A woman will NOT submit to a man that is less successful than her... (Regardless of being good looking)

[Deleted member 6908]

It is very rare that a woman will submit to a man who is less successful than her. In-fact it's not seen. Ever.

This is why the only times successful women enter successful relationships is when they are able to land with a guy who is more successful than them. She won't have your respect otherwise.

Think about it. A couple where the woman is more intelligent than the man is at a long-term stability disadvantage, because the man needs to exert authority over her to ensure her inner emotional chaos doesn't sabotage them and dumber men are unable to achieve this without being abusive.

So let's say you aren't violent or abusive, but you're dumber than her or at least this is what she believes. What then? She will end up managing things because she believes she will be able to see things you cannot. Naturally putting her above you, eroding your dignity and making her feel stressed out and unfeminine. Doesn't work.

It comes with the territory. You always have to be better than her at pretty much everything. Women who gloat about having a high IQ may as well also gloat about being 6'2 and only dating taller men, or earning 7 figures and only dating richer men. Outlier women have terrifically small viable mating pools.

To state this in clearer terms. As a man gets richer, older, higher status, smarter, taller etc his viable mating pool expands. But NOW as a woman gets richer, older, higher status, smarter, taller etc - her viable mating pool shrinks. Quite frankly women are penalised for "being too good" and it's not bloody society or us men penalising them, as a lot of these liberal feminists stupidly assume. But human psychology itself.

A woman always wants a man better than she is and a man never wants to feel beneath his woman. So if you are an extremely gifted woman, who is left for you? Barely anyone.

If she didn't want a man better than her and could suppress her ego to follow a man of inferior competence and ability to her, she could be happy. But can she do this without being miserable? Big LOL. More chance of peace in Syria. No. She will find him too easy to disrespect and over-time grow to resent him. She will come to the realisation she settled for a man who was never good enough for her to begin with, but rather than blame herself for exercising poor judgement or being desperate enough to choose him, she will blame him. Women hate settling.

If you disagree, instead of shouting inane remarks, explain why and be clear...

 

[Deleted member 8576]

 

[Deleted member 6380]

View attachment 866729

Interesting

 

[Deleted member 6380]

It is very rare that a woman will submit to a man who is less successful than her. In-fact it's not seen. Ever.

This is why the only times successful women enter successful relationships is when they are able to land with a guy who is more successful than them. She won't have your respect otherwise.

Think about it. A couple where the woman is more intelligent than the man is at a long-term stability disadvantage, because the man needs to exert authority over her to ensure her inner emotional chaos doesn't sabotage them and dumber men are unable to achieve this without being abusive.

So let's say you aren't violent or abusive, but you're dumber than her or at least this is what she believes. What then? She will end up managing things because she believes she will be able to see things you cannot. Naturally putting her above you, eroding your dignity and making her feel stressed out and unfeminine. Doesn't work.

It comes with the territory. You always have to be better than her at pretty much everything. Women who gloat about having a high IQ may as well also gloat about being 6'2 and only dating taller men, or earning 7 figures and only dating richer men. Outlier women have terrifically small viable mating pools.

To state this in clearer terms. As a man gets richer, older, higher status, smarter, taller etc his viable mating pool expands. But NOW as a woman gets richer, older, higher status, smarter, taller etc - her viable mating pool shrinks. Quite frankly women are penalised for "being too good" and it's not bloody society or us men penalising them, as a lot of these liberal feminists stupidly assume. But human psychology itself.

A woman always wants a man better than she is and a man never wants to feel beneath his woman. So if you are an extremely gifted woman, who is left for you? Barely anyone.

If she didn't want a man better than her and could suppress her ego to follow a man of inferior competence and ability to her, she could be happy. But can she do this without being miserable? Big LOL. More chance of peace in Syria. No. She will find him too easy to disrespect and over-time grow to resent him. She will come to the realisation she settled for a man who was never good enough for her to begin with, but rather than blame herself for exercising poor judgement or being desperate enough to choose him, she will blame him. Women hate settling.

If you disagree, instead of shouting inane remarks, explain why and be clear...

Drop the older part and you're right. Also women don't like men they can't manipulate. Atleast the bad ones.

 

[Deleted member 5891]

Everything matters theory

 

[CrazyFitLover]

Whole thread is based on your misconception " It is very rare that a woman will submit to a man who is less successful than her. In-fact it's not seen. Ever. " have not you heard about jeremy meeks? homeless chads,
What do yo mean in succes? :d to me succes i winning genetic lottery.

 

[Deleted member 6908]

Drop the older part and you're right. Also women don't like men they can't manipulate. Atleast the bad ones.

Which older ones?

And yes you are right. That's why being high machiavellian is important. You need to have the ability as a man to be manipulative af to see when a woman is trying to manipulative you.

 

[Deleted member 6380]

Which older ones?

And yes you are right. That's why being high machiavellian is important. You need to have the ability as a man to be manipulative af to see when a woman is trying to manipulative you.

Ehh, not really. All you need is to be even slightly aware of it. Everyone is born with that. As long as you're not dumb.

 

[Deleted member 6908]

Ehh, not really. All you need is to be even slightly aware of it. Everyone is born with that. As long as you're not dumb.

Women are instinctively manipulative and play games. No point hating them for it, because it's simply a part of who they are and how they protect themselves. Your job is to beat her at that game for the greater good. If you cannot, you won't be able to lead her. Simple as that.

 

[Deleted member 6380]

Women are instinctively manipulative and play games. No point hating them for it, because it's simply a part of who they are and how they protect themselves. Your job is to beat her at that game for the greater good. If you cannot, you won't be able to lead her. Simple as that.

I mean, that's true. Women will even be less attracted to you when and if you get pussy-whipped (quickly at least. But you're ignoring the amount of things you can get away with, with good looks. Even being non-nt.

 

[MentalistKebab]

Dn rd. There is a reason this thread is in OffTopic

 

[Deleted member 6908]

Dn rd. There is a reason this thread is in OffTopic

Yeah because I clicked on the Off-Topic section and hit 'post thread'.

Utter spastic. Don't care that you 'dn read'. Your personality is a meme.

 

[Deleted member 10679]

Which older ones?

And yes you are right. That's why being high machiavellian is important. You need to have the ability as a man to be manipulative af to see when a woman is trying to manipulative you.

Are you? Could be useful guide to point out the more obvious forms of manipulation women use

 

[Deleted member 6908]

Are you? Could be useful guide to point out the more obvious forms of manipulation women use

Well be mindful of distrustful manipulative women who aren't true submissives at heart, but pretend they are because you're very masculine. They make you feel like you're the man, but subtly direct your actions and thinkings with their charm.

Also women can find your aggression arousing (I've had this before) and so will sometimes try to manufacture situations that purposely elicit it. They can be very manipulative and it isn't beneath them to play with your emotions.

 

[owlofathena]

It is very rare that a woman will submit to a man who is less successful than her. In-fact it's not seen. Ever.

This is why the only times successful women enter successful relationships is when they are able to land with a guy who is more successful than them. She won't have your respect otherwise.

Think about it. A couple where the woman is more intelligent than the man is at a long-term stability disadvantage, because the man needs to exert authority over her to ensure her inner emotional chaos doesn't sabotage them and dumber men are unable to achieve this without being abusive.

So let's say you aren't violent or abusive, but you're dumber than her or at least this is what she believes. What then? She will end up managing things because she believes she will be able to see things you cannot. Naturally putting her above you, eroding your dignity and making her feel stressed out and unfeminine. Doesn't work.

It comes with the territory. You always have to be better than her at pretty much everything. Women who gloat about having a high IQ may as well also gloat about being 6'2 and only dating taller men, or earning 7 figures and only dating richer men. Outlier women have terrifically small viable mating pools.

To state this in clearer terms. As a man gets richer, older, higher status, smarter, taller etc his viable mating pool expands. But NOW as a woman gets richer, older, higher status, smarter, taller etc - her viable mating pool shrinks. Quite frankly women are penalised for "being too good" and it's not bloody society or us men penalising them, as a lot of these liberal feminists stupidly assume. But human psychology itself.

A woman always wants a man better than she is and a man never wants to feel beneath his woman. So if you are an extremely gifted woman, who is left for you? Barely anyone.

If she didn't want a man better than her and could suppress her ego to follow a man of inferior competence and ability to her, she could be happy. But can she do this without being miserable? Big LOL. More chance of peace in Syria. No. She will find him too easy to disrespect and over-time grow to resent him. She will come to the realisation she settled for a man who was never good enough for her to begin with, but rather than blame herself for exercising poor judgement or being desperate enough to choose him, she will blame him. Women hate settling.

If you disagree, instead of shouting inane remarks, explain why and be clear...

The party does start for men in a lot of ways at age 30 to 40 should be prime SMV for most men

 

[owlofathena]

Whole thread is based on your misconception " It is very rare that a woman will submit to a man who is less successful than her. In-fact it's not seen. Ever. " have not you heard about jeremy meeks? homeless chads,
What do yo mean in succes? :d to me succes i winning genetic lottery.

OP is right but no high class good looking women would ever chose Meeks for LTR

 

[MentalistKebab]

Yeah because I clicked on the Off-Topic section and hit 'post thread'.

Utter spastic. Don't care that you 'dn read'. Your personality is a meme.

Nigga anyone publishing his ideas at OffTopic is either a giant conspiracy retard, or just one step away from saying "No I wass just memeing did you take it srs " and totally not engaging in a conversation.

This place is for reaction maxxing but you cant even do that correctly.

 

[CrazyFitLover]

OP is right but no high class good looking women would ever chose Meeks for LTR

Never underestimate the power of emotions.

 

[Deleted member 6403]

Semi legit

Women are always emotional tho so they are very easy to manipulate if u know what ur doing

 

[owlofathena]

Never underestimate the power of emotions.

ONS only

 

[Cali Yuga]

this is why women dont leave/are attracted to physically abusive men

its the most primal form of dominance that every man has over every woman (other than giga manlets vs giant women or w/e)

 

[Effortless]

this is why women dont leave/are attracted to physically abusive men

its the most primal form of dominance that every man has over every woman (other than giga manlets vs giant women or w/e)

Though I agree, emotional abuse can be much worse than physical abuse if you know what you're doing, legit make them feel worthless to the very core

 

[Deleted member 6908]

this is why women dont leave/are attracted to physically abusive men

its the most primal form of dominance that every man has over every woma

Very good point.

 

[Effortless]

Very good point.

Tbf though Brad Pitt cucked Mike Tyson who was physically abusive to his wife

 

[datboijj]

Big cope there are tons of chads who have Becky's beta bux them

 

[Deleted member 6380]

Yeah because I clicked on the Off-Topic section and hit 'post thread'.

Utter spastic. Don't care that you 'dn read'. Your personality is a meme.

Dn

 

[Deleted member 6908]

You see?

This woman's a business owner that's earning a decent sum of money from what she's built and what now? Well she wants a man that earns a '6 figure sum'. This was her exactly very words. The guy says exactly what I just did; "men don't care about how much you earn and how successful you are".

 

[whiteissuperior]

Water

 

[Deleted member 6908]

Water

Actually it's not water, as many cucks on here didn't believe this to be the case at all. Stop typing what's trendy and fashionable on the forum right now in order to get dopamine hits from some reacts you absolute sad bastard geek. Thanks.

 

[randomuser2407]

No, women will try to take control no matter who you are, what you look like or how much money you make. It is in their nature. They meet a man, then they try to get him to commit to her by using many strategies, then when he finally commits, they try to take control of the decision making not just for when they are together but she tries to control him too.

Women use famous tools like nagging and shaming to make you into the man that they want you to be and to assert dominance over you, if you let them do it and you fall victim to their tricks, little by little they start to lose respect for you because they know that a man who is too weak to stand up to a woman is not really a man, and a man who can be manipulated easily through the use of shit tests would not be able to protect them in a dangerous situation.


And as they start losing respect for you more and more, they will either stop loving you and end up breaking up with you or cheating on you or they will be happy to be in control and just rule over the relationship for the rest of your life. Most men are in that situation, my father is a good example of that, my mother started dominating him while I was growing up, at first he was in control but now he knows that he has no control over anything, although they make decisions as a team, she has the final say even though he makes like 3 times her salary


There is a way to prevent this though, as long as you have self respect and limits to what you will and will not tolerate and as long as you are able to communicate this clearly to the other person, you will never become a submissive man because you will never give up your rights because women won't be able to manipulate you or to try to take control over your life. To do this, you must call women out on their nagging and their shaming and debate with them based on emotions, not logic, since they often talk based on how they feel, not what is logical.

 

[Deleted member 6908]

No, women will try to take control no matter who you are, what you look like or how much money you make. It is in their nature. They meet a man, then they try to get him to commit to her by using many strategies, then when he finally commits, they try to take control of the decision making not just for when they are together but she tries to control him too.

Women use famous tools like nagging and shaming to make you into the man that they want you to be and to assert dominance over you, if you let them do it and you fall victim to their tricks, little by little they start to lose respect for you because they know that a man who is too weak to stand up to a woman is not really a man, and a man who can be manipulated easily through the use of shit tests would not be able to protect them in a dangerous situation.


And as they start losing respect for you more and more, they will either stop loving you and end up breaking up with you or cheating on you or they will be happy to be in control and just rule over the relationship for the rest of your life. Most men are in that situation, my father is a good example of that, my mother started dominating him while I was growing up, at first he was in control but now he knows that he has no control over anything, although they make decisions as a team, she has the final say even though he makes like 3 times her salary


There is a way to prevent this though, as long as you have self respect and limits to what you will and will not tolerate and as long as you are able to communicate this clearly to the other person, you will never become a submissive man because you will never give up your rights because women won't be able to manipulate you or to try to take control over your life. To do this, you must call women out on their nagging and their shaming and debate with them based on emotions, not logic, since they often talk based on how they feel, not what is logical.

Dude how are you such an expert on women when you haven't even been in a single relationship in your life? Or spent any physical intimacy with them either? I don't mean to be rude.

 

[Pumanator]

Dont agree with this one. I got a good looking friend with above average social skills who slays woman none stop and got woman falling in love with him left and right. These woman legit try to help hem in his life and even pay some of his stuff.
He is also socially NT.
He got mental problems (depression, dissociation and light schizophrenia), lives of government money who gave him a own room in a place with people who can't live alone so they get help and mental support and got legit an iq of 90 (tested by a psychologist). Basically somebody who will never will be a benefit of society. I got another friend who got 2 masters cum laude, got a high paying job, a own house and nice car and really good social skills. He is really ugly, with glasses, acne and is like 1.60. Never seen him with a girl who was into him romantically.

 

[whiteissuperior]

Dude how are you such an expert on women when you haven't even been in a single relationship in your life? Or spent any physical intimacy with them either? I don't mean to be rude.

He got all this from the r/theredpill sidebar

Actually it's not water, as many cucks on here didn't believe this to be the case at all. Stop typing what's trendy and fashionable on the forum right now in order to get dopamine hits from some reacts you absolute sad bastard geek. Thanks.

Bro anyone in the manosphere who isn’t dumb knows this. Why are you trying to teach not fully black pilled cucks who conveniently forget the MS in LMS? They are retarded coping with “muh Meeks”. But you taking the time to write this thread that no one read or more retarded

 

[randomuser2407]

Dude how are you such an expert on women when you haven't even been in a single relationship in your life? Or spent any physical intimacy with them either? I don't mean to be rude.

I know this because I have seen it in my own life, I have seen the tools of manipulation that my mother used against my father and even against me to control us.

And I have learned some ways to fight back psychologically in a very subtle manner and I have applied them and it worked, I have managed to discover through research and experience how they think and what they use to control their men.

I'm not just reading stuff, I see it in real life too, it is there. That is not to say that every woman on the planet is that manipulative but where I live, most women are like that, they are naturally dominant and take control in most relationships. I didn't want that for me so I avoided relationships. Then in 2019, I realized that I still wanted to get laid and here I am gymmaxxing to be able to do that. I still don't want to get a girlfriend unless I know that she is the right match (not dominant or bossy, just normal), but since I may never find that here, I'll probably just stay single.

And I have seen more than just my parents, I have seen other members of my family who are in that same situation. In a way MGTOW was right about relationships, although women CAN love men, the women of today are very bossy and dominant and even the men who are the alphas in the workplace are submissive pussies in their relationship and have no power over their decision making. Relationships who seem to be the exception are just at their start and going slowly towards that destination.

Just look at the married couples that you know and you will see what I am talking about, we don't live in a patriarchy, we live in a feminist matriarchal dominion where fathers are easily stripped of their rights and enslaved to the state and have no power in relationships. The only true remaining patriarchies in the world are located in third world countries like Thailand and the Philippines so for a man who seeks a successful happy relationship where he is not a submissive bitch, those types of countries are the only option.

 

[Deleted member 6908]

Dont agree with this one. I got a good looking friend with above average social skills who slays woman none stop and got woman falling in love with him left and right. These woman legit try to help hem in his life and even pay some of his stuff.
He is also socially NT.
He got mental problems (depression and disacation and light schizophrenia), lives of government money who gave him a own room in a place with people who can't live alone,so they get help and mental support and got legit an iq of 90 (tested by a psychologist). Basically somebody who will never will be a benefit of society. I got another friend who got 2 masters cum laude, got a high paying job, a own house and nice car and really good social skills. He is really ugly, with glasses, acne and is like 1.60. Never seen him with a girl who was into him romantically.

I always laugh at these types of reasons for disagreeing.

You find this outlier example and suddenly believe that it completely dispels the rule and makes it a myth or theory which isn't proven in the concrete of reality. The exception to the rule is not an argument. Every rule must have an exception as there is no such thing as a hard rule.

Considering the world's size it would be silly not to stumble upon exceptions. Another thing. They are sleeping with him and falling in LUST with him, then are stupid enough to think it's love.

 

[Deleted member 10172]

It is very rare that a woman will submit to a man who is less successful than her. In-fact it's not seen. Ever.

This is why the only times successful women enter successful relationships is when they are able to land with a guy who is more successful than them. She won't have your respect otherwise.

Think about it. A couple where the woman is more intelligent than the man is at a long-term stability disadvantage, because the man needs to exert authority over her to ensure her inner emotional chaos doesn't sabotage them and dumber men are unable to achieve this without being abusive.

So let's say you aren't violent or abusive, but you're dumber than her or at least this is what she believes. What then? She will end up managing things because she believes she will be able to see things you cannot. Naturally putting her above you, eroding your dignity and making her feel stressed out and unfeminine. Doesn't work.

It comes with the territory. You always have to be better than her at pretty much everything. Women who gloat about having a high IQ may as well also gloat about being 6'2 and only dating taller men, or earning 7 figures and only dating richer men. Outlier women have terrifically small viable mating pools.

To state this in clearer terms. As a man gets richer, older, higher status, smarter, taller etc his viable mating pool expands. But NOW as a woman gets richer, older, higher status, smarter, taller etc - her viable mating pool shrinks. Quite frankly women are penalised for "being too good" and it's not bloody society or us men penalising them, as a lot of these liberal feminists stupidly assume. But human psychology itself.

A woman always wants a man better than she is and a man never wants to feel beneath his woman. So if you are an extremely gifted woman, who is left for you? Barely anyone.

If she didn't want a man better than her and could suppress her ego to follow a man of inferior competence and ability to her, she could be happy. But can she do this without being miserable? Big LOL. More chance of peace in Syria. No. She will find him too easy to disrespect and over-time grow to resent him. She will come to the realisation she settled for a man who was never good enough for her to begin with, but rather than blame herself for exercising poor judgement or being desperate enough to choose him, she will blame him. Women hate settling.

If you disagree, instead of shouting inane remarks, explain why and be clear...

Cope.Women will suck off a homeless chad and pay for everything.Women want a man who is more attractive than her.If you are blackpilled you realize looks is the only thing that matters and money is merely compensation at best.

 

[Pumanator]

I always laugh at these types of reasons for disagreeing.

You find this outlier example and suddenly believe that it completely dispels the rule and makes it a myth or theory which isn't proven in the concrete of reality. Let me tell you it is man. The exception to the rule is not an argument. Every rule must have an exception as there is no such thing as a hard rule.

Considering the world's size it would be silly not to stumble upon exceptions. Another thing. They are sleeping with him and falling in LUST with him, then are stupid enough to think it's love.

I agree with the outliers part. I was just trying to say that looks firstly and above average social skills secondly is the most important for attraction and the rest take into account for a lesser degree for attraction. Those 2 friend are for me the confirmation I need, but it could be a outlier.
Unless the woman is really high value, then everything matters since hyperghamy.

 

[Deleted member 7776]

Cope.Women will suck off a homeless chad and pay for everything.Women want a man who is more attractive than her.If you are blackpilled you realize looks is the only thing that matters and money is merely compensation at best.

WOmen just want a man who's genetically superior.

 

[Deleted member 10172]

WOmen just want a man who's genetically superior.

^ basically.

 

[Deleted member 6908]

Cope.Women will suck off a homeless chad and pay for everything.Women want a man who is more attractive than her.If you are blackpilled you realize looks is the only thing that matters and money is merely compensation at best.

Cool. So explain why it is Jeremy Meeks was not with a high-class woman with a successful career before he went viral for his convict photo on twitter and facebook?

There is Meeks' girlfriend, who he is still with even after becoming famous. BECKY. Pure Becky. 6/10 at best. You don't know because you haven't lived in his day-to-day reality and experienced what life is like in the ghetto. (Neither have I for that matter, but I know reality often differs from a view of the world carried solely by an ideology)

The practicalities of every day reality and the every day world mean Blonde 8/10 Staceys would never be able to get into relationships with guys like Meeks (Before he became famous) He would have been completely useless to them outside sex and a man to take to parties/bars as a trophy-piece. What would Meeks have in common with a well-educated, eloquently-spoken and successful business owner Stacey? How would the conversations go do you think?

Once guys surpass a certain looks threshold, the woman then looks at how much money you have got in your bank.

1. Looks
2. Money
3. Status
4. Personality

The BlackPill was made for guys UNDER 4/10 in looks and is basically Red-Pill on steroids. It was invented by those who tried red-pill, but failed because they were 3/10 or lower and so quickly realised it didn't mean shit since they were fucked facially.

 

[Deleted member 6908]

Cope.Women will suck off a homeless chad and pay for everything.Women want a man who is more attractive than her.If you are blackpilled you realize looks is the only thing that matters and money is merely compensation at best.

You're not the brightest 14 year old around, I've got to say that. Fact these twits are liking your posts shows how in-denial they are.

We are talking about two different things dummy.

You're talking about sex. I am talking about relationships. Focus on your studies and less on these Looks improvement forums, as your reading comprehension sucks.

 

[Deleted member 10172]

You're not the brightest 14 year old around, I've got to say that. Fact these twits are liking your posts shows how in-denial they are.

We are talking about two different things dummy.

You're talking about sex. I am talking about relationships.

Everyone is agreeing with me because I am right.It doesn't matter if your talking about relationships.Women want relationships with CHAD.Ok she is in a relationship with a top notch beta buxx deluxe collectors edition, shes still fucking chad on the side.

 

[Deleted member 6908]

Everyone is agreeing with me because I am right.It doesn't matter if your talking about relationships.Women want relationships with CHAD.Ok she is in a relationship with a top notch beta buxx deluxe collectors edition, shes still fucking chad on the side.

3 idiots who are subhuman virgins that have never had a relationship agreed with you, I wouldn't get too excited.

Show me one example of a successful WOMAN (Not girl) that is in a relationship with a Chad who is ALSO not successful and the relationship has lasted for more than 2 years. I mean there will be outliers and those relationships will be toxic, I'm sure, but I'm betting you can't show me one.

 

[Deleted member 7776]

Cool. So explain why it is Jeremy Meeks was not with a high-class woman with a successful career before he went viral for his convict photo on twitter and facebook?

There is Meeks' girlfriend, who he is still with even after becoming famous. BECKY. Pure Becky. 6/10 at best. You don't know because you haven't lived in his day-to-day reality and experienced what life is like in the ghetto. (Neither have I for that matter, but I know reality often differs from a view of the world carried solely by an ideology)

View attachment 868995

The practicalities of every day reality and the every day world mean Blonde 8/10 Staceys would never be able to get into relationships with guys like Meeks (Before he became famous) He would have been completely useless to them outside sex and a man to take to parties/bars as a trophy-piece. What would Meeks have in common with a well-educated, eloquently-spoken and successful business owner Stacey? How would the conversations go do you think?

Once guys surpass a certain looks threshold, the woman then looks at how much money you have got in your bank.

1. Looks
2. Money
3. Status
4. Personality

The BlackPill was made for guys UNDER 4/10 in looks and is basically Red-Pill on steroids. It was invented by those who tried red-pill, but failed because they were 3/10 or lower and so quickly realised it didn't mean shit since they were fucked facially.

If that's a Becky for you it's over for you my curry friend. That's an ABOMINATION

 

[Deleted member 6908]

If that's a Becky for you it's over for you my curry friend. That's an ABOMINATION

Cool. Whatever. If you wanna call that low-tier Becky or borderline Ugly that's totally fine. But remember he's a Chad, he had nothing, was locked in the ghetto and wasn't dating a beautiful woman when he got convicted.

 

[Deleted member 7776]

Cool. Whatever. If you wanna call that low-tier Becky or borderline Ugly that's totally fine. But remember he's a Chad, he had nothing, was locked in the ghetto and wasn't dating a beautiful woman when he got convicted.

I'm not disagreeing with you except for your OP. That's just BS. Women show absolute submissiveness to Chads. If you have the genetic superiority, you will not need M and S.

 

[randomuser2407]

I'm not disagreeing with you except for your OP. That's just BS. Women show absolute submissiveness to Chads. If you have the genetic superiority, you will not need M and S.

There is a huge difference between being sexually submissive and being submissive in a relationship. Yes, most women are sexually submissive but in relationships, they tend to be dominant unless you live in a patriarchal society like Thailand, the Philippines, Afghanistan, or the Congo.

 

[Deleted member 6908]

I agree with the outliers part. I was just trying to say that looks firstly and above average social skills secondly is the most important for attraction and the rest take into account for a lesser degree for attraction. Those 2 friend are for me the confirmation I need, but it could be a outlier.
Unless the woman is really high value, then everything matters since hyperghamy.

I seriously think some of you people literally live and die by this black pill ideology and belief system you all have.

Not one time did I dispute the blackpill. Not one time did I state looks were not foremost and fundamental. What I've said is clear. Even if you are good looking, a woman will not submit to you INSIDE OF A RELATIONSHIP unless you are more successful (Which will also mean intelligent) than her. Unless you can keep up with being continually abusive and not get sent to prison for it.

That's all I've said. Now unless there is no room for nuance in the community which LOVES to call itself "high" fucking "IQ" I must be missing something?

Once you pass a looks threshold, money and status matters more. A woman will use you for sex if you are Chad but not her type of person. That is not make-believe. It's fact. The reason you don't hear about it is because no women admit to it.

 

[Deleted member 6908]

There is a huge difference between being sexually submissive and being submissive in a relationship. Yes, most women are sexually submissive but in relationships, they tend to be dominant unless you live in a patriarchal society like Thailand, the Philippines, Afghanistan, or the Congo.

Lol it's like we have to dumb it down for them into abc = 123 fashion.

Yet this is the community remember who constantly puke out this "high IQ, low IQ" nonsense meme.

Genuinely fucking dumb. Or just no life experience whatsoever.

 

[Deleted member 7776]

There is a huge difference between being sexually submissive and being submissive in a relationship. Yes, most women are sexually submissive but in relationships, they tend to be dominant unless you live in a patriarchal society like Thailand, the Philippines, Afghanistan, or the Congo.

That sounds illogical. If she's submissive to you sexually, she's submissive to you in absolute terms, period.