A refutation of genetic hyper-determinism

[EuphoricAsianNormie]

White nationalists genetic hyper-determinism is simply incorrect. Japanese people have invented a lot more technology and made much more contribution to science than Uyghurs despite Japs being full Asians, even Japanese with pseudo-caucasoid Jomon phenotypes are still full Asians.

Uyghurs and Kazakh-Kyrgyz are not only more genetically related to Europeans and share more phenotypical similarities to Europeans than the average Han Chinese, they are also geographically closer to Europe, but however the average coastal Chinese is more culturally westernized than the average Uyghur or Central Asian.

In a world based on continental empires, nations with longer coastlines or are islands are better preserve their culture and avoid cultural dilution. However Western European Empires, based on maritime expansion altered the pervious dynamic.

This is why Japan and South Korea are more culturally westernized than China due to their longer coastlines relative to geographic landmass. Southern China is more culturally westernized than northern China due to their longer coastline relative to landmass. However Northern Chinese have somewhat more Scythian-Tocharian ancestry compared to southern Chinese and overall has more robust and dimorphic bone structures.

Southern India is more culturally westernized than northern India despite northern Indians have more genetic and phenotypical similarities with Europeans.

 

[Quetila]

Jomon Caucasoid phenotypes

jfl Jomon are still East Eurasian (Mongoloid) a developed frontal bone doesn’t make you West Eurasian

 

[Tenres]

NEA are intelligent obviously.

Central Asians only overlap with Europeans in WSH, populations with higher WSH (NE Europeans) don't seem to be more intelligent than Europeans (NE and E Europeans) without so it isn't likely that WSH genetics are what contributes to a higher IQ.

This is all guesswork though.

 

[Bars]

Cuz they are isolated duh