You may be Much, MUCH More Attractive than the 'Average' Person, but You Are Likely Still Just a 5.

untouchable_coper

untouchable_coper

Silver
Joined
Feb 1, 2022
Posts
539
Reputation
535
The observed attraction of EVERY SINGLE person in the West (for example the U.S.) is distributed to be something like this (humps not to scale):

1647992904113


Proof: how does it feel harder and harder to date a girl when the majority of men (and women) are overweight and a third of each gender is obese? Why are Shouldn't it be super easy to waltz in and pick up a girl when everyone else is fat? The reality is that these people are not a part of dating. There are Americans who are either in the dating market (right hump), and those who are not (left hump), making it a bimodal distribution.

Walk into a Walmart. There it will capture this portion of the graph:

1647992952612


If you feel ugly, just go to a Walmart bro. You will easily mog 90% of the people there and in comparison you will seem hella attractive to women. However, this does not mean that you are a 6.5-7/10. Most people are not part of the dating market. If you have a friend group that is diverse in looks, you will notice that only the average and attractive men in that group talk about women while the less attractive guys just awkwardly sit there. The attractive guys may roast the 'average' guys for not being able to pull, but the unattractive guys are not even a part of the conversation. In my personal experience, they often cope with studies by making a snarky comment about everyone else wasting time, even if some of the attractive/average guys have just as good grades as them.

Similarly, most of the people that you encounter in Walmart are don't even think about trying to pull a woman. If we cut out all of the non-participants (of the dating market), then the people that you are competing with capture this portion of the distribution:
1647993388176


In order to see your true competition for yourself, go to a school dance/college part or any school/college event where unattractive people don't bother coming for the most part and thus voluntarily pull themselves out of the dating pool. If you compare to these people, only then the seemingly harsh looksmax.org and the normally distributed TRM ratings make sense.
 

Attachments

  • 1647993364458.png
    1647993364458.png
    26 KB · Views: 0
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: Kasanova, Deleted member 22886, A23ghskung and 20 others
water
 
  • WTF
Reactions: thecel
Good theory , but does it have an explanation to why most of the Walmart males have partners?
 
Last edited:
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 21531, badamj, closedplatecel and 9 others
cope im a solid 12
 
  • JFL
Reactions: thecel
good theory but how do you explain why most of those Walmart males have partners?
They used to be a part of the dating market, got married, and then fell off.
 
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: Deleted member 22886, FrameMogger, Deleted member 15827 and 3 others
Bookmarked.

80% of men are sub 5 according to this Ok Cupid Study.

Screen Shot 2021 06 07 at 60657 PM
 
  • +1
  • Woah
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 19281, Deleted member 15827, Daniel Plainview and 7 others
It’s unimodal and is made up of 2 groups each with its own mode.

1647994539235


kind of like (a)
 
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: Deleted member 2729 and thereallegend
The attractive guys may roast the 'average' guys for not being able to pull, but the unattractive guys are not even a part of the conversation. In my personal experience, they often cope with studies by making a snarky comment about everyone else wasting time, even if some of the attractive/average guys have just as good grades as them.
not true at all i know guys that get mogged by blackops2cel who constantly fraud about pulling bitches and make it their whole personality
 
  • Woah
Reactions: thecel
Looks good, going to bookmark
 
  • +1
Reactions: thecel
The biodiversity of plant species is the highest on Earth with one 2001 study finding a quarter square kilometer (62 acres) of Ecuadorian rainforest supports more than 1,100 tree species
 
  • JFL
  • Woah
  • +1
Reactions: FrameMogger, Deleted member 15827, SendMePicsToRate and 2 others
Can we safely say that the x/10 scale is much better than PSL scale?
 
  • +1
Reactions: thecel, Yerico7, untouchable_coper and 1 other person
Most young people aren’t fat @looksmaxxer234

Yea obviously 50 year olds aren’t part of dating market
 
  • +1
Reactions: FrameMogger, Deprived and Looks234
The observed attraction of EVERY SINGLE person in the West (for example the U.S.) is distributed to be something like this (humps not to scale):

View attachment 1602054

Proof: how does it feel harder and harder to date a girl when the majority of men (and women) are overweight and a third of each gender is obese? Why are Shouldn't it be super easy to waltz in and pick up a girl when everyone else is fat? The reality is that these people are not a part of dating. There are Americans who are either in the dating market (right hump), and those who are not (left hump), making it a bimodal distribution.

Walk into a Walmart. There it will capture this portion of the graph:

View attachment 1602057

If you feel ugly, just go to a Walmart bro. You will easily mog 90% of the people there and in comparison you will seem hella attractive to women. However, this does not mean that you are a 6.5-7/10. Most people are not part of the dating market. If you have a friend group that is diverse in looks, you will notice that only the average and attractive men in that group talk about women while the less attractive guys just awkwardly sit there. The attractive guys may roast the 'average' guys for not being able to pull, but the unattractive guys are not even a part of the conversation. In my personal experience, they often cope with studies by making a snarky comment about everyone else wasting time, even if some of the attractive/average guys have just as good grades as them.

Similarly, most of the people that you encounter in Walmart are don't even think about trying to pull a woman. If we cut out all of the non-participants (of the dating market), then the people that you are competing with capture this portion of the distribution:
View attachment 1602064

In order to see your true competition for yourself, go to a school dance/college part or any school/college event where unattractive people don't bother coming for the most part and thus voluntarily pull themselves out of the dating pool. If you compare to these people, only then the seemingly harsh looksmax.org and the normally distributed TRM ratings make sense.
Interesting. Needs to be more research into physiognomy self segregation on a societal scale. It is pretty obvious that Walmart, public transport, etc all have the genetic underclass while places like college frat parties have the genetic elite conglomerations, but how does this look in terms of geographic locations?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 2729
Finally some useful threads . I see many people coping here saying that " I mog most guys but still no gf it has to be because I'm a mentalcel". Most people who looksmax maybe better than average population but it's still nowhere near getting laid/ getting gf
 
  • +1
Reactions: FrameMogger and Ken
Good theory , but does it have an explanation to why most of the Walmart males have partners?
They go to secondhand stores to mog
 
Interesting. Needs to be more research into physiognomy self segregation on a societal scale. It is pretty obvious that Walmart, public transport, etc all have the genetic underclass while places like college frat parties have the genetic elite conglomerations, but how does this look in terms of geographic locations?
Intelligent people are generally more attractive. Richer people are generally more intelligent. Most likely, wherever there are high-class events, there will be more attractive people. In lower-class places like Walmart, there are more unattractive people.

The richest places are Northwestern/Central Europe (Austria, Denmark, UK, etc) and Northeastern (MA, NH, CT, etc)/Western (WY, OR, ID, WA, etc) US. Is it coincidence that these are the tallest places in the world too? Here you will most likely find the most attractive people in the world.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 15827 and BetaGayFace2
The observed attraction of EVERY SINGLE person in the West (for example the U.S.) is distributed to be something like this (humps not to scale):

View attachment 1602054

Proof: how does it feel harder and harder to date a girl when the majority of men (and women) are overweight and a third of each gender is obese? Why are Shouldn't it be super easy to waltz in and pick up a girl when everyone else is fat? The reality is that these people are not a part of dating. There are Americans who are either in the dating market (right hump), and those who are not (left hump), making it a bimodal distribution.

Walk into a Walmart. There it will capture this portion of the graph:

View attachment 1602057

If you feel ugly, just go to a Walmart bro. You will easily mog 90% of the people there and in comparison you will seem hella attractive to women. However, this does not mean that you are a 6.5-7/10. Most people are not part of the dating market. If you have a friend group that is diverse in looks, you will notice that only the average and attractive men in that group talk about women while the less attractive guys just awkwardly sit there. The attractive guys may roast the 'average' guys for not being able to pull, but the unattractive guys are not even a part of the conversation. In my personal experience, they often cope with studies by making a snarky comment about everyone else wasting time, even if some of the attractive/average guys have just as good grades as them.

Similarly, most of the people that you encounter in Walmart are don't even think about trying to pull a woman. If we cut out all of the non-participants (of the dating market), then the people that you are competing with capture this portion of the distribution:
View attachment 1602064

In order to see your true competition for yourself, go to a school dance/college part or any school/college event where unattractive people don't bother coming for the most part and thus voluntarily pull themselves out of the dating pool. If you compare to these people, only then the seemingly harsh looksmax.org and the normally distributed TRM ratings make sense.
Great thread. Go to a college party and you'll find your height percentile will also be drastically lower than you think. I've been at events/parties where the median height is 5'11/6' (in the US).
 
  • +1
Reactions: FrameMogger and untouchable_coper
the seemingly harsh looksmax.org and the normally distributed TRM ratings make sense
People here don’t rate harsh, they are fairly reasonable and some overrate quite a bit.
 
Lots of ugly dudes lie or exaggerate stuff to fit in with those conversations in my experience
 
  • +1
Reactions: untouchable_coper

Similar threads

can’t relate
Replies
30
Views
810
Xangsane
Xangsane
forevergymcelling
Replies
124
Views
2K
Jarate
Jarate
rogerpilled
Replies
15
Views
1K
noodlelover
noodlelover
chief detectiveman
Replies
8
Views
2K
bourgeoizyzz
bourgeoizyzz
TURK-KUN
Replies
92
Views
2K
Azonin
Azonin

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top