literally who?
u have the same pfp as him
>gets btfod by philosophyI see this all too often
Person A: completely btfo's person B with facts + logic
Person B: well you're just trolling
you were parroting an actual high iq philosopher yet I still managed to outwit you into submission with pure on the spot intuition LOL
>I outwitted you
you were literally claiming being lgbtq+ is bad/immoral at the same time as claiming morals don't exist. mirin ability to contradict yourself so brutally in like 5 posts
I never said LGBT was immoral. I just told you to stop pushing your moral values upon others. Secondly I said objective morality did not exist. Again you demonstrate your low iq
why should i stop pushing my morals onto others? because it's immoral?
because I dislike it, and think slave morality (which you love) will make others weak.why should i stop pushing my morals onto others? because it's immoral?
well I think it's the right thing to do and idc what whether you like it or not
And you think by doing the "right thing" you're helping people out? How are you helping individual people out if you're not freeing them?
precisely
You encourage collectivism, which will discourage the strong to rise. Let the untermensch die
yes, because it is the right thing to do. everyone benefits even those at the top
Why is it the right thing to do? You're merely preventing the strong rising because of your collectivist mindset. Those strong individuals will not be able to rule if you allow the weak masses to make decisions
my intuition
Because you want the weak (lgbt) to survive and have plenty of rights. They are the weak.
what makes anything anything? intuition
circular logic, intiution more like your feelings. Your morals aren't objectively correct.
I never claimed they were. objective morality doesn't exist, objective reality may not even exist.
so your entire philosophy is based on "my intiution", thus why would anyone listen to you? Seriously your defence of the weak only comes from an emotional standpoint.
that's all anyone's philosophy is. in fact that is literally what philosophy is. otherwise it is called math/physics/logic, but even they are hardly objective
Right but your entire thing is "my feelings". If you were to say "i wish to reduce human suffering in general" it would make sense. You seem to be a utilitarian
Who are you quoting on The trans suicides? Oh right im The one quoting The real studies JFLI see this all too often
Person A: completely btfo's person B with facts + logic
Person B: well you're just trolling
Expose that nigga
@CrusileWho are you quoting on The trans suicides? Oh right im The one quoting The real studies JFL
Btw @FailedNormieManlet you mental mogg that fag hard tbh
How? You can be collectively strong as a people
you made a blackpill presentation to your class...
Because most people are weak, under collectivism those majority weak become the leaders and thus won't allow the strong to the top.
why do you think i am emotional? As a utilitarian then you are surely aware of the weaknesses within your own philosophy
Why can’t a strong leader make the collective equally strong?
disagree, in collectivism the strong will still find their way to the top
because most of the collective can't be strong.
when an idea is presented with appeal to humanity/emotions you have a kneejerk reaction of bad
Literally don’t even know who you aremy bullied victims always seethe for me
@looksmaxxer234 @Leonardo DiCaprio @n0rthface etc etc
I believe ideas coming from an emotional standpoint which are presented as objective is wrong and yes it annoys me since it interferes in my will to power.
You literally asked mods to delete my thread on you jflmy bullied victims always seethe for me
@looksmaxxer234 @Leonardo DiCaprio @n0rthface etc etc
