You're not ugly you just need to aim for mental ill women

So why don't you fuck up all your relationships
Because I'm willing to sacrifice my own ego for a healthy relationship, but most people aren't. Just because the odds aren't in your favor it doesn't mean you give up. That's like the antithesis of masculinity.
 
  • Woah
Reactions: fashioncel
Because I'm willing to sacrifice my own ego for a healthy relationship, but most people aren't. Just because the odds aren't in your favor it doesn't mean you give up. That's like the antithesis of masculinity.
You are very smart
 
  • +1
Reactions: HostSamurai
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 90909
  • Woah
Reactions: Deleted member 90909
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 90909 and HostSamurai
In fact, they're probably ideal. Like a more traditional minded woman who is a tomboy.
I feel like women tend to be more pro-social than men. Therefore, it may track that women who have more masculine interests would perhaps fall in line with more anti-social tendencies.

Those in these communities tend to be pretty anti-social, I feel like, which if true, would also be a plus--at least to me.
 
  • +1
Reactions: FutureSlayer and HostSamurai
They let MTN+ hit instead of the usual HTN+ rules
 
  • JFL
Reactions: HostSamurai
  • JFL
Reactions: HostSamurai and Deleted member 90909
I feel like women tend to be more pro-social than men. Therefore, it may track that women who have more masculine interests would perhaps fall in line with more anti-social tendencies.

Those in these communities tend to be pretty anti-social, I feel like, which if true, would also be a plus--at least to me.
It's perhaps my only hope at getting a high quality LTR anyways at this rate. I am too esoteric personality wise.
 
  • +1
Reactions: FutureSlayer and Deleted member 90909
how to find them?
ill care for them
fucking simp. your loser tactic doesnt work

u need to abuse them to make them love you
 
  • Love it
Reactions: fashioncel
It's perhaps my only hope at getting a high quality LTR anyways at this rate. I am too esoteric personality wise.
Yeah, it may not sound all that great, but you may have to generate a bit of a social media presence. Not influencer-level of course, but if you want to meet some anti-social girl, you're going to have to be present online to a certain extent, and/or go to events that have to do with these communities.
 
  • +1
Reactions: FutureSlayer and HostSamurai
  • +1
Reactions: MoggerGaston
Most of users here are mentalcels, most of the girls today are insane too, we live in the cyberpunk right now boyo... I'm not targeting typical normie women, any 'autist' stay away from them, too nt life and would rather be single than with a 'trad-programmed' normie
 
They don't have to look like tomboys lol, just in terms of their interests.
So you like women but with a manly mind
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 90909
  • +1
Reactions: HostSamurai
Bro take this down I’m trying to gatekeep it
 
  • JFL
Reactions: fashioncel
Yeah, it may not sound all that great, but you may have to generate a bit of a social media presence. Not influencer-level of course, but if you want to meet some anti-social girl, you're going to have to be present online to a certain extent, and/or go to events that have to do with these communities.
cosplaying is usually the gold standard in this regard
 
  • +1
Reactions: HostSamurai and Deleted member 90909
I'm so ugly that bitches in coma would wake up and reject me - over
 
  • WTF
Reactions: fashioncel
Think about it they don't have a good brain So they can't think about looks And if they're eating pills it's better because it destroys their brain even better if it's anti depressants Just go for mental woman
I know a 5’5 ltn who only goes after autistic or mentally ill girls and he’s already had sex before me
 
I know a 5’5 ltn who only goes after autistic or mentally ill girls and he’s already had sex before me
That's what I'm telling you it's so easy
 
  • +1
Reactions: Napoleon1800
That's what I'm telling you it's so easy
But he’s autistic himself, Im just socially awkward, I cannot match with mentally ill women
 
  • So Sad
Reactions: fashioncel
he sent me his ranking of penis colours nigga, that should be enough to show you that he’s autistic. I just struggle to speak to people normally
 
Autistic women don't leave the house I think
 
  • +1
Reactions: HostSamurai
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: HostSamurai and fashioncel
I feel like women tend to be more pro-social than men. Therefore, it may track that women who have more masculine interests would perhaps fall in line with more anti-social tendencies.

Those in these communities tend to be pretty anti-social, I feel like, which if true, would also be a plus--at least to me.
women are less social than men. It's just that due to female/looks privileges they have an easier time socializing and forming deeper bonds/connection.
 
women are less social than men. It's just that due to female/looks privileges they have an easier time socializing and forming deeper bonds/connection.
They are absolutely more social. I don't think there's a biological difference because that's not my area, but generally speaking, girls are raised in a more hands-on sense than boys, which contributes to a healthier and more lively social life.

A teenage girl who stays indoors all the time is somewhat stigmatized, but the same is not observed regarding teenage boys; hell, to a certain extent, anti-social behavior may even be encouraged or celebrated in teenage boys.

In the past, when less was expected of women, the overall situation was probably rather different.

They do have an easier time socializing and forming connections, in general, not because of looks (some do for sure, but it can't be generalized in this way since not every woman is attractive enough to experience pretty privilege), but because of the way they are positioned in and perceived by society, which I suppose is sort of a privilege as you said.
 
  • +1
Reactions: HostSamurai
They are absolutely more social.
proof?
A teenage girl who stays indoors all the time is somewhat stigmatized, but the same is not observed regarding teenage boys; hell, to a certain extent, anti-social behavior may even be encouraged or celebrated in teenage boys.
Never experienced this whatsoever. It's true that there's more lonely teenage boys than girls, but that is because of the same social gender privilege I mentioned earlier.

It is NOT and NEVER was celebrated among teenage boys. I have no clue what kind of subhuman family you grew up with that encouraged anti-social behavior.
In the past, when less was expected of women, the overall situation was probably rather different.
??? what past. what u yapping about
They do have an easier time socializing and forming connections, in general, not because of looks (some do for sure, but it can't be generalized in this way since not every woman is attractive enough to experience pretty privilege), but because of the way they are positioned in and perceived by society, which I suppose is sort of a privilege as you said.
this is the exact privilege I talk about and it is bound to their gender + female looks.

thanks for agreeing with me
 
It's just an observable truth, but I'm sure there's credible research into this. And I'm not saying the gap is huge, but it is there.
It is NOT and NEVER was celebrated among teenage boys.
I should have clarified that when I said "anti-social", I wasn't referring to the stereotypical kind of individual, such as those you'd encounter on here. I mean, if a teenage boy sacrifices his social life for interests, academics, and/or other characteristic things, he won't be made to feel out of place as much in general.
??? what past. what u yapping about
I was referring to when women had less rights, and were more prone to being stay-at-home wives for instance. Perhaps back then, women were more anti-social but probably not as substantial. But this is besides my point.
this is the exact privilege I talk about and it is bound to their gender + female looks.

thanks for agreeing with me
Yeah, I agree with you that women are privileged in this way; you just happen to think that they aren't more social.

If you concede that they have an easier time socializing and forming connections, you're burdened with having to justify why you think they wouldn't be more social, which can't be done.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: HostSamurai
Think about it they don't have a good brain So they can't think about looks And if they're eating pills it's better because it destroys their brain even better if it's anti depressants Just go for mental woman
Cope, I'm ugly.
 
  • So Sad
  • JFL
Reactions: HostSamurai and fashioncel
It's just an observable truth, but I'm sure there's credible research into this. And I'm not saying the gap is huge, but it is there.
its not a truth and it is not observable
I should have clarified that when I said "anti-social", I wasn't referring to the stereotypical kind of individual, such as those you'd encounter on here. I mean, if a teenage boy sacrifices his social life for interests, academics, and/or other characteristic things, he won't be made to feel out of place as much in general.
thats just your family and your experience.
Normal teenage boys are attacked and confronted when they don't date, don't have girlfriends, don't have friends, etc.

If you are a virgin beyond x age as a BOY, you are a fucking worthless anti-social freak, a loser.
if you are virgin beyond x age as a GIRL, you are cherished and celebrated.

reality is the complete opposite as to what you are stating here.
I was referring to when women had less rights, and were more prone to being stay-at-home wives for instance. Perhaps back then, women were more anti-social but probably not as substantial. But this is besides my point.
the past is irrelevant and useless to argue about
Yeah, I agree with you that women are privileged in this way; you just happen to think that they aren't more social.
you think that they are more social when they are just more privileged. theres a massive difference.
If you concede that they have an easier time socializing and forming connections, you're burdened with having to justify why you think they wouldn't be more social, which can't be done.
why do you think women would be more social if they werent socially privileged?
 
its not a truth and it is not observable
Well, it is, but we can agree to disagree.
thats just your family and your experience.
I am not even referring to my own experience. I am speaking only in general.
Normal teenage boys are attacked and confronted when they don't date, don't have girlfriends, don't have friends, etc.
They are, sure. But anti-social behavior is more normalized or perhaps tolerated (if normalized is too strong a word here) in men than it is with women. Both of these things can be true at once.
the past is irrelevant and useless to argue about
Not necessarily. We're talking about gender here, for which there is a history, but, yes, as I said, it's beyond the main point.
you think that they are more social when they are just more privileged. theres a massive difference.
To a certain extent, they are more social because of their privilege. That's my point. You're hyperfixating on the privilege part, which I don't disagree with at all.
why do you think women would be more social if they werent socially privileged?
I don't. That is my whole point. Women are more social because of how they're generally raised and treated by society.

You have a certain social standard for what's considered normal in society. And I agree with it. Anti-social behavior is generally bad and generally frowned upon. But my whole point is that, with men, there's more leniency here and different standards in certain cases that don't apply to women.

I don't want to try and psychoanalyze you, but what I think is happening here is that you personally want to feel justified in your own insecurities pertaining to what may be anti-social tendencies of your own. I am not saying that you're wrong to feel victimized by society, nor am I saying that anti-social men don't face stigma of their own and a whole plethora of problems.

All I am saying is that there are different standards in different situations, and that the idea of a male being anti-social has more of a foundation in what's normalized than not. That's it. It's purely conceptual. If you simply don't agree with this, that's fine, but I am not trying to deny people's experiences.
 
  • +1
Reactions: HostSamurai and MoggerGaston
Well, it is, but we can agree to disagree.

I am not even referring to my own experience. I am speaking only in general.
You have no proof or anything to support your claims. Just 'your own experience', which is very likely to be influenced by the overall 'woman are wonderful' effect that has people attribute more positive character traits to women compared to men.
They are, sure. But anti-social behavior is more normalized or perhaps tolerated (if normalized is too strong a word here) in men than it is with women. Both of these things can be true at once.
calling it anti-social behavior is blaming the teenage kid for being socially rejected which is just brutal.
instead we should wonder why we accept and tolerate the fact that teenage boys are socially rejected and have to live lonely lives?

you are making it sound like it is somehow a fucking advantage for teenage boys to end up totally socially rejected and alone and have their surroundings deem it normal and acceptable instead of SOUNDING THE FUCKING ALARM BELLS?

You just made it clear why it is so brutal to be male:
You can end up as a bullied social-reject teenager and your surroundings will normalize, tolerate this brutal situation instead of helping you overcome this like they do with girls.

Not necessarily. We're talking about gender here, for which there is a history, but, yes, as I said, it's beyond the main point.

To a certain extent, they are more social because of their privilege. That's my point. You're hyperfixating on the privilege part, which I don't disagree with at all.

I don't. That is my whole point. Women are more social because of how they're generally raised and treated by society.
Well yes but this is water. If people treat you better, you are more likely to seek out interaction with people.
You have a certain social standard for what's considered normal in society. And I agree with it. Anti-social behavior is generally bad and generally frowned upon. But my whole point is that, with men, there's more leniency here and different standards in certain cases that don't apply to women.
Like I discussed above, it is SUPER TERRIBLE for men that there is leniency towards boys being treated like dog-shit and boys ending up socially isolated.

This is a massive DISADVANTAGE for men in life, not an advantage like you put it.
I don't want to try and psychoanalyze you, but what I think is happening here is that you personally want to feel justified in your own insecurities pertaining to what may be anti-social tendencies of your own. I am not saying that you're wrong to feel victimized by society, nor am I saying that anti-social men don't face stigma of their own and a whole plethora of problems.
?????
men are anti-social because they are treated like shit and society normalizes the fact men are treated like shit and end up anti-social. You just stated this yourself.
All I am saying is that there are different standards in different situations, and that the idea of a male being anti-social has more of a foundation in what's normalized than not. That's it. It's purely conceptual. If you simply don't agree with this, that's fine, but I am not trying to deny people's experiences.
It's terrible that it is normalized for men to be socially rejected by society.
 
Last edited:
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Deleted member 90909
You just made it clear why it is so brutal to be male:
You can end up as a bullied social-reject teenager and your surroundings will normalize, tolerate this brutal situation instead of helping you overcome this like they do with girls.
@Krisis

just too fucking brutal
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Deleted member 90909
You have no proof or anything to support your claims.
If you don't think women are more social than men, that's fine, but you're not in the majority there. And I'm not going to start citing social science journals to prove such an obvious point. I mean, what's your proof?
Just 'your own experience',
Well, we certainly cannot completely control our biases; that being said, I do think if anyone's allowing their personal experiences to interfere with their perception of reality here, it's mainly you, which is fine by the way; we all do it.
which is very likely to be influenced by the overall 'woman are wonderful' effect that has people attribute more positive character traits to women compared to men.
This has nothing to do with anything I've actually said.
calling it anti-social behavior is blaming the teenage kid for being socially rejected which is just brutal.
I'm not blaming anyone here. Once again, you're allowing your emotions to cloud your judgement. If anything, I've gotten across that young men who are anti-social can, to a certain extent, blame others for it.

Once again, my whole point has to do with the differences between how boys and girls are raised.
instead we should wonder why we accept and tolerate the fact that teenage boys are socially rejected and have to live lonely lives?
I agree with this, and the why is exactly what I've been talking about. That being said, the young men we're talking about here don't have to live lonely lives. But their experiences have made them believe that they do, which, yes, is a societal problem that needs to be alleviated.
you are making it sound like it is somehow a fucking advantage for teenage boys to end up totally socially rejected and alone and have their surroundings deem it normal and acceptable instead of SOUNDING THE FUCKING ALARM BELLS?
No, I didn't. This is just your incorrect reading of what I've written.
You just made it clear why it is so brutal to be male:
You can end up as a bullied social-reject teenager and your surroundings will normalize, tolerate this brutal situation instead of helping you overcome this like they do with girls.
Yes, I agree with this. This is definitely an area in which men have it harder. People aren't necessarily going to have empathy for you if you're lonely as a young man. We're on the same page; you're just misreading what I'm saying to a ridiculous extent.

This is why I advocate that society has to treat men with more carefulness and attention as they do with women.
Well yes but this is water. If people treat you better, you are more likely to seek out interaction with people.
Is it actually obvious to you? You seem to have taken issue with it.
This is a massive DISADVANTAGE for men in life, not an advantage like you put it.
But I've never claimed it to be an advantage... All I've said is that anti-social behavior is somewhat more normalized in men than it is in women. When I say normalized, I'm not saying that it's a good thing, but that society, for whatever reason, doesn't regard it as they do with women. My point is that it should be different, that the way in which boys are raised is a disadvantage.

I believe I've made my point rather clear, but for whatever reason, you're just unfortunately unable to see where I'm coming from. That's fine, though. I wish you well.
 
  • +1
Reactions: HostSamurai
If you don't think women are more social than men, that's fine, but you're not in the majority there. And I'm not going to start citing social science journals to prove such an obvious point. I mean, what's your proof?

Well, we certainly cannot completely control our biases; that being said, I do think if anyone's allowing their personal experiences to interfere with their perception of reality here, it's mainly you, which is fine by the way; we all do it.

This has nothing to do with anything I've actually said.

I'm not blaming anyone here. Once again, you're allowing your emotions to cloud your judgement. If anything, I've gotten across that young men who are anti-social can, to a certain extent, blame others for it.

Once again, my whole point has to do with the differences between how boys and girls are raised.

I agree with this, and the why is exactly what I've been talking about. That being said, the young men we're talking about here don't have to live lonely lives. But their experiences have made them believe that they do, which, yes, is a societal problem that needs to be alleviated.

No, I didn't. This is just your incorrect reading of what I've written.

Yes, I agree with this. This is definitely an area in which men have it harder. People aren't necessarily going to have empathy for you if you're lonely as a young man. We're on the same page; you're just misreading what I'm saying to a ridiculous extent.

This is why I advocate that society has to treat men with more carefulness and attention as they do with women.

Is it actually obvious to you? You seem to have taken issue with it.

But I've never claimed it to be an advantage... All I've said is that anti-social behavior is somewhat more normalized in men than it is in women. When I say normalized, I'm not saying that it's a good thing, but that society, for whatever reason, doesn't regard it as they do with women. My point is that it should be different, that the way in which boys are raised is a disadvantage.

I believe I've made my point rather clear, but for whatever reason, you're just unfortunately unable to see where I'm coming from. That's fine, though. I wish you well.
your entire post was making it seem like you were largely blaming men for being socially isolated, while embracing women for being so pro-social that they avoid this situation through their own merit.

My bad for misunderstanding it like this if you didn't mean it like that, but this is the common thought-process in normie-society.

The idea that men are to blame for their social-isolation due to their own self-destructive tendencies and anti-social behavior. Not due to any outside factors, failed parenting, failed educational system, failed teachers, failed family structures and more.

Somehow men are to blame for their issues themselves, while women are victims of the patriarchy in any issues they face in life.
This is how the average person thinks about men and women in society right now.
 
  • +1
Reactions: HostSamurai and Deleted member 90909
your entire post was making it seem like you were largely blaming men for being socially isolated, while embracing women for being so pro-social that they avoid this situation through their own merit.

My bad for misunderstanding it like this if you didn't mean it like that, but this is the common thought-process in normie-society.

The idea that men are to blame for their social-isolation due to their own self-destructive tendencies and anti-social behavior. Not due to any outside factors, failed parenting, failed educational system, failed teachers, failed family structures and more.

Somehow men are to blame for their issues themselves, while women are victims of the patriarchy in any issues they face in life.
This is how the average person thinks about men and women in society right now.
It's all good, dude. I get and agree with what you take issue with. And I don't blame you for misunderstanding, since I'm sure this topic means a lot to you. It means a lot to me as well.

Take care.
 
  • +1
Reactions: HostSamurai and MoggerGaston

Similar threads

Klasik616
Replies
10
Views
249
Deleted member 116224
D
forevergymcelling
Replies
45
Views
946
Autisticbrokeass2
Autisticbrokeass2
IHATEINDIANS
Replies
12
Views
262
Deleted member 139575
D
Zeekie
Replies
13
Views
674
iblamejames
iblamejames

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top