absurd how many people think they r smart here

[Aladin]

View attachment 3558895

View attachment 3558896

most common rating: LTN (4/10)
median rating: High LTN (4.5/10)
mean rating (pulled up by chads): MTN (5/10)

OP loves making threads talking down to users here.

 

[Aladin]

because the way you interpreted was wrong,

just because mtn is in the middle doesn’t mean that’s the world’s average, as an most common/typical

and no it’s not logically flawed, if you didn’t drop out of highschool you’d be informed that the average isn’t always the middle, how can YOU say all this so confidently? JFL

I'm convinced OP meant something different, there's no way someone makes a thread challenging everyone else's intelligence only to get statistics knowledge for 13 year olds completely wrong...

.

OP loves making threads talking down to users here.

 

[swt]

I'm convinced OP meant something different, there's no way someone makes a thread challenging everyone else's intelligence only to get statistics knowledge for 13 year olds completely wrong...

nah he didn’t mean something different because he made this thread right after he saw my reply in my own thread saying this exact thing

 

[Snicket]

there's no way someone makes a thread challenging everyone else's intelligence only to get statistics knowledge for 13 year olds completely wrong...

You'd think!
Average = mean if there is a normal distribution.
If OP thinks looks follow a normal distribution then he's got a point otherwise he doesn't have a leg to stand on.

 

[imontheloose]

Think again.
Average = mean if there is a normal distribution.
If OP thinks looks follow a normal distribution then he's got a point otherwise he doesn't have a leg to stand on.

He made the blank statement that the average is the middle, he seems to think everything follows ND lmao

nah he didn’t mean something different because he made this thread right after he saw my reply in my own thread saying this exact thing

Yikes. Really embarrassing

OP loves making threads talking down to users here.

Muh IQ

 

[returnofthecutecel]

But so clearly lack key bits of critically thinking

Like a fuck who just said “the average male” and then said “the average isn’t always in the middle” when this sentence objectively logically flawed

How can they be confident and then claim something so entirely stupid

Dunning–Kruger effect

 

[TheVoidInside]

the average isn’t always in the middle”

average and median aint the same buddy

 

[Meteor21]

But so clearly lack key bits of critically thinking

Like a fuck who just said “the average male” and then said “the average isn’t always in the middle” when this sentence objectively logically flawed

How can they be confident and then claim something so entirely stupid

I've gotten into multiple arguments on this forum cause some users argued "the average person is below average"

 

[WELOVELOOKS]

because the way you interpreted was wrong,

just because mtn is in the middle doesn’t mean that’s the world’s average, as an most common/typical

and no it’s not logically flawed, if you didn’t drop out of highschool you’d be informed that the average isn’t always the middle, how can YOU say all this so confidently? JFL

I already explained what I meant ITT

If you have completely blank slate of statistics you need to enter in a measurement of 10, the most reoccurring (average) variables will always be ranked at 5 this is a fact

It’s called creating a normative measurement

I'm convinced OP meant something different, there's no way someone makes a thread challenging everyone else's intelligence only to get statistics knowledge for 13 year olds completely wrong...

Retard alert

Niggas don’t understand how things are measured

Sure you can place the fucking average where you see fit I guess, considering looks are fucking subjective, logically you’re not “wrong”

It’s still a spastic thing to to

I personally see things in a practical way and try to take a pragmatic approach and not measure things like a fucking goofy goober

View attachment 3558895

View attachment 3558896

most common rating: LTN (4/10)
median rating: High LTN (4.5/10)
mean rating (pulled up by chads): MTN (5/10)

Imagine taking dating app statistics and seeing them as a real world fact nah nigga

It doesn’t really matter what women rate either, it just matters what the average male LOOKS like. But continue to let subjective messy inconsistent data literally dictate your guys’ sperg fucking rating system idrc

 

[widdi]

@WELOVELOOKS There's no intrinsic reason to expect male looks to be normally distributed. This is just some random standard that you made up. There are a billion different flaws that can make someone subhuman, but there are a lot fewer ways to give someone a high PSL face. You just asume that good looking men and subhumans would be equal in number when one is a lot harder to be born with.

 

[imontheloose]

Retard alert

Niggas don’t understand how things are measured

Sure you can place the fucking average where you see fit I guess, considering looks are fucking subjective, logically you’re not “wrong”

It’s still a spastic thing to to

I personally see things in a practical way and try to take a pragmatic approach and not measure things like a fucking goofy goober

LOL, "Retard alert" while publicly proving you're a case study in cognitive failure. You're a functionally useless lump of wasted oxygen.

How far into maths did you get? Seriously. Did you drop out before or after long division?

Regardless, let me break this down to you spacky. The average isn't always in the middle because it depends on distribution. If the data is skewed, the mean can be way off centre. This is basic statistics.

You started this by implying the average is always in the middle, but now you're saying averages are flexible "I guess"? So which is it? Either you admit you had no idea what you were talking about in the first place, or you decide to triple down on being an unteachable dumbass.

This is the purest form of intellectual backpedaling I've ever seen. The mean is a maths concept. Whether looks are subjective or not has zero impact on the fact you fumbled basic statistics. Averages exist in objective data sets, and the statement "the average isn't always in the middle" is a fact, not an opinion. Even if people rate attractiveness differently, the distribution of ratings still determines whether the mean is centred or not. This isn't about subjectivity, it's about how numbers work

 

[WELOVELOOKS]

@WELOVELOOKS There's no intrinsic reason to expect male looks to be normally distributed. This is just some random standard that you made up. There are a billion different flaws that can make someone subhuman, but there are a lot fewer ways to give someone a high PSL face. You just asume that good looking men and subhumans would be equal in number when one is a lot harder to be born with.

It doesn’t really matter if male looks are normally distributed at some type of baseline or whatever ur saying, which I didn’t even imply
What I am implying is that in order to standardize a (subjective) measurement you need some sort of baseline which I’m implying would be 5/10. There’s no even amount of good or bad physical traits distributed evenly throughout the population it’s just a point for comparison

I already said, it’s a normative measurement and it makes the most sense compared to using convoluted shit to measure something that’s already objective in the first place

 

[WELOVELOOKS]

LOL, "Retard alert" while publicly proving you're a case study in cognitive failure. You're a functionally useless lump of wasted oxygen.

How far into maths did you get? Seriously. Did you drop out before or after long division?

Regardless, let me break this down to you spacky. The average isn't always in the middle because it depends on distribution. If the data is skewed, the mean can be way off centre. This is basic statistics.

You started this by implying the average is always in the middle, but now you're saying averages are flexible "I guess"? So which is it? Either you admit you had no idea what you were talking about in the first place, or you decide to triple down on being an unteachable dumbass.

This is the purest form of intellectual backpedaling I've ever seen. The mean is a maths concept. Whether looks are subjective or not has zero impact on the fact you fumbled basic statistics. Averages exist in objective data sets, and the statement "the average isn't always in the middle" is a fact, not an opinion. Even if people rate attractiveness differently, the distribution of ratings still determines whether the mean is centred or not. This isn't about subjectivity, it's about how numbers work

I guess you can’t read between the lines, quite a shame

The average isn’t “always in the middle” no fucking shit, that’s obviously the mean

But in context with “the average male” this only makes sense to someone logical, the most logical way to measure something subjective is by putting the most common variable as the mean

You’re completely taking what I said and using it in different context, then saying I’m “intellectually backpedaling” fucking lunatic bro

 

[Tusseleif]

I’m dumb and not afraid to admit it

 

[Aladin]

The average isn’t “always in the middle” no fucking shit, that’s obviously the mean

Average = mean

 

[Nick.Harte]

To me it's 6’5 HTN+ or death.

 

[imontheloose]

I guess you can’t read between the lines, quite a shame

The average isn’t “always in the middle” no fucking shit, that’s obviously the mean

But in context with “the average male” this only makes sense to someone logical, the most logical way to measure something subjective is by putting the most common variable as the mean

You’re completely taking what I said and using it in different context, then saying I’m “intellectually backpedaling” fucking lunatic bro

Your new argument is just desperate damage control.

You now claim "the most logical way to measure something subjective is by putting the most common variable as the average" except that's literally just the mode, not the mean. You are still fumbling basic statistics and digging a deeper hole. So not only were you wrong the first time, but now you're just digging a deeper hole by showing that you don't even know which statistical measure you're trying to defend.

Your first post literally called it "entirely stupid" to say "the average isn’t always in the middle." If you actually understood how statistics work, you wouldn't have typed that in the first place. Now that you've been corrected, you're hiding behind some vague "context" excuse like that somehow changes what you said. It doesn't.

You keep shifting the goalpost and talking in circles, but the one thing you won't do is answer a simple question: How far did you actually get in maths? Because at this point, I'm willing to bet it wasn’t past pre-algebra.

At this point, just take the L and go. The only thing you've successfully "proved" is that your IQ isn't in the middle of the bell curve either

 

[Snicket]

The average isn’t “always in the middle” no fucking shit, that’s obviously the mean

Even this isn't technically right.
The average isn't always the mean.
There are three ways of measuring the average: mode, median or mean.

Sometimes it's just better to put your hands up and admit you've made a mistake. I know it's unheard of on .org but it would be the mature thing to do.

Stop digging.

 

[Meteor21]

View attachment 3558895

View attachment 3558896

most common rating: LTN (4/10)
median rating: High LTN (4.5/10)
mean rating (pulled up by chads): MTN (5/10)

Mean rating (pulled up by chads) but not pulled down cause of subhumans? Idiot

 

[chrishell]

I IQ mog everyone here

 

[widdi]

Mean rating (pulled up by chads) but not pulled down cause of subhumans? Idiot

Is 3 or 8 closer to 4 dumbass? 1 8 pulls up the mean as much as 4 3s pull it down

 

[gooner23]

ay .org be young asf moneymaking forum is like a prime example of how they think

 

[Meteor21]

Is 3 or 8 closer to 4 dumbass? 1 8 pulls up the mean as much as 4 3s pull it down

Why do you use the highest score possible for Chad but 1 psl lower than 4 for subhuman? Dishonest piece of shit. If you're gonna use 8 for chads then use 0 for subhumans

 

[Deleted member 133325]

 

[WELOVELOOKS]

Even this isn't technically right.
The average isn't always the mean.
There are three ways of measuring the average: mode, median or mean.

Sometimes it's just better to put your hands up and admit you've made a mistake. I know it's unheard of on .org but it would be the mature thing to do.

Stop digging.

lol, I never even said the average isn’t always the mean, how’d you even get that from what I wrote there. I literally said I know the average isn’t always in the middle aka the mean

U lost bro, I’ve won this you just don’t have the iq to realize it, I made a mistake in not clarifying exactly what I meant, you lose the argument. You won a battle, I won the war. Gg

 

[pfl]

MTN = mogs 90% of the general population

Cope

 

[Monarchy]

But so clearly lack key bits of critically thinking

Like a fuck who just said “the average male” and then said “the average isn’t always in the middle” when this sentence objectively logically flawed

How can they be confident and then claim something so entirely stupid

You are dumber than me ngl

 

[WELOVELOOKS]

You are dumber than me ngl

Explain how and why, let’s see

 

[Monarchy]

Explain how and why, let’s see

idk I just wanted to interact with you cutie


Here tho https://looksmax.org/threads/iq-test-insane-iq-mog.1361860/

 

[WELOVELOOKS]

Your new argument is just desperate damage control.

You now claim "the most logical way to measure something subjective is by putting the most common variable as the average" except that's literally just the mode, not the mean. You are still fumbling basic statistics and digging a deeper hole. So not only were you wrong the first time, but now you're just digging a deeper hole by showing that you don't even know which statistical measure you're trying to defend.

Your first post literally called it "entirely stupid" to say "the average isn’t always in the middle." If you actually understood how statistics work, you wouldn't have typed that in the first place. Now that you've been corrected, you're hiding behind some vague "context" excuse like that somehow changes what you said. It doesn't.

You keep shifting the goalpost and talking in circles, but the one thing you won't do is answer a simple question: How far did you actually get in maths? Because at this point, I'm willing to bet it wasn’t past pre-algebra.

At this point, just take the L and go. The only thing you've successfully "proved" is that your IQ isn't in the middle of the bell curve either

Again you’re just ignoring what I said earlier by context matters when I say that average is always in the middle

I’m referring to measuring things of course like subjective things

And you didn’t prove how I’m wrong about that being the most logical way to measure something, instead ur just hyper focusing on how I didn’t elaborate enough on a certain point I made, when I already explained it. Seems like ur iq is fizzling out bud

 

[longjohnmong]

I've gotten into multiple arguments on this forum cause some users argued "the average person is below average"

it's true, and it's because average has different meanings. a lot of people use "average" to man plain or neither good looking nor bad looking. but someone who is neither good looking or bad looking is actually above average, as the average person is ugly.

common redditor mistake to not understand that there are multiple definitions of a word and not be able to keep track of which is being used

 

[SoundnVision]

Just have a big nob

 

[WELOVELOOKS]

it's true, and it's because average has different meanings. a lot of people use "average" to man plain or neither good looking nor bad looking. but someone who is neither good looking or bad looking is actually above average, as the average person is ugly.

common redditor mistake to not understand that there are multiple definitions of a word and not be able to keep track of which is being used

I can agree that average can be used as a synonym

It just means the average person looks uneventful, or even ugly. Yeah like so what lmao? Nobody is saying the average person on the street out of 10 are ugly, they def are

 

[WELOVELOOKS]

idk I just wanted to interact with you cutie


Here tho https://looksmax.org/threads/iq-test-insane-iq-mog.1361860/

Online iq tests aren’t valid sorry my guy

 

[Monarchy]

Online iq tests aren’t valid sorry my guy

Where shall I go to prove my IQ, honestly I think the test nerfed me, I am around 180 IQ

 

[Meteor21]

it's true, and it's because average has different meanings. a lot of people use "average" to man plain or neither good looking nor bad looking. but someone who is neither good looking or bad looking is actually above average, as the average person is ugly.

common redditor mistake to not understand that there are multiple definitions of a word and not be able to keep track of which is being used

More like this is a reddit tier cope response

 

[longjohnmong]

More like this is a reddit tier cope response

nuh uh you are