angularity shouldnt be a pillar

how? ian has 60-69 H bro
oxL27Z3XtjoABaOynKazZeg7qKM.jpg

Why wouldn’t bomer have the same
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: -joe, 6'4cel, SilvioMoltisantiDan and 2 others
Its correlated with attractiveness.
So is misc, dimo, and ang

These ratios have nothing to do with proportion or harmony, ur just making lazy arguments now
I was referring to stuff like esr there. These things coexist
Even then an esr score is not very telling, just like any other ratio
I'd like to know how you take harmony. I didn't use a dataset btw i was just defending the mainstream approach
Too complicated to sperg out about here
 
  • +1
Reactions: 6'4cel and xye
Too complicated to sperg out about here
no no no no no dont back out now you just criticized every mainstream way of calculating harmony you gotta back that up
 
  • +1
Reactions: 6'4cel
Nearly every ratio is flawed in that pic
how did you got 76 wtf? impossible to get 76 with nearly all ratios flawed
 
  • +1
Reactions: 6'4cel, pfl, killcry and 1 other person
I didn’t get 76 i just posted an analysis of someone getting 76
Surgerymax just shitposts his front harm is probably 80s
 
  • +1
Reactions: pfl, 6'4cel, SilvioMoltisantiDan and 1 other person
  • +1
Reactions: killcry, pfl, 6'4cel and 1 other person
Chadlite, looks awesome but has some severe dimo flaws, misc isnt chad tier either but its passable
other than his upper third size what's wrong with his dimo?
 
  • +1
Reactions: killcry and SilvioMoltisantiDan
@xye holy shit 4 pages, this thread was interesting make more
 
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: xye and killcry
most of these threads either get 5 replies or get 2 pages of discussion, i guess this thread was really good
really good tbh
 
  • +1
Reactions: xye and killcry
Just zygos and maxilla other than his frontal bone, all are rly bad
i mean i dont think either are bad dimo traits theyre just bad traits in general regardless of dimo. zygos maybe but thats not major or severe he has good ratio based dimorphism and misc based dimorphism, his side is where most of the flaws come from though
 
  • +1
Reactions: killcry
i mean i dont think either are bad dimo traits theyre just bad traits in general regardless of dimo. zygos maybe but thats not major or severe he has good ratio based dimorphism and misc based dimorphism, his side is where most of the flaws come from though
What ratios and misc trend masculine lmao are we looking at the same face, and they are bad dimo traits
 
  • +1
Reactions: xye
What ratios and misc trend masculine lmao are we looking at the same face, and they are bad dimo traits
idk if you consider him a chinlet but if you do thats a misc deduction
everything harmony wise looks dimorphic except for obv upper third height and maybe midface ratio and tfwhr? i dont know it might be off
 
  • +1
Reactions: killcry
idk if you consider him a chinlet but if you do thats a misc deduction
everything harmony wise looks dimorphic except for obv upper third height and maybe midface ratio and tfwhr? i dont know it might be off
Nah you're off you're gonna have to measure yourself & there's nothing wrong with his chin

Ratio dimo is a myth that shit comes from your BONES which he has feminine development

So does henry cavill but he has more masculine dev regarding his upper maxilla which boosts him like .5 above bomer in dimo
 
  • +1
Reactions: xye
Nah you're off you're gonna have to measure yourself & there's nothing wrong with his chin
in some pics its recessed
but i was referring to chin height
Ratio dimo is a myth that shit comes from your BONES which he has feminine development
i dont think having a poor maxilla is good for female aesthetics
also
1788488845438
a lot of this is ratio based
 
  • +1
Reactions: killcry
in motion you can hardly tell the difference except for maybe the forehead
View attachment 5604286View attachment 5604287
I promise it'd be way more noticeable in motion. Idk why ppl say this. Small changes tend to make a big difference. His zygos would legit pop out of his skull and his forehead height is arguably the least different
im interested in how you calculate harmony though
Pms if you really want to know
also thoughts on this morph?
1788489587879
Chad but I can never tell with morphs. Im just assuming this would be a better looking chris carmack
 
  • +1
Reactions: xye
Chad but I can never tell with morphs. Im just assuming this would be a better looking chris carmack
its a morph of a lot of chads, made it a while ago with the intent of it being an adam morph
I promise it'd be way more noticeable in motion. Idk why ppl say this. Small changes tend to make a big difference. His zygos would legit pop out of his skull and his forehead height is arguably the least different
im not gonna lie i didnt even notice the changes to the zygos. imo harmony and facial proportions as well as misc features and soft tissue are considerably more important than bonemass and angularity. i dont really consider bonemass as a priority while rating tbh
Pms if you really want to know
pmed you
 
  • +1
Reactions: killcry
its a morph of a lot of chads, made it a while ago with the intent of it being an adam morph

im not gonna lie i didnt even notice the changes to the zygos. imo harmony and facial proportions as well as misc features and soft tissue are considerably more important than bonemass and angularity. i dont really consider bonemass as a priority while rating tbh

pmed you
im hopping off tho for today its late good night
 
  • +1
Reactions: killcry

Similar threads

Emz
Replies
2
Views
27
Emz
Emz
freakb0b69
Replies
3
Views
47
AscendHQ
AscendHQ
sync!
Replies
5
Views
70
sync!
sync!
coastal
Replies
9
Views
88
justwantlove
justwantlove
xanlack
Replies
4
Views
68
xanlack
xanlack

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top