your environment GREATLY impacts your facial bone structure

D

Deleted member 27511

Kraken
Joined
Mar 17, 2023
Posts
4,914
Reputation
4,647
1691169536217
 
  • +1
  • JFL
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Aero, vaseqmoherad, It'snotover and 8 others
I broke this thread's hymen
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: RAMU KAKA, Deleted member 32968, Xangsane and 1 other person
time to raise my kid in a cabin in alaska
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 21898
Chads are relicts from primitive times, and letting females to choose mate is unprogressive
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: RomanianZaddy, LampPostPrime and Deleted member 27511
Genetics also play a part but it's your actions as well and not your environment.These people at that time, while their jaw was still developing, they were chewing hard foods but if we did the same thing in the same environment, we might have looked a bit different.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 27511
Chads are relicts from primitive times, and letting females to choose mate is unprogressive
cope, its not "primitive" humans are suppose to develop skulls like that its just weve been cucked by eating soft foods and estrogenics in our food and water lowering our T levels
 
  • +1
Reactions: It'snotover and Nick.Harte
Genetics also play a part but it's your actions as well and not your environment.These people at that time, while their jaw was still developing, they were chewing hard foods but if we did the same thing in the same environment, we might have looked a bit different.
it does but hunter gatherers have far more robust skulls than the average modern male
 
  • +1
Reactions: Nick.Harte
cope, its not "primitive" humans are suppose to develop skulls like that its just weve been cucked by eating soft foods and estrogenics in our food and water lowering our T levels
High IT and aggressive males are unprogressive and does not fit well in technologically advanced society

Eliotoft
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 27511
it does but hunter gatherers have far more robust skulls than the average modern male
Robust does not equal attractive in our modern times though, you need harmony and both feminine and masculine features in order to be attractive in a woman's eyes. People from today who are overly robust and actually resemble hunter gatherers are incels and considered ogre. If robusticity is attractiveness then Brock Lesnar would be the biggest chad, yet he gets effortlessly mogged by someone like Chico despite the fact that Lesnar is objectively more high T and robust, and resembles hunter gatherers.

21512
 
Robust does not equal attractive in our modern times though, you need harmony and both feminine and masculine features in order to be attractive in a woman's eyes. People from today who are overly robust and actually resemble hunter gatherers are incels and considered ogre. If robusticity is attractiveness then Brock Lesnar would be the biggest chad, yet he gets effortlessly mogged by someone like Chico despite the fact that Lesnar is objectively more high T and robust, and resembles hunter gatherers.

View attachment 2360864
I never said it does but robust skulls tend to be more attractive just ask urself this which skull would you rather have the left or the right?
1691170637938


we both know the answer
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 21898
Hunter gatherers would be considered low class ogrecels in our modern age

635610
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 23558 and Debetro
they could have chose the chaddest hunter gather and the sissiest modern human skull. They could have chosen different races, with entirely different socio cultural practices ,climate etc. I need more skulls as comparison with the same race and climate. For eg masai are a good pick as they are moving away from traditional hunter gatherer practices
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 28117
I never said it does but robust skulls tend to be more attractive just ask urself this which skull would you rather have the left or the right?
View attachment 2360875

we both know the answer
Someone like Chico is somewhere in between these two
 
You showed less evidence than the people claiming Earth is flat
 
Robust does not equal attractive in our modern times though, you need harmony and both feminine and masculine features in order to be attractive in a woman's eyes. People from today who are overly robust and actually resemble hunter gatherers are incels and considered ogre. If robusticity is attractiveness then Brock Lesnar would be the biggest chad, yet he gets effortlessly mogged by someone like Chico despite the fact that Lesnar is objectively more high T and robust, and resembles hunter gatherers.

View attachment 2360864
I never said it does but robust skulls tend to be more attractive just ask urself this which skull would you rather have the left or the right?
View attachment 2360875

we both know the answer
Screenshot 20230802 015941 DuckDuckGo
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 27511
Imagine all the fucking supermodels that existed before photography and 10,000 years ago that we’ll never know of
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 21898
This was tens of thousands of years of selection lol. A real comparison wud be modern hunter gatherers vs modern civilized people
here are some faces of hunter gatherers in africa
1691431301622

1691431311631

1691431329068
 
  • +1
Reactions: LampPostPrime
Water? Your looks is both genes and Environment, and for environment it's not just hard food but also your hormonal profile, cortisol levels, nutrition, posture, and other stuff that today you cannot control like estrogen exposure.
 
they were chewing hard foods
That's fantasy, raw meat is easier to chew than cooked meat, you don't even need to chew it, you can just tear off a piece and swallow it whole like any other carnivore.
 
  • +1
Reactions: bloodsteal
That's fantasy, raw meat is easier to chew than cooked meat, you don't even need to chew it, you can just tear off a piece and swallow it whole like any other carnivore.
Holy shit. I eat raw meat and I never chew it I swallow it whole and my jaw got wider because of the vitamins and minerals xD
 
  • +1
Reactions: HerpDerpson
Holy shit. I eat raw meat and I never chew it I swallow it whole and my jaw got wider because of the vitamins and minerals xD
That's actually not true anyway and I was super wrong. Smaller animals (cats and dogs) have much more concentrated hydrochloric acid in the stomach to dissolve chunks of meat. So we do actually need to chew. Still, I still don't believe that the physical act of chewing does anything.
 
Water

Just look at long term bruxer pheno.

Everted gonial angle, flat teeths, below 110 degrees gonial angle, wide jaw, massive masseter, wide zygomatic bone that match the masseter, toned lips etc...

A few examples
534
Rgdrghdrghdrh


342
Sdqd534

Sdqd534


Screenshot 2023 05 sdqq 10 24 20 900 comandroidchrome
Bruxsim


53dgdgg
 

Similar threads

N
Replies
8
Views
121
theonewhorisesabove
theonewhorisesabove
pechososonPiller
Replies
4
Views
254
pechososonPiller
pechososonPiller
MyDreamIsToBe183CM
Replies
17
Views
368
Southsmog
S
Angutoid
Replies
3
Views
80
Angutoid
Angutoid
Zenis
Replies
5
Views
158
Zenis
Zenis

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top