you guys dont realise but hypergamy is saving the human race

[mtn_dude_193]

if there was no hypergamy woman would just fuck any retared and genetically inferior men and the next generation would always be worse until we die of retardation

 

[eology]

80 IQ thought process

 

[mtn_dude_193]

80 IQ thought process

explain

 

[troy_exe]

finally sb who gets it
we men would also be hypergamous if there were a lot less of us then women

 

[moffeloffen]

welcome to darwinism brother

 

[eology]

explain

its deeper than this horse/dog breeding playbook eugenics

 

[eology]

like @aids says
i wont go any further

 

[Throw_Away]

we men would also be hypergamous if there were a lot less of us then women

Are you fucking retarded?
Hypergamy doesn't benefit shit, if a low level inferior genetic speciman of a foid is reproducing with chad, that doesn't mean the human race is benefitting lol

 

[mtn_dude_193]

its deeper than this horse/dog breeding playbook eugenics

dude its really simple actually if there is no natural instinct to fuck a better looking man chance is you will get a man with inferior genetics

 

[mtn_dude_193]

Are you fucking retarded?
Hypergamy doesn't benefit shit, if a low level inferior genetic speciman of a foid is reproducing with chad, that doesn't mean the human race is benefitting lol

you know that isnt always the case woman always go for someone 1 tier higher than them but no one can even get chad what im saying is there would be no natural selection (there is still no real natural selection but the men with inferior looks have a lower chance of having a kid)

 

[Throw_Away]

you know that isnt always the case woman always go for someone 1 tier higher than them but no one can even get chad what im saying is there would be no natural selection (there is still no real natural selection but the men with inferior looks have a lower chance of having a kid)

How does this improve the genepool?

 

[troy_exe]

Are you fucking retarded?
Hypergamy doesn't benefit shit, if a low level inferior genetic speciman of a foid is reproducing with chad, that doesn't mean the human race is benefitting lol

well ur right about that obv
but u have ho look at if more in a grand perspective
women being hypergamous means that the worst genetics (aka the ugliest dudes) wont reproduce and carry on these bad genetics
if u look at it from a biological standpoint it makes sense for the human race

we men would also be hypergamous if roles were revesed. obviously wed pic a mtb over a ltb, meaning that in the big picture we wouldnt carry on the worst genetics

 

[Throw_Away]

women being hypergamous means that the worst genetics (aka the ugliest dudes) wont reproduce and carry on these bad genetics

You ignore the fact that his looksmatch reproduces, so the "inferior" genes aren't eliminated, they're only allowed to be passed on by one side, the genepool isn't being improved, it's being ruined because the inferiors can reproduce with the superiors from only one side.

 

[troy_exe]

How does this improve the genepool?

darwinism.
the worst genetics are "kicked out" (by not being able to reproduce) of the genetic pool

 

[Throw_Away]

darwinism.
the worst genetics are "kicked out" (by not being able to reproduce) of the genetic pool

You ignore the fact that his looksmatch reproduces, so the "inferior" genes aren't eliminated, they're only allowed to be passed on by one side, the genepool isn't being improved, it's being ruined because the inferiors can reproduce with the superiors from only one side.

 

[troy_exe]

You ignore the fact that his looksmatch reproduces, so the "inferior" genes aren't eliminated, they're only allowed to be passed on by one side, the genepool isn't being improved, it's being ruined because the inferiors can reproduce with the superiors from only one side.

well yeah obv the bad genetic females will carry on their genetics. but they bond their genetics with a genetically supereior male. thus again improving the genepool

we men would do the same if it was our call

im sorry man, thats just how nature works. works the same way with animals (not as exxagerated as with humans obv cus hypergamy was exxagerated through delusional dating standarts but thats a different topic)
female animals wont reproduce with very small or disabled males either (considering if they survived the survival of the fittest game obv)

 

[SilvioMoltisantiDan]

brutal sexy son pill

 

[Throw_Away]

thus again improving the genepool

How exactly is bad mixing with good improving the genetics? If the guy reproduced with his looksmatch and the foid didn't reproduce at all, that would be improving the genepool.

 

[mtn_dude_193]

How does this improve the genepool?

the men with the worse genes just die off

 

[Throw_Away]

the men with the worse genes just die off

read my reply chain with the other retard

 

[EyeHateGod]

if there was no hypergamy woman would just fuck any retared and genetically inferior men and the next generation would always be worse until we die of retardation

Women contribute to eugenics

 

[mtn_dude_193]

read my reply chain with the other retard

yes its still bad but its better than the both 2 sides being worse

 

[Throw_Away]

yes its still bad but its better than the both 2 sides being worse

There's more issues with modern day foids reproducing at older ages and overall the genepool being dilluted in the same dogshit way, but sure

 

[mtn_dude_193]

i made this post assuming that everyone would just fuck with aynone ignoring all looks if everyone went for their looksmatch thats another story

 

[troy_exe]

How exactly is bad mixing with good improving the genetics? If the guy reproduced with his looksmatch and the foid didn't reproduce at all, that would be improving the genepool.

yeah your example would improve the genepool aswell but thats not how nature works

"How exactly is bad mixing with good improving the genetics?"
very easy: (this is the theorie behind it, in reality there are obv some contraty examples. that doesnt disproove it tho)
when every girl dates one step up (so a 9/10 dates a 10/10) it leads to the 1/10 not being able to reproduce
therefore they dont carry on those bad genetics (cus looks are obv mostly genetic)
and therefore on the long run always the worst genetics die out
cus even if a 1/10 girl dates a 2/10 guy the result is a 1,5/10 child in theory

thats just how nature works

 

[Throw_Away]

cus even if a 1/10 girl dates a 2/10 guy the result is a 1,5/10 child in theory

not how that works, the bad trait won't just disappear and make the kid better looking, +Attraction dynamics are relative, if everyone was born at chadlite then chadlite would become ltn, eugenics like this not only doesn't work, but is also retarded

 

[silently_said]

no

 

[mtn_dude_193]

not how that works, the bad trait won't just disappear and make the kid better looking, +Attraction dynamics are relative, if everyone was born at chadlite then chadlite would become ltn, eugenics like this not only doesn't work, but is also retarded

generally inferior traits are reccesive and when two people have inferior genes the chance of that trait being at the next generation is higher but someone with better genes usually have the dominant gene and with enough generations that reccesive trait can completely be eliminated so every generation gets a bit better with hypergamy actually if there was no hypergamy human race would probably be extinct

 

[troy_exe]

the bad trait won't just disappear

well actually it would in lots of cases. bad traits are often recessive genes that mixed with dominant genes will disappear
just imagne a brown eyed and a blue eyed making kids: very unlikely that any would have blue eyes cus blue eyes gene is recessive

if everyone was born at chadlite then chadlite

yeah but that will never happen cus a 1/10 and a 2/10 who make a 1,5/10 cant ever make a chad
even if the overall genepool will improve there will always be hierarchy within it

an economic example is that if the economy grows, even tho everyone gets richer and life standarts get higher. the poor will stay the poor and the rich will stay the rich

eugenics like this not only doesn't work, but is also retarded

its not eugenics. eugenics would be: "if ur bewlow a 3/10 your not legally allowed to reproduce"

 

[Blondepawg'sDildo]

 

[troy_exe]

generally inferior traits are reccesive and when two people have inferior genes the chance of that trait being at the next generation is higher but someone with better genes usually have the dominant gene and with enough generations that reccesive trait can completely be eliminated so every generation gets a bit better with hypergamy actually if there was no hypergamy human race would probably be extinct

well actually it would in lots of cases. bad traits are often recessive genes that mixed with dominant genes will disappear
just imagne a brown eyed and a blue eyed making kids: very unlikely that any would have blue eyes cus blue eyes gene is recessive


yeah but that will never happen cus a 1/10 and a 2/10 who make a 1,5/10 cant ever make a chad
even if the overall genepool will improve there will always be hierarchy within it

an economic example is that if the economy grows, even tho everyone gets richer and life standarts get higher. the poor will stay the poor and the rich will stay the rich


its not eugenics. eugenics would be: "if ur bewlow a 3/10 your not legally allowed to reproduce"

 

[mtn_dude_193]

yeah didnt see your reply lol

 

[Throw_Away]

an economic example is that if the economy grows, even tho everyone gets richer and life standarts get higher. the poor will stay the poor and the rich will stay the rich

The standard won't actually get higher tho, when the economy grows there's a real impact on average life from it, whereas with looks level overall improving, nothing will actually change, is it truly worth forsaking a good chunk of all men's current lives for a goal like that?

 

[mtn_dude_193]

The standard won't actually get higher tho, when the economy grows there's a real impact on average life from it, whereas with looks level overall improving, nothing will actually change, is it truly worth forsaking a good chunk of all men's current lives for a goal like that?

biology doesnt care about how mens lives are

 

[MROK1231]

yes its still bad but its better than the both 2 sides being worse

hypergamy is a concept of inferior women being attracted to superior men and thus alot of times they reproduce inferior men if u mean that superior men reproducing with superior women make a superior child yes but for example a 5 foot asian foid gets with a tall white guy they reproduce a wasian eliot rodger

 

[Throw_Away]

biology doesnt care about how mens lives are

True that, historically 40% of men have reproduced as it is, the number will probably get lower now, the genepool will "Improve" based on arbitrary attraction dynamics (Which won't actual impact anything), whereas the actual issues natural selection would've accounted for won't be addressed by what foids are going for

no
View attachment 5655066

^look above.

 

[mtn_dude_193]

hypergamy is a concept of inferior women being attracted to superior men and thus alot of times they reproduce inferior men if u mean that superior men reproducing with superior women make a superior child yes but for example a 5 foot asian foid gets with a tall white guy they reproduce a wasian eliot rodger

alright what about a 5 foot woman fucking s 4.10 truecel

 

[foidslayerr333]

if there was no hypergamy woman would just fuck any retared and genetically inferior men and the next generation would always be worse until we die of retardation

The only retard here is you buddy, what you said doesnt make any sense, if everybody dated their looksmatch then all ranks from subhuman to htn would be born at a normal rate and continue to be that way, but with hypergamy, ltbs- date htns+ giving their child a 60% chance of being born ugly, so hypergamy is actually transforming chad genes into retarded genes and making us die from retardation

 

[MROK1231]

biology doesnt care about how mens lives are

alright what about a 5 foot woman fucking s 4.10 truecel

well that doesnt happen ? what point are you trying to make

 

[SpanishManlett]

if there was no hypergamy woman would just fuck any retared and genetically inferior men and the next generation would always be worse until we die of retardation

You are the retard one. First of all inferior women reproduce with superior men doing the race inferior, if hypergamy is to high fertility rates go straight up down fucking up the economy and making less people have children and hypergamy can never be to low to have sex with a someone truthly retarded or discapacitated in any way.

 

[Throw_Away]

well that doesnt happen ? what point are you trying to make

He's saying "What if ugly people kept reproducing with ugly people?"

 

[troy_exe]

The standard won't actually get higher tho, when the economy grows there's a real impact on average life from it,

higher avg life is the same as higher life standart (im german so idk the proper english terms, so i could be wron on it)

whereas with looks level overall improving, nothing will actually change

yes, inferior genetics will get extinct.
inferior genetics will cause bad health

is it truly worth forsaking a good chunk of all men's current lives for a goal like that?

im not saying its morally good or just
but there are no morals in nature. in the wilderness animals will kill their offspring if they suspect that the offspring isnt worth raising due to bad developement. (thats also darwinism and a progress similar to hypergamy)

 

[OrbitMax]

if there was no hypergamy woman would just fuck any retared and genetically inferior men and the next generation would always be worse until we die of retardation

Nigga is just describing this movie

 

[MROK1231]

He's saying "What if ugly people kept reproducing with ugly people?"

well they dont? its mostly ugly girls with good looking guys or good looking girls with goodlooking guys inferior with superior or superior with superior inferior with superior reproduces inferior so inferior men will always exist hypergamy does not solve inferior problem lol

 

[mtn_dude_193]

i made this post assuming that everyone would just fuck with aynone ignoring all looks if everyone went for their looksmatch thats another story

.

 

[mtn_dude_193]

not gonna debate anymore

 

[Throw_Away]

yes, inferior genetics will get extinct.
inferior genetics will cause bad health

Inferior by what metric lol? an average height guy is healthier than some 6'7 retard, but he's the one who gets to reproduce, because sexual selection doesn't equate to natural selection

higher avg life is the same as higher life standart (im german so idk the proper english terms, so i could be wron on it)

Irrelevant to the discussion, attractiveness is relative, even if everyone is better looking objectively, the hierarchy will still be the same and attractiveness doesn't matter in the eyes of nature, only in the eyes of the same species as you (Which won't change)

 

[SchoolLooksmaxxer]

if there was no hypergamy woman would just fuck any retared and genetically inferior men and the next generation would always be worse until we die of retardation

No retard if there was no hypergamy everyone would only be with their looksmax.

 

[castnd]

Ur so retarded rampant hypergamy on really exists in the west so u could say its saving the west but then theres millions on immigrants constantly pouring in from asia and africa if everyone was hypergamous then maybe but only to a degree

 

[troy_exe]

Inferior by what metric lol? an average height guy is healthier than some 6'7 retard, but he's the one who gets to reproduce, because sexual selection doesn't equate to natural selection

well yeah
thats why a girl is gonna choose a good looking healthy avg height guy over a 67 ugly retarded guy

nature has worked that way since forever and wont change. these rules of nature even tho unfair are just how things work

attractiveness is relative, even if everyone is better looking objectively, the hierarchy will still be the same

i literally said that a few posts up.
its not about the hirarchy changing its about keep getting rid of retards and bad genes
hypergamy would still exist if it was us men who could be hypergamous

attractiveness doesn't matter in the eyes of nature,

being attractive = good genetics, good developement, good nutrition