Yet another coper using shit graphs to say that asian women mog white women

[Deleted member 17430]

Cope thread. She looks better than 99% of white women. Not a masculine bone in that skull.

You guys don't understand because you like mannish, bukldyke women. Because you are closet homos.


Daily reminder:

This graph is incorrect in pretty much every way possible.


First thing to notice, this graph is extremely biased as it aims to undermine gender differences. It shows men and women getting a similar amount of average messages on dating apps. When in reality, it's obvious that women regardless of race or age will always receive far more messages than men of the same category.

Look at the first "By age" chart. Do you really think men get more messages on average than women across the board after 30? Maybe in the wet dream of some MGTOW coper, but in the real world? I don't think so. And even before 30, do you really think 20yo women get only 25% more messages than 20yo men? Please. More like 10x more (at least) since most men get no first messages and most women are bombarded.

Okay, we've established the graph is biased for equalizing the genders, but if we're only looking at one particular gender and within that, comparing how each race performs, it should still be a good metric right?

No. This graph only measures the number of initial messages a user receives. You can only receive messages from people that you match with. Which means the pickier you are, the least messages you will receive. Therefore desirability isn't the only factor at play, making the results unreliable.

In what world is the average asian woman or hispanic woman is considered more attractive than white women? Anyone living on planet earth knows it's not here.

White women are just the pickiest. Because they can afford to be the pickiest due to having the highest SMV. They get less messages because they swipe right and match with less men. Meanwhile asian and latina women swipe right on white normies due to JBW.

On the other hand, black women score last due to being so unattractive and desperate that they swipe right the most and still get the least first messages from men.

In conclusion, never bring up this graph again and delete it from your computer as it is trash.

 

[Deleted member 17531]

both are not ideal, Latina and MENA women are the best looking women on earth

 

[ScoobyCurry420]

This graph is incorrect in pretty much every way possible.


First thing to notice, this graph is extremely biased as it aims to undermine gender differences. It shows men and women getting a similar amount of average messages on dating apps. When in reality, it's obvious that women regardless of race or age will always receive far more messages than men of the same category.

Look at the first "By age" chart. Do you really think men get more messages on average than women across the board after 30? Maybe in the wet dream of some MGTOW coper, but in the real world? I don't think so. And even before 30, do you really think 20yo women get only 25% more messages than 20yo men? Please. More like 10x more (at least) since most men get no first messages and most women are bombarded.

Okay, we've established the graph is biased for equalizing the genders, but if we're only looking at one particular gender and within that, comparing how each race performs, it should still be a good metric right?

No. This graph only measures the number of initial messages a user receives. You can only receive messages from people that you match with. Which means the pickier you are, the least messages you will receive. Therefore desirability isn't the only factor at play, making the results unreliable.

In what world is the average asian woman or hispanic woman is considered more attractive than white women? Anyone living on planet earth knows it's not here.

White women are just the pickiest. Because they can afford to be the pickiest due to having the highest SMV. They get less messages because they swipe right and match with less men. Meanwhile asian and latina women swipe right on white normies due to JBW.

On the other hand, black women score last due to being so unattractive and desperate that they swipe right the most and still get the least first messages from men.

In conclusion, never bring up this graph again and delete it from your computer as it is trash.

We know jfl. Are there anyone that actually think asians mog white women jfl.

 

[Deleted member 17430]

BTW
This was the asian woman @Detona was defending in his post:

She looks better than 99% of white women. Not a masculine bone in that skull.

Not a masculine bone in that skull.

Not a single bone at all you mean

 

[Xangsane]

This graph is incorrect in pretty much every way possible.


First thing to notice, this graph is extremely biased as it aims to undermine gender differences. It shows men and women getting a similar amount of average messages on dating apps. When in reality, it's obvious that women regardless of race or age will always receive far more messages than men of the same category.

Look at the first "By age" chart. Do you really think men get more messages on average than women across the board after 30? Maybe in the wet dream of some MGTOW coper, but in the real world? I don't think so. And even before 30, do you really think 20yo women get only 25% more messages than 20yo men? Please. More like 10x more (at least) since most men get no first messages and most women are bombarded.

Okay, we've established the graph is biased for equalizing the genders, but if we're only looking at one particular gender and within that, comparing how each race performs, it should still be a good metric right?

No. This graph only measures the number of initial messages a user receives. You can only receive messages from people that you match with. Which means the pickier you are, the least messages you will receive. Therefore desirability isn't the only factor at play, making the results unreliable.

In what world is the average asian woman or hispanic woman is considered more attractive than white women? Anyone living on planet earth knows it's not here.

White women are just the pickiest. Because they can afford to be the pickiest due to having the highest SMV. They get less messages because they swipe right and match with less men. Meanwhile asian and latina women swipe right on white normies due to JBW.

On the other hand, black women score last due to being so unattractive and desperate that they swipe right the most and still get the least first messages from men.

In conclusion, never bring up this graph again and delete it from your computer as it is trash.

White women are bottom of the barrel for me

 

[Detona]

This graph is incorrect in pretty much every way possible.


First thing to notice, this graph is extremely biased as it aims to undermine gender differences. It shows men and women getting a similar amount of average messages on dating apps. When in reality, it's obvious that women regardless of race or age will always receive far more messages than men of the same category.

Are you fucking retarded? The graph shows women receiving way more messages than men.

Look at the first "By age" chart. Do you really think men get more messages on average than women across the board after 30?

Yes dummy. Men's SMV increases with age. Men under 30 are poorcels, don't own homes, drive shitty cars, and are often less masculine and attractive than they will be after 30.

I'm 30 and my looks are improving drastically. I'm getting less pudgy and round, leaner in the face, more facial definition, etc. Age can be a plus for a man. Sorry it almost never can be for woman (unless you're Asian, of course).

Maybe in the wet dream of some MGTOW coper, but in the real world? I don't think so. And even before 30, do you really think 20yo women get only 25% more messages than 20yo men? Please. More like 10x more (at least) since most men get no first messages and most women are bombarded.

Cope. It's a statistically verifiable fact that older men have more sex than younger men. Also this is OKCupid not Tinder you stupid fuck.

Okay, we've established the graph is biased for equalizing the genders, but if we're only looking at one particular gender and within that, comparing how each race performs, it should still be a good metric right?

No. This graph only measures the number of initial messages a user receives. You can only receive messages from people that you match with. Which means the pickier you are, the least messages you will receive. Therefore desirability isn't the only factor at play, making the results unreliable

Again retard, this isn't Tinder. It's OKCupid.

In what world is the average asian woman or hispanic woman is considered more attractive than white women? Anyone living on planet earth knows it's not here.

In this planet, you stupid bitch. You do realize there are multiple studies in which men rate Asian women's faces as more attractive, right?

White women are just the pickiest. Because they can afford to be the pickiest due to having the highest SMV. They get less messages because they swipe right and match with less men. Meanwhile asian and latina women swipe right on white normies due to JBW

WRONG. White men were ranked higher than white women in this study. White women have extremely low SMV and receive fewer message than Asian and Latina women on this study, despite outnumbering them by 10 to 1. White women settle for lower quLity men and this is demonstratablr by studies showing that their husbands earn less than men who msrried Asian or Latina women. White women also have lower standards for men's height, masculinity snd dominance.

https://repository.ubn.ru.nl/bitstream/handle/2066/28412/28412___.PDF?sequence=1

"The ideal man as rated by the Japanese subjects was found to be significantly taller, stronger, more independent, and more arrogant than the Dutch ideal man.



"In all cases the Japanese ratings are more extreme, that is further removed from the neutral scalc position 4 than the Dutch ratings. So, contrary to expectation it is not so much the ideal woman who differs between the Japanese and Dutch cultures, but rather the ideal man"

On the other hand, black women score last due to being so unattractive and desperate that they swipe right the most and still get the least first messages from men.

In conclusion, never bring up this graph again and delete it from your computer as it is trash.

Keep coping, you utter subhuman. Multiple studies all say the same thing: white women and black women form a 'cluster' and have similar outcomes in dating: they are unattractive and less desired. Meanwhile Asian and Latina women form a cluster, and are extremely desired and attractive. Asian and Latina women are both "Mongoloid" as well, like half-Asian women, who also beat white women. It's a very common sensical pattern thst everyone is observing, but you're denying it because it hurts your feelings as a white woman (genetic dead end).

 

[Detona]

Daily reminder: this study used mostly white male+Asian and Latina female couples and found that they were rated more attractive than white-white couples.

"Compared with intraracial daters, interracial daters reported that their partners saw them more positively on attractiveness, cerebral, and relational attributes (Study 1), rated their partners more positively on attractiveness and cerebral attributes (Study 2), and were rated by independent coders as more physically attractive (Study 3). Implications are discussed."

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/274233268_The_sweetness_of_forbidden_fruit_Interracial_daters_are_more_attractive_than_intraracial_daters

 

[Erik-Jón]

This graph is incorrect in pretty much every way possible.


First thing to notice, this graph is extremely biased as it aims to undermine gender differences. It shows men and women getting a similar amount of average messages on dating apps. When in reality, it's obvious that women regardless of race or age will always receive far more messages than men of the same category.

Look at the first "By age" chart. Do you really think men get more messages on average than women across the board after 30? Maybe in the wet dream of some MGTOW coper, but in the real world? I don't think so. And even before 30, do you really think 20yo women get only 25% more messages than 20yo men? Please. More like 10x more (at least) since most men get no first messages and most women are bombarded.

Okay, we've established the graph is biased for equalizing the genders, but if we're only looking at one particular gender and within that, comparing how each race performs, it should still be a good metric right?

No. This graph only measures the number of initial messages a user receives. You can only receive messages from people that you match with. Which means the pickier you are, the least messages you will receive. Therefore desirability isn't the only factor at play, making the results unreliable.

In what world is the average asian woman or hispanic woman is considered more attractive than white women? Anyone living on planet earth knows it's not here.

White women are just the pickiest. Because they can afford to be the pickiest due to having the highest SMV. They get less messages because they swipe right and match with less men. Meanwhile asian and latina women swipe right on white normies due to JBW.

On the other hand, black women score last due to being so unattractive and desperate that they swipe right the most and still get the least first messages from men.

In conclusion, never bring up this graph again and delete it from your computer as it is trash.

Cerci isn’t Asian so debunked

 

[Deleted member 19499]

White women are the best and should be worshiped by all men of all races as the true Aryan Goddesses that they are. If they spit on your face, say "thank you, princess" and start jerking your lil dick to them QUEENS!

 

[CFW432]

both are not ideal, Latina and MENA women are the best looking women on earth

Lightskin Latina, LEVANTINE ARABS, Iranians, lightskin stacypreets, and white girls.

Not ALL MENA women.

 

[dreamcake1mo]

Although i dislike talking about such carnalities, i have to be fair, Asian women probably do mog white women. Its all about pheno with chicks, even more so than with men. White skin is white skin, Asians have halo for being white and white women have halo for being white. But when it it comes to pheno, Asians mog because of that. The pheno of an average white women is more masculine than Asian. primarily the jaw and chin area.

I took some screens of before and after makeup photos. In my observation, because of the masc features of the European/Caucasian woman, it seems that after makeup, its more "impressive" or "powerful"/noticeable than the asian pheno. Perhaps this is the reason why makeup on the european/caucasian pheno mogs harder than the rest, creating the illusion of high tier looks. The asian pheno does not change much after makeup but is all around more consistent and less masc.

 

[Deleted member 17430]

Are you fucking retarded? The graph shows women receiving way more messages than men.

It doesn’t show women receiving way more messages. It’s more or less the same. Maybe slightly more?

If they were to really showcase just how much women get messaged more, the scope of the graph would have to be very increased.

Yes dummy. Men's SMV increases with age. Men under 30 are poorcels, don't own homes, drive shitty cars, and are often less masculine and attractive than they will be after 30.

I’m not denying that men’s smv improves with age. You clearly didn’t understand my point.

What I said is that women’s smv still is much higher. Male smv gets higher in comparison to what it was before, but it doesn’t reach female smv. Female smv is on a league of its own. But the graph makes it look like the genders have similar comparable levels of smv.

Cope. It's a statistically verifiable fact that older men have more sex than younger men

Yes. That’s right. In comparison to younger men. It’s still a lot easier for a 30yo woman than for a 30yo man.

 

[Deleted member 15390]

Look at the first "By age" chart. Do you really think men get more messages on average than women across the board after 30? Maybe in the wet dream of some MGTOW coper, but in the real world? I don't think so. And even before 30, do you really think 20yo women get only 25% more messages than 20yo men? Please. More like 10x more (at least) since most men get no first messages and most women are bombarded.

You’re just denying objective evidence and data because it doesn’t make sense to you.

Just because you don’t agree with or understand the objective evidence, that doesn’t make it false or inaccurate.

Your whole argument here is invalid with no logical basis.

You really are a true retard for even typing this out.

No. This graph only measures the number of initial messages a user receives. You can only receive messages from people that you match with. Which means the pickier you are, the least messages you will receive. Therefore desirability isn't the only factor at play, making the results unreliable.

then you go on to showcase how much of a spastic you’re by not even understanding how OkCupid works before you tried to debunk the data.

Once you like someone on OkCupid you can send a 1 time introductory message.

This isn’t tinder data retard.

In what world is the average asian woman or hispanic woman is considered more attractive than white women? Anyone living on planet earth knows it's not here.

This entire post is basically you coping and spazzing because Asian women being more attractive than white women doesn’t make sense to YOU.

EVERY single objective attractiveness study out there has concluded Asian women are more attractive than white women due to higher feminine dimorphism.

dating site data shows Asian women are more desired than white women and have higher SMV.

Normal men want to fuck Asian women more than they want to fuck white women.

not everyone worships white women like you incels.

there is data that literally shows ALL races of men rated Asian women more attractive than white women.

You’re literally a coping basement dog if you don’t think Asian women are superior to white women.

 

[Deleted member 15390]

This entire post is just you claiming without any actual evidence or objective proof that OkCupid data is false or inaccurate all because your beliefs are disproven from the findings.

legit 0 iq thread

 

[Magical Apple]

This graph is incorrect in pretty much every way possible.


First thing to notice, this graph is extremely biased as it aims to undermine gender differences. It shows men and women getting a similar amount of average messages on dating apps. When in reality, it's obvious that women regardless of race or age will always receive far more messages than men of the same category.

Look at the first "By age" chart. Do you really think men get more messages on average than women across the board after 30? Maybe in the wet dream of some MGTOW coper, but in the real world? I don't think so. And even before 30, do you really think 20yo women get only 25% more messages than 20yo men? Please. More like 10x more (at least) since most men get no first messages and most women are bombarded.

Okay, we've established the graph is biased for equalizing the genders, but if we're only looking at one particular gender and within that, comparing how each race performs, it should still be a good metric right?

No. This graph only measures the number of initial messages a user receives. You can only receive messages from people that you match with. Which means the pickier you are, the least messages you will receive. Therefore desirability isn't the only factor at play, making the results unreliable.

In what world is the average asian woman or hispanic woman is considered more attractive than white women? Anyone living on planet earth knows it's not here.

White women are just the pickiest. Because they can afford to be the pickiest due to having the highest SMV. They get less messages because they swipe right and match with less men. Meanwhile asian and latina women swipe right on white normies due to JBW.

On the other hand, black women score last due to being so unattractive and desperate that they swipe right the most and still get the least first messages from men.

In conclusion, never bring up this graph again and delete it from your computer as it is trash.

stfu

 

[Detona]

It doesn’t show women receiving way more messages. It’s more or less the same. Maybe slightly more?

*sigh*

You need to learn how to read data. These are not p-values. You're looking at the gender chart. Look at the race chart. Asian, white and Latina women received way more messages than Asian and Hispanic men.

If they were to really showcase just how much women get messaged more, the scope of the graph would have to be very increased.

Or you could just look at the damn race chart.

I’m not denying that men’s smv improves with age. You clearly didn’t understand my point.

What I said is that women’s smv still is much higher. Male smv gets higher in comparison to what it was before, but it doesn’t reach female smv. Female smv is on a league of its own. But the graph makes it look like the genders have similar comparable levels of smv.

Oh hell no.

Only Asian and Latina women have higher SMV than men after age 30. White women's SMV absolutely TANKS by age 17-20. Face dumpy and melted, cellulite everywhere, spider veins looking like a French road atlas, frizzy hair, looking like a zombie, etc. Then add in kids, having to work late hours, mental illness if they didn't have kids, low libido, etc. Life effectively ends at age 30 for women.

A man age 30-40 has way more SMV than a woman of the same age. Like, infinitely more. Men don't even start reaching their peak until 25. This isn't just about looks, it's about home ownership, mental maturity (which men reach at a way later age than women), cars, investments, etc. Men aren't even living before age 35. At age 35 men overtake women and they start getting with 20 year old college girls.

Unfortunately the burnt-out Karen who made this chart cut out the singles, but it also showed 30-40yo single women falling way behind.

Yes. That’s right. In comparison to younger men. It’s still a lot easier for a 30yo woman than for a 30yo man.

Barely. By 30 the scales are tipping. 30 is when most men start realizing they have higher SMV than women. That's when they start getting more confident and feeling like they control the community. And when women start acting real humble. Now shine my shoes you 40 year old slag dump.

 

[Deleted member 17430]

*sigh*

You need to learn how to read data. These are not p-values. You're looking at the gender chart. Look at the race chart. Asian, white and Latina women received way more messages than Asian and Hispanic men.




Or you could just look at the damn race chart.




Oh hell no.

Only Asian and Latina women have higher SMV than men after age 30. White women's SMV absolutely TANKS by age 17-20. Face dumpy and melted, cellulite everywhere, spider veins looking like a French road atlas, frizzy hair, looking like a zombie, etc. Then add in kids, having to work late hours, mental illness if they didn't have kids, low libido, etc. Life effectively ends at age 30 for women.

A man age 30-40 has way more SMV than a woman of the same age. Like, infinitely more. Men don't even start reaching their peak until 25. This isn't just about looks, it's about home ownership, mental maturity (which men reach at a way later age than women), cars, investments, etc. Men aren't even living before age 35. At age 35 men overtake women and they start getting with 20 year old college girls.

Unfortunately the burnt-out Karen who made this chart cut out the singles, but it also showed 30-40yo single women falling way behind.

Barely. By 30 the scales are tipping. 30 is when most men start realizing they have higher SMV than women. That's when they start getting more confident and feeling like they control the community. And when women start acting real humble. Now shine my shoes you 40 year old slag dump.

Yeah... up until now i thought you were a reasonable person. But it seems I was speaking to a teracoper this whole time....

You're old aren't you? How old? Either way, the world you grew up in doesn't exist anymore. You need to come to terms with that.

 

[Deleted member 12002]

We know jfl. Are there anyone that actually think asians mog white women jfl.

I do. They're much better looking in every way. They're the best looking women on earth if you ask me.

 

[ScoobyCurry420]

I do. They're much better looking in every way. They're the best looking women on earth if you ask me.

Jfl . That not the opinion of majority of men tho.

 

[Deleted member 12002]

Jfl . That not the opinion of majority of men tho.

I don't know. Maybe not. I've always felt that way. When I was in the 3rd grade I fell in love with a little Viet girl who was in the 2nd. And can you guess what her name was? It wad Yen. Yen Nguyen. Boy, how I used to stare at her picture in my yearbook for hours. I used to hug my pillow to sleep pretending it was her.

 

[Detona]

Yeah... up until now i thought you were a reasonable person. But it seems I was speaking to a teracoper this whole time....

You're old aren't you? How old? Either way, the world you grew up in doesn't exist anymore. You need to come to terms with that.

Barely 34 years old. Keep coping and choking, the world is pretty much the same as it was 20 years ago.

 

[Detona]

Jfl . That not the opinion of majority of men tho

Actually, it is.

 

[ScoobyCurry420]

I don't know. Maybe not. I've always felt that way. When I was in the 3rd grade I fell in love with a little Viet girl who was in the 2nd. And can you guess what her name was? It wad Yen. Yen Nguyen. Boy, how I used to stare at her picture in my yearbook for hours. I used to hug my pillow to sleep pretending it was her.

You a weeb or something cause thats kinda wierd man jfl.

 

[ScoobyCurry420]

Actually, it is.

Yea sure I know your a troll jfl.

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

BTW
This was the asian woman @Detona was defending in his post:
View attachment 1718241



Not a single bone at all you mean

Asian and white woman are designed for porn and escorting only

 

[Deleted member 12002]

You a weeb or something cause thats kinda wierd man jfl.

No, but I'm going yo the Asian market today! I'll go there and buy a whole bunch of Asian stuff.

Hey, would you like to see a picture of Yen Nguyen? I think I might be able to find my old yearbook from 3rd grade.

 

[Deleted member 12002]

Barely 34 years old. Keep coping and choking, the world is pretty much the same as it was 20 years ago.

Actually Asian women have become more appreciated since you and I were youngsters. I'm 34 too.

 

[stamaster21]

You’re just denying objective evidence and data because it doesn’t make sense to you.

Just because you don’t agree with or understand the objective evidence, that doesn’t make it false or inaccurate.

Your whole argument here is invalid with no logical basis.

You really are a true retard for even typing this out.


then you go on to showcase how much of a spastic you’re by not even understanding how OkCupid works before you tried to debunk the data.

Once you like someone on OkCupid you can send a 1 time introductory message.

This isn’t tinder data retard.


This entire post is basically you coping and spazzing because Asian women being more attractive than white women doesn’t make sense to YOU.

EVERY single objective attractiveness study out there has concluded Asian women are more attractive than white women due to higher feminine dimorphism.

dating site data shows Asian women are more desired than white women and have higher SMV.

Normal men want to fuck Asian women more than they want to fuck white women.

not everyone worships white women like you incels.

there is data that literally shows ALL races of men rated Asian women more attractive than white women.

You’re literally a coping basement dog if you don’t think Asian women are superior to white women.

I hate to say this but their is some truth its because asian women then to have the lowest fat/obesity rates they age very well and tend to have smaller petit bodies. The lack sexual dimorphism so they on avg have smaller jaws and orbital bones making them look much younger, they also have melinin in their skin that gives a a slight yelow skin tone which helps protect from, uv rays and skin aging.

Some folks even go as far to call it pedo dating when men go or go with younger asian women. Because even thou the women may be legal adult women they look alot younger, and womens main value is youth, and beauty. How is a women gonna compete with a 30 year old asian women who looks like she is 21 years old, even worse a 23 year old asian women who looks like she is 17. Then this turns into not age of consent but different races of women competing for high value mates by bringing up THE LOOK OF the women being to young, aka any women that looks younger then the age of 21 years old.

 

[Kristin]

Detona try not to use random graphs challenge (impossible)

 

[Deleted member 7580]

Detona is a retard , but you don’t even live in west

White girls have lowest standards @looksmaxxer234

Also look at your Stacy mom , her standards were giga low that’s why you’re an incel