Anyone got a plug for Favipiravir??

[htndnrrr]

Favipiravir please

 

[Genio]

Holy shit, Tiktok is a plug for the most useless individual's.

Favipiravir will not change your eyecolour for fuck's sake.
It's all just Pigmentation of the Tear drop which is only visible under UV light and the guy who posted the Slideshows did not provide source's for his evidence. At most it will be barely visible under sunlight, but indoor light's will not provide enough UV for it to show.

 

[htndnrrr]

Holy shit, Tiktok is a plug for the most useless individual's.

Favipiravir will not change your eyecolour for fuck's sake.
It's all just Pigmentation of the Tear drop which is only visible under UV light and the guy who posted the Slideshows did not provide source's for his evidence. At most it will be barely visible under sunlight, but indoor light's will not provide enough UV for it to show.

Dude, I found this out from reading the actual documented cases. I know it won't save my shitty eyes and it only works for 5 days dude. and also the change can be sense in light but there's only been 5> documented cases of it

 

[Genio]

actual documented cases.

Oh yes, the 3 Pubmed Article's, good for you.

and also the change can be sense in light but there's only been 5> documented cases of it

I don't care if there's hundred's or thousand's. we all know how Favipiravir causes Pigmentation, you can't go out on a hunch and say it actually does anything for Eye-colour other than the documented result's.

It cannot be seen in light, it's pigmentation is fluorescent, it need's UV, this is the entire point of the Article's.
If you truly believe it can be seen in normal light, link some result's, or explain the mechanism.

 

[htndnrrr]

Oh yes, the 3 Pubmed Article's, good for you.


I don't care if there's hundred's or thousand's. we all know how Favipiravir causes Pigmentation, you can't go out on a hunch and say it actually does anything for Eye-colour other than the documented result's.

It cannot be seen in light, it's pigmentation is fluorescent, it need's UV, this is the entire point of the Article's.
If you truly believe it can be seen in normal light, link some result's, or explain the mechanism.

Adult case report (visible bluish corneal discoloration) https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8837286/(Raiturcar TP, Nayak CA. An unusual case of bluish discoloration of the cornea after favipiravir therapy for COVID-19. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2021)

Infant case report (visible under sunlight) https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/pediatrics/articles/10.3389/fped.2023.1154814/full (Jiravisitkul P et al. Case report: Favipiravir-induced bluish corneal discoloration in infant with COVID-19. Front Pediatr. 2023)

Fluorescence of sclera/nails/teeth under UV (separate finding) https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8944284/ (Öztürk Durmaz E, Demircioglu D. Fluorescence in the Sclera, Nails, and Teeth Secondary to Favipiravir Use… J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2022)

Favipiravir, an antiviral originally developed for influenza and used off-label for COVID-19 in several countries, has a rare side effect of temporary bluish discoloration of the cornea. This was documented in at least two published case reports: a 20-year-old man in India (2021) whose eyes appeared bluish on day 2 of treatment (visible without special lighting, confirmed on slit-lamp, resolved the day after stopping the drug) and a 6-month-old infant in Thailand (2023) whose dark-brown corneas turned bright blue under sunlight within 18 hours, returning to normal within 5 days after discontinuation. In both cases vision remained normal and no permanent damage was found. A separate, more frequently observed phenomenon is fluorescence of the sclera, nails, and teeth under Wood’s lamp (UV light), which is distinct from the visible color change.

The exact mechanism is not fully understood; authors suggest it may involve the drug, its metabolites, or tablet excipients depositing in or interacting with the cornea. The discoloration is not a true change in iris pigmentation, is rare (known only from case reports with no established incidence rate), and is reversible upon stopping the medication. It should not be viewed as a method for permanently or reliably altering eye color.

Hope, this is enough to help shape your opinion

 

[Genio]

Adult case report (visible bluish corneal discoloration) https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8837286/(Raiturcar TP, Nayak CA. An unusual case of bluish discoloration of the cornea after favipiravir therapy for COVID-19. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2021)

Infant case report (visible under sunlight) https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/pediatrics/articles/10.3389/fped.2023.1154814/full (Jiravisitkul P et al. Case report: Favipiravir-induced bluish corneal discoloration in infant with COVID-19. Front Pediatr. 2023)

Fluorescence of sclera/nails/teeth under UV (separate finding) https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8944284/ (Öztürk Durmaz E, Demircioglu D. Fluorescence in the Sclera, Nails, and Teeth Secondary to Favipiravir Use… J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2022)

Favipiravir, an antiviral originally developed for influenza and used off-label for COVID-19 in several countries, has a rare side effect of temporary bluish discoloration of the cornea. This was documented in at least two published case reports: a 20-year-old man in India (2021) whose eyes appeared bluish on day 2 of treatment (visible without special lighting, confirmed on slit-lamp, resolved the day after stopping the drug) and a 6-month-old infant in Thailand (2023) whose dark-brown corneas turned bright blue under sunlight within 18 hours, returning to normal within 5 days after discontinuation. In both cases vision remained normal and no permanent damage was found. A separate, more frequently observed phenomenon is fluorescence of the sclera, nails, and teeth under Wood’s lamp (UV light), which is distinct from the visible color change.

The exact mechanism is not fully understood; authors suggest it may involve the drug, its metabolites, or tablet excipients depositing in or interacting with the cornea. The discoloration is not a true change in iris pigmentation, is rare (known only from case reports with no established incidence rate), and is reversible upon stopping the medication. It should not be viewed as a method for permanently or reliably altering eye color.

Hope, this is enough to help shape your opinion

Did you read this at all?
It say's what I have said in my previous messages.

whose dark-brown corneas turned bright blue under sunlight

A separate, more frequently observed phenomenon is fluorescence of the sclera, nails, and teeth under Wood’s lamp (UV light), which is distinct from the visible color change.

The discoloration is not a true change in iris pigmentation, is rare

rare side effect of temporary bluish discoloration of the cornea.

Sunlight provides enough UV Ray to display the Fluorescence of the Medicine.
In addition, the babies eyecolour was only viewed in UV light (Sunlight)

This is not under UV and after treatment was discontinued

it seem's well established that any discoloration come's from fluorescence.
I will be humble enough to say I have no idea how the Eye-hue of the Indian man changed or was visible under normal light, maybe there's a mechanism I haven't read upon yet, but this treatment doesn't seem promising in the slightest.

 

[htndnrrr]

Did you read this at all?
It say's what I have said in my previous messages.





Sunlight provides enough UV Ray to display the Fluorescence of the Medicine.
In addition, the babies eyecolour was only viewed in UV light (Sunlight)
View attachment 5465232
This is not under UV and after treatment was discontinued
View attachment 5465233

it seem's well established that any discoloration come's from fluorescence.
I will be humble enough to say I have no idea how the Eye-hue of the Indian man changed or was visible under normal light, maybe there's a mechanism I haven't read upon yet, but this treatment doesn't seem promising in the slightest.

mirin the effort. im going to bed