AI + PCT DISCUSSION

gymcelled

gymcelled

6'3 sub5 hardstuck
Joined
Jun 28, 2025
Posts
585
Reputation
536
I see so many people say AI is cope or PCT is cope, so I’d like to discuss this.

When on a testosterone cycle, AI and PCT is very useful, if you want to minimize side effects and try to save your natural T production post-cycle.

Please tell me how this is bad.
 
  • +1
Reactions: renos
nigga who said aromatase inhibitors are cope :lul:, they are very effective when ur estrogen is high

and not sure on pcts, i see a lot of bodybuilders agree with it and a lot of people like @imontheloose against it, imma have to do my own research on it.

also dont roid if u are planning on coming off lol
 
  • +1
Reactions: SouthAfricancel, FutureSlayer, aids and 2 others
nigga who said aromatase inhibitors are cope :lul:, they are very effective when ur estrogen is high

and not sure on pcts, i see a lot of bodybuilders agree with it and a lot of people like @imontheloose against it, imma have to do my own research on it.

also dont roid if u are planning on coming off lol
IMG 2482

this is what prompted me to make this post, as there was a lil guy asking about AI, and this guy convinced him to not do it :forcedsmile:
 
  • +1
Reactions: renos
I just permarun hcg
 
  • +1
Reactions: elkkkk, aids, flambria and 2 others
i said ais are useful if u have high estrogen, its not gonna increase your height too much (most likely wont lol).

plus estrogen is necessary for height growth, is neuro protective and cardio protective
i mean OP said hes considering an AI off bloodwork - so i’m guessing he has high estrogen. to which then bryce said its cope :feelswat:
 
  • +1
Reactions: renos
Some steroids themselves reduce estrogen levels (but that's bullshit, DHT derivatives). Obviously, most people don't need PCT. Fuck your hormones? I'll be on testosterone and growth hormone for the rest of my life lol. That's why bridges are used instead of PCT
 
  • +1
Reactions: renos
Some steroids themselves reduce estrogen levels (but that's bullshit, DHT derivatives). Obviously, most people don't need PCT. Fuck your hormones? I'll be on testosterone and growth hormone for the rest of my life lol. That's why bridges are used instead of PCT
i mean if im planning to only do one cycle, and then try to go to normal levels, pct just makes sense no?
 
nigga who said aromatase inhibitors are cope :lul:, they are very effective when ur estrogen is high

and not sure on pcts, i see a lot of bodybuilders agree with it and a lot of people like @imontheloose against it, imma have to do my own research on it.

also dont roid if u are planning on coming off lol
What is the need for anything above hCG for muh therapy? PCT is a meme.
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: ru58841
i mean OP said hes considering an AI off bloodwork - so i’m guessing he has high estrogen. to which then bryce said its cope :feelswat:
he probably thought he meant using an ai for heightmaxxing, i doubt bryce thinks ais are shit for controlling estrogen lol
 
i mean if im planning to only do one cycle, and then try to go to normal levels, pct just makes sense no?
ngl if you are taking steroids then taking risks for the sake of 1 cycle is a stupid idea. write your course in more detail, you probably don't need PCT only hcg
 
What is the need for anything above hCG for muh therapy? PCT is a meme.
hcg only boosts your testosterone production while ur pinning it, when u stop it stops (afaik)
pct is trying to restart your NATURAL production
 
hcg only boosts your testosterone production while ur pinning it, when u stop it stops (afaik)
pct is trying to restart your NATURAL production
What on earth are you talking about? Your pituitary recovers itself and doesn’t need any PCT. Your balls need to kickstart back and hCG does that for you.
 
  • +1
Reactions: ru58841, SlayerJonas and flambria
What on earth are you talking about? Your pituitary recovers itself and doesn’t need any PCT. Your balls need to kickstart back and hCG does that for you.
your pituitary recovering itself is very slow and unpredictable. thats why you help with serms
 
ngl if you are taking steroids then taking risks for the sake of 1 cycle is a stupid idea. write your course in more detail, you probably don't need PCT only hcg
i want to do one cycle just to boost my gym progress, and then i can continue naturally.
that’s why i want pct - to try and recover fully from it (ofc i know thats not guaranteed)
 
your pituitary recovering itself is very slow and unpredictable. thats why you help with serms
It’s actually very quick. You are a clueless normie.
 
  • +1
Reactions: renos
i want to do one cycle just to boost my gym progress, and then i can continue naturally.
that’s why i want pct - to try and recover fully from it (ofc i know thats not guaranteed)
I think this is a damn stupid idea
 
rando org user knows more than the millions of bodybuilders swearing by pct :forcedsmile:
You’re actually retarded. No, millions don’t swear by it. If you trust a few bodybuilders so much, go copy each and every one of their habits. You should be injecting oil into yourself and blasting grams of tren.

Kill yourself. You’re seriously a waste of space on this planet. I did you the honour of lecturing you on PCT and you make up a fact to justify your bullshit. Suicide is mandatory.

@chadisbeingmade @SlayerJonas
 
  • +1
Reactions: chadisbeingmade, ru58841, SlayerJonas and 1 other person
You’re actually retarded. No, millions don’t swear by it. If you trust a few bodybuilders so much, go copy each and every one of their habits. You should be injecting oil into yourself and blasting grams of tren.

Kill yourself. You’re seriously a waste of space on this planet. I did you the honour of lecturing you on PCT and you make up a fact to justify your bullshit. Suicide is mandatory.

@chadisbeingmade @SlayerJonas
still no explanation for why pct is bad, just “trust me bro i know more than you”
truly a specimen of the human kind
 
  • +1
Reactions: elkkkk and renos
what happened to nandrolone only
When i say deca only i mean deca + 10 other ancillaries to migigate its disasterous side effect profile
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: SouthAfricancel, ru58841, Oreone and 1 other person
still no explanation for why pct is bad, just “trust me bro i know more than you”
truly a specimen of the human kind
I explained to you very clearly that the pituitary bounces back quickly. Not to mention that there is not one study on PCT doing anything helpful; in fact, it only did absolutely nothing useful and arguably had a negative outcome on one particular study.

What other evidence do you need? Another random bodybuilder injecting oil in his tits to tell you it’s good?
 
  • +1
Reactions: chadisbeingmade, ru58841, SlayerJonas and 3 others
I explained to you very clearly that the pituitary bounces back quickly. Not to mention that there is not one study on PCT doing anything helpful; in fact, it only did absolutely nothing useful and arguably had a negative outcome.

What other evidence do you need? Another random bodybuilder injecting oil in his tits to tell you it’s good?
your explanation is just a random statement “the pituitary bounces back quickly”
any evidence of that? feel free to share the studies that told u this fact.
 
your explanation is just a random statement “the pituitary bounces back quickly”
any evidence of that? feel free to share the studies that told u this fact.

“We were unable to demonstrate any beneficial effect of medications referred to as PCT, therefore the use of these agents should be discouraged.”

Fucking retarded cunt.
 
  • +1
Reactions: SlayerJonas and renos
nigga who said aromatase inhibitors are cope :lul:, they are very effective when ur estrogen is high

and not sure on pcts, i see a lot of bodybuilders agree with it and a lot of people like @imontheloose against it, imma have to do my own research on it.

also dont roid if u are planning on coming off lol
agreed with the last statement if you are planning to roid never think about leaving it
 
  • +1
Reactions: renos

“We were unable to demonstrate any beneficial effect of medications referred to as PCT, therefore the use of these agents should be discouraged.”

Fucking retarded cunt.
hCG as PCT is more than enough including in the long-term.

There are only limited niche use cases for SERMs, using them as PCT is stupid.
 
  • +1
Reactions: chadisbeingmade, ru58841, aids and 2 others
hCG as PCT is more than enough including in the long-term.

There are only limited niche use cases for SERMs, using them as PCT is stupid.
Woah, son. OP is about to say you made that up and to trust Rich Piana. I haven’t saw someone on this forum who is more worthless, seriously.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: chadisbeingmade and SlayerJonas
Woah, son. OP is about to say you made that up and to trust Rich Piana. I haven’t saw someone on this forum who is more worthless, seriously.
"B-but the majority says-" is where he failed.
 
  • +1
Reactions: imontheloose

“We were unable to demonstrate any beneficial effect of medications referred to as PCT, therefore the use of these agents should be discouraged.”

Fucking retarded cunt.
“Recovery of testosterone levels doesn’t account for how quickly or fully the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis (HPTA) restarts - what matters for real-world effects like libido, mood, and fertility.”

It’s a good study, but I guess there are studies for and against PCT, so we won’t get anywhere by arguing.



 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: renos
What do you mean? Democracy has always worked, clearly. The majority is always correct.
Cope. We need an aristocracy with the shanghai triplets at the top.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: imontheloose
"B-but the majority says-" is where he failed.
so if pct helped 90 people and didn’t do anything for 10, majority doesn’t matter and we can conclude it’s useless because of the 10 people?

interesting view
 
  • +1
Reactions: renos
“Recovery of testosterone levels doesn’t account for how quickly or fully the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis (HPTA) restarts - what matters for real-world effects like libido, mood, and fertility.”

It’s a good study, but I guess there are studies for and against PCT, so we won’t get anywhere by arguing.



Nice, a single case and general hypogonadiam populations.

Still waiting for the PCT study. @SlayerJonas @chadisbeingmade
 
  • +1
Reactions: chadisbeingmade, renos and SlayerJonas
hCG as PCT is more than enough including in the long-term.

There are only limited niche use cases for SERMs, using them as PCT is stupid.
To clarify, are you saying HCG specifically for PCT, or as on-cycle support, for coming off easier?

I explained to you very clearly that the pituitary bounces back quickly. Not to mention that there is not one study on PCT doing anything helpful; in fact, it only did absolutely nothing useful and arguably had a negative outcome on one particular study.

What other evidence do you need? Another random bodybuilder injecting oil in his tits to tell you it’s good?
The study (I think) you are referring to is flawed, given the soonest bloodwork that the participants had done post-cycle (excluding immediately), was 3-months post-cycle.

No person running a 3 month cycle of AAS will run PCT for 3 months, especially given all participants had normal blood results pre-cycle.

It would have been better to have participants do bloodwork 1 month post-cycle as well, to more effectively gauge the contributions of PCT. I also don't recall which compounds they used for PCT, maybe you can shed some light, but unless all commonly-used SERMs were included in the study en masse, we can't rule them out as not helping.

You cannot definitively conclude that PCT did not help with recovering endogenous production, solely because sperm count was lower in the experimental group one year after the beginning of the cycle.

I am not necessarily saying that this means PCT is going to expedite recovery, but you cannot rule it out given how the study was conducted.

I personally will run HCG for the remainder of my cycle and PCT with Enclomiphene, I'd rather waste money and have slightly lower sperm volume 9 months later, than potentially inhibit my recovery time by not using it.
 
  • +1
Reactions: SouthAfricancel, renos, SlayerJonas and 1 other person
To clarify, are you saying HCG specifically for PCT, or as on-cycle support, for coming off easier?


The study (I think) you are referring to is flawed, given the soonest bloodwork that the participants had done post-cycle (excluding immediately), was 3-months post-cycle.

No person running a 3 month cycle of AAS will run PCT for 3 months, especially given all participants had normal blood results pre-cycle.

It would have been better to have participants do bloodwork 1 month post-cycle as well, to more effectively gauge the contributions of PCT. I also don't recall which compounds they used for PCT, maybe you can shed some light, but unless all commonly-used SERMs were included in the study en masse, we can't rule them out as not helping.

You cannot definitively conclude that PCT did not help with recovering endogenous production, solely because sperm count was lower in the experimental group one year after the beginning of the cycle.

I am not necessarily saying that this means PCT is going to expedite recovery, but you cannot rule it out given how the study was conducted.

I personally will run HCG for the remainder of my cycle and PCT with Enclomiphene, I'd rather waste money and have slightly lower sperm volume 9 months later, than potentially inhibit my recovery time by not using it.
The study is shit, yes. But it is the only study on PCT. What can you do? There’s no point inventing information to justify using PCT when the only data on it so far shows that it, at best, has zero positive effect, if not entirely negative.
 
  • +1
Reactions: chadisbeingmade, renos, SlayerJonas and 1 other person
To clarify, are you saying HCG specifically for PCT, or as on-cycle support, for coming off easier?


The study (I think) you are referring to is flawed, given the soonest bloodwork that the participants had done post-cycle (excluding immediately), was 3-months post-cycle.

No person running a 3 month cycle of AAS will run PCT for 3 months, especially given all participants had normal blood results pre-cycle.

It would have been better to have participants do bloodwork 1 month post-cycle as well, to more effectively gauge the contributions of PCT. I also don't recall which compounds they used for PCT, maybe you can shed some light, but unless all commonly-used SERMs were included in the study en masse, we can't rule them out as not helping.

You cannot definitively conclude that PCT did not help with recovering endogenous production, solely because sperm count was lower in the experimental group one year after the beginning of the cycle.

I am not necessarily saying that this means PCT is going to expedite recovery, but you cannot rule it out given how the study was conducted.

I personally will run HCG for the remainder of my cycle and PCT with Enclomiphene, I'd rather waste money and have slightly lower sperm volume 9 months later, than potentially inhibit my recovery time by not using it.
holy high iq user :soy:
 
  • +1
Reactions: renos and aids

“We were unable to demonstrate any beneficial effect of medications referred to as PCT, therefore the use of these agents should be discouraged.”

Fucking retarded cunt.
jfl entire study was on self administered PCT with no knowledge of what, how long, and how much, dudes couldve been running clomid as pct:lul:
 
  • +1
Reactions: gymcelled
The study is shit, yes. But it is the only study on PCT. What can you do? There’s no point inventing information to justify using PCT when the only data on it so far shows that it, at best, has zero positive effect, if not entirely negative.
wait so ur agreeing you use a flawed study to confirm your beliefs, even tho you know it’s probably not accurate?

what if the study said PCT did help? would u still be using that study or would u be on here telling us that the study is worthless and pct is useless anyways

low iq, dni
 
The study is shit, yes. But it is the only study on PCT. What can you do? There’s no point inventing information to justify using PCT when the only data on it so far shows that it, at best, has zero positive effect, if not entirely negative.
I agree as to there not being literature for PCT helping but personally will not let that sway me to not PCT whatsoever.
Again, I'd rather use it acknowledging the risks than not, and potentially delay recovery.
Though I think we can both agree that using HCG on-cycle to keep LH/FSH high is definitively going to help with recovering endogenous production.
 
  • +1
Reactions: SouthAfricancel and renos
jfl entire study was on self administered PCT with no knowledge of what, how long, and how much, dudes couldve been running clomid as pct:lul:
And it’s still the only study on PCT. This is my literal point.
wait so ur agreeing you use a flawed study to confirm your beliefs, even tho you know it’s probably not accurate?

what if the study said PCT did help? would u still be using that study or would u be on here telling us that the study is worthless and pct is useless anyways

low iq, dni
I didn’t confirm my beliefs by it. I stated that the only study on it had a negative impact yet initially affirmed there is no data on it, so I actually disregarded the study myself.

You are absolutely clueless. If the study said it helped, I’d have shown it helped in this one particular study so there isn’t enough data to say it has negative impacts. Same way here I will say the only study was negative so there’s no reason to believe it’ll have a positive effect.

You’re unironically the lowest IQ user on this site.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: chadisbeingmade, SlayerJonas and aids
I see so many people say AI is cope or PCT is cope, so I’d like to discuss this.

When on a testosterone cycle, AI and PCT is very useful, if you want to minimize side effects and try to save your natural T production post-cycle.

Please tell me how this is bad.
nah, just masks your recovering process, it actually isn’t different than recovering naturally
 
wait so ur agreeing you use a flawed study to confirm your beliefs, even tho you know it’s probably not accurate?

what if the study said PCT did help? would u still be using that study or would u be on here telling us that the study is worthless and pct is useless anyways

low iq, dni
A flawed study does not necessarily mean we should not consider it whatsoever. As @imontheloose mentioned, it's all we have.
The discourse surrounding PCT is slippery because all the evidence for/against it is either anecdotal, or not flawless.
He is not wrong to mention this study, but it should not be considered as proof to definitively rule out PCT, which I don't think is his implication; it is evidence against, not proof.
 
  • +1
Reactions: imontheloose
I agree as to there not being literature for PCT helping but personally will not let that sway me to not PCT whatsoever.
Again, I'd rather use it acknowledging the risks than not, and potentially delay recovery.
Though I think we can both agree that using HCG on-cycle to keep LH/FSH high is definitively going to help with recovering endogenous production.
I have advocated for hCG for ages. OP believes PCT helps and thinks that the lack of literature means you must now trust bodybuilders injecting oil into their tits.

I follow the data and there is no reason to believe it works. If you want to take it for the sake of muh safety then that is a personal decision.
 
  • +1
Reactions: chadisbeingmade, renos and aids
A flawed study does not necessarily mean we should not consider it whatsoever. As @imontheloose mentioned, it's all we have.
The discourse surrounding PCT is slippery because all the evidence for/against it is either anecdotal, or not flawless.
He is not wrong to mention this study, but it should not be considered as proof to definitively rule out PCT, which I don't think is the implication; it is evidence against, not proof.
Precisely. Evidence against, not proof. Very well put.

I did not base my premise on that study. I disregarded it and stated there was zero data and that the ONLY information we have was negative.
 
  • +1
Reactions: chadisbeingmade and aids
I have advocated for hCG for ages. OP believes PCT helps and thinks that the lack of literature means you must now trust bodybuilders injecting oil into their tits.

I follow the data and there is no reason to believe it works. If you want to take it for the sake of muh safety then that is a personal decision.
Have you advocated for HCG use on-cycle, post-cycle, or both?
 
  • +1
Reactions: imontheloose

Similar threads

skareye
Replies
7
Views
221
skareye
skareye
Azie555
Replies
211
Views
3K
Copercel
Copercel
Zeba
Replies
5
Views
172
Dastan
Dastan
stufftodo
Replies
4
Views
240
eyecope
E
ru58841
Replies
9
Views
253
Keylozz
Keylozz

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top