HarrierDuBois
Writer
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2022
- Posts
- 24,960
- Reputation
- 39,560
I still have that and I'm circumcised + yes, it's the most sensitive part of my shit
Keep believing soyddit cucks I guess
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
I still have that and I'm circumcised + yes, it's the most sensitive part of my shit
Keep believing soyddit cucks I guess
I was extremely depressed once and I hadn’t showered for six months. Not a single sign of cheese dick or a stinky dick.Aka. Never wash your dick theory.
Just try to convince me that something natural you get at birth is somehow a bad thing.Blud blud bud doo la pa pa
Enjoy your cheese dick and phimosis
Most women also prefer circumcised penises remember this
You surely are getting offended quite easily, you definitely know deep down you’re insecure about it.Yea no I'm not being convinced retard, I'm proud of having my penis intact.
also the study does not state anywhere all the subjects has been circumcised after puberty. you obviously wont adress this too
What do you think "In comparison to men circumcised before puberty" means?"In comparison to men circumcised before puberty, men circumcised during adolescence or later indicated less sexual pleasure at the glans penis, and a higher percentage of them reported discomfort or pain and unusual sensations at the penile shaft."
@Autismcel Look at this logic. Cancer is also natural, is it somehow a good thing? Natural =/= good.Just try to convince me that something natural you get at birth is somehow a bad thing.
When did I say it was a bad thing?Just try to convince me that something natural you get at birth is somehow a bad thing.
outdated study? with a sample size of 1000? just fucking cage at you. did circumcision techniques changed or something? meanwhile the one "not outdated study" i found had a sample size of like 60. the sheer laughable subject size is enough to dismiss itJust post outdated studies theory.
Insecure about my perfectly good functionning penis having everything untouched.You surely are getting offended quite easily, you definitely know deep down you’re insecure about it.
Yes, it’s an outdated study. I did research into this already and the newer studies all say there’s no difference. Just check the date of the study.outdated study? with a sample size of 1000? just fucking cage at you. did circumcision techniques changed or something? meanwhile the one "not outdated study" i found had a sample size of like 60. the sheer laughable subject size is enough to dismiss it
just fucking stop man
It’s stinky and it looks ugly. You have every reason to be insecure about it.Insecure about my perfectly good functionning penis having everything untouched.
i genuinely cant repeat the same thing to you over and over you are just too low iq i am done discussing with youWhat do you think "In comparison to men circumcised before puberty" means?
The study didn't explicitly mention men before puberty btwoutdated study? with a sample size of 1000? just fucking cage at you. did circumcision techniques changed or something? meanwhile the one "not outdated study" i found had a sample size of like 60. the sheer laughable subject size is enough to dismiss it
just fucking stop man
Exactly. Run awayi genuinely cant repeat the same thing to you over and over you are just too low iq i am done discussing with you
Both of these things are false.It’s stinky and it looks ugly. You have every reason to be insecure about it.
show me a good study with a good sample size thenYes, it’s an outdated study. I did research into this already and the newer studies all say there’s no difference. Just check the date of the study.
Mirin how you edited your message like the autistic retard you areView attachment 3120410
you are so low iq its actually sad. you choose to ignore the wall of text above and cherrypick comprasion after the conclusion to appease your pitiful cope.
its actually amazing how in denial you are because i destroyed your cope. or maybe you genuinely cant difference the comprasion from conclusion which i genuinely not hope for because your brain capacity would have been so little you must be breathing trough a machine
Keep owning this niggersMirin how you edited your message like the autistic retard you are
Source: Your BBC-fucked assYou lose 80% of sensation when your circumsized
I think he ignored me tbhKeep owning this niggers
Look how I owned one of the pro-uncircumcised retards upSource: Your BBC-fucked ass
@Gengar did he ignore me?@piec another study stating that it's for men who had it after puberty from your beloved source
The effect of male circumcision on sexuality - PubMed
There was a decrease in masturbatory pleasure and sexual enjoyment after circumcision, indicating that adult circumcision adversely affects sexual function in many men, possibly because of complications of the surgery and a loss of nerve endings.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Stop being a retard and saying that it reduces pleasure for all men
It’s okay bhai, you can cope all you want.Both of these things are false.
There was a really good newer study in which they used sensors to determine things and it concluded that there was no to little difference in sensitivity.show me a good study with a good sample size then
also funny how "outdated" can a study like this be. again, did circumcision techniques change? large sample size survey is basically gold standard for examining sexual function. its how clinical trials of for example finasteride go through. by a large sample survery. not by examining fucking neurons or any other insignificant shit
Good point. There is a difference between men who were circumcised at birth and those who were circumcised in their older years.@piec another study stating that it's for men who had it after puberty from your beloved source
The effect of male circumcision on sexuality - PubMed
There was a decrease in masturbatory pleasure and sexual enjoyment after circumcision, indicating that adult circumcision adversely affects sexual function in many men, possibly because of complications of the surgery and a loss of nerve endings.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Stop being a retard and saying that it reduces pleasure for all men
There's literally 0 sensation lost for men before pubertyThere was a really good newer study in which they used sensors to determine things and it concluded that there was no to little difference in sensitivity.
@Autismcel
Yep, if it’s done at a young age (I.e. a few days or months after birth), IIRC it doesn’t affect anything.There's literally 0 sensation lost for men before puberty
I think it's because dick nerves develop during puberty for pleasure iirc
Strong first postFirst
LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL nigga how is that a good result?Good point. There is a difference between men who were circumcised at birth and those who were circumcised in their older years.
@piec
Didn’t @Autismcel already post that?LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL nigga how is that a good result?
"Masturbatory pleasure decreased after circumcision in 48% of the respondents, while 8% reported increased pleasure. Masturbatory difficulty increased after circumcision in 63% of the respondents but was easier in 37%. About 6% answered that their sex lives improved, while 20% reported a worse sex life after circumcision."
"There was a decrease in masturbatory pleasure and sexual enjoyment after circumcision, indicating that adult circumcision adversely affects sexual function in many men, possibly because of complications of the surgery and a loss of nerve endings."
you did not post any good study which proves men circumcised before puberty do not lose any sensation
only a 1 study which proves they do after. or did i miss the other one which said circumcision before puberty has no impact?
I think he's genuinely ragebaiting for funDidn’t @Autismcel already post that?
you tagged me in this so i assumed its your point. ok, good you proved its detrimental after puberty (i definitely agree). but i am yet to see a good study saying its insignificant if done beforeDidn’t @Autismcel already post that?
I tagged you so you could read it as well, same reason why I tagged him in the post before.you tagged me in this so i assumed its your point. ok, good you proved its detrimental after puberty (i definitely agree). but i am yet to see a good study saying its insignificant if done before
JFL. I’m not even raging though.I think he's genuinely ragebaiting for fun
Ignore his retarded ass
ok. so? this proves what? where is the "good study"?I tagged you so you could read it as well, same reason why I tagged him in the post before.
I’m on mobile, don’t feel like searching and copy and pasting using this. I’ll see when I’m on pc.ok. so? this proves what? where is the "good study"?
Let me see if I got this right. So when you cut the foreskin off very shortly after the child is born as is done in America, as well as the Judeo-Islamic faiths. The body will compensate by creating a new layer of harder skin around the tip in order to protect it from friction and other physical damages (essentially what the foreskin is there for), so how would there be 'no to just very little difference' in sensitivity just purely biomechanically?There was a really good newer study in which they used sensors to determine things and it concluded that there was no to little difference in sensitivity.
@Autismcel
I don’t know the specifics but based on scientific research, the conclusion is there is “no to little difference.” Basically negligible, irrelevant. When I get on a PC, I’ll try to find the study I was talking about.Let me see if I got this right. So when you cut the foreskin off very shortly after the child is born as is done in America, as well as the Judeo-Islamic faiths. The body will compensate by creating a new layer of harder skin around the tip in order to protect it from friction and other physical damages (essentially what the foreskin is there for), so how would there be 'no to just very little difference' in sensitivity just purely biomechanically?
Just seen this, nice projection
Your mother said otherwise faggot.It doesn't affect girth you brainlet
i had it done 3 months ago and havent losst any sensitivity, in fact its slightly more sensitive now that i can directly stimulate the glans. pretty much all research into adult circumcision concludes no change in sensitivityIt's better to do it at birth
neither do circumcised, only smallcockcels need lubeyes, we dont need lube to masturbate
horrible analogy@Autismcel Look at this logic. Cancer is also natural, is it somehow a good thing? Natural =/= good.
You will never feel the sensation of the foreskin going up and down the tip...that's almost the best part as well...Just seen this, nice projection
You're like that retard I owned earlier
"Your dick isn't as sensitive as mine because I said so"
Cheese dicks detected