All your theories come to a halt when watching how dating dynamics play out in real life

D

Deleted member 15468

Luminary
Joined
Sep 25, 2021
Posts
4,871
Reputation
7,608
This is water to people who have actual social experience and self-reflect but I think I still need to point it out to a few of you:

All your theories are too shitty and small in scope to be accurate in how dating and attraction plays out in real life.

Most of it is a coping mechanism. You might think: „how can something as nihilistic as the blackpill be cope?“

Its pretty easy to explain. A lot of you (myself included) have a very analytical approach to life, and a strong hunger for knowledge and understanding. This is probably the #1 thing people here have in common.

Dating and attraction however is faaar too complex and fluid to just reduce it to looks. Same for redpill or whatever theory basement dwellers come up with.

We‘re basically the conspiracy theorists of dating. Exactly how some people can‘t comprehend their poorness and say ‚muh the illuminati/jews/etc are responsible for my misery‘, we say ‚muh its only about looks, when in reality dating (and in my analogy wealth and the economy) is very complex.

Every single theory I‘ve seen here can be debunked by spending one night outside and watching who hooks up with whom. The positive and negative ones.

There is no formula for attraction. It‘s detrimental to take an analytical approach to it, as it is far too complex and never plays out how you expect.

There‘s just too much variance in individual preferences. The one trait or attraction switch that‘s probably most effective is portraying confidence/competence. But even then there are girls who don‘t care as long as you‘re attractive enough.

TL;DR: None of your theories and formulas will ever be able to accurately estimate how attraction plays out in real life. I personally wish there was one too, but realistically there is none and there will never be one.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
  • Ugh..
Reactions: chadison, Deleted member 16357, Adonisss and 45 others
I need looks for confidence, it was never about slaying or dating to begin with.
 
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: rand anon, Yuya Moggershima, Juice WRLD and 8 others
I've got a theory and I think it's the only one that matters

If they like you, they will fuck you

If they don't like you, they won't fuck you

They don't fuck me

Therefore they don't like me
 
  • +1
  • JFL
  • Hmm...
Reactions: OGJBSLAYER, vanillaicecream, AppealMaxxing and 12 others
I've got a theory and I think it's the only one that matters

If they like you, they will fuck you

If they don't like you, they won't fuck you

They don't fuck me

Therefore they don't like me
smart conclusion
 
  • +1
Reactions: ReadBooksEveryday, Deleted member 29167, subhuman incel and 1 other person
Cope you don't have experience you're Just 19 yo. Once you enter adult world you realize every girl turns into a massive slut if chad Is around even if she's engaged. you would know that those looksmatched or girl mogs ltr don't play out very well, there's Always conflict and few Joy and sex.

Females all look the same more or less (pimeyes doesn't work for them while It works wonders on males), chad Is LITERALLY a different species and there Is an objective rule to determine it
 
  • +1
  • So Sad
Reactions: rand anon, OGJBSLAYER, BoneDensity and 14 others
I need looks for confidence, it was never about slaying or dating to begin with.
Like all of us

To slay/ltr a girl its not just about the look, anyway irl
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 29167
This is water to people who have actual social experience and self-reflect but I think I still need to point it out to a few of you:

All your theories are too shitty and small in scope to be accurate in how dating and attraction plays out in real life.

Most of it is a coping mechanism. You might think: „how can something as nihilistic as the blackpill be cope?“

Its pretty easy to explain. A lot of you (myself included) have a very analytical approach to life, and a strong hunger for knowledge and understanding. This is probably the #1 thing people here have in common.

Dating and attraction however is faaar too complex and fluid to just reduce it to looks. Same for redpill or whatever theory basement dwellers come up with.

We‘re basically the conspiracy theorists of dating. Exactly how some people can‘t comprehend their poorness and say ‚muh the illuminati/jews/etc are responsible for my misery‘, we say ‚muh its only about looks, when in reality dating (and in my analogy wealth and the economy) is very complex.

Every single theory I‘ve seen here can be debunked by spending one night outside and watching who hooks up with whom. The positive and negative ones.

There is no formula for attraction. It‘s detrimental to take an analytical approach to it, as it is far too complex and never plays out how you expect.

There‘s just too much variance in individual preferences. The one trait or attraction switch that‘s probably most effective is portraying confidence/competence. But even then there are girls who don‘t care as long as you‘re attractive enough.

TL;DR: None of your theories and formulas will ever be able to accurately estimate how attraction plays out in real life. I personally wish there was one too, but realistically there is none and there will never be one.
This is indeed very true to the last letter. But I will still cope with black pill.
Interested I Like It GIF by UFC
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: ReadBooksEveryday, CFW432 and Deleted member 15468
Cope you don't have experience you're Just 19 yo. Once you enter adult world you realize every girl turns into a massive slut if chad Is around even if she's engaged. you would know that those looksmatched or girl mogs ltr don't play out very well, there's Always conflict and few Joy and sex.
Its really true


for ltr to work well you must be at least gl . If not she will be frustrated
 
  • +1
Reactions: the BULL
i agree. for example, if you looked how asertive and cocky i was with my tinder date you could easily understand that looks were the issue
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: ReadBooksEveryday, Deleted member 23558, the BULL and 1 other person
This is water to people who have actual social experience and self-reflect but I think I still need to point it out to a few of you:

All your theories are too shitty and small in scope to be accurate in how dating and attraction plays out in real life.

Most of it is a coping mechanism. You might think: „how can something as nihilistic as the blackpill be cope?“

Its pretty easy to explain. A lot of you (myself included) have a very analytical approach to life, and a strong hunger for knowledge and understanding. This is probably the #1 thing people here have in common.

Dating and attraction however is faaar too complex and fluid to just reduce it to looks. Same for redpill or whatever theory basement dwellers come up with.

We‘re basically the conspiracy theorists of dating. Exactly how some people can‘t comprehend their poorness and say ‚muh the illuminati/jews/etc are responsible for my misery‘, we say ‚muh its only about looks, when in reality dating (and in my analogy wealth and the economy) is very complex.

Every single theory I‘ve seen here can be debunked by spending one night outside and watching who hooks up with whom. The positive and negative ones.

There is no formula for attraction. It‘s detrimental to take an analytical approach to it, as it is far too complex and never plays out how you expect.

There‘s just too much variance in individual preferences. The one trait or attraction switch that‘s probably most effective is portraying confidence/competence. But even then there are girls who don‘t care as long as you‘re attractive enough.

TL;DR: None of your theories and formulas will ever be able to accurately estimate how attraction plays out in real life. I personally wish there was one too, but realistically there is none and there will never be one.
I've been to HTNs bedrooms. All the PSL theories are true. The more I go outside, the more their get reinforced.
 
  • +1
Reactions: BoneDensity, User49, Deleted member 29167 and 3 others
This forum underrates the importance of social skill/money too much when talking about ltr. The face is an important parameter for attractiveness, but if you are an empty shell the girl will get tired of you even if you are chadlite. In the same way if you are mtn or poor it's shit because she will always see better than you and will also end up being frustrated. It's all about balance
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 28883, bishōnenmaxxer, ReadBooksEveryday and 5 others
I've been to HTNs bedrooms. All the PSL theories are true. The more I go outside, the more their get reinforced.
U can be facially strong mtn/low htn and smv wise far more than that. Women aren't just interested in the face.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 27213, ReadBooksEveryday, Deleted member 29167 and 4 others
i agree with the right theories
 
U can be facially strong mtn/low htn and smv wise far more than that. Women aren't just interested in the face.
Tall with wide frame and HTN face = Hasan Piker = won the genetic lottery
 
  • +1
Reactions: BoneDensity, User49, Deleted member 29167 and 3 others
  • Ugh..
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: BoneDensity, ReadBooksEveryday and St.TikTokcel
This forum underrates the importance of social skill/money too much when talking about ltr. The face is an important parameter for attractiveness, but if you are an empty shell the girl will get tired of you even if you are chadlite. In the same way if you are mtn or poor it's shit because she will always see better than you and will also end up being frustrated. It's all about balance
even for str its important
 
  • +1
Reactions: ReadBooksEveryday and Deleted member 24789
U can be facially strong mtn/low htn and smv wise far more than that. Women aren't just interested in the face.
Who cares about betabuxxing and being in a dead relationship though
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: BoneDensity, Deleted member 28691, AsGoodAsItGets and 1 other person
Cope you don't have experience you're Just 19 yo. Once you enter adult world you realize every girl turns into a massive slut if chad Is around even if she's engaged. you would know that those looksmatched or girl mogs ltr don't play out very well, there's Always conflict and few Joy and sex.

Females all look the same more or less (pimeyes doesn't work for them while It works wonders on males), chad Is LITERALLY a different species and there Is an objective rule to determine it
stfu im 23 years and ive been out like twice every month on sverage, meanwhile youre a neet and have no friends at all

no there is not an objective rule to determine chad, and not all girls thirst for them

sure some do, but you dont need to reach the .org threshhold to reach it
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 25710, Deleted member 27213, Deleted member 22888 and 5 others
  • JFL
Reactions: the BULL
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: BoneDensity and Deleted member 27213
sure some do, but you dont need to reach the .org threshhold to reach it
You need to reach IRL's threshold of HTN. .org's HTN is a genetic dead end IRL.
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: BoneDensity, AsGoodAsItGets, It'snotover and 1 other person
stfu im 23 years and ive been out like twice every month on sverage, meanwhile youre a neet and have no friends at all

no there is not an objective rule to determine chad, and not all girls thirst for them

sure some do, but you dont need to reach the .org threshhold to reach it
Ahahahahahahahahahahah twice every month?? I'm out every day buddy boyo. Who fucking told you i have no Friends?? Another fake news spread by dalits??

There Is an objective rule to determine chad. Maherfish and other Major chadfishes have proven that EVERY girl thrist for them

Besides that i go to a club where Mario perozzi works as a bouncer, he Just stands still silent and i hear girls saying "he's tooooo hot i would let him choke me" while other normies are simping for nothing. HTNs get some play
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 16357, OGJBSLAYER, User49 and 7 others
rare 3 digit iq looksmax user
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 27213
  • +1
Reactions: St.TikTokcel
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 23558, AsGoodAsItGets and St.TikTokcel
Having a rich chad for a friend cemented blackpill in my mind. You can add confidence in equation, but it's pretty easy to be confident when you were getting positive reinforcement and offers from foids from an early age due to good looks.
 
  • +1
Reactions: p0lishsubhuman, ManletBlackcel, Deleted member 29167 and 5 others
tl;dr cope looks above all else
 
This is water to people who have actual social experience and self-reflect but I think I still need to point it out to a few of you:

All your theories are too shitty and small in scope to be accurate in how dating and attraction plays out in real life.

Most of it is a coping mechanism. You might think: „how can something as nihilistic as the blackpill be cope?“

Its pretty easy to explain. A lot of you (myself included) have a very analytical approach to life, and a strong hunger for knowledge and understanding. This is probably the #1 thing people here have in common.

Dating and attraction however is faaar too complex and fluid to just reduce it to looks. Same for redpill or whatever theory basement dwellers come up with.

We‘re basically the conspiracy theorists of dating. Exactly how some people can‘t comprehend their poorness and say ‚muh the illuminati/jews/etc are responsible for my misery‘, we say ‚muh its only about looks, when in reality dating (and in my analogy wealth and the economy) is very complex.

Every single theory I‘ve seen here can be debunked by spending one night outside and watching who hooks up with whom. The positive and negative ones.

There is no formula for attraction. It‘s detrimental to take an analytical approach to it, as it is far too complex and never plays out how you expect.

There‘s just too much variance in individual preferences. The one trait or attraction switch that‘s probably most effective is portraying confidence/competence. But even then there are girls who don‘t care as long as you‘re attractive enough.

TL;DR: None of your theories and formulas will ever be able to accurately estimate how attraction plays out in real life. I personally wish there was one too, but realistically there is none and there will never be one.
Brain>looks
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: St.TikTokcel and Deleted member 29167
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 15468
the only theory that exists is be better than the competition
 
  • +1
Reactions: the BULL
its obvious from your posts
What a clueless retard you are. Just because i don't take pics with my Friends or the girls i slay It doesn't mean they don't exist
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 23558
You can add confidence in equation, but it's pretty easy to be confident
But op didn't talk about confidence, he simply said that looking outside most of the couples and even hook ups males are not that gl and they would be rated low here which is true, meaning that blackpill is not the absolute truth. Then explain why facially mtn max guys have success irl when it's all about the face.
Yeah chad can fuck everything and cant't lose etc but they are like 1% of male population, they live in different universe
 
This is water to people who have actual social experience and self-reflect but I think I still need to point it out to a few of you:

All your theories are too shitty and small in scope to be accurate in how dating and attraction plays out in real life.

Most of it is a coping mechanism. You might think: „how can something as nihilistic as the blackpill be cope?“

Its pretty easy to explain. A lot of you (myself included) have a very analytical approach to life, and a strong hunger for knowledge and understanding. This is probably the #1 thing people here have in common.

Dating and attraction however is faaar too complex and fluid to just reduce it to looks. Same for redpill or whatever theory basement dwellers come up with.

We‘re basically the conspiracy theorists of dating. Exactly how some people can‘t comprehend their poorness and say ‚muh the illuminati/jews/etc are responsible for my misery‘, we say ‚muh its only about looks, when in reality dating (and in my analogy wealth and the economy) is very complex.

Every single theory I‘ve seen here can be debunked by spending one night outside and watching who hooks up with whom. The positive and negative ones.

There is no formula for attraction. It‘s detrimental to take an analytical approach to it, as it is far too complex and never plays out how you expect.

There‘s just too much variance in individual preferences. The one trait or attraction switch that‘s probably most effective is portraying confidence/competence. But even then there are girls who don‘t care as long as you‘re attractive enough.

TL;DR: None of your theories and formulas will ever be able to accurately estimate how attraction plays out in real life. I personally wish there was one too, but realistically there is none and there will never be one.
What hair colour is your girlfriend bro
 
  • JFL
Reactions: the BULL
Basicallly everyone thinks the formula is x/10 face.
the real formula is:
1685798717494


where x, y, and z are lookz, money, and status
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 21765 and AsGoodAsItGets
This is water to people who have actual social experience and self-reflect but I think I still need to point it out to a few of you:

All your theories are too shitty and small in scope to be accurate in how dating and attraction plays out in real life.

Most of it is a coping mechanism. You might think: „how can something as nihilistic as the blackpill be cope?“

Its pretty easy to explain. A lot of you (myself included) have a very analytical approach to life, and a strong hunger for knowledge and understanding. This is probably the #1 thing people here have in common.

Dating and attraction however is faaar too complex and fluid to just reduce it to looks. Same for redpill or whatever theory basement dwellers come up with.

We‘re basically the conspiracy theorists of dating. Exactly how some people can‘t comprehend their poorness and say ‚muh the illuminati/jews/etc are responsible for my misery‘, we say ‚muh its only about looks, when in reality dating (and in my analogy wealth and the economy) is very complex.

Every single theory I‘ve seen here can be debunked by spending one night outside and watching who hooks up with whom. The positive and negative ones.

There is no formula for attraction. It‘s detrimental to take an analytical approach to it, as it is far too complex and never plays out how you expect.

There‘s just too much variance in individual preferences. The one trait or attraction switch that‘s probably most effective is portraying confidence/competence. But even then there are girls who don‘t care as long as you‘re attractive enough.

TL;DR: None of your theories and formulas will ever be able to accurately estimate how attraction plays out in real life. I personally wish there was one too, but realistically there is none and there will never be one.
The more complex subjects get the more analytic it gets.

Game js important.

Looks is important.

Moneyb is important.

Status is important.

You need everything bro.

Instead of comparing Chad Vs HTB VS. MTN VS etc,

Compare a hypothetical of different versions of the same Chad / HTN / MTN with different combinations of money, status, game, network etc.

The one with more skill in each win.

Ive “AMOG”ged chads to fuck girls when I was completey unkempt, manboobs, acne, bloated, no muscle mass just hecause I had extremely good game and was statusmaxxed / circlemaxxed. (Preselection)

Ive also seen LTNs and below score with girls with money and charisma.

So yeah why not optimize for everything.

Go to the gym,

Get your skin right

Get your money right

Get surgeries if needed

Build money and a network to make cool things, going places and meeting people possible

Get your social presence right

Know game, practice low-risk low investment day/night game
 
The more complex subjects get the more analytic it gets.

Game js important.

Looks is important.

Moneyb is important.

Status is important.

You need everything bro.

Instead of comparing Chad Vs HTB VS. MTN VS etc,

Compare a hypothetical of different versions of the same Chad / HTN / MTN with different combinations of money, status, game, network etc.

The one with more skill in each win.

Ive “AMOG”ged chads to fuck girls when I was completey unkempt, manboobs, acne, bloated, no muscle mass just hecause I had extremely good game and was statusmaxxed / circlemaxxed. (Preselection)

Ive also seen LTNs and below score with girls with money and charisma.

So yeah why not optimize for everything.

Go to the gym,

Get your skin right

Get your money right

Get surgeries if needed

Build money and a network to make cool things, going places and meeting people possible

Get your social presence right

Know game, practice low-risk low investment day/night game
By the way I used textbook AMOG.

“Oh thats a cool shirt, I used to have the same in high school”
 
The more complex subjects get the more analytic it gets.

Game js important.

Looks is important.

Moneyb is important.

Status is important.

You need everything bro.

Instead of comparing Chad Vs HTB VS. MTN VS etc,

Compare a hypothetical of different versions of the same Chad / HTN / MTN with different combinations of money, status, game, network etc.

The one with more skill in each win.

Ive “AMOG”ged chads to fuck girls when I was completey unkempt, manboobs, acne, bloated, no muscle mass just hecause I had extremely good game and was statusmaxxed / circlemaxxed. (Preselection)

Ive also seen LTNs and below score with girls with money and charisma.

So yeah why not optimize for everything.

Go to the gym,

Get your skin right

Get your money right

Get surgeries if needed

Build money and a network to make cool things, going places and meeting people possible

Get your social presence right

Know game, practice low-risk low investment day/night game
Bro It's all useless if chad walks into the room. You mogged a bunch of normies
 
Basicallly everyone thinks the formula is x/10 face.
the real formula is:
View attachment 2238222

where x, y, and z are lookz, money, and status
6 PSL neet chad mogs 5 PSL status and Money maxxed htn to the grave. status and Money matters only when you're comparing the same tier of PSL
 
  • +1
Reactions: User49, St.TikTokcel and wollet2
Bro It's all useless if chad walks into the room. You mogged a bunch of normies
Bro, I've socialized so much (weeks on end in day game and night game in top clubs in prime cities) you have no idea.

We even had a WhatsApp group where we shared lays.

One of the guys I AMOGged was a fucking model for a top agency.

What the guy in OP is saying is right.

Just that...

Looks do play a very important part.

But it just gets you in the door.

Just that the guys who win without looks aren't winning despite having shit looks but in spite of shit looks ie other factors.
 
6 PSL neet chad mogs 5 PSL status and Money maxxed htn to the grave. status and Money matters only when you're comparing the same tier of PSL
neet chads cant even sniff some high status Stacy panties
 
  • +1
Reactions: stevielake and AsGoodAsItGets
6 PSL neet chad mogs 5 PSL status and Money maxxed htn to the grave. status and Money matters only when you're comparing the same tier of PSL
ye
 
I agree
The lack of insight people on here have is insane
 
6 PSL neet chad mogs 5 PSL status and Money maxxed htn to the grave. status and Money matters only when you're comparing the same tier of PSL
I've looks maxed extensively so I'm not denying it at all.

But to think looks is everything is just asinine.

Instead of comparing Chad Vs HTB VS. MTN VS etc,

Compare a hypothetical of different versions of the same Chad / HTN / MTN with different combinations of money, status, game, network etc.

The one with more skill in each win.
👆🏼
 
neet chads cant even sniff some high status Stacy panties
keep dreaming
stacy doesn't give a shit about your money she earns more than you
 
  • Love it
Reactions: wollet2
I've looks maxed extensively so I'm not denying it at all.

But to think looks is everything is just asinine.


👆🏼
it's everything other things start to matter only at the same tier, aka if you're a chadlite it doesn't because you barely meet people like you.
 
  • +1
Reactions: AsGoodAsItGets
keep dreaming
stacy doesn't give a shit about your money she earns more than you
No offense but you so clueless its almost funny

Why do celebrities always date eachother you dumbass?
a woman that actually makes money cares about money even more than some broke ho, because she has a way higher living standard
 
  • +1
Reactions: It'snotover, inceI and AsGoodAsItGets
it's everything other things start to matter only at the same tier, aka if you're a chadlite it doesn't because you barely meet people like you
Maybe youre right.

I dont know what yoour rating is, but I’ve been rated HTN - Chadlite before looksmax so i might have a skewed perspective.

My personlal experience is:

Your looks convey a certain image to the person.

Once you start talking to women, if their perceived image of you doesn't match how you actually appear in conversation, you will lose the girl.

I have...

But if it exceeds or matches they think “ah thank god, not a good looking loser simp, interesting”

I don't know if you ever worked in sales, but its the same concept.

You're just selling sex.

And why yoire the best product for sex.
 
No offense but you so clueless its almost funny

Why do celebrities always date eachother you dumbass?
a woman that actually makes money cares about money even more than some broke ho, because she has a way higher living standard
they do it so retards like you spend time on the tv gossiping about them
a random chad would blow melissa satta's ugly old roastie's back
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top