
eternalcoper
Platinum
- Joined
- Mar 20, 2025
- Posts
- 1,110
- Reputation
- 1,834
People throw around "10/10" like it’s reserved for 8 PSL looks, but let’s be real, no human even reaches that. Most of the top-tier models, actors, and genetically elite people in history barely scratch 7.5 PSL, if that.
So if the most beautiful humans ever recorded fall into the 7-7.5 PSL range, why are we calling that anything less than a 10/10?
You reach maximum human appeal at 7+ PSL since realistically the most beautiful humans are in that level and will never surpass it. Beyond that is pure fantasy or AI-generated faces. Even if someone somehow hits 8 PSL, they won’t be universally attractive to 100% of people. There's a limit to what actual humans can be.
I know this sounds low iq at first glance but it makes sense if you think about it. The 10/10 label should be based on reality, not some unreachable nonexistent level.
TLDR:
So if the most beautiful humans ever recorded fall into the 7-7.5 PSL range, why are we calling that anything less than a 10/10?
You reach maximum human appeal at 7+ PSL since realistically the most beautiful humans are in that level and will never surpass it. Beyond that is pure fantasy or AI-generated faces. Even if someone somehow hits 8 PSL, they won’t be universally attractive to 100% of people. There's a limit to what actual humans can be.
I know this sounds low iq at first glance but it makes sense if you think about it. The 10/10 label should be based on reality, not some unreachable nonexistent level.
TLDR:
- No one hits 8 PSL irl
- 7-7.5 PSL = the real 10/10
- “10/10” shouldn’t mean "unreachable perfection"
- we’re just coping if we act like actual human beauty can go higher than what the top 0.001% already look like.