17 m 5’10 rate and advice please

[jake689]

 

[jake689]

bump

 

[jake689]

bump

 

[Ducan]

Mtn

 

[oprysideprofile]

View attachment 5223763View attachment 5223764View attachment 5223770

low mtn

 

[oprysideprofile]

flaws :

Ratio Name	Your Value	Ideal Range	Status	Deviation & Score
Facial Width to Midface Height Ratio Bizygomatic width / Height from midpoint of pupils to Upper Lip Superior.	2.12	1.95 - 2.20	Ideal	+2.0% Score: 100.0/100
Mouth to Nose Width Ratio	1.17	1.50 - 1.62	Off	-24.8% Score: 0.0/100
Nose to Face Width Ratio Nose width / Bizygomatic width.	0.27	0.20 - 0.30	Ideal	+7.1% Score: 100.0/100
Lower to Upper Lip Height Ratio	2.28	1.25 - 1.67	Off	+56.4% Score: 27.0/100
Chin to Philtrum Ratio Chin height (Lower Lip Inferior-Menton) / Philtrum length (Subnasale-UpperLipSuperior).	1.70	2.00 - 3.00	Off	-32.1% Score: 84.8/100
Chin Width Ratio (Bizygomatic width * 0.9) / Chin width.	3.36	2.45 - 2.70	Off	+30.7% Score: 0.0/100
Jaw Frontal Angle	100.88°	85.00° - 90.00°	Off	+15.3% Score: 0.0/100
Bigonial to Bizygomatic Ratio	0.89	0.80 - 0.92	Ideal	+3.1% Score: 100.0/100
Eye Separation Ratio (ESR) Interpupillary to Bizygomatic width.	0.50	0.45 - 0.47	Off	+8.5% Score: 27.5/100
Eyes Canthal Tilt Average angle of the intercanthal line with the horizontal. Positive: lateral canthus visually higher than medial. Calculated as geometric angle.	3.67°	0.00° - 8.00°	Ideal	-8.2% Score: 100.0/100
Eye-Mouth-Eye (EME) Angle Around 48°. Lower values considered more masculine.	49.22°	45.00° - 51.00°	Ideal	+2.5% Score: 100.0/100
Eye Width to Height Ratio	3.23	3.00 - 4.50	Ideal	-13.9% Score: 100.0/100
Midface to Lower Face Height Ratio Ratio of Midface height (Nasion-Subnasale) to Lower face height (Subnasale-Menton).	0.75	0.67 - 0.82	Ideal	+0.5% Score: 100.0/100

 

[Van]

View attachment 5223763View attachment 5223764View attachment 5223770

good pheno, you can try to dye eyebrows and hair black

 

[jake689]

bump

 

[clavicularDihRider]

View attachment 5223763View attachment 5223764View attachment 5223770

maybe dye your eyebrows and get a light perm or something because straight hair sucks

 

[MoggerPogger]

flaws :

Ratio Name	Your Value	Ideal Range	Status	Deviation & Score
Facial Width to Midface Height Ratio Bizygomatic width / Height from midpoint of pupils to Upper Lip Superior.	2.12	1.95 - 2.20	Ideal	+2.0% Score: 100.0/100
Mouth to Nose Width Ratio	1.17	1.50 - 1.62	Off	-24.8% Score: 0.0/100
Nose to Face Width Ratio Nose width / Bizygomatic width.	0.27	0.20 - 0.30	Ideal	+7.1% Score: 100.0/100
Lower to Upper Lip Height Ratio	2.28	1.25 - 1.67	Off	+56.4% Score: 27.0/100
Chin to Philtrum Ratio Chin height (Lower Lip Inferior-Menton) / Philtrum length (Subnasale-UpperLipSuperior).	1.70	2.00 - 3.00	Off	-32.1% Score: 84.8/100
Chin Width Ratio (Bizygomatic width * 0.9) / Chin width.	3.36	2.45 - 2.70	Off	+30.7% Score: 0.0/100
Jaw Frontal Angle	100.88°	85.00° - 90.00°	Off	+15.3% Score: 0.0/100
Bigonial to Bizygomatic Ratio	0.89	0.80 - 0.92	Ideal	+3.1% Score: 100.0/100
Eye Separation Ratio (ESR) Interpupillary to Bizygomatic width.	0.50	0.45 - 0.47	Off	+8.5% Score: 27.5/100
Eyes Canthal Tilt Average angle of the intercanthal line with the horizontal. Positive: lateral canthus visually higher than medial. Calculated as geometric angle.	3.67°	0.00° - 8.00°	Ideal	-8.2% Score: 100.0/100
Eye-Mouth-Eye (EME) Angle Around 48°. Lower values considered more masculine.	49.22°	45.00° - 51.00°	Ideal	+2.5% Score: 100.0/100
Eye Width to Height Ratio	3.23	3.00 - 4.50	Ideal	-13.9% Score: 100.0/100
Midface to Lower Face Height Ratio Ratio of Midface height (Nasion-Subnasale) to Lower face height (Subnasale-Menton).	0.75	0.67 - 0.82	Ideal	+0.5% Score: 100.0/100

did u write ts yuourself