1.8 fwhr bad

Y

Yoyo2233

Kraken
Joined
Mar 18, 2020
Posts
3,001
Reputation
1,671
Title. What’s ideal
To be considered attractive? I’m assuming below 1.7 and your done?
 
Yes, below 1.7 and you become and actual horse. Over for us horcecels
 
  • So Sad
Reactions: Taylorswift
Title. What’s ideal
To be considered attractive? I’m assuming below 1.7 and your done?

1.8 its actually at the end of the range, you are still ok there, not ideal tho
 
how do you even calculate FWHR right? camera angle changes a lot of shit
 
how do you even calculate FWHR right? camera angle changes a lot of shit

Just take a photo of your face looking front without any tilt from 2 m away
 
Daily reminder O'pry has an fwhr of 2.2
 
I havent measured mine but it must be shit, do you measured it in photoshopp?
I measured it in Picsart. I think you may have the same FHWR.
 
Can you measure it for me and pm? Or send me the link of picsart tru pms
I uninstalled picsart due to subhuman storage but you can just type in “picsart” on the App Store or google play store and it will show up. I’m pretty sure your FHWR is the same as mine. We actually look alike (except that your eye spacing is better than mine).
 
I uninstalled picsart due to subhuman storage but you can just type in “picsart” on the App Store or google play store and it will show up..
Its there any version for computer?

I’m pretty sure your FHWR is the same as mine. We actually look alike (except that your eye spacing is better than mine).

Damn bro, is your dad arab? Arab midfaces are so subhuman
 
  • +1
Reactions: Taylorswift
Its there any version for computer?



Damn bro, is your dad arab? Arab midfaces are so subhuman
Both my parents are arab JFL. And I don’t think there is a version on PC but you can look it up. Use paint instead.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 5634
entirely different in every pic I take

You can also take your id and measure it with a ruler as its a ratio, normal id photos are taked with a good camera from a decent distance
 
Well i saw some guy measuring it once, idk if he got it correctly
Yeah I know what you’re referring to; that’s a cherry picked picture. Rule of thumb is to measure pictures taken at the same distance as pictures you are using to measure your own ratios.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 5634
Yeah I know what you’re referring to; that’s a cherry picked picture. Rule of thumb is to measure pictures taken at the same distance as pictures you are using to measure your own ratios.

Ok i see, 2 meters is ideal right? (I mean the space between the camera and oneself)
 
Both my parents are arab JFL. And I don’t think there is a version on PC but you can look it up. Use paint instead.

I feel you bro, if you ever feel like venting you can pm me.
 
  • So Sad
Reactions: Taylorswift
Yes, below 1.7 and you become and actual horse. Over for us horcecels
What’s the vertical measurement? I know the width is the widest part From zygo to zygo (the widest part of the cheek)
 
Dang really? So women actually notice this shit

Obv man, its one of the bigestt failos that you can have, low fhr and you can not be good looking as a male
 
Mines 1.8 is that bad
the ideal is 1.93
7EUeYOFOUtFANoH2PWqN92oW4hVnYrgZzDaFZq3BsQA

as demonstrated by pitt

1.80 is okay
 
I got 1.829 from the highest point of my eyebrows and 2.205 from the lowest point of my eyebrows.
Do you use the highest part or lowest part?
 

Similar threads

Eduardo DOV
Replies
41
Views
1K
mvp2v1
mvp2v1
BullyofAlphaBitches
Replies
12
Views
808
MoggsWithBoness
MoggsWithBoness
N
Replies
10
Views
495
newzealand
N
Accelerator
Replies
63
Views
2K
Baxy
Baxy
Ricky212
Replies
1
Views
80
Vermilioncore
Vermilioncore

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top