You look 2-3 points higher irl than you do in photos

[CelestialJackrabbit]

Photos are a flat image that can't replicate the true 3d depth or energy of a face. I've noticed friends who look borderline subhuman in photos but are actually pretty good looking irl. Imagine guys like gandy and chico must've looked like fucking angels that came down from heaven in person compared to just looking really really good in photos. I'm sure videos are slightly closer to your real look because the motion , but still not totally accurate.

My suspension is most people here are mentalcel MTN's who've seen themselves as subhuman in photos and believe that's what they actually look like. HELL NAWWW

I'm mainly counting the default raw photo you get in your camera apps without filters. We all know how woman (even some men) filterfraud to hell and back loooool.

 

[Paul7]

cope

 

[superpsycho]

cope

 

[CelestialJackrabbit]

It's true folks. This is completely without considering myself, but what I've observed with other people and even family members. Very few people are truly photogenic

 

[HostSamurai]

Not true. Maybe like 0.2 PSL at most higher.

 

[doxcine]

cope, if you look ass o pictires you look ass irl

 

[CelestialJackrabbit]

I don't mean psl btw (that would be way too extreme) i mean out of 10

Like a 6/10 irl could look 4/10 in photos

 

[davidlaidisme67]

Wow went from 1 psl to 3 psl. Look at guys, chad coming through