You can’t logically show why a pacifier fetish is immoral btw

ICXCLuvr

ICXCLuvr

Fire
Joined
Oct 14, 2023
Posts
18,587
Reputation
26,175
Just a reminder. Can debate anyone on the ethics of it. Last time i only received ad homs
7D40D531 6420 44D8 8A1B FA6071F7BE55

@Aezac @InanimatePragmatist @Peubert @L(oser)ooksmaxxer @buccalfatremoval
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: horseman., Old Büll, Joeseminate and 3 others
Just a reminder. Can debate anyone on the ethics of it. Last time i only received ad homs
View attachment 5577648
@Aezac @InanimatePragmatist @Peubert @L(oser)ooksmaxxer @buccalfatremoval
nigga why are we still doing this bullshit:feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek:
yall finna end up like @Verdam
 
  • +1
Reactions: Aezac, superchud90000 and greylurker
Yes
 
  • +1
Reactions: ICXCLuvr
IMG 2576
 
  • +1
Reactions: Fledermaus and dsaliron
it’s not inherently immoral in of itself but it is really strange and kinda suspicious
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Joeseminate
Idk what u mean by this. Explain

that’s not an argument
that wasn’t supposed to be an argument in the first place. i was explaining why some people dislike you

anyone can make value judgements (not saying i agree with them) we all have our own opinions

you don’t need an argument for that
 
  • Hmm...
  • +1
Reactions: Fledermaus and Joeseminate
Crazy. Pacifiers are used by literal babies and you sexualize them on women
 
this is how it starts
 
  • +1
Reactions: Fledermaus and superchud90000
Okay and? It’s adult women
Its still an item used by literal children and you are sexualizing it

Let’s say I like when women wear lipstick, now UA females could wear lipstick too, but so do many adult women, that’s why liking lipstick isn’t inherently pedophilic while the bullshit you’re into is.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Fledermaus and milkshake_addict
an object used by infants and children and youre sexualizing it by putting it on pornstars i think that alone speaks volumes in itself
 
  • +1
Reactions: InanimatePragmatist and james_2006
Morality is a man made idea in nature there’s no such thing
 
  • +1
Reactions: ØUROBOROS and horseman.
Geniuenly kill yourself
 
  • +1
Reactions: Fledermaus
  • +1
Reactions: Fledermaus
Morality is subjective

But pacifers r used by children so its weird and most people would agree
 
Just a reminder. Can debate anyone on the ethics of it. Last time i only received ad homs
View attachment 5577648
@Aezac @InanimatePragmatist @Peubert @L(oser)ooksmaxxer @buccalfatremoval
Essentially you are putting older woman in a pacifier and babys clothes, as shown above the age kids in general wear pacifiers is 2-4 years old. Why give woman characteristics that are ONLY given to babies?

I have a theory that this is basically just the beginning of a more sinister darker fetish, grown from this to something more severe.

Its just ethically wrong because only babies wear those type of clothes and wear pacifiers, there quite literally isn't an argument for this. Soon you'll stop being a "moralfag" like Verdam and resort to child porn, as this fetish won't be enough to satisfy your horniness.

Case closed.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Fledermaus

Similar threads

WonkyChin186
Replies
16
Views
110
selqa
selqa
ICXCLuvr
Replies
1
Views
40
Gen1leman
Gen1leman
romanstock
Replies
1
Views
28
selqa
selqa
ICXCLuvr
Replies
136
Views
781
VHSHORROR
VHSHORROR

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top