illusion
Forefront of the Anti-Rotter Movement
- Joined
- Jun 1, 2024
- Posts
- 1,107
- Reputation
- 7,234
So we are aware that human nature is inherently primal and instinct based. By all known metrics, there is no reason that looks or height should matter yet according to objective studies, we see that better looking people make at minimum 15% more annually compared to normies. The same goes for taller people. For every inch you are above 5'7, you will make somewhere in between $700 to $2000 more than someone who is average height annually. This means that on average, a man who is 6'5 will make $20,000 more yearly at minimum than someone who is 5'7.
Assuming that the average salary for someone who lives in the United States is $69,846, if you were to be 6'5 and attractive, your minimum average salary would be roughly $103,322. This is a ginormous difference, it's nearly double of what the average normie makes, but why?
Well we are driven by primal instincts. These are built into us immediately from the millisecond the sperm touches the egg, you cannot get rid of this. Height and facial attractiveness are objective and being developed in those is superior to being not objectively 100% of the time.
_______
So what is the meaning of human life? Well if we strip away religion (not in an insulting manner, just if we were to look at the majority of life) human life itself is inherently meaningless. Any happiness we find in our lives is either from human made concepts or through primal instincts. Primal instincts are objective and man-made concepts are not. This is why the work of famous artists, politicians, and human revolutionaries are debated intensely with no end. The fact is that there is no objective answer to them.
So if you were to try to live a meaningful live, chasing human made concepts is pointless. You will always be unsatisfied, you will never be universally appreciated if you chase to be significant in man-made metrics. Look at billionaires as an example, they are slandered, harassed, and hated by the majority of society. By logic, they should be idolized and worshipped for reaching such a high status in society, but because money is a human made concept, human beings can also decide when it is too much, when the person is too greedy, and what they should actually do with their money. And they will be correct, because they can't be wrong. Money is a human concept, it cannot be disproved objectively.
This being known, the life lived by war lords, revolutionary figures, artists, or anyone who lived a hard life/didn't reap what they worked for their entire life was meaningless. The only thing that objectively matters is the release of dopamine, serotonin, oxytocin, and endorphins. This is because this is objective, you will feel this. You will enjoy the release of dopamine, of serotonin, of oxytocin, and of endorphins 100% of the time. Drugs are a subideal way to reach this as they will eventually end up preventing you from feeling the release of these chemicals. So what is the best way?
Many human beings try to cope with things like money, status, talent, any many other human made concepts like that. It's why short men are biologically more likely to buy those large lifted trucks, why people in the lower class are more likely to want an expensive piece of jewelry or a luxury piece of clothing or a supercar. It's a coping mechanism for attention, which is the only real metric to uphold to.
Human beings are inherently wired to be extremely social creatures, people with illnesses like ASPD where people are unable to socialize are statistically more likely to be depressed, to commit crimes, and be a nuisance in society. This is what not being social does to someone. So social currency is what matters, but how do you achieve this? Well as previously stated, people try to cope with man made concepts but the only true way to achieve this is looks. The HALO effect is a biological law, that better looking people will be admired and attributed to greatness simply for existing.
Ghengis Khan
Sean O' Pry
Which of the two people above is more significant, and superior in life? If you choose Ghengis Khan, you are brainwashed. There is nothing objectively significant about Ghengis Khan. He was a master of human made metrics. Sure primally he was a "leader" and a "warrior" but those are meaningless, he lived an inferior live to Sean O'Pry, who was treated like a God from birth. Ghengis Khan worked to achieve the status he got through his entire life, full of grueling, horrifying methods. His most important and worst thing he did, was risking his life. Risking your life is a moronic act, if you truly knew how precious life is, you wouldn't even half consider it in your sleep let alone do it.
However someone like Sean O'Pry never worked for anything, he was offered a high status for simply existing. All he had done was be born and stay alive, and the people did the rest for him. He will live a more significant, happy, and more fulfilling life than Ghengis Khan or any other human revolutionary, historical figure, high status person, or anything like that of the sort.
"But illusion, what about legacy! We will remember Ghengis Khan for thousands of years but we won't remember Sean O'Pry after 50 years of him being dead." I'm sure you may have thought of this, and to that I have to say, so what?
Ghengis Khan doesn't know that, therefore it is meaningless to him. It may be significant to us, as it is part of "history" which we must learn, however Ghengis Khan will never reap what he planted, he will never experience being remembered. Ghengis Khan exists as much the sight out of your elbow. Try it, try seeing out of your elbow, you can't right? It's not black, it's not blurry, it's nothingness, that is what Ghengis Khan is. Everything he did throughout his life means nothing to him which is the only thing that objectively matters.
_______
"But illusion, don't you tell us to love each other, to be kind, and to improve ourselves? Why blackpill us now? Was everything you said fake?"
No. It wasn't. In fact, what I uphold is the exact ideology I'm speaking of here. Kindness is superior to hate, therefore we must be kind. Positivity is superior to negativity, therefore we must be positive. A world of people who are successful and happy is superior to a world of people who are failures and miserable. That is why we must all try to improve the world we live in, for ourselves, for others. However we must never give ourselves up, we must improve ourselves to our deaths.
What you feel is what matters, the moment, your consciousness. That is what matters, once you close your eyes, it's all gone forever, and you are too. You won't know it, you won't even be. So you must treasure every second you are alive. For you are alive, but one day you will not, and that makes every moment special, and makes the stakes even higher, to become better, to enjoy every millisecond of our small glimpse of consciousness, of being alive.
Any other idea of happiness is human made. It's a coping mechanism created by the evolutionary subconscious desire to be Chad, to be biologically high status. It's not real, it is materialistic. It is meaningless.
________
However there is one thing superior to Sean O' Pry (or any Chad) and that is one who works for it. If you are an abused dog for 18 years and ascend to Chad, you will constantly seek to fill the void of subhumanity that was set by your suboptimal development and you will constantly get it and feel amazing forever. Your receptors will be broken, and you will constantly feel the same joy of being accepted and idolized by society for simply existing. You will never feel the stress of having to perform, you will simply be accepted just for existing, and that is superior to any action you could ever commit.
______
Therefore I tell you, go out and ascend. Improve every aspect of your life, and help others. Be kind, be chad, love, and be happy. That is what matters.
The world is yours.
@Seth Walsh first time I'm tagging you, was inspired to write this from your social status threads. @HtnceI @Sayori @Pony @tuberculosisinmybal
Assuming that the average salary for someone who lives in the United States is $69,846, if you were to be 6'5 and attractive, your minimum average salary would be roughly $103,322. This is a ginormous difference, it's nearly double of what the average normie makes, but why?
Well we are driven by primal instincts. These are built into us immediately from the millisecond the sperm touches the egg, you cannot get rid of this. Height and facial attractiveness are objective and being developed in those is superior to being not objectively 100% of the time.
_______
So what is the meaning of human life? Well if we strip away religion (not in an insulting manner, just if we were to look at the majority of life) human life itself is inherently meaningless. Any happiness we find in our lives is either from human made concepts or through primal instincts. Primal instincts are objective and man-made concepts are not. This is why the work of famous artists, politicians, and human revolutionaries are debated intensely with no end. The fact is that there is no objective answer to them.
So if you were to try to live a meaningful live, chasing human made concepts is pointless. You will always be unsatisfied, you will never be universally appreciated if you chase to be significant in man-made metrics. Look at billionaires as an example, they are slandered, harassed, and hated by the majority of society. By logic, they should be idolized and worshipped for reaching such a high status in society, but because money is a human made concept, human beings can also decide when it is too much, when the person is too greedy, and what they should actually do with their money. And they will be correct, because they can't be wrong. Money is a human concept, it cannot be disproved objectively.
This being known, the life lived by war lords, revolutionary figures, artists, or anyone who lived a hard life/didn't reap what they worked for their entire life was meaningless. The only thing that objectively matters is the release of dopamine, serotonin, oxytocin, and endorphins. This is because this is objective, you will feel this. You will enjoy the release of dopamine, of serotonin, of oxytocin, and of endorphins 100% of the time. Drugs are a subideal way to reach this as they will eventually end up preventing you from feeling the release of these chemicals. So what is the best way?
Many human beings try to cope with things like money, status, talent, any many other human made concepts like that. It's why short men are biologically more likely to buy those large lifted trucks, why people in the lower class are more likely to want an expensive piece of jewelry or a luxury piece of clothing or a supercar. It's a coping mechanism for attention, which is the only real metric to uphold to.
Human beings are inherently wired to be extremely social creatures, people with illnesses like ASPD where people are unable to socialize are statistically more likely to be depressed, to commit crimes, and be a nuisance in society. This is what not being social does to someone. So social currency is what matters, but how do you achieve this? Well as previously stated, people try to cope with man made concepts but the only true way to achieve this is looks. The HALO effect is a biological law, that better looking people will be admired and attributed to greatness simply for existing.
Ghengis Khan
Sean O' Pry
Which of the two people above is more significant, and superior in life? If you choose Ghengis Khan, you are brainwashed. There is nothing objectively significant about Ghengis Khan. He was a master of human made metrics. Sure primally he was a "leader" and a "warrior" but those are meaningless, he lived an inferior live to Sean O'Pry, who was treated like a God from birth. Ghengis Khan worked to achieve the status he got through his entire life, full of grueling, horrifying methods. His most important and worst thing he did, was risking his life. Risking your life is a moronic act, if you truly knew how precious life is, you wouldn't even half consider it in your sleep let alone do it.
However someone like Sean O'Pry never worked for anything, he was offered a high status for simply existing. All he had done was be born and stay alive, and the people did the rest for him. He will live a more significant, happy, and more fulfilling life than Ghengis Khan or any other human revolutionary, historical figure, high status person, or anything like that of the sort.
"But illusion, what about legacy! We will remember Ghengis Khan for thousands of years but we won't remember Sean O'Pry after 50 years of him being dead." I'm sure you may have thought of this, and to that I have to say, so what?
Ghengis Khan doesn't know that, therefore it is meaningless to him. It may be significant to us, as it is part of "history" which we must learn, however Ghengis Khan will never reap what he planted, he will never experience being remembered. Ghengis Khan exists as much the sight out of your elbow. Try it, try seeing out of your elbow, you can't right? It's not black, it's not blurry, it's nothingness, that is what Ghengis Khan is. Everything he did throughout his life means nothing to him which is the only thing that objectively matters.
_______
"But illusion, don't you tell us to love each other, to be kind, and to improve ourselves? Why blackpill us now? Was everything you said fake?"
No. It wasn't. In fact, what I uphold is the exact ideology I'm speaking of here. Kindness is superior to hate, therefore we must be kind. Positivity is superior to negativity, therefore we must be positive. A world of people who are successful and happy is superior to a world of people who are failures and miserable. That is why we must all try to improve the world we live in, for ourselves, for others. However we must never give ourselves up, we must improve ourselves to our deaths.
What you feel is what matters, the moment, your consciousness. That is what matters, once you close your eyes, it's all gone forever, and you are too. You won't know it, you won't even be. So you must treasure every second you are alive. For you are alive, but one day you will not, and that makes every moment special, and makes the stakes even higher, to become better, to enjoy every millisecond of our small glimpse of consciousness, of being alive.
Any other idea of happiness is human made. It's a coping mechanism created by the evolutionary subconscious desire to be Chad, to be biologically high status. It's not real, it is materialistic. It is meaningless.
________
However there is one thing superior to Sean O' Pry (or any Chad) and that is one who works for it. If you are an abused dog for 18 years and ascend to Chad, you will constantly seek to fill the void of subhumanity that was set by your suboptimal development and you will constantly get it and feel amazing forever. Your receptors will be broken, and you will constantly feel the same joy of being accepted and idolized by society for simply existing. You will never feel the stress of having to perform, you will simply be accepted just for existing, and that is superior to any action you could ever commit.
______
Therefore I tell you, go out and ascend. Improve every aspect of your life, and help others. Be kind, be chad, love, and be happy. That is what matters.
The world is yours.
@Seth Walsh first time I'm tagging you, was inspired to write this from your social status threads. @HtnceI @Sayori @Pony @tuberculosisinmybal
Last edited:
