Ponder
Bronze
- Joined
- Dec 10, 2020
- Posts
- 468
- Reputation
- 919
Being taller than 6'0 is a significant dating disadvantage. At height 6'4 even 35% of foids will reject you for height alone. At 6'0 it is barely 2%. Tallfags on suicidewatch
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
I have been lurking here and similar forums for years. I just never felt like interacting with a bunch of autistsCope,lurk more greycel
View attachment 862228
At some point there’s a cut off though. Most women would prefer 6’5 over 6’11Nothing surprising from a greycel.
The taller the better. You need a proportionate skull, frame and a built body if you're above 8', otherwise you're just a lanklet.
The most broscience chart ever but its still accurate in the grand scheme of things lmaoJFL AT THIS FUCKING GIGACOPE
1. WATCH WHAT WOMEN DO NOT WHAT THEY SAY
2. EVEN IF 6'5 PEOPLE WERE RULED OUT BY A FEW FUCKING FEMCELS, IT DOESN'T CHANGE THE FACT THAT THEIR HEIGHT IS A GIGAHALO AND THE WOMEN WITHIN THEIR DATING POOL ARE MUCH MORE LIKELY TO GO FOR THEM THAN FOR THE 6'0 GUY
3. IT'S OVER ONCE YOU READ THIS GRAPH
View attachment 862175
6'6 CHAD DOESN'T EVEN NEED AN INCOME TO BE ON PAR WITH A 5'11.5 MANLET WHO MAKES $62,500 A YEAR
This. You can never be too tall when it comes to women, you just need to be proportionate. It’s just easier to have good ratios and proportions at 6’0 than at 6’4as long as frame and skull are proportionate, the skys the limit with height
6'0 sounds like a cool height tho, like the number alone