Zoophiles vs pedophiles

Banned User

Banned User

Temp. Banned
Joined
May 21, 2019
Posts
37,990
Reputation
114,071
IMG 1549
 
  • +1
  • Ugh..
Reactions: blinkers, slaviccartfiend, Zurrz and 9 others
I fw pedos
 
  • JFL
  • Hmm...
  • +1
Reactions: subhuman37, imontheloose, infraorbidal and 4 others
But they lowkey attracted to puppy’s and kittens

IMG 8901
 
  • JFL
Reactions: negative, mistyjfl, avenox and 2 others
Pedos can be chill zoophiles are just weird
 
  • +1
Reactions: H72, subhuman37, 1966Ford and 1 other person
  • JFL
Reactions: pleasevanity, negative and Former Shortcel
then a necrophile walks in
The Boys Homelander GIF
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: shedontluv-U, pleasevanity, v8zen and 2 others
September 10, 2004
 
  • +1
Reactions: buccalfatremoval
Why is your name foggy
 
  • +1
Reactions: blinkers and the exile v2
i mean both are bad but it depends on the case as they are both umbrella terms. If you want to go jack your shit to furry porn or other weird shit its your life i guess do what you want but thats vastly different from raping animals. As for pedophiles theres also a difference, for example if your 20 and attracted to 16-17 year old girls i dont think its that bad tbh but if its like literal kids under 12 then thats arguably worse than any zoophillia.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Banned User
i mean both are bad but it depends on the case as they are both umbrella terms. If you want to go jack your shit to furry porn or other weird shit its your life i guess do what you want but thats vastly different from raping animals. As for pedophiles theres also a difference, for example if your 20 and attracted to 16-17 year old girls i dont think its that bad tbh but if its like literal kids under 12 then thats arguably worse than any zoophillia.
pedophilia is by definition attraction to kids younger than teenagers
 
  • Nerd
Reactions: negative
pedophilia is by definition attraction to kids younger than teenagers
its an umbrella term jfl, I have seen people saying a 30 year old dating an 18 year old is pedophilia again it depends on what you believe is the definition is.
 
  • +1
Reactions: proxxyy11
its an umbrella term jfl, I have seen people saying a 30 year old dating an 18 year old is pedophilia again it depends on what you believe is the definition is.
true tbf nobody actually uses it by what it actually means
 
  • +1
Reactions: forzp
isn't a kid always younger than a teenager? it is redundant if you say that
no? teenagers can be considered kids as well retard, also they're still called "kids"

you want me to say people younger than teenagers? LMFAOO
 
someone on this forum is both
 
  • JFL
Reactions: shedontluv-U
no? teenagers can be considered kids as well retard, also they're still called "kids"

you want me to say people younger than teenagers? LMFAOO
No retard, teenagers can't be considered kids, and aren't called kids, different developmental stages.

A kid is always by definition, younger than a teenager, so why even mention it, i know why, because you're a dumb APE.
 
No retard, teenagers can't be considered kids, and aren't called kids, different developmental stages.

A kid is always by definition, younger than a teenager, so why even mention it, i know why, because you're a dumb APE.
so a 13 year old isn't a kid? so what are they then nigga

a kid isn't by definition younger than a teenager a kid is a young person in general
 
  • +1
Reactions: v8zen
so a 13 year old isn't a kid? so what are they then nigga

a kid isn't by definition younger than a teenager a kid is a young person in general
Teenagers are in the transitional phase of adolescence, between tanner 3 - 4, can't be a kid.

Plus teenagers are called that because of "teen"agers meaning the number of their age ends with a teen, it starts with 13, so, no, a thirteen year old isn't a kid, its an adolescent
 
hey retard a kid means a young person why are u replying to me trying to change a definition of what it is
Teenagers are in the transitional phase of adolescence, between tanner 3 - 4, can't be a kid.

Plus teenagers are called that because of "teen"agers meaning the number of their age ends with a teen, it starts with 13, so, no, a thirteen year old isn't a kid, its an adolescent
 
Why not both
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: shedontluv-U and pleasevanity

Similar threads

Johnny Bravo
Replies
12
Views
108
olyen
olyen
Big Boss
Replies
9
Views
100
Oopity
Oopity
arkzy7
Replies
5
Views
32
arkzy7
arkzy7
D
Replies
3
Views
94
KB_maxxer
KB_maxxer
Farsin
Replies
13
Views
135
Farsin
Farsin

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
Sponsored
Stake.us
America's #1 Social Casino
Slots, Poker & More
Join Now →