and instead tech like Microsoft and Nvidia I doubt you'll loose much. Even my financial literacy teacher said she doesn't believe it's a bubble

 

[alexito]

" GPT-4, released in March 2023, builds upon the foundation laid by GPT-3 with significant enhancements. It introduces multimodal capabilities, allowing it to process both text and images and has a longer context window, handling up to 128,000 tokens in its Turbo variant. "

I always knew AI was destined to fail from the time GPT-4 came out. When I found out GPT-4 was literally just 8 GPT-3 instances in a trenchcoat, I realised OpenAI, the main AI giant, can't scale it's model much higher. Hours a̶r̶g̶u̶i̶n̶g̶ ̶a̶g̶a̶i̶n̶s̶t̶ educating people with actual studies and proof that AI just cannot continue much longer, and that it's going to turn into a bubble, and just receiving cope back.

Serious question to the AI-tards, how could you not forsee this since 2023?

---

View attachment 4284801

​

damn, lets build our own LLM then

 

[SQL2VD]

I made a rant about AI on another site that won't be named, but to sum it up AI was doomed from the start.

 

[mcmentalonthemic]

Most .com sites made absolutely no revenue and weren't real business before like pets.com and Amazon and YouTube built off of the structure left behind from .com. now I'm not a AI boot licker but it does have some legitimate uses. I do think it's over valued right now but it legitimately is the future.

Ahh yes you're right. I remember how people made a killing for applying to companies as "email engineers"
I guess the modern iteration would be prompt engineers

 

[a1ad3nn]

Ahh yes you're right. I remember how people made a killing for applying to companies as "email engineers"
I guess the modern iteration would be prompt engineers

Actually don't know how the future for ai oriented jobs are gonna turn out