Age verification on VPNs now proposed for England

[imontheloose]

Just in case you thought in Bonkers Britain we couldn’t get any worse, we have now had our children’s commissioner — whatever the fuck that is — call for the age verification of all Britons using a VPN amid porn ban.

A government spokesperson states there is no plan to truly ban VPNs, but didn’t rule out age verification on them that of which restricted content under the new act succumbs to.

Some hilarious stats are in this article. “Pornography depicting rape of a sleeping person was also seen by 44% of respondents as children.” As well as VPNs being last month’s most downloaded apps in the UK.

A man by the name of Josh Lane has listed several paragraphs about his porn addiction; for what reason? I have no idea. Retard is openly saying he couldn’t stop choking his chode since 14. Muh “happily married”. They’re acting like he witnessed the Malmedy massacre.

Stop children using VPNs to watch porn, ministers told

The children's commissioner for England tells the BBC virtual private networks are a "loophole that needs closing.

www.bbc.co.uk

UK’s Online Safety Act slams posts about illegal immigration as illegal content.

How is this about protecting children exactly? Does Starmer want Orwellian dictatorship? This is an assisted dying bill. It’s almost as if they’re trying to surveil the population out of fear of civil outrage. Remember, folks, extremism is anything which opposes liberal democracy. It’s for...

looksmax.org

 

[jaaba]

Just in case you thought in Bonkers Britain we couldn’t get any worse, we have now had our children’s commissioner — whatever the fuck that is — call for the age verification of all Britons using a VPN amid porn ban.

A government spokesperson states there is no plan to truly ban VPNs, but didn’t rule out age verification on them that of which restricted content under the new act succumbs to.

Some hilarious stats are in this article. “Pornography depicting rape of a sleeping person was also seen by 44% of respondents as children.” As well as VPNs being last month’s most downloaded apps in the UK.

A man by the name of Josh Lane has listed several paragraphs about his porn addiction; for what reason? I have no idea. Retard is openly saying he couldn’t stop choking his chode since 14. Muh “happily married”. They’re acting like he witnessed the Malmedy massacre.

Stop children using VPNs to watch porn, ministers told

The children's commissioner for England tells the BBC virtual private networks are a "loophole that needs closing.

www.bbc.co.uk

UK’s Online Safety Act slams posts about illegal immigration as illegal content.

How is this about protecting children exactly? Does Starmer want Orwellian dictatorship? This is an assisted dying bill. It’s almost as if they’re trying to surveil the population out of fear of civil outrage. Remember, folks, extremism is anything which opposes liberal democracy. It’s for...

looksmax.org

Now they’re trying to mitigate online safety measures for minors

Great law guys keep it up?!

 

[Foreverbrad]

Meanwhile 11 year olds fucking in primary school.

 

[imontheloose]

Now they’re trying to mitigate online safety measures for minors

Great law guys keep it up?!

You’re not clear in your English. Very ambiguous. Mitigating risks through safety measures, or mitigating the safety measures themselves?

 

[jaaba]

You’re not clear in your English. Very ambiguous. Mitigating risks through safety measures, or mitigating the safety measures themselves?

Mitigate the safety measures

VPNs are at their core, a safety measure and taking them away is like telling children to drive without a seatbelt

 

[imontheloose]

Meanwhile 11 year olds fucking in primary school.

I knew some people who alleged getting blowjobs in year 6. In fact, someone in my primary school had a video leaked of her doing all sorts of disgrace to herself. I’m talking forcing her dog to lick her out as well as penetrating herself with lipstick. This was in year 6 to 7 I believe.

I refused to watch the video(s).

 

[imontheloose]

Mitigate the safety measures

VPNs are at their core, a safety measure and taking them away is like telling children to drive without a seatbelt

Children don’t know what they’re doing with them anyway, the company farms their data and sells it to the CCP. The point is that they are trying to push age verification measures upon all Britons because some kids want a little wanky wanky.

 

[StalinCel]

The UK is a woke Communist totalitarian dictatorship. 1984 style. It's DISGUSTING. Porn should be banned from society completely. With these "muh age verification laws", it's obvious that they only care about surveillance and control.

 

[imontheloose]

The UK is a woke Communist totalitarian dictatorship. 1984 style. It's DISGUSTING. Porn should be banned from society completely. With these "muh age verification laws", it's obvious that they only care about surveillance and control.

Check the thread I put at the bottom of the body. I said something similar.

 

[Shrek2OnDvD]

it’s never going to end, is it

 

[imontheloose]

it’s never going to end, is it

You will eat your bugs and be happy, goy.

 

[childishkillah]

I'm going to rub one for all my UK lads

 

[imontheloose]

@Jason Voorhees @wishIwasSalludon @SlayerJonas @chadisbeingmade @Saint Casanova

 

[Jason Voorhees]

It seems like my princess is also in danger. I need to come to her rescue and save her from this tyranny. Poor thing must be suffering so much. Don't worry I am coming for you my princess. I'll rescue you.

 

[Node]

Shit place
Never wanna go near it

 

[NotaChadyet]

Uk niggas are doomed

 

[imontheloose]

It seems like my princess is also in danger. I need to come to her rescue and save her from this tyranny. Poor thing must be suffering so much. Don't worry I am coming for you my princess. I'll rescue you.

White saviour turns defenceless prey. You must help your Sussex cupcake from Orwellian dictatorship.

 

[Daddy's Home]

Why does politics/a particular government have a problem with what teenagers do on the internet?

There are laws that porn sites must comply with, and there are parents who must monitor their children (if they want to or care), and that's water

I don't understand where "the government needs" comes into all of this?

To what extent can a government intrude into a person's private life, the content they watch, the apps they use and for what purpose, etc.

 

[FiendFiend]

Just in case you thought in Bonkers Britain we couldn’t get any worse, we have now had our children’s commissioner — whatever the fuck that is — call for the age verification of all Britons using a VPN amid porn ban.

A government spokesperson states there is no plan to truly ban VPNs, but didn’t rule out age verification on them that of which restricted content under the new act succumbs to.

Some hilarious stats are in this article. “Pornography depicting rape of a sleeping person was also seen by 44% of respondents as children.” As well as VPNs being last month’s most downloaded apps in the UK.

A man by the name of Josh Lane has listed several paragraphs about his porn addiction; for what reason? I have no idea. Retard is openly saying he couldn’t stop choking his chode since 14. Muh “happily married”. They’re acting like he witnessed the Malmedy massacre.

Stop children using VPNs to watch porn, ministers told

The children's commissioner for England tells the BBC virtual private networks are a "loophole that needs closing.

www.bbc.co.uk

UK’s Online Safety Act slams posts about illegal immigration as illegal content.

How is this about protecting children exactly? Does Starmer want Orwellian dictatorship? This is an assisted dying bill. It’s almost as if they’re trying to surveil the population out of fear of civil outrage. Remember, folks, extremism is anything which opposes liberal democracy. It’s for...

looksmax.org

wow uk is the most based country ever.

Perfect country for the whtie man. Bunch of pajeetas and shaneeqwas imported on ur doorstep who r willing to fuck. I honestly enjoy living in the poor side of a UK city. Its a free for all at times, all criminals get caught cuz mass surveillence, ugly blacks and pakis are forced to get careers and do shit and they are so miserable.

I went to a mall in like the most paki place ever and i find so much joy and amusement being a 6 foot white blonde nordic guy and seeing like 4'11 pajeets defeated working and shit. Fucking hilarious. I love this country

 

[imontheloose]

View attachment 4034751

Why does politics/a particular government have a problem with what teenagers do on the internet?

There are laws that porn sites must comply with, and there are parents who must monitor their children (if they want to or care), and that's water

I don't understand where "the government needs" comes into all of this?

To what extent can a government intrude into a person's private life, the content they watch, the apps they use and for what purpose, etc.

Due to the effects it has on the youth as they say. They use that 44% of children alleging to have saw rape-reenacting porn as a concern which is fair, but they can simply enforce moderation on the site.

It seems to be built off the idea that porn is a cancerous form of media and harms the youth: many youth claim how it affects them.

I believe there are a couple billion who are thought to be addicted.

 

[imontheloose]

wow uk is the most based country ever.

Perfect country for the whtie man. Bunch of pajeetas and shaneeqwas imported on ur doorstep who r willing to fuck. I honestly enjoy living in the poor side of a UK city. Its a free for all at times, all criminals get caught cuz mass surveillence, ugly blacks and pakis are forced to get careers and do shit and they are so miserable.

I went to a mall in like the most paki place ever and i find so much joy and amusement being a 6 foot white blonde nordic guy and seeing like 4'11 pajeets defeated working and shit. Fucking hilarious. I love this country

Newham? Whitechapel? Birmingham?

 

[FiendFiend]

Newham? Whitechapel? Birmingham?

Tower hamlets is paradise. Same as newham.

 

[imontheloose]

Tower hamlets is paradise. Same as newham.

Lifefuel for @inceI.

 

[FiendFiend]

Lifefuel for @inceI.

is he white and in East london?

 

[Jason Voorhees]

White saviour turns defenceless prey. You must help your Sussex cupcake from Orwellian dictatorship.

Are you considering leaving the UK?

 

[imontheloose]

is he white and in East london?

Think he’s an Arab, but in East London, yes. I refuse to visit East London. It’s an absolute dump. I don’t need comparative fleet.

 

[FiendFiend]

Newham? Whitechapel? Birmingham?

i was transferred for a year school in a white area and holy fuck it was aids, came back to my paki neighbourhood i fucking loved it. They love white niggas especially if ur not a british white.

 

[FiendFiend]

Think he’s an Arab, but in East London, yes. I refuse to visit East London. It’s an absolute dump. I don’t need comparative fleet.

I love it. I sometimes go westfield with my bro and see like sub5 roadmen get arrested

 

[imontheloose]

Are you considering leaving the UK?

I am Lord High Chancellor of Britain. This country would capitulate without their final remaining people of class.

 

[Jason Voorhees]

I

Due to the effects it has on the youth as they say. They use that 44% of children alleging to have saw rape-reenacting porn as a concern which is fair, but they can simply enforce moderation on the site.

It seems to be built off the idea that porn is a cancerous form of media and harms the youth: many youth claim how it affects them.

I believe there are a couple billion who are thought to be addicted.

against porn too but I'm also against taking away peoples right and choice. It needs to be conscious choice only then you can conquer a degeneracy like porn not forced upon

 

[imontheloose]

I

against porn too but I'm not against taking away peoples right and choice. It needs to be conscious choice only then you can conquer a degeneracy like porn not forced upon

I guess their argument would be, why enforce anything?

 

[Jason Voorhees]

I guess their argument would be, why enforce anything?

Just because something becomes "illegal" or "banned" doesn't stop It's use. It's like prohibition in United States in 1920. They wanted to stop alcohol consumption but it just sky rocketed instead because of lack of regulations. It doesn't solve the root problem, just drives it underground. The only way someone 'beats' porn is if they consciously choose to stop, not because the option was taken away. That's why I think it's better to focus on awareness and discipline rather than enforcement.

 

[imontheloose]

Just because something becomes day illegal or banned doesn't stop.It's like prohibition in United States in 1920 alcohol consumption just sky rocketed because of lack of regulations. It doesn't solve the root problem, just drives it underground. The only way someone 'beats' porn is if they consciously choose to stop, not because the option was taken away. That's why I think it's better to focus on awareness and discipline rather than enforcement.

I understand your point. My question is, why would you enforce anything then? How would you? You need some form of authority. Where does it end? When it gets into personal matters?

 

[Jason Voorhees]

I understand your point. My question is, why would you enforce anything then? How would you? You need some form of authority. Where does it end? When it gets into personal matters?

That's the difference crime is enforced because it directly harms others. Porn or any personal vice is just a private choice. Once you start treating personal habits like crimes, you're basically opening the door to policing every aspect of someone's life.

 

[Daddy's Home]

Due to the effects it has on the youth as they say

Then, I assume that this government has clear regulations by which..

- They ban alcohol or cigarettes in the country, because ''effects they have on children'', and "the government need" in this direction..

- They banned sugar and any products containing sugar from the country because ''effects they have on children'', and "the government need" in this direction..

- They ban any chemical or biological product from any food that can cause obesity because ''effects they have on children'', and "the government need" in this direction..

- They forbid parents from having access to their children at the first conflict between them because ''effects they have on children'', and "the government need" in this direction..

..and the list can go on and on about anything, but obviously that's just total nonsense

Many things can have many effects on children, that doesn't mean that all of them can be influenced by the government or that any government should do anything about it

It seems to be built off the idea that porn is a cancerous form of media and harms the youth: many youth claim how it affects them.

''child who consumes porn*''

This is just goofy at this point, don't young people have parents? Don't parents also tell them not to consume too much sweet, or salty, or alcohol, or cigarettes, or whatever? lol

 

[imontheloose]

That's the difference crime is enforced because it directly harms others. Porn or any personal vice is just a private choice. Once you start treating personal habits like crimes, you're basically opening the door to policing every aspect of someone's life.

Incest and necro?

 

[Jason Voorhees]

Incest and necro?

Incest and necro aren’t ‘personal choices they cross into abuse and crime. Porn doesn’t that’s the whole difference.

 

[imontheloose]

Then, I assume that this government has clear regulations by which..

- They ban alcohol or cigarettes in the country, because ''effects they have on children'', and "the government need" in this direction..

- They banned sugar and any products containing sugar from the country because ''effects they have on children'', and "the government need" in this direction..

- They ban any chemical or biological product from any food that can cause obesity because ''effects they have on children'', and "the government need" in this direction..

- They forbid parents from having access to their children at the first conflict between them because ''effects they have on children'', and "the government need" in this direction..

..and the list can go on and on about anything, but obviously that's just total nonsense

Many things can have many effects on children, that doesn't mean that all of them can be influenced by the government or that any government should do anything about it



''child who consumes porn*''

View attachment 4034776

This is just goofy at this point, don't young people have parents? Don't parents also tell them not to consume too much sweet, or salty, or alcohol, or cigarettes, or whatever? lol

I disagree with what the government is doing but your comparison is so narrow and basically written that it is hard to even accept this. All of these are not anywhere near as accessible as typing a website into your phone; they’re concerned with the level of it. They weren’t before since it was a small %, but that has since risen. They have done the same with vaping and smoking since their prevalence increased.

You’re incredibly narrow in reasoning. It isn’t so simple as whatever could possibly affect children. It is about what actually affects them on a large scale. We have regulations on a lot of things nowadays including sugar and considering many, including Bundy, report that porn was a motivating power behind their crimes and no one reports sugar as such, it seems obvious which is a larger concern.

 

[imontheloose]

Incest and necro aren’t ‘personal choices they cross into abuse and crime. Porn doesn’t that’s the whole difference.

What? How is that abuse or crime? You are calling it a crime because of the law you experience now. If you forget about your law currently and think of two consenting adults wanting to commit incest, or one having sex with a corpse, what is the harm done? It’s of course a personal choice.

 

[yesimog420]

Nice government nice rules we have guys we are “being protected” while the government fiddles kids themself

 

[Jason Voorhees]

What? How is that abuse or crime? You are calling it a crime because of the law you experience now. If you forget about your law currently and think of two consenting adults wanting to commit incest, or one having sex with a corpse, what is the harm done? It’s of course a personal choice.

Incest messes with power dynamics in families and can lead to genetic harm if kids are involved. Necro literally removes consent a corpse can't agree to anything That's why those are abuse. Porn, alcohol, gambling etc don't cross that line they're just vices people choose.

 

[Hide]

Please nuke Britain literally no point of existing

 

[jaaba]

Children don’t know what they’re doing with them anyway, the company farms their data and sells it to the CCP. The point is that they are trying to push age verification measures upon all Britons because some kids want a little wanky wanky.

Yeah it’s clearly a ploy to have greater control over Brits online usage, they don’t care about kids

If they really cared about the kids, they’d deport all the shitskins that keep raping them

 

[Daddy's Home]

It is about what actually affects them on a large scale

It makes no sense

Almost no government on the planet does this, and those that do, simply ban any site that contains porn in general, and the ''smarter'' adults or young people (top 5% of them) will use VPN and that's it, but the vast majority in the country / young people will not consume porn bc of this, and that's perfectly fine

But this witch hunt of "hey, they're still watching porn through VPNs. Let's block VPNs," but then they'll say they're watching porn through other methods, and they'll still find some option to consume it if they want to or feel the need, it's just dumb..

You can't realistically stop that, or if you do, you can only do it to a certain extent, superficially

That's why I said it. Porn sites should have rules and warnings about age, and parents should monitor children, that's the first barrier that any country has.. whatever happens after that.. you can only do something to a certain extent, as a government, or as whatever..

 

[luke17k]

Meanwhile 11 year olds fucking in primary school.

Nigga what type of primary schools are in your area

 

[Greypiller]

Just in case you thought in Bonkers Britain we couldn’t get any worse, we have now had our children’s commissioner — whatever the fuck that is — call for the age verification of all Britons using a VPN amid porn ban.

A government spokesperson states there is no plan to truly ban VPNs, but didn’t rule out age verification on them that of which restricted content under the new act succumbs to.

Some hilarious stats are in this article. “Pornography depicting rape of a sleeping person was also seen by 44% of respondents as children.” As well as VPNs being last month’s most downloaded apps in the UK.

A man by the name of Josh Lane has listed several paragraphs about his porn addiction; for what reason? I have no idea. Retard is openly saying he couldn’t stop choking his chode since 14. Muh “happily married”. They’re acting like he witnessed the Malmedy massacre.

Stop children using VPNs to watch porn, ministers told

The children's commissioner for England tells the BBC virtual private networks are a "loophole that needs closing.

www.bbc.co.uk

UK’s Online Safety Act slams posts about illegal immigration as illegal content.

How is this about protecting children exactly? Does Starmer want Orwellian dictatorship? This is an assisted dying bill. It’s almost as if they’re trying to surveil the population out of fear of civil outrage. Remember, folks, extremism is anything which opposes liberal democracy. It’s for...

looksmax.org

Over for the yookay , thank god mullvad exists

 

[imontheloose]

Incest messes with power dynamics in families and can lead to genetic harm if kids are involved. Necro literally removes consent a corpse can't agree to anything That's why those are abuse. Porn, alcohol, gambling etc don't cross that line they're just vices people choose.

Everything involves muh power dynamic. This is the same as boss and employee, parent and child, age of your partner. They’re all extents of power; relationships with age gaps or gaps in education would have to be declared as immoral under this. Incest quite literally cannot be declared as wrong under your framework. You just emotively think it’s wrong.

The corpse can’t consent, sure, but neither can a pillow. At the point of death, they are nothing more than inanimate now; you can treat the corpse like you would any inanimate object and there is no harm done.

We emotively feel these are all wrong, but you’re failing to understanding there’s absolutely no reason for it bar emotive nonsense.

 

[imontheloose]

It makes no sense

Almost no government on the planet does this, and those that do, simply ban any site that contains porn in general, and the ''smarter'' adults or young people (top 5% of them) will use VPN and that's it, but the vast majority in the country / young people will not consume porn bc of this, and that's perfectly fine

But this witch hunt of "hey, they're still watching porn through VPNs. Let's block VPNs," but then they'll say they're watching porn through other methods, and they'll still find some option to consume it if they want to or feel the need, it's just dumb..

You can't realistically stop that, or if you do, you can only do it to a certain extent, superficially

That's why I said it. Porn sites should have rules and warnings about age, and parents should monitor children, that's the first barrier that any country has.. whatever happens after that.. you can only do something to a certain extent, as a government, or as whatever..

Yes. This level of policing is too much and although the level of VPN usage is absolutely above 5% of porn-watchers given how it skyrocketed to the number one downloaded umbrella of apps for the month, it doesn’t mean they need to be regulated.

There are so many loopholes for this sort of thing and they’re not tricky at all. The government is making a tit out of themselves. I said this in the thread I linked in OP, it is an assisted dying bill. Seems intentionally implemented as a soft start to greater surveillance.

 

[imontheloose]

Over for the yookay , thank god mullvad exists

Mullvad won’t take you out of Birmingham, son. You need to evacuate ASAP.

 

[wishIwasSalludon]

Supposed to be a free country btw