Your Looks Match is 1 PSL Below You

MLGS0LD1ERB0Y

MLGS0LD1ERB0Y

Egotistical loser who hates himself
Joined
Oct 26, 2025
Posts
1,923
Reputation
1,952
In today’s modern hypergamous dating market, your looksmax, that being who you’re most likely to end up in a romantic relationship with, is expected to be 1 entire PSL below you.

If you are an LTN, please do not expect to be with anyone higher than a sub 3 or any more a low LTB or else you will only end up being disappointed.

I wish this weren’t the truth, but it is. If you are an LTN that is above the height of 6’2 though, you can likely expect a MTB, since now height matters more than your face.


This is the truth, I’ve seen this too many times and this is what you should expect. I’m letting you know this because I don’t want you to have higher expectations than what is expected. Do not expect anything more than what your PSL score is, minus 1.

Have a good rest of your day.
 
  • +1
Reactions: abzz, AustrianMogger, Bajio and 4 others
High iq thread
 
  • +1
Reactions: MLGS0LD1ERB0Y
In today’s modern hypergamous dating market, your looksmax, that being who you’re most likely to end up in a romantic relationship with, is expected to be 1 entire PSL below you.

If you are an LTN, please do not expect to be with anyone higher than a sub 3 or any more a low LTB or else you will only end up being disappointed.

I wish this weren’t the truth, but it is. If you are an LTN that is above the height of 6’2 though, you can likely expect a MTB, since now height matters more than your face.


This is the truth, I’ve seen this too many times and this is what you should expect. I’m letting you know this because I don’t want you to have higher expectations than what is expected. Do not expect anything more than what your PSL score is, minus 1.

Have a good rest of your day.
Jfl, depend on continent and content exposure, sure lots of girls are hypergamous, but I’ve got a looksmatch, kinda, and I’ve seen boys with 2psl girls above them
 
  • +1
Reactions: nocajebudala and MLGS0LD1ERB0Y
The new Ramanujan, thank you for the demonstration
 
  • +1
Reactions: AustrianMogger and MLGS0LD1ERB0Y
Jfl, depend on continent and content exposure, sure lots of girls are hypergamous, but I’ve got a looksmatch, kinda, and I’ve seen boys with 2psl girls above them
There are obviously some rare anecdotes that can disprove this theory, but I think this is most common and what most people should expect. I think it’s realistic.
 
  • +1
Reactions: AustrianMogger and ccwb
  • +1
Reactions: AustrianMogger
In today’s modern hypergamous dating market, your looksmax, that being who you’re most likely to end up in a romantic relationship with, is expected to be 1 entire PSL below you.

If you are an LTN, please do not expect to be with anyone higher than a sub 3 or any more a low LTB or else you will only end up being disappointed.

I wish this weren’t the truth, but it is. If you are an LTN that is above the height of 6’2 though, you can likely expect a MTB, since now height matters more than your face.


This is the truth, I’ve seen this too many times and this is what you should expect. I’m letting you know this because I don’t want you to have higher expectations than what is expected. Do not expect anything more than what your PSL score is, minus 1.

Have a good rest of your day.
Looks dont matter for girls.
 
  • +1
Reactions: AustrianMogger and MLGS0LD1ERB0Y
There are obviously some rare anecdotes that can disprove this theory, but I think this is most common and what most people should expect. I think it’s realistic.
Realistic, expect one more but not intensively, get ur point, mirin
 
  • +1
Reactions: AustrianMogger and MLGS0LD1ERB0Y
Guess im dating sub2s now🥀
 
  • +1
Reactions: AustrianMogger
  • +1
Reactions: AustrianMogger and ccwb
Guess im dating sub2s now🥀
So most likely you will be with a morbidly obese foid then. Lock in now or end up with a creature for the rest of your life JFL. Choice is yours bud.
 
  • +1
Reactions: roadtochang123 and AustrianMogger
Looks dont matter for girls.
I was about to diss but I assume you think height is more important? This is also correct.
 
  • +1
Reactions: AustrianMogger
I was about to diss but I assume you think height is more important? This is also correct.
you legit only need to be 5'10+ to not experience any disadvantage, and 5'7 isnt that short either.
 
  • +1
Reactions: AustrianMogger and MLGS0LD1ERB0Y
  • +1
Reactions: AustrianMogger
Dude cmon, is this serious? How tall are you?
Im 184 cm. I live around a country full of 5'7 guys.

You have to be below 5'7 to really be raped by height.
 
  • +1
Reactions: AustrianMogger and MLGS0LD1ERB0Y
Im 184 cm. I live around a country full of 5'7 guys.

You have to be below 5'7 to really be raped by height.
Depends where you live I guess.
 
  • +1
Reactions: AustrianMogger
Yup it’s over I am 5’6 and idek what ranking I am it so over for all I know I am subhuman
 
  • +1
Reactions: AustrianMogger and MLGS0LD1ERB0Y
In today’s modern hypergamous dating market, your looksmax, that being who you’re most likely to end up in a romantic relationship with, is expected to be 1 entire PSL below you.

If you are an LTN, please do not expect to be with anyone higher than a sub 3 or any more a low LTB or else you will only end up being disappointed.

I wish this weren’t the truth, but it is. If you are an LTN that is above the height of 6’2 though, you canh likely expect a MTB, since now height matters more than your face.


This is the truth, I’ve seen this too many times and this is what you should expect. I’m letting you know this because I don’t want you to have higher expectations than what is expected. Do not expect anything more than what your PSL score is, minus 1.

Have a good rest of your day.
Tailscope
Height doesnt matter more than face. I think they are evenly matched maybe 50% face, 40% height, 10% rest
 
  • +1
Reactions: MLGS0LD1ERB0Y
Yup it’s over I am 5’6 and idek what ranking I am it so over for all I know I am subhuman
You can geomax. It’s never over bud.
 
In today’s modern hypergamous dating market, your looksmax, that being who you’re most likely to end up in a romantic relationship with, is expected to be 1 entire PSL below you.

If you are an LTN, please do not expect to be with anyone higher than a sub 3 or any more a low LTB or else you will only end up being disappointed.

I wish this weren’t the truth, but it is. If you are an LTN that is above the height of 6’2 though, you can likely expect a MTB, since now height matters more than your face.


This is the truth, I’ve seen this too many times and this is what you should expect. I’m letting you know this because I don’t want you to have higher expectations than what is expected. Do not expect anything more than what your PSL score is, minus 1.

Have a good rest of your day.
This is true for lots but I’m a mtn and got with a htb last night so idk
 
  • +1
Reactions: MLGS0LD1ERB0Y
Yup it’s over I am 5’6 and idek what ranking I am it so over for all I know I am subhuman
5"6 and 100k and you are frauded 6"2
 
  • +1
Reactions: MLGS0LD1ERB0Y
Tailscope
Height doesnt matter more than face. I think they are evenly matched maybe 50% face, 40% height, 10% rest
Agreed. 50/50, but it’s better to be gifted with height rather than face. If you are above 6’2 you can still pull MTB and above if you have an LTN face.
 
  • +1
Reactions: AustrianMogger
This is true for lots but I’m a mtn and got with a htb last night so idk
Yeah, that was a one night thing. I explained at the start this mostly goes for long term romance.
 
  • +1
Reactions: AustrianMogger
Im 184 cm. I live around a country full of 5'7 guys.

You have to be below 5'7 to really be raped by height.
Geography is law. Depending on the country you live height might matter more or less. You might be a chad on latam while being 5'11, but just try that in the Netherlands and you might not be considered human at all
 
  • +1
Reactions: MLGS0LD1ERB0Y, AustrianMogger and tgun564636
Agreed. 50/50, but it’s better to be gifted with height rather than face. If you are above 6’2 you can still pull MTB and above if you have an LTN face.
Nah. I think its worse to be disadvantaged in height than face (from a Former turbo manlet, now shortcel).
Will be frauded 6"2-3 in 3 years anyway.
But i think if you are legit attractive like chadlite that is so much better than beeing 6"3.
Havi g a chadlite face inrl carries you so hard.
But best is always htn+ and cl+.
 
  • +1
Reactions: MLGS0LD1ERB0Y
Yeah, that was a one night thing. I explained at the start this mostly goes for long term romance.
Yeah true. Also does this theory apply to htns?
 
  • +1
Reactions: MLGS0LD1ERB0Y
Yeah true. Also does this theory apply to htns?
Nope. Good point actually, I’d say if you are above HTN you practically have access to most of the dating pool.
 
  • +1
Reactions: tgun564636
it really depends, seen psl 5 girls with sub 3 guys, your status also matters a lot
 
  • +1
Reactions: MLGS0LD1ERB0Y
it really depends, seen psl 5 girls with sub 3 guys, your status also matters a lot
Like I said, there are rare anecdotes that disprove this theory, but this is most common and most likely to happen.
 
  • +1
Reactions: tgun564636
Like I said, there are rare anecdotes that disprove this theory, but this is most common and most likely to happen.
its really simple to slay if ur not sub3, just softmaxx, statusmaxx and larp being nt and its easy, most of kids on this forum are larping anyway
 
  • +1
Reactions: MLGS0LD1ERB0Y
its really simple to slay if ur not sub3, just softmaxx, statusmaxx and larp being nt and its easy, most of kids on this forum are larping anyway
Depends what you are trying to slay bro, obviously many people can slay a fat bitch with purple hair but who wants that
 
  • +1
Reactions: MLGS0LD1ERB0Y
its really simple to slay if ur not sub3, just softmaxx, statusmaxx and larp being nt and its easy, most of kids on this forum are larping anyway
Easier said than done. Some people are capped at MTN with softmaxxing, plus if you’re not above at least 6’ you’ll have trouble. With how hypergamous women are now, people that do not fit these standards will not survive. They could find one, but it will most likely not fit their needs and be hard to find in the first place. I don’t think your statement is necessarily true.
 
Easier said than done. Some people are capped at MTN with softmaxxing, plus if you’re not above at least 6’ you’ll have trouble. With how hypergamous women are now, people that do not fit these standards will not survive. They could find one, but it will most likely not fit their needs and be hard to find in the first place. I don’t think your statement is necessarily true.
I’m capped at mtn right? I won’t get offended
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2989.jpeg
    IMG_2989.jpeg
    983.1 KB · Views: 0
  • IMG_1853.jpeg
    IMG_1853.jpeg
    1.4 MB · Views: 0
  • +1
Reactions: abzz
In today’s modern hypergamous dating market, your looksmax, that being who you’re most likely to end up in a romantic relationship with, is expected to be 1 entire PSL below you.

If you are an LTN, please do not expect to be with anyone higher than a sub 3 or any more a low LTB or else you will only end up being disappointed.

I wish this weren’t the truth, but it is. If you are an LTN that is above the height of 6’2 though, you can likely expect a MTB, since now height matters more than your face.


This is the truth, I’ve seen this too many times and this is what you should expect. I’m letting you know this because I don’t want you to have higher expectations than what is expected. Do not expect anything more than what your PSL score is, minus 1.

Have a good rest of your day.
mostly true

good job

:FeelsLoveMan:
 
  • +1
Reactions: MLGS0LD1ERB0Y
I’m capped at mtn right? I won’t get offended
Arguable HTN - if not you are very close. Your lips are holding you back a little and your philtrum may be slightly too long. Other than that, you could be HTN
 
  • +1
Reactions: nocajebudala and tgun564636
Easier said than done. Some people are capped at MTN with softmaxxing, plus if you’re not above at least 6’ you’ll have trouble. With how hypergamous women are now, people that do not fit these standards will not survive. They could find one, but it will most likely not fit their needs and be hard to find in the first place. I don’t think your statement is necessarily true.
true, height is brutal, but what i am saying is most people don’t even try 1% and then make threads and cry about how someone with high psl is doing better than them. if ur capped at mtn its not over, just depends on your height, how much of a jester u are and status
 
  • +1
Reactions: MLGS0LD1ERB0Y

Similar threads

AustrianMogger
Replies
10
Views
107
madma
madma
infraorbidal
Replies
8
Views
48
infraorbidal
infraorbidal
jj1yden
Replies
10
Views
444
Sick
Sick

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top