Are mtns actually invisible?

[Xylmaxxing]

Mtn, ltn and htn throughout this whole post means average, below avg, and above avg  by female standards. Applying that logic, most guys would be ltns and sub.

I mog a lot of guys around me and get compliments from guys on my looks even though I'm high ltn (4.6) smv wise and get ignored by foids. Thus, girls standards for rating guys is higher than what guys think is good looking (except psl autists)

So do you really need to be htn to not be invisible or is being mtn enough?

Girls considering htns as mtns and mtns as ltns due to muh hypergamy or muh social media is bullshit. Foids standards are the actual standards.

So is an NT guy who is mtn (avg) by female standards actually invisible or is he passable for ONS and STRs?

 

[zemult]

do u want me to tell you why i actually am rotting? there is a good reason dude

also i am 6'4 infact i grew a few inches on my time on this forum with medical reports. if u look at the history of my height posting i was 6'2 when i joined, this was the last time i grew, then after this i grew to 6'4\

heighmaxxing

am 6'3"5 but want 6'4 or 6'4"5 i am 17 with open growth plates, my father is 6'5 and my mother 5'9 most of my cousins are 6'4/6'5 while im the shortest one, will i get 1 last inch or do i need to heavy height max?

looksmax.org

Go on then.

exactly yes
most men dont have sex
the only ones who get sex are those who are high value / attractive
most of my friends and classmates look sexless too
only a few have girlfriends like 3/10 mtns

My experience is the exact opposite, everyone around me is getting something. In fact I saw a 5'6 Indian LMTN score a white MTB somehow.

There's also lots of recent studies suggesting that sexlessness isn't this prevalent.
What @Narroworbits was saying is more accurate. We're just loser incels really.

 

[Narroworbits]

JFL if you genuinely believe what you just spewed. A true 6'0 is a small percentage of the population statistically, he's probably not actually 6'4 but it's safe to say he's over 6ft. Being over 6ft and white with a decent face is peak SMV, he is an autist deciding to rot inside and cope with surgeries. Simple.

He's also not "low MTN" or whatever you were spewing. Nigga is not below average
If he is then it's genuinely never began for you boyo.

JFLLLLL, get your standards in check. No ones talking about smv, just what his face rating is at a core level

 

[esoterik]

Go on then.

after 2 months of my new virgin htb innocent girlfriend left me i just said fuck it, to be able to have another virgin htb i need to be a chadlite

im going to blur her face for privacy but you can tell that she was quite attractive

 

[zemult]

after 2 months of my new virgin htb innocent girlfriend left me i just said fuck it, to be able to have another virgin htb i need to be a chadlite

View attachment 3297421
View attachment 3297422



im going to blur her face for privacy but you can tell that she was quite attractive

View attachment 3297423

@Klasik616 JFL

 

[TheoRaven]

Tbh being good looking is a good base, but to really not be invisible you need that special "something".

Barretts wide face, chicos height, o'prys eyes, they all have that one thing that makes them stick out of a crowd.

Doesn't mean that good looks aren't going to get you laid, but shit becomes a lot easier when chicks already instinctively look at you, either because you have that "something" or because your chadlite+

 

[Deleted member 94756]

Mtn, ltn and htn throughout this whole post means average, below avg, and above avg  by female standards. Applying that logic, most guys would be ltns and sub.

I mog a lot of guys around me and get compliments from guys on my looks even though I'm high ltn (4.6) smv wise and get ignored by foids. Thus, girls standards for rating guys is higher than what guys think is good looking (except psl autists)

So do you really need to be htn to not be invisible or is being mtn enough?

Girls considering htns as mtns and mtns as ltns due to muh hypergamy or muh social media is bullshit. Foids standards are the actual standards.

So is an NT guy who is mtn (avg) by female standards actually invisible or is he passable for ONS and STRs?

MTN+NT= HTN
work on your charisma too, everything is about looks but with a good charisma you will get way more pussy

 

[BWC_virgin]

nobody can agree on mtn, but yes unless your talking about 3/10 foids plus some foids will see a mtn as htn based on their preferences.

but yes to 90% of women

 

[ajd]

ya im mtn and invisible

is that you in your pfp or if not, who is it?

 

[ajd]

MTN+NT= HTN
work on your charisma too, everything is about looks but with a good charisma you will get way more pussy

Charisma does matter but its not gonna change the fact OP is mtn.

 

[Xylmaxxing]

REGARDLESS of the girl's own attractiveness.

Not really. If you're 2 points higher than her she will see you as attractive generally. I would rate myself ltn-mtn get only femcels jfl

 

[Xylmaxxing]

Charisma does matter but its not gonna change the fact OP is mtn.

I have PIE and acne so hopefully I'll ascend to htn without it

 

[Kelly Oubre Jr]

yeah women rate the average guy a 3

 

[moggedlooksmaxxer]

Mtn, ltn and htn throughout this whole post means average, below avg, and above avg  by female standards. Applying that logic, most guys would be ltns and sub.

I mog a lot of guys around me and get compliments from guys on my looks even though I'm high ltn (4.6) smv wise and get ignored by foids. Thus, girls standards for rating guys is higher than what guys think is good looking (except psl autists)

So do you really need to be htn to not be invisible or is being mtn enough?

Girls considering htns as mtns and mtns as ltns due to muh hypergamy or muh social media is bullshit. Foids standards are the actual standards.

So is an NT guy who is mtn (avg) by female standards actually invisible or is he passable for ONS and STRs?

i’m mtn and completely invisible for foids

 

[ajd]

I have PIE and acne so hopefully I'll ascend to htn without it

Yo same here.

 

[Gabriel2005]

Mtn, ltn and htn throughout this whole post means average, below avg, and above avg  by female standards. Applying that logic, most guys would be ltns and sub.

I mog a lot of guys around me and get compliments from guys on my looks even though I'm high ltn (4.6) smv wise and get ignored by foids. Thus, girls standards for rating guys is higher than what guys think is good looking (except psl autists)

So do you really need to be htn to not be invisible or is being mtn enough?

Girls considering htns as mtns and mtns as ltns due to muh hypergamy or muh social media is bullshit. Foids standards are the actual standards.

So is an NT guy who is mtn (avg) by female standards actually invisible or is he passable for ONS and STRs