user1728482728
zephir
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2020
- Posts
- 3,017
- Reputation
- 8,927
Think again...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Fogged by the mother,brutalimagine having her genetics... 1 in a million
View attachment 949713
She’s ugly no capimagine having her genetics... 1 in a million
View attachment 949713
She not gl but she is built for producing Chad slayer sons.she looks good, will age well and breed gigaslayer sons. inb4 cope in this forum
she is still gl in my book...it doesn't matter though, we know she has infinite smv and will pick a gigachad husband (since her dad was a gigachad she will never settle for less)She not gl but she is built for producing Chad slayer sons.
its imo more about race, height and dimorphism, and less about symmetry and how well everything goes togetherGetting a good-looking partner to have children with is the best thing you can do for your children.
It's why, unironically, looks are more important for serious relationships than for casual flings. Not less like people try to make you believe.
Race/Dimorphism is a part of looks. I think facial asymmetry is also a genetic trait. Usually when I see weird, assymetric looking parents, their children end up looking weird too.its imo more about race, height and dimorphism, and less about symmetry and how well everything goes together
in other words a not so good looking person with good height and dimorphism (think some ogre guy) is still a good gene giver bc the failos aren't really passed down genetically
whats really passed down are dimorphic features, forward growth, height, race. but they are not the only markers for attractiveness
yeah, but I have also made the anecdotal observation that parents who love each other a lot get pretty kids, much prettier than they are actually. sounds giga bluepilled, but who knows. love/safety etc certainly has hormonal/chemical effects, most definitely for the mother with the child in her womb. and I guess lots of love is a good indicator for good environment, too.Race/Dimorphism is a part of looks. I think facial asymmetry is also a genetic trait. Usually when I see weird, assymetric looking parents, their children end up looking weird too.
In the end, humans are extremely good at judging genetic value from looks. We do this instinctively, without having to analyze things like maxilla, hunter eyes, jaw forward growth, etc. We all instinctively know this already.
Kids with loving parents grow up in better environments, happier. Happiness leads to better childhood development and hormone levels I think. When kids are stressed they are probably less likely to eat properly, socialize less, go outside less, get less physical exercise, etc. So yeah I do agree with you.yeah, but I have also made the anecdotal observation that parents who love each other a lot get pretty kids, much prettier than they are actually. sounds giga bluepilled, but who knows. love/safety etc certainly has hormonal/chemical effects, most definitely for the mother with the child in her womb. and I guess lots of love is a good indicator for good environment, too.
I think age might be just as important as looks, too.
yeah but thats how it works anyway as a non chad male.Kids with loving parents grow up in better environments, happier. Happiness leads to better childhood development and hormone levels I think. When kids are stressed they are probably less likely to eat properly, socialize less, go outside less, get less physical exercise, etc. So yeah I do agree with you.
Everything is important, but I innately know my standards for a girl that is breeding material are a lot higher than a girl I would bang a few times but never have kids with.
Don't ltrs basically all start as FwB's that develop into something more nowadays? That's what dating seems like to me. You turn your lay into a fwb into a ltr. You never start dating with the intention straight-up to be serious.yeah but thats how it works anyway as a non chad male.
you can get better girls in ltr than for slaying.
my 4 ltrs are on average 8/10 I think.
my slays are on average like 5/10 or something.
hypergamy is real for slaying
I don't think most average guys have the FWB step in between tbhDon't ltrs basically all start as FwB's that develop into something more nowadays? That's what dating seems like to me. You turn your lay into a fwb into a ltr. You never start dating with the intention straight-up to be serious.
With actual slaying being only ONS/hookups from bars/clubs or the rare straight-up netflix&chill tinderdate. Haven't had that much yet.
I think it's very common to have sex on your second date, or at the latest, third date nowadays. Only sluts will fuck on a first-date.I don't think most average guys have the FWB step in between tbh
yeah well most girls will check if you are at the very least giving decent dick before ltring you i guessI think it's very common to have sex on your second date, or at the latest, third date nowadays.
Unless you were already friends beforehand, you hardly know eachother. I would consider it a fwb at this point.
I think you need to impregnate a girl that you feel is 'your type'. I have this with certain girls where I know objectively her looks aren't the best perhaps. But she has that something about her and I believe its my instincts telling me that she is a good genetic match for me.Thats why you need to impregnate a high E girl.
Whats up with this masculine high T look men go for.