You'll never see a leftist politican who looks like this

[Bryce]

Too bad he's paralyzed

 

[Bryce]

Men

 

[TiktokUser]

What’s his name

 

[Mogs Me]

Why is he paralyzed

 

[looksmaxxed]

the biggest requirement of being right wing, from which all associated right wing traits follow(racism, liking guns, militarism, being unapologetically hierarchical, having high conscientiousness, etc) is high t:

 

[Mizi44]

View attachment 4200193View attachment 4200197View attachment 4200200

Too bad he's paralyzed

What about newsom tho he isn't really leftist but he is for republican standards

 

[Bryce]

What about newsom tho he isn't really leftist but he is for republican standards

Newsom is a subhuman jfl

 

[Bryce]

What’s his name

Madison Cawthorn

 

[Bryce]

Why is he paralyzed

Car accident

 

[looksmaxxed]

Newsom is a subhuman jfl

View attachment 4200806

narrow palate gracile cuck with jewish pheno

 

[Node]

I want icecream

 

[1385]

Why is he paralyzed

too much BWC up his ass

 

[Mogs Me]

too much BWC up his ass

Blud is bo sin maxxed then

 

[1385]

Blud is bo sin maxxed then

the sinn life isnt for everyone. he couldnt handle it

 

[Deleted member 146915]

Justin Trudeau, Joe Biden, Emmanuel Macron Martin Heinrich. All technically right of center but I think most people would call them leftist.

Politicians tend to be old, subhuman, dysgenic. Most people who get into career politics are genetic and social rejects, terrorists and activists are usually the young, high T, virile ones. You can cherry pick any group.

 

[Bryce]

View attachment 4200841View attachment 4200843View attachment 4200900View attachment 4200861
Justin Trudeau, Joe Biden, Emmanuel Macron Martin Heinrich. All technically right of center but I think most people would call them leftist.

Politicians tend to be old, subhuman, dysgenic. Most people who get into career politics are genetic and social rejects, terrorists and activists are usually the young, high T, virile ones. You can cherry pick any group.

Only one who's even close to Madison is Trudeau

 

[Deleted member 146915]

Only one who's even close to Madison is Trudeau

 

[slaters]

Too bad he's paralyzed

Damn bro

 

[CantStopTheMog]

View attachment 4200193View attachment 4200197View attachment 4200200

Too bad he's paralyzed

Please stop replying to me.

 

[Bryce]

Who's the faggot above me LMAO

 

[looksmaxxed]

View attachment 4200841View attachment 4200843View attachment 4200900View attachment 4200861
Justin Trudeau, Joe Biden, Emmanuel Macron Martin Heinrich. All technically right of center but I think most people would call them leftist.

Politicians tend to be old, subhuman, dysgenic. Most people who get into career politics are genetic and social rejects, terrorists and activists are usually the young, high T, virile ones. You can cherry pick any group.

they're left of center. and are these gracile little phaggits supposed to be good looking or something? there's levels to this shit. yeah they look better than the typical low t dysgenic leftist worm from antifa mugshots. but they still look subhuman compared their center right counterparts:

the most obvious difference is robustness and the presence of testosterone.

 

[Cafu]

His face is too wide I mog him tbh

 

[unon]

Men

Bryce

 

[Deleted member 146915]

Nixon has no zygos, he's like 18 in that photo and already has nasolabial folds

Gracile, nothing about him looks robust. Small undefined lower third and geriatric looking mouth area. He isn't ugly but definitely not "high T" looking.

Both high T and robust I'll give you that.

This is a pointless debate though there are chads on both sides, but the majority are subhumans.

You can find a million subhuman right wingers and a million subhuman leftists.

 

[looksmaxxed]

2 years age difference btw

 

[looksmaxxed]

Nixon has no zygos, he's like 18 in that photo and already has nasolabial folds
View attachment 4200917

Gracile, nothing about him looks robust. Small undefined lower third and geriatric looking mouth area. He isn't ugly but definitely not "high T" looking.

Both high T and robust I'll give you that.

This is a pointless debate though there are chads on both sides, but the majority are subhumans.
View attachment 4200922View attachment 4200923
You can find a million subhuman right wingers and a million subhuman leftists.

the same concept here applies to the whites vs non white argument. it's a matter of proportion. what is the proportion of subhumans on either side. i mean if you have a brain capable of pattern recognition, making basic observations, and cross referencing data, it's obvious that the left as a whole have a much higher concentration of subumans, and this makes sense, considering how leftist policies appeal to subhumans, criminals, pedophiles and others who benefit from "inclusion" and the abolition of traditions, norms, standards, rules, laws, hierarchies, and meritocracies.

they also have a range of studies proving conservatives are more attractive now, so even if you're dumb, you can trust the soyence

at the very least, the phenotype difference between the opposite ends of the spectrum is pretty telling and supports the earlier study i posted about testosterone

 

[Deleted member 146915]

the same concept here applies to the whites vs non white argument. it's a matter of proportion. what is the proportion of subhumans on either side. i mean if you have a brain capable of pattern recognition, making basic observations, and cross referencing data, it's obvious that the left as a whole have a much higher concentration of subumans, and this makes sense, considering how leftist policies appeal to subhumans, criminals, pedophiles and others who benefit from "inclusion" and the abolition of traditions, norms, standards, rules, laws, hierarchies, and meritocracies.

they also have a range of studies proving conservatives are more attractive now, so even if you're dumb, you can trust the soyence

at the very least, the phenotype difference between the opposite ends of the spectrum is pretty telling and supports the earlier study i posted about testosterone

I think it all comes down to antisocial behavior and disagreeableness. I'd agree that within certain political archetypes you will find more subhumans, but I don't think it scales linearly with the left/right dichotomy. The highest T groups will always be those who resort to violence, whether it be right or left wing extremists. Basically anyone trying to violently revolt. This also applies to soldiers, soldiers are going to be higher T.
I'd agree that openly nazi dudes in europe are higher T than some inner city faggot who frequents coffee shops to get his corn syrup bean slurry and post on twitter about how problematic leather is, but at the same time, a leftist rioter in france is going to be higher T than the 20 something trumpist with a beer gut and ED who thinks vivek ramyshwamy is "one of the good ones".
It has nothing to do with your specific beliefs on meaningless man made policies, that's all cultural. It has more to do with your inclination towards violence and fulfilling your natural desires.

 

[bunnƴ]

I’ve noticed that leftists always have this like high pitched nasally voice

 

[looksmaxxed]

I think it all comes down to antisocial behavior and disagreeableness. I'd agree that within certain political archetypes you will find more subhumans, but I don't think it scales linearly with the left/right dichotomy. The highest T groups will always be those who resort to violence, whether it be right or left wing extremists. Basically anyone trying to violently revolt. This also applies to soldiers, soldiers are going to be higher T.
I'd agree that openly nazi dudes in europe are higher T than some inner city faggot who frequents coffee shops to get his corn syrup bean slurry and post on twitter about how problematic leather is, but at the same time, a leftist rioter in france is going to be higher T than the 20 something trumpist with a beer gut and ED who thinks vivek ramyshwamy is "one of the good ones".
It has nothing to do with your specific beliefs on meaningless man made policies, that's all cultural. It has more to do with your inclination towards violence and fulfilling your natural desires.

the left exhibits higher genetic load and spiteful mutations which means they will be uglier on average regardless of t levels. the entire basis of the left is psychological coping mechanism for not capable of hacking it under the current civilizational paradigm but refusing to believe they are inferior. a lot of their outreach and propaganda specifically targets losers of society who think they are unconditionally entitled to services and other people's resources, and it innervates them to want to overthrow the current system. the right in general wants to maintain the system. only the far right wants to accelerate because they think the system is beyond saving. incidentally the far right shooters do not exhibit the same level of genetic load:

they also have the most cogent and consistent ideological framework and motivation. it's clear if you read their manifesto. it reads like shakespeare compared to those tranny shooter's incoherent screeching and seething.

 

[Deleted member 242704]

The vast majority of people into politics are incel tier. Attractive normies just go along with whatever is mainstream and right now it's mostly centrist, centrist left, centrist right depending on where you live. There's always outliers.

 

[looksmaxxed]

patriot front plus fbi informant mugshots:

antifa mugshots:

similar sample size of random selection of people on opposite ends of the spectrum(plus some feds)

the patriot front guys are indistinguishable from the general population, whereas the subhumanity of antifa is highly distinctive. i think it's possible for ai facial analysis to be able to fairly accurately guess someone's political affiliation in this manner.