Xylmaxxing
Iron
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2024
- Posts
- 72
- Reputation
- 35
Mtn, ltn and htn throughout this whole post means average, below avg, and above avg by female standards. Applying that logic, most guys would be ltns and sub.
I mog a lot of guys around me and get compliments from guys on my looks even though I'm high ltn (4.6) smv wise and get ignored by foids. Thus, girls standards for rating guys is higher than what guys think is good looking (except psl autists)
So do you really need to be htn to not be invisible or is being mtn enough?
Girls considering htns as mtns and mtns as ltns due to muh hypergamy or muh social media is bullshit. Foids standards are the actual standards.
So is an NT guy who is mtn (avg) by female standards actually invisible or is he passable for ONS and STRs?
I mog a lot of guys around me and get compliments from guys on my looks even though I'm high ltn (4.6) smv wise and get ignored by foids. Thus, girls standards for rating guys is higher than what guys think is good looking (except psl autists)
So do you really need to be htn to not be invisible or is being mtn enough?
Girls considering htns as mtns and mtns as ltns due to muh hypergamy or muh social media is bullshit. Foids standards are the actual standards.
So is an NT guy who is mtn (avg) by female standards actually invisible or is he passable for ONS and STRs?