A big part of this forum (and generation) is gay (or abused dogs)

[irrumator praetor]

And then I see this video:


Surely another big part of society is this abused dog class as well.

So we have the abused dogs, and among new gens we have outright homos. How can you seriously be rating male models etc?

I think, male-to-male, you shouldn't rate anyone on a scale in order to avoid being gay. If you seriously start rating people IRL instinctively YOU BECOME A WOMAN. in a split second you'll say "damn that nigga mogs" which translates to "damn that nigga is attractive (to women)" and as soon as the thought comes in, NIGGA YOU'RE GAY. THE SECOND YOU SAY A MAN IS ATTRACTIVE (TO WOMEN) YOU'RE GAY. YOU HAVEE, HAAAAAVEEE THE FEMALE GAZE NOW! STOP FUCKING RATING PEOPLE YOU FAGGOTS.

If you wanna be rated, compare yourself to a CHART (made by either women or faggots) that's IT. MALE TO MALE RATINGS ARE GAY. Nothing wrong with being rated by faggots, but lets call it what it is. The person that rates, for a moment, assumes the position of a female or a faggot, in their brain.

Let me establish some ground rules here:
1) If you treat another MAN differently because of his looks only after the blackpill, because hes "attractive" YOU'RE GAY

if you even behave in any way while having the thought of him being attractive in the back of your mind, lingering because of the BP, YOU'RE GAY

Saying a dude is attractive to his face or otherwise is GAY

2) Male to male comparison, competition should be in strength, capability, intelligence, success, money, masculinity. Can we go back to the redpiller days when niggas were just flexing lambos and roided physiques and shit? Everything is super gay now

3) You gotta admit, and I talked about this in my previous threads, since looksmaxing is basically about men becoming like women, some methods of becoming more attractive to women are kinda feminine (makeup, skincare, longer hair...).

So if we combine all these factors together we get a very faggot situation: men with makeup, glowy skin, long hair calling other men attractive left and right, viewing other men through the female gaze/lens, treating other men how females would treat them (because of the BP telling them so in their subconscious/back of the head), not how actual males would interact/treat each other. You're a female, or a faggot, in everything EXCEPT attraction to men. What says you won't become one?

Going back to the abused dogs. Now that so much of the newer generations are either abused dogs or newgen looksmax tiktok crypto homos, idk. I guess I just wanna say we're cooked

This is a vent post anyway lol but I can't formulate these thoughts anyhow.

https://looksmax.org/threads/lookism-is-a-female-status-game.1901205/

 

[magneso]

And then I see this video:


Surely another big part of society is this abused dog class as well.

So we have the abused dogs, and among new gens we have outright homos. How can you seriously be rating male models etc?

I think, male-to-male, you shouldn't rate anyone on a scale in order to avoid being gay. If you seriously start rating people IRL instinctively YOU BECOME A WOMAN. in a split second you'll say "damn that nigga mogs" which translates to "damn that nigga is attractive (to women)" and as soon as the thought comes in, NIGGA YOU'RE GAY. THE SECOND YOU SAY A MAN IS ATTRACTIVE (TO WOMEN) YOU'RE GAY. YOU HAVEE, HAAAAAVEEE THE FEMALE GAZE NOW! STOP FUCKING RATING PEOPLE YOU FAGGOTS.

If you wanna be rated, compare yourself to a CHART (made by either women or faggots) that's IT. MALE TO MALE RATINGS ARE GAY. Nothing wrong with being rated by faggots, but lets call it what it is. The person that rates, for a moment, assumes the position of a female or a faggot, in their brain.

Let me establish some ground rules here:
1) If you treat another MAN differently because of his looks only after the blackpill, because hes "attractive" YOU'RE GAY

if you even behave in any way while having the thought of him being attractive in the back of your mind, lingering because of the BP, YOU'RE GAY

Saying a dude is attractive to his face or otherwise is GAY

2) Male to male comparison, competition should be in strength, capability, intelligence, success, money, masculinity. Can we go back to the redpiller days when niggas were just flexing lambos and roided physiques and shit? Everything is super gay now

3) You gotta admit, and I talked about this in my previous threads, since looksmaxing is basically about men becoming like women, some methods of becoming more attractive to women are kinda feminine (makeup, skincare, longer hair...).

So if we combine all these factors together we get a very faggot situation: men with makeup, glowy skin, long hair calling other men attractive left and right, viewing other men through the female gaze/lens, treating other men how females would treat them (because of the BP telling them so in their subconscious/back of the head), not how actual males would interact/treat each other. You're a female, or a faggot, in everything EXCEPT attraction to men. What says you won't become one?

Going back to the abused dogs. Now that so much of the newer generations are either abused dogs or newgen looksmax tiktok crypto homos, idk. I guess I just wanna say we're cooked

This is a vent post anyway lol but I can't formulate these thoughts anyhow.

Or youre just honest to yourself

 

[Firstname.Lastname]

And then I see this video:


Surely another big part of society is this abused dog class as well.

So we have the abused dogs, and among new gens we have outright homos. How can you seriously be rating male models etc?

I think, male-to-male, you shouldn't rate anyone on a scale in order to avoid being gay. If you seriously start rating people IRL instinctively YOU BECOME A WOMAN. in a split second you'll say "damn that nigga mogs" which translates to "damn that nigga is attractive (to women)" and as soon as the thought comes in, NIGGA YOU'RE GAY. THE SECOND YOU SAY A MAN IS ATTRACTIVE (TO WOMEN) YOU'RE GAY. YOU HAVEE, HAAAAAVEEE THE FEMALE GAZE NOW! STOP FUCKING RATING PEOPLE YOU FAGGOTS.

If you wanna be rated, compare yourself to a CHART (made by either women or faggots) that's IT. MALE TO MALE RATINGS ARE GAY. Nothing wrong with being rated by faggots, but lets call it what it is. The person that rates, for a moment, assumes the position of a female or a faggot, in their brain.

Let me establish some ground rules here:
1) If you treat another MAN differently because of his looks only after the blackpill, because hes "attractive" YOU'RE GAY

if you even behave in any way while having the thought of him being attractive in the back of your mind, lingering because of the BP, YOU'RE GAY

Saying a dude is attractive to his face or otherwise is GAY

2) Male to male comparison, competition should be in strength, capability, intelligence, success, money, masculinity. Can we go back to the redpiller days when niggas were just flexing lambos and roided physiques and shit? Everything is super gay now

3) You gotta admit, and I talked about this in my previous threads, since looksmaxing is basically about men becoming like women, some methods of becoming more attractive to women are kinda feminine (makeup, skincare, longer hair...).

So if we combine all these factors together we get a very faggot situation: men with makeup, glowy skin, long hair calling other men attractive left and right, viewing other men through the female gaze/lens, treating other men how females would treat them (because of the BP telling them so in their subconscious/back of the head), not how actual males would interact/treat each other. You're a female, or a faggot, in everything EXCEPT attraction to men. What says you won't become one?

Going back to the abused dogs. Now that so much of the newer generations are either abused dogs or newgen looksmax tiktok crypto homos, idk. I guess I just wanna say we're cooked

This is a vent post anyway lol but I can't formulate these thoughts anyhow.

DNR

 

[irrumator praetor]

Or youre just honest to yourself

the classic projection argument when talking about modern issues

 

[magneso]

the classic projection argument when talking about modern issues

Well i dont think damn that nigga mogs i know i mog every1 but if i go to sleep tomorrow i can goon tonight

 

[A_H0T_Wombat]

Been saying this for the past 10 years, majority of men are cock sucking chad worshipping fags

 

[DrMd]

just be DrMd
brooootal

 

[dictator]

MALE TO MALE RATINGS ARE GAY.

not gay we’re secure with our sexuality

 

[irrumator praetor]

not gay we’re secure with our sexuality

You're a female, or a faggot, in everything EXCEPT attraction to men. What says you won't become one?

 

[Bars]

Dnr

 

[kwk3998]

I think, male-to-male, you shouldn't rate anyone on a scale in order to avoid being gay. If you seriously start rating people IRL instinctively YOU BECOME A WOMAN. in a split second you'll say "damn that nigga mogs" which translates to "damn that nigga is attractive (to women)" and as soon as the thought comes in, NIGGA YOU'RE GAY.

Except beauty is objective and it’s very easy to tell if someone is GL or not

 

[brotato78]

this is why im becoming a dark triad (through blasting tren) , its what makes foids truely cream (even if they pretend it doesnt) not some cuck who will shill out money to look at her toilet

 

[Daddy's Home]

Porn was a mistake..

It convinces your brain that other men fucking women right in front of your eyes is normal, and it normalizes the idea that if you don’t get to do it, it’s just as normal, because they will always be other mmen how will do it in your place anyway.. so you have way less motivation to go out and try to hook up with someone compared to if you’d never seen porn..

The brutal “there will always be someone else to fuck your wife that you didn’t get to have in your place” theory

 

[irrumator praetor]

Except beauty is objective and it’s very easy to tell if someone is GL or not

Beauty's objective but this never contradicted the fact that 1) men use a different system of values as opposed to women (these are nowadays called cope but tbf these male values have real life effect outside of attracting foids so) and 2) calling another dude attractive (to women, viewing him as a woman) is gay. Like, there's some obvious and definable faggot behavior on this forum.

BP going mainstream simply made a lot of straight dudes inhabit the headspace of women. Its just gay bro. I clicked on a simon nessman discussion post half an hour ago and it disgusted me

women are the ones who discuss the attractiveness of a famous male figure, not other straight men

women are the only ones who candidly value people with the female value system, which is based on looks (attractiveness to females).

Men size other men up in a straight way, male value system used to include all the other shit I mentioned above and in my dedicated thread about how lookism is a female status game

If a bunch of gen z men start rating other men like women (because of the BP and tiktok) they are mentally gay

if you forego all other values men used to assign traditional importance to, you mentally become a woman. Like how saying the ability to fight is cope, putting looks over money is literally gay too. Skills, virtue, intelligence etc. basically everything we as men traditionally used to value in other men is today said to be cope. But calling that shit cope is literally gay...

 

[irrumator praetor]

Porn was a mistake..

It convinces your brain that other men fucking women right in front of your eyes is normal, and it normalizes the idea that if you don’t get to do it, it’s just as normal, because they will always be other mmen how will do it in your place anyway.. so you have way less motivation to go out and try to hook up with someone compared to if you’d never seen porn..

The brutal “there will always be someone else to fuck your wife that you didn’t get to have in your place” theory

this def helps in creating the abused dog types too

 

[irrumator praetor]

Beauty's objective but this never contradicted the fact that 1) men use a different system of values as opposed to women (these are nowadays called cope but tbf these male values have real life effect outside of attracting foids so) and 2) calling another dude attractive (to women, viewing him as a woman) is gay. Like, there's some obvious and definable faggot behavior on this forum.

BP going mainstream simply made a lot of straight dudes inhabit the headspace of women. Its just gay bro. I clicked on a simon nessman discussion post half an hour ago and it disgusted me

women are the ones who discuss the attractiveness of a famous male figure, not other straight men

women are the only ones who candidly value people with the female value system, which is based on looks (attractiveness to females).

Men size other men up in a straight way, male value system used to include all the other shit I mentioned above and in my dedicated thread about how lookism is a female status game

If a bunch of gen z men start rating other men like women (because of the BP and tiktok) they are mentally gay

if you forego all other values men used to assign traditional importance to, you mentally become a woman. Like how saying the ability to fight is cope, putting looks over money is literally gay too. Skills, virtue, intelligence etc. basically everything we as men traditionally used to value in other men is today said to be cope. But calling that shit cope is literally gay...

So now I guess I'd like to postulate: understanding lookism (female attraction) is important, as it helps understand the female perspective and how it influences women and men. As it pertains to other men, how attractive you are to women only matters little as a standalone value, only merit being that if you attract more women, it might potentially be a sign you're at least somewhat competent (in the male perspective).

Surface level lookism (the impression you give off of) would be separate from understanding female attraction, and its just obvious stuff. Like, looking the part, dressing the part, looking well put together (bluepill lookism). This would have more importance when interacting with either men or women. Looking "normal" is more societally important

Thats as far as lookism should go for the average user of this forum that isn't a FAGGOT.
Saying you mog another man is equally as gay as saying some other man mogs you.

As it pertains to the dynamics between other men, lookism shouldn't play a role bigger than the bluepill level (as I shittly defined it). If it does, YOU'RE GAY.

Male values should be predominant in male interactions. That means, FORGET all the looksmaxing shit, blackpill shit, tiktok shit, rating shit. If you don't you're gay

This is exactly what leads to groups of men on org obsessing over other male models lmfao like women over justin bieber

tldr not taking into account another mans looks while interacting with him (whether hes more or less hot to women) ie. applying bluepill or redpill in male to male interactions is the straightest thing you can do. Not doing so is the gayest, thinking another man is more or less attractive to women is gay, etc

 

[kisslessvirgin]

too much chad worship

 

[TrueRamirez]

And then I see this video:


Surely another big part of society is this abused dog class as well.

So we have the abused dogs, and among new gens we have outright homos. How can you seriously be rating male models etc?

I think, male-to-male, you shouldn't rate anyone on a scale in order to avoid being gay. If you seriously start rating people IRL instinctively YOU BECOME A WOMAN. in a split second you'll say "damn that nigga mogs" which translates to "damn that nigga is attractive (to women)" and as soon as the thought comes in, NIGGA YOU'RE GAY. THE SECOND YOU SAY A MAN IS ATTRACTIVE (TO WOMEN) YOU'RE GAY. YOU HAVEE, HAAAAAVEEE THE FEMALE GAZE NOW! STOP FUCKING RATING PEOPLE YOU FAGGOTS.

If you wanna be rated, compare yourself to a CHART (made by either women or faggots) that's IT. MALE TO MALE RATINGS ARE GAY. Nothing wrong with being rated by faggots, but lets call it what it is. The person that rates, for a moment, assumes the position of a female or a faggot, in their brain.

Let me establish some ground rules here:
1) If you treat another MAN differently because of his looks only after the blackpill, because hes "attractive" YOU'RE GAY

if you even behave in any way while having the thought of him being attractive in the back of your mind, lingering because of the BP, YOU'RE GAY

Saying a dude is attractive to his face or otherwise is GAY

2) Male to male comparison, competition should be in strength, capability, intelligence, success, money, masculinity. Can we go back to the redpiller days when niggas were just flexing lambos and roided physiques and shit? Everything is super gay now

3) You gotta admit, and I talked about this in my previous threads, since looksmaxing is basically about men becoming like women, some methods of becoming more attractive to women are kinda feminine (makeup, skincare, longer hair...).

So if we combine all these factors together we get a very faggot situation: men with makeup, glowy skin, long hair calling other men attractive left and right, viewing other men through the female gaze/lens, treating other men how females would treat them (because of the BP telling them so in their subconscious/back of the head), not how actual males would interact/treat each other. You're a female, or a faggot, in everything EXCEPT attraction to men. What says you won't become one?

Going back to the abused dogs. Now that so much of the newer generations are either abused dogs or newgen looksmax tiktok crypto homos, idk. I guess I just wanna say we're cooked

This is a vent post anyway lol but I can't formulate these thoughts anyhow.

https://looksmax.org/threads/lookism-is-a-female-status-game.1901205/

No

 

[irrumator praetor]

https://looksmax.org/threads/first-time-ive-felt-genuine-rage-about-lookism-in-years.1928967/

 

[lightswinning]

dnr @asdvek will still keep jerking off to ramirez edits instead of going outside his parents basement. Keep coping you will never be dark traid richard ramirez JFL

 

[Foreverbrad]

Let me establish some ground rules here:
1) If you treat another MAN differently because of his looks only after the blackpill, because hes "attractive" YOU'RE GAY

if you even behave in any way while having the thought of him being attractive in the back of your mind, lingering because of the BP, YOU'RE GAY

If you behave in any other way then you will be labelled non-NT for inappropriate behaviour. Glazing chads and ostracising subhumans and every level in between is expected. Fail to conform and you become outcast.

2) Male to male comparison, competition should be in strength, capability, intelligence, success, money, masculinity. Can we go back to the redpiller days when niggas were just flexing lambos and roided physiques and shit? Everything is super gay now

That’s how it is, adapt or die. These things all do still matter. Looks have always mattered too, perhaps not to the same extent as now, but lookism is certainly part of the social hierarchy to which you must conform.

 

[lnceIs]

dnr @asdvek will still keep jerking off to ramirez edits instead of going outside his parents basement. Keep coping you will never be dark traid richard ramirez JFL

*triad

 

[NoaA99]

A lot of them struggle with basic reasoning, and emotional regulation.

Words like truth, reality or cope are thrown around constantly, yet most of the people using them have never actually looked at, let alone critically evaluated, or understood the underlying data.
They tend to have little understanding of scientific bias or how evidence should be carefully interpreted.
Studies are not universal rules.
At best, they provide indicators or guidelines, and even then they must be interpreted within a broader context of evidence, not in isolation.

Sometimes it’s necessary to take a step back, reflect and distance yourself from the ego, arrogance, and megalomania that dominate the community nowadays.

It has become unbearable, and I believe it’s merely a symptom of a greater underlying pandemic- stupidity.

 

[oatmeal]

BP going mainstream simply made a lot of straight dudes inhabit the headspace of women. Its just gay bro. I clicked on a simon nessman discussion post half an hour ago and it disgusted me

tbh it will manifest (and has), just look @ the demography of lgbt growing. scary tbh

 

[oatmeal]

im a fag roon abused puppy arab slave atp. 10 years of r9k turned me into this. in the end my tragedy written by my own hand.

 

[irrumator praetor]

Glazing chads and ostracising subhumans and every level in between is expected. Fail to conform and you become outcast.

but this is exactly what would've been called gay a generation or two ago. Fucking insane. Our generation literally is mentally faggot

Looks have always mattered too, perhaps not to the same extent as now, but lookism is certainly part of the social hierarchy to which you must conform.

But us, the individuals, decide that... You can let other faggots glaze chads if they want, but you don't have to

 

[irrumator praetor]

A lot of them struggle with basic reasoning, and emotional regulation.

Words like truth, reality or cope are thrown around constantly, yet most of the people using them have never actually looked at, let alone critically evaluated, or understood the underlying data.
They tend to have little understanding of scientific bias or how evidence should be carefully interpreted.
Studies are not universal rules.
At best, they provide indicators or guidelines, and even then they must be interpreted within a broader context of evidence, not in isolation.

Sometimes it’s necessary to take a step back, reflect and distance yourself from the ego, arrogance, and megalomania that dominate the community nowadays.

It has become unbearable, and I believe it’s merely a symptom of a greater underlying pandemic- stupidity.

The greater question is, since this is an unstoppable tsunami, how will society react when all this shit happens? All the guys literally become mentally gay? Fuck will we have an anti-gay trend that reverses some of this faggot shit, thats stuck to lookism? Somehow I doubt it. Dude...

I thought about it before, in regard to soddom and gomorrah, when hypergamy creates a shit ton of faggots. They form up bands and start raping people on the street. I wanted to post about this, but refrained, not seeing it related to looksmax.org until now. Its a very long text that connects weimar germany, babylon, hypergamy, faggots and their nature, how they grow in number and what happens after. If you read the story of soddom and gomorrah, you will see a landscape of rape bands lol. Men that rape each other etc. Are we headed for this?

 

[Aspiemogger]

And then I see this video:


Surely another big part of society is this abused dog class as well.

So we have the abused dogs, and among new gens we have outright homos. How can you seriously be rating male models etc?

I think, male-to-male, you shouldn't rate anyone on a scale in order to avoid being gay. If you seriously start rating people IRL instinctively YOU BECOME A WOMAN. in a split second you'll say "damn that nigga mogs" which translates to "damn that nigga is attractive (to women)" and as soon as the thought comes in, NIGGA YOU'RE GAY. THE SECOND YOU SAY A MAN IS ATTRACTIVE (TO WOMEN) YOU'RE GAY. YOU HAVEE, HAAAAAVEEE THE FEMALE GAZE NOW! STOP FUCKING RATING PEOPLE YOU FAGGOTS.

If you wanna be rated, compare yourself to a CHART (made by either women or faggots) that's IT. MALE TO MALE RATINGS ARE GAY. Nothing wrong with being rated by faggots, but lets call it what it is. The person that rates, for a moment, assumes the position of a female or a faggot, in their brain.

Let me establish some ground rules here:
1) If you treat another MAN differently because of his looks only after the blackpill, because hes "attractive" YOU'RE GAY

if you even behave in any way while having the thought of him being attractive in the back of your mind, lingering because of the BP, YOU'RE GAY

Saying a dude is attractive to his face or otherwise is GAY

2) Male to male comparison, competition should be in strength, capability, intelligence, success, money, masculinity. Can we go back to the redpiller days when niggas were just flexing lambos and roided physiques and shit? Everything is super gay now

3) You gotta admit, and I talked about this in my previous threads, since looksmaxing is basically about men becoming like women, some methods of becoming more attractive to women are kinda feminine (makeup, skincare, longer hair...).

So if we combine all these factors together we get a very faggot situation: men with makeup, glowy skin, long hair calling other men attractive left and right, viewing other men through the female gaze/lens, treating other men how females would treat them (because of the BP telling them so in their subconscious/back of the head), not how actual males would interact/treat each other. You're a female, or a faggot, in everything EXCEPT attraction to men. What says you won't become one?

Going back to the abused dogs. Now that so much of the newer generations are either abused dogs or newgen looksmax tiktok crypto homos, idk. I guess I just wanna say we're cooked

This is a vent post anyway lol but I can't formulate these thoughts anyhow.

https://looksmax.org/threads/lookism-is-a-female-status-game.1901205/

Water bro, get in and out of bp gtfo and stop bed rotting u queer fucks

 

[Aspiemogger]

this is why im becoming a dark triad (through blasting tren) , its what makes foids truely cream (even if they pretend it doesnt) not some cuck who will shill out money to look at her toilet

View attachment 4764261

Meeks and rira pill

 

[Aspiemogger]

The greater question is, since this is an unstoppable tsunami, how will society react when all this shit happens? All the guys literally become mentally gay? Fuck will we have an anti-gay trend that reverses some of this faggot shit, thats stuck to lookism? Somehow I doubt it. Dude...

I thought about it before, in regard to soddom and gomorrah, when hypergamy creates a shit ton of faggots. They form up bands and start raping people on the street. I wanted to post about this, but refrained, not seeing it related to looksmax.org until now. Its a very long text that connects weimar germany, babylon, hypergamy, faggots and their nature, how they grow in number and what happens after. If you read the story of soddom and gomorrah, you will see a landscape of rape bands lol. Men that rape each other etc. Are we headed for this?

High iq and pray to gandy its not headed that way, all though we are most likely headed for that direction by seeing all of which has happened with exposure of the pdfile elite, they literally are poisoning us to turn us gay bro

 

[soulless_npc]

It's not gay you're just trying to compete with what women are naturally selecting for. Or rather unnaturally, since their exposure to these types of guys is mainly online, on shit like tiktok, instagram, etc. it makes it say less organic than in say the 80s or 90s but fuck it this is modern times you either keep up or get left behind.

 

[Aspiemogger]

It's not gay you're just trying to compete with what women are naturally selecting for. Or rather unnaturally, since their exposure to these types of guys is mainly online, on shit like tiktok, instagram, etc. it makes it say less organic than in say the 80s or 90s but fuck it this is modern times you either keep up or get left behind.

Good take but u dont agree men are becoming more faggot like over time especially in this generation??

 

[irrumator praetor]

It's not gay you're just trying to compete with what women are naturally selecting for. Or rather unnaturally, since their exposure to these types of guys is mainly online, on shit like tiktok, instagram, etc. it makes it say less organic than in say the 80s or 90s but fuck it this is modern times you either keep up or get left behind.

looksmaxxing itself isn't gay

applying the ideas of blackpill and lookism (viewing other men according to standards women find attractive) to other men, when interacting with other men, is gay

Applying blackpill/lookism info for interacting with women isn't gay. Doing so when interacting with men is gay. With men, bluepill or redpill mindset must be assumed. With women you can keep the blackpill in the mental background

To specify further: you shouldn't think in dynamics of the blackpill when no women are around, or in context of anyone other than a woman. If done without the context of women, so men-to-men, its gay. You're rating other men, behaving differently due to their rating, etc. thats gay

 

[soulless_npc]

Good take but u dont agree men are becoming more faggot like over time especially in this generation??

Yeah low-key lol

looksmaxxing itself isn't gay

applying the ideas of blackpill and lookism (viewing other men according to standards women find attractive) to other men, when interacting with other men, is gay

Applying blackpill/lookism info for interacting with women isn't gay. Doing so when interacting with men is gay. With men, bluepill or redpill mindset must be assumed. With women you can keep the blackpill in the mental background

To specify further: you shouldn't think in dynamics of the blackpill when no women are around, or in context of anyone other than a woman. If done without the context of women, so men-to-men, its gay. You're rating other men, behaving differently due to their rating, etc. thats gay

Yeah I see whatcha mean. You can definitely assume when dealing with a modern woman you have to see things thru a blackpill lens in order to have a basis of interaction, like where she is coming from. But with men largely you're speaking a different language altogether. If you're ugly, men might think you're stupid and treat you like shit, but it's not like the average man is going to critique your appearance in blackpill terms, and if he does it's gay.

 

[Divineincel]

And then I see this video:


Surely another big part of society is this abused dog class as well.

So we have the abused dogs, and among new gens we have outright homos. How can you seriously be rating male models etc?

I think, male-to-male, you shouldn't rate anyone on a scale in order to avoid being gay. If you seriously start rating people IRL instinctively YOU BECOME A WOMAN. in a split second you'll say "damn that nigga mogs" which translates to "damn that nigga is attractive (to women)" and as soon as the thought comes in, NIGGA YOU'RE GAY. THE SECOND YOU SAY A MAN IS ATTRACTIVE (TO WOMEN) YOU'RE GAY. YOU HAVEE, HAAAAAVEEE THE FEMALE GAZE NOW! STOP FUCKING RATING PEOPLE YOU FAGGOTS.

If you wanna be rated, compare yourself to a CHART (made by either women or faggots) that's IT. MALE TO MALE RATINGS ARE GAY. Nothing wrong with being rated by faggots, but lets call it what it is. The person that rates, for a moment, assumes the position of a female or a faggot, in their brain.

Let me establish some ground rules here:
1) If you treat another MAN differently because of his looks only after the blackpill, because hes "attractive" YOU'RE GAY

if you even behave in any way while having the thought of him being attractive in the back of your mind, lingering because of the BP, YOU'RE GAY

Saying a dude is attractive to his face or otherwise is GAY

2) Male to male comparison, competition should be in strength, capability, intelligence, success, money, masculinity. Can we go back to the redpiller days when niggas were just flexing lambos and roided physiques and shit? Everything is super gay now

3) You gotta admit, and I talked about this in my previous threads, since looksmaxing is basically about men becoming like women, some methods of becoming more attractive to women are kinda feminine (makeup, skincare, longer hair...).

So if we combine all these factors together we get a very faggot situation: men with makeup, glowy skin, long hair calling other men attractive left and right, viewing other men through the female gaze/lens, treating other men how females would treat them (because of the BP telling them so in their subconscious/back of the head), not how actual males would interact/treat each other. You're a female, or a faggot, in everything EXCEPT attraction to men. What says you won't become one?

Going back to the abused dogs. Now that so much of the newer generations are either abused dogs or newgen looksmax tiktok crypto homos, idk. I guess I just wanna say we're cooked

This is a vent post anyway lol but I can't formulate these thoughts anyhow.

https://looksmax.org/threads/lookism-is-a-female-status-game.1901205/

Male deer may engage in same sex behavior if females don’t consider them suitable mates. I think the same is happening to humans due to unrestrained hypergamy

 

[irrumator praetor]

Male deer may engage in same sex behavior if females don’t consider them suitable mates. I think the same is happening to humans due to unrestrained hypergamy

The greater question is, since this is an unstoppable tsunami, how will society react when all this shit happens? All the guys literally become mentally gay? Fuck will we have an anti-gay trend that reverses some of this faggot shit, thats stuck to lookism? Somehow I doubt it. Dude...

I thought about it before, in regard to soddom and gomorrah, when hypergamy creates a shit ton of faggots. They form up bands and start raping people on the street. I wanted to post about this, but refrained, not seeing it related to looksmax.org until now. Its a very long text that connects weimar germany, babylon, hypergamy, faggots and their nature, how they grow in number and what happens after. If you read the story of soddom and gomorrah, you will see a landscape of rape bands lol. Men that rape each other etc. Are we headed for this?

 

[Divineincel]

This is our future. In 100 years the society will collapse because let’s be honest, this degeneracy cannot work in a long run

 

[irrumator praetor]

looksmaxxing itself isn't gay

applying the ideas of blackpill and lookism (viewing other men according to standards women find attractive) to other men, when interacting with other men, is gay

Applying blackpill/lookism info for interacting with women isn't gay. Doing so when interacting with men is gay. With men, bluepill or redpill mindset must be assumed. With women you can keep the blackpill in the mental background

To specify further: you shouldn't think in dynamics of the blackpill when no women are around, or in context of anyone other than a woman. If done without the context of women, so men-to-men, its gay. You're rating other men, behaving differently due to their rating, etc. thats gay

alright so if you cannot fluently switch between bluepill/redpill and blackpill in gender context you might be perma stuck in a female headspace/mentality hence perma gay cuz of this forum and tiktok, and its over

Complexity increases... learning blackpill is gay unless you can revert to bluepill or redpill in correct context

Proof of this:
Faggots discussing male models
Rating other men
Behavior alterations (chad glazing) due to looks (female status/value system) - seen both in normies and tiktokfags, but more extreme in tiktokfags

I kept saying how tiktok is a hypnosis app designed to make you accept more radical ideas and faster.

This is mitigated via the old male value system (now often disregarded as cope):
masculinity
iq
money
virtue
skill and capability
strength

looks aren't on that list

 

[sick kunt31]

im sorry bro
but DNR

I'm here to roid

 

[sadcel]

This one is a shit thread OP + very normiepilled JFL

I think, male-to-male, you shouldn't rate anyone on a scale in order to avoid being gay. If you seriously start rating people IRL instinctively YOU BECOME A WOMAN. in a split second you'll say "damn that nigga mogs" which translates to "damn that nigga is attractive (to women)" and as soon as the thought comes in, NIGGA YOU'RE GAY. THE SECOND YOU SAY A MAN IS ATTRACTIVE (TO WOMEN) YOU'RE GAY. YOU HAVEE, HAAAAAVEEE THE FEMALE GAZE NOW! STOP FUCKING RATING PEOPLE YOU FAGGOTS.

You rate other men as a man because you are not gay and because beauty is mostly objective (with a touch of subjectivity) so rating becomes unbiaised for you, an example would be the retards here rating the foid they matched with a HTB just because she's appealing to them when she's the most average becky on earth.

Let me establish some ground rules here:
1) If you treat another MAN differently because of his looks only after the blackpill, because hes "attractive" YOU'RE GAY

if you even behave in any way while having the thought of him being attractive in the back of your mind, lingering because of the BP, YOU'RE GAY

This is halo effect, you don't control that so it's not like you clearly choose to treat attractive people differently. That's a bad take from you.

2) Male to male comparison, competition should be in strength, capability, intelligence, success, money, masculinity. Can we go back to the redpiller days when niggas were just flexing lambos and roided physiques and shit? Everything is super gay now

That's pure foid social propaganda that wants you to be a good oofy doofy to settle down with, it's deceiving from you to still think like this 6 years after joining this indian forum. Those criterias are made by woman (https://incels.is/threads/masculinity-is-an-actual-social-construct-and-more-studies.481353).

 

[NoaA99]

The greater question is, since this is an unstoppable tsunami, how will society react when all this shit happens? All the guys literally become mentally gay? Fuck will we have an anti-gay trend that reverses some of this faggot shit, thats stuck to lookism? Somehow I doubt it. Dude...

I thought about it before, in regard to soddom and gomorrah, when hypergamy creates a shit ton of faggots. They form up bands and start raping people on the street. I wanted to post about this, but refrained, not seeing it related to looksmax.org until now. Its a very long text that connects weimar germany, babylon, hypergamy, faggots and their nature, how they grow in number and what happens after. If you read the story of soddom and gomorrah, you will see a landscape of rape bands lol. Men that rape each other etc. Are we headed for this?

Tag me when finished, could be an interesting read.

And, unfortunately, it is a self-fulfilling prophecy.
If a man living in a wooden mansion only notices the dysfunctional heater, he pours gasoline onto it to fuel it again. obviously exacerbating the very problem he’s trying to fix.

We have a permanent feedback loop between the environment and our actions, in every context. Some people are unable to notice or let go of their preconceptions. They keep and keep adding fuel to the fire, trying to solve a deeper issue, but only worsen it.
Women tend to follow social hierarchies, cultural constructs, and patterns, they are naturally more adaptive in relative terms, shaped by their environment and biased accordingly.
Men, on the other hand, are proactive, seeking to shape and manipulate their surroundings.
Their beliefs create behavior, which creates a reality that confirms their original, initial beliefs.

Paradoxically today, more than ever, men behave and act symptomatically, adapting to circumstances, only to later complain that their efforts are rendered meaningless over time. It’s like a man with a hammer seeing every problem as a nail.

 

[irrumator praetor]

You rate other men as a man because you are not gay and because beauty is mostly objective (with a touch of subjectivity) so rating becomes unbiaised for you, an example would be the retards here rating the foid they matched with a HTB just because she's appealing to them when she's the most average becky on earth.

if this line of thinking produces threads where niggers discuss the attractiveness of a man, sorry its gay (its a female behavior, not a male one)

working backwards from that, we know for a fact 1) blackpill and rating mens attractiveness is LEARNED, not natural to men. As a man, you aren't supposed to view men through that "female lens" which is all the blackpill shit.

Hence if one state of thinking or point of view is inherently female, then frequently inhabiting it is gay, utilizing it frequently is gay, and in proper context, its gay unless only used to understand women. If we extend the usage of the blackpill/lookism to male-to-male interactions, it becomes a fundamentally gay behavior

Im not discussing the bias when rating females, or the objectivity of the ratings. Even if its objective, its learned, and its a learned female lens. Inhabiting it and using it like a female is therefore gay. You're learning to judge individuals and inspect male faces like a woman does. Using that normally instead of the old "bluepilled" or redpilled lens (pre-blackpill going mainstream) on other men is gay.

This is halo effect, you don't control that so it's not like you clearly choose to treat attractive people differently. That's a bad take from you.

Further down in a message I make the difference between tiers of lookism

That's pure foid social propaganda that wants you to be a good oofy doofy to settle down with, it's deceiving from you to still think like this 6 years after joining this indian forum. Those criterias are made by woman (https://incels.is/threads/masculinity-is-an-actual-social-construct-and-more-studies.481353).

The difference lies in how this information is utilized. You cannot use the lens of masculinity (lets call it that, as opposed to the female lookism lens) in context of women, only in context of other men. Again, I developed this in a message further down in the thread. The difference between different views, or systems of value, how and when they should be utilized in gender context.

 

[sadcel]

blackpill and rating mens attractiveness is LEARNED, not natural to men.

Even if its objective, its learned, and its a learned female lens. Inhabiting it and using it like a female is therefore gay. You're learning to judge individuals and inspect male faces like a woman does.

It's not learned, it's innate in humans. There is a study about how babies react to unnattractive and attractive faces (https://www.researchgate.net/public...esponses_to_Attractive_and_Unattractive_Faces) proving that even newborns can make a difference between both. Furthermore, saying it's learned could mean somebody made the rules and criterias, which makes beauty entirely unobjective.
But I could agree with you on the fact that it's gay to think some model is "adamlite" or 8 PSL or whatever because at this point it becomes just model worshipping.

 

[Tenres]

this is why im becoming a dark triad (through blasting tren) , its what makes foids truely cream (even if they pretend it doesnt) not some cuck who will shill out money to look at her toilet

View attachment 4764261

Your a geek lil bro

 

[Tenres]

Is an interesting idea, you do acquire the female gaze in some way and it tends toward Chad worship, which is a characteristically female trait. While I doubt you could 'learn' to be gay, you definitely get gayer behaviorally.

Also in regards to the arg with @sadcel it's obviously unlearned to tell if someone is attractive but the method / scale is learned, and you're putting special emphasis on it.

 

[luuk]

And then I see this video:


Surely another big part of society is this abused dog class as well.

So we have the abused dogs, and among new gens we have outright homos. How can you seriously be rating male models etc?

I think, male-to-male, you shouldn't rate anyone on a scale in order to avoid being gay. If you seriously start rating people IRL instinctively YOU BECOME A WOMAN. in a split second you'll say "damn that nigga mogs" which translates to "damn that nigga is attractive (to women)" and as soon as the thought comes in, NIGGA YOU'RE GAY. THE SECOND YOU SAY A MAN IS ATTRACTIVE (TO WOMEN) YOU'RE GAY. YOU HAVEE, HAAAAAVEEE THE FEMALE GAZE NOW! STOP FUCKING RATING PEOPLE YOU FAGGOTS.

If you wanna be rated, compare yourself to a CHART (made by either women or faggots) that's IT. MALE TO MALE RATINGS ARE GAY. Nothing wrong with being rated by faggots, but lets call it what it is. The person that rates, for a moment, assumes the position of a female or a faggot, in their brain.

Let me establish some ground rules here:
1) If you treat another MAN differently because of his looks only after the blackpill, because hes "attractive" YOU'RE GAY

if you even behave in any way while having the thought of him being attractive in the back of your mind, lingering because of the BP, YOU'RE GAY

Saying a dude is attractive to his face or otherwise is GAY

2) Male to male comparison, competition should be in strength, capability, intelligence, success, money, masculinity. Can we go back to the redpiller days when niggas were just flexing lambos and roided physiques and shit? Everything is super gay now

3) You gotta admit, and I talked about this in my previous threads, since looksmaxing is basically about men becoming like women, some methods of becoming more attractive to women are kinda feminine (makeup, skincare, longer hair...).

So if we combine all these factors together we get a very faggot situation: men with makeup, glowy skin, long hair calling other men attractive left and right, viewing other men through the female gaze/lens, treating other men how females would treat them (because of the BP telling them so in their subconscious/back of the head), not how actual males would interact/treat each other. You're a female, or a faggot, in everything EXCEPT attraction to men. What says you won't become one?

Going back to the abused dogs. Now that so much of the newer generations are either abused dogs or newgen looksmax tiktok crypto homos, idk. I guess I just wanna say we're cooked

This is a vent post anyway lol but I can't formulate these thoughts anyhow.

https://looksmax.org/threads/lookism-is-a-female-status-game.1901205/

dnrd when you started with the gay stuff
“avoid being gay” jfl

That just isn’t how sexuality works and you’re no better than those redpill retards when you start ascribing unrelated traits to sexual persuasion and describing bullshit” slippery slopes” & pining on about what a man should be

 

[blonde slayer]

Hard disagree.
Gay or not is very black and white, you are either SEXUALLY ATTRACTED to men or or you ARE NOT.

I can objectively rate my mother, some granny on the street and some girls from 5th grade, that doesn't mean I am attracted to them like tf?

Sexual perversion is a very easy route nowadays with the amounts of porn. If someone is gay but doesn't know it he would quickly turn gay and know it because he would take a peek at the gay porn category or smth.

Also "only using bluepill/redpill mindsets with other men" implies you will never have genuine friends. Because blackpill is the truth and anyone not accepting the truth is brainwashed.

Making men friends who are on the same level of attractiveness also makes a lot of sense, since you likely share more experiences with them than with chads or subhumans.

Just like manlets chill with manlets, autists chill with autists and emos chill with emos.

In my friend group at school it's basically an unwritten rule to be at least mmtn and there has been a pattern where guys below that looks level don't remain in the group for long, even though no one thinks about it directly

 

[sadcel]

Is an interesting idea, you do acquire the female gaze in some way and it tends toward Chad worship, which is a characteristically female trait. While I doubt you could 'learn' to be gay, you definitely get gayer behaviorally.

Also in regards to the arg with @sadcel it's obviously unlearned to tell if someone is attractive but the method / scale is learned, and you're putting special emphasis on it.

I think if a study would be made on it (rating people face by normies) everyone would get a roughly correct rating like if you are a 5/10 , you ratings would go from 4/10 to 6/10 ( some would see you as a below average looking while some others would see you as above average looking). This would prove it's innate and not learnt.

 

[stonecold trucel]

fax

 

[Tenres]

I think if a study would be made on it (rating people face by normies) everyone would get a roughly correct rating like if you are a 5/10 , you ratings would go from 4/10 to 6/10 ( some would see you as a below average looking while some others would see you as above average looking). This would prove it's innate and not learnt.

Yeah but it's more about the attentive to traits and calling good looking men chads and worshiping them. I'm guilty of this too