![Blackout.xl](/data/avatars/l/3/3149.jpg?1634096077)
Blackout.xl
Retired.
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2019
- Posts
- 23,344
- Reputation
- 47,584
Sure, you can be economically left wing and blackpilled. But social liberalism and the blackpill are inherently contradictory. For example,
Social liberalism and left wing social politics: society is still unjust towards women! It must be restructured in order to Better ensure equality
Blackpill: society is unjust. But in favour of women, they got the better deal. If anything has to be restructured and reformed, it must be the exclusive privileges that have been afforded to women and not to men
Social liberalism: The main divider of people is race!
Radical leftism (socialism and communism): The main divider of people is economic class and background!
The blackpill: The main thing that divides people is looks. How you look is a major, if not the most major determinant of how your life will be and how much your hard work will payoff. The uglier you are, the harder it is for you and the more you need to find copes in order to survive. The better looking you are, the more easy things are for you.
No one cared about Jeremy Meek’s economic background or race. They cared about his looks. How he was treated by society was not determined by his economic background or race, it was purely his looks.
Social liberalism & socialism: Society must be structured from the view of the centre-left and beyond. Equality and social justice must be fought for from a left wing view. When this is fully achieved, equality will achieved.
Blackpill: Left wing social policy meant to bring equality has only brought more inequality. The left wings fight for “social justice” has only led to more social injustice. Not less.
at every point, social liberalism and radically leftist social politics has only been in conflict with the blackpill. You can’t be socially left wing and blackpilled. It’s one or the other. You have to pick a side.
@PrettyBoyMaxxing
@Blitz
@Fuk
@Dogs
@OOGABOOGA
disclaimer: I have 76 Iq. So don’t take what I say seriously and don’t expect me to make intelligent statements
Social liberalism and left wing social politics: society is still unjust towards women! It must be restructured in order to Better ensure equality
Blackpill: society is unjust. But in favour of women, they got the better deal. If anything has to be restructured and reformed, it must be the exclusive privileges that have been afforded to women and not to men
Social liberalism: The main divider of people is race!
Radical leftism (socialism and communism): The main divider of people is economic class and background!
The blackpill: The main thing that divides people is looks. How you look is a major, if not the most major determinant of how your life will be and how much your hard work will payoff. The uglier you are, the harder it is for you and the more you need to find copes in order to survive. The better looking you are, the more easy things are for you.
No one cared about Jeremy Meek’s economic background or race. They cared about his looks. How he was treated by society was not determined by his economic background or race, it was purely his looks.
Social liberalism & socialism: Society must be structured from the view of the centre-left and beyond. Equality and social justice must be fought for from a left wing view. When this is fully achieved, equality will achieved.
Blackpill: Left wing social policy meant to bring equality has only brought more inequality. The left wings fight for “social justice” has only led to more social injustice. Not less.
at every point, social liberalism and radically leftist social politics has only been in conflict with the blackpill. You can’t be socially left wing and blackpilled. It’s one or the other. You have to pick a side.
@PrettyBoyMaxxing
@Blitz
@Fuk
@Dogs
@OOGABOOGA
disclaimer: I have 76 Iq. So don’t take what I say seriously and don’t expect me to make intelligent statements