
Deleted member 11053
Luminary
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2020
- Posts
- 6,710
- Reputation
- 9,705
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Why do i hear chang everywhere here then?absolutely not
I agree. Reminds me of a horde of clones.They all look the same to me ngl
A lot of white chads look pretty similar too.They all look the same to me ngl
Attractive people all look similar in some way, ugly people are all ugly in their own peculiar waysA lot of white chads look pretty similar too.
thats sounds so bad. Its like when the teacher gives easier test to the autistic kids because they can't compete with the restye but there's a different standard for them
Proofsyes we exist![]()
yes we exist![]()
Chang can never mog chad?Lowest form of chads, they have the lowest looks floor and lowest looks cap. Extremely rare unicorns.
ye but there's a different standard for them
Chang can never mog chad?
Chang is by far the lowest form of Chad they still mog but their monolid eye area and non Caucasian skull will permanently fuck them.Chang can never mog chad?
Then the guys you called Changs aren't Changs.
Chang = Chad = Chadpreet = Tyrone
Tbh chang> the restThen the guys you called Changs aren't Changs.
Chang = Chad = Chadpreet = Tyrone
Utterly false Chang doesn't = Chad nor chadpreet nor Tyrone. Changs have the lowest appeal by far
Utterly moronic system.
The Chad standard is 8/10 across the board. 8/10 in absolute attractiveness, not relative. Some people think the definition of Chad is the top X% of men in an ethnic group, and that's just not it.
You're arguing for the concept of a Chang, while the others are arguing about the best looking Asian men known not being as GL as the best looking men of other races.Changs, Chadpreets, and Tyrones are simply race-specific terms for Chads. Changs ARE Chads.
The standard for Chad is based on absolute attractiveness, not the top X% of every ethnicity.
You're arguing for the concept of a Chang, while the others are arguing about the best looking Asian men known not being as GL as the best looking men of other races.
Semanticspilled
I have never said they aren't "chads" They are by far the least attractive. In actual appeal an exotic chaddam or chadpreet mog the hardest, white Chad at its base level is the best, but chadpreet if northern and chaddam compete closely. Chang can be mogged by even white chadlites at times because their monolid eye area and non Caucasian skull fucks them permanently. They definitely mog but in appeal lowest and it's not close.Changs, Chadpreets, and Tyrones are simply race-specific terms for Chads. Changs ARE Chads.
The standard for Chad is based on absolute attractiveness, not the top X% of every ethnicity.
Hu Bing lost to Siva kaneswaran and Asim Riaz in tinder experiments I think.Got way lower Matches than both so you might be right.Chang is by far the lowest form of Chad they still mog but their monolid eye area and non Caucasian skull will permanently fuck them.
Hu Bing and Godfrey Gao are one of the few gigachangs but they still get mogged by chadpreets, Chaddams and white chads.
so be ugly=be especialAttractive people all look similar in some way, ugly people are all ugly in their own peculiar ways
That's not what I mean. Changs tend to have a different look to other chads generally speaking.Utterly moronic system.
The Chad standard is 8/10 across the board. 8/10 in absolute attractiveness, not relative. Some people think the definition of Chad is the top X% of men in an ethnic group, and that's just not it.
maby
yes we exist![]()
Chang can be mogged by even white chadlites at times
TbhYou see, this is exactly the bullshit I'm frustrated about.
Chang is 8/10.
Chadlite is 7/10.
Chadlites can't mog Changs; it doesn't make any sense.
If a guy you call a "Chang" gets mogged by White Chadlites, he isn't a Chang to begin with.
could interpret it that way tooI'm indirectly arguing what you said they're arguing.
Since the standard for Chang and Chad are the same, there’re far fewer Changs than Chads.
Could be tyrone larping tbhThis guy looks like a chang to me. I don't see how changs aren't real.
![]()
If that is the case then gigachangs don't exist.Top tier Asians can't go head to head with o' pry and Gandy.Chang is someone who's relatively top 5% for his raceYou see, this is exactly the bullshit I'm frustrated about.
Chang is 8/10.
Chadlite is 7/10.
Chadlites can't mog Changs; it doesn't make any sense.
If a guy you call a "Chang" gets mogged by White Chadlites, he isn't a Chang to begin with.
This guy looks like a chang to me. I don't see how changs aren't real.
![]()
If that is the case then gigachangs don't exist.Top tier Asians can't go head to head with o' pry and Gandy.Chang is someone who's relatively top 5% for his race
wait, this is a girl