are skull implants worth it?

DonaldJTrump

DonaldJTrump

The President
Joined
Apr 29, 2024
Posts
1,303
Reputation
876
Are skull/temple implants worth it and aesthetic for a narrow skull/temples?

Most other implants seem to look uncanny often but skull and temple implants you can hide using hair, and just widen the area with the implants. Easy looksmax!

Am i right or deluded?
 
No
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: DonaldJTrump
Look at skull implants in this thread
 
  • +1
Reactions: holycoper and DonaldJTrump
Look at skull implants in this thread
Low ROI even for a narrow skullcel? Should i just grow out my hair and cover forehead with hair instead?
 
  • +1
Reactions: DonaldJTrump
What do you make of fat grafting to the zygos? Some suggest it as an alternative or addition to zygo implants. I didnt see it in your thread. Great thread btw!
 
What do you make of fat grafting to the zygos? Some suggest it as an alternative or addition to zygo implants. I didnt see it in your thread. Great thread btw!
Thanks bro
 
  • +1
Reactions: DonaldJTrump
What do you make of fat grafting to the zygos? Some suggest it as an alternative or addition to zygo implants. I didnt see it in your thread. Great thread btw!
I dislike it as you canโ€™t accurately decide the results as some of the fat is lost
 
  • +1
Reactions: DonaldJTrump
I dislike it as you canโ€™t accurately decide the results as some of the fat is lost
i think you may overrate implants in your thread though. they tend to turn out quite uncanny, don't age well, require revisions often (and the skin is left sagging with every revision/removal), can show through skin especially as you age and probably need to be replaced with age, also cause numbness/nerve issues/damage.

i believe in implants only in severe cases.. otherwise i hear fat transfer/graft is the better solution, or sometimes filler (although both come with their own risks as well), or just don't do anything... what do you think?
 
i think you may overrate implants in your thread though. they tend to turn out quite uncanny, don't age well, require revisions often (and the skin is left sagging with every revision/removal), can show through skin especially as you age and probably need to be replaced with age, also cause numbness/nerve issues/damage.

i believe in implants only in severe cases.. otherwise i hear fat transfer/graft is the better solution, or sometimes filler (although both come with their own risks as well), or just don't do anything... what do you think?
I prefer fat graft in the eye area rather than implants as it looks more natural but generally if you go to a good enough surgeon implants wonโ€™t look uncanny
 
  • Hmm...
  • +1
Reactions: sham66 and DonaldJTrump
I prefer fat graft in the eye area rather than implants as it looks more natural but generally if you go to a good enough surgeon implants wonโ€™t look uncanny
so you think fat grafts are better than infraorbital implants or undereye filler??
 
  • +1
Reactions: DonaldJTrump

Similar threads

taintedjoke
Replies
17
Views
553
thanks
thanks
teddy101
Replies
50
Views
505
teddy101
teddy101
shyaa
Replies
54
Views
1K
rrg
rrg
S
Replies
6
Views
595
subiva
S
D
Replies
24
Views
1K
911.sobhan
911.sobhan

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top