That picture isn’t a selfie, which is what most people here use to measure. Most people have a good FWHR when the picture is taken by someone else, as the distance will be farther. Mine’s a 1.9 from the distance your picture shows.
PSL 5 is chadlite.
Yeah aka you measured incorrectly
You're fucking retarded. Lens distorted and NOBODY here measures from selfies as they're lens distorted. Chico doesn't have a narrow face
You're so low iq it hurts
You claiming that without evidence doesn’t mean shit. I already told you how I measured. It’s the standard way.
Tons of people here measure from selfies. That’s why so many get results like 1.5 and 1.6. If they measured with pictures taken of them from someone else at a distance, like the one you used, they would have a higher FWHR.
Substantive response.
Substantive response.
imagine ur so delusional u cope with measuring lens distorted pics taken inches away with a shitty phone camera
Most people have high FWHR with pictures taken by someone else from a distance. Mine’s a 1.9 from that distance. Most people here measure selfies.
Also why is Chico’s measurement from the eyebrows and Gandy’s from the top of the eyes?
FWHR is associated with STR success and attractiveness
View attachment 548271
*Women not only expressed interest in short term relationships with these men, but were also more likely to choose them for a second date, regardless of their age."
Why women are attracted to men with wide faces
Women are drawn to men with broader faces for short-term relationships, according to a study – but they do not tend to see them as husband material.www.dailymail.co.uk
FWHR is associated with fighting success
View attachment 548256View attachment 548278
(PDF) Higher facial width to height ratio predicts fighting performance and perceived aggressiveness in MMA fighters
PDF | Previous studies showed that facial width-to-height ratio (fWHR), which is considered as cue to testosterone levels, is associated with sport... | Find, read and cite all the research you need on ResearchGatewww.researchgate.net
Fig. 2. Visualization of the shape regression on fighting success by...
Download scientific diagram | Visualization of the shape regression on fighting success by thin-plate spline-deformation grids (top row) and composite visualizations (bottom row), based on faces of heavyweight fighters. Results are shown separately for low and high fighting success, with the...
Monkeys with wider faces are more likely to stand up for themselves and command respect
View attachment 548284
CEO's with wider faces have better business success
"Indeed, one study has shown that facial width-to-height ratio (fWHR), a physical facial measurement associated with testosterone in men (Lefevre, Lewis, Perrett, & Penke, 2013), predicts company profit when measured in the faces of CEOs of successful large-scale businesses with simple leadership hierarchies"
FWHR is associated with breeding success
View attachment 548299
Soldiers' faces predict aggression, military rank and number of children
John Loehr & GrrlScientist: New research suggests male soldiers' faces may predict their military rank and how many children they ultimately fatherwww.theguardian.com
So how do you know wether you have a low FWHR?
It's pretty simple, if your parents, friends or people in general have ever commented on your facial shape it's most likely narrow. But generally a FWHR lower than 1.80 would be considered narrow. 1.80 is near average, but usually still somewhat narrow with neurocranium etc taken into account.
Next time you see someone say FWHR doesn't matter, spam him this thread and remind him how much of a retarded faggot he is.
Thank you.
everybody knows this
How the fuck is it without evidence when LITERALLY every study measures it from straight pictures since that's the way to measure facial ratios? What? Are you gonna measure someones interpupillary distance from a 3/4 profile too?
No you're genuinely retarded. You don't even understand the accurate way of measuring facial ratios the way they'd stand out irl is without lens distortion
I was saying your claim that I’m measuring incorrectly has no evidence. Gandy’s pic was straight, and the first one of Chico was as well. Second one was slightly below.
They're still not accurate cause they're DISTORTED you low iq mong. You should get yourself a razorblade and end it
BECAUSE THAT'S THE WAY IT'D BE IRL
So most people have good FWHR...
Yeah how many times do you see someone with an actually narrow ass head to the point it brings shivers up your spine? Most people have a normal headshape
Not even normal. Ideal. When I measure pictures from the distance you say is correct, nearly every person has a 1.8+.
i dont really give a shit what "most people" here do. you arent measuring correctly if youre using a phone camera taken inches away, simple as that. pictures taken from a distance are far more accurate than that because its actually how people perceive you in real life
So if almost everyone has an ideal FWHR, and it’s one of the most important factors for sexual success, most of them should be slaying.
now youre just over emphasizing the importance of one single feature
Not saying it’s the only thing that matters. However, if FWHR is a top three feature, and your other features are acceptable, and you have an ideal FWHR (as most people do by the correct measurement), why would they not slay?
Tbh don't bother with him, he's legit retarded
