Are you hypergamous?

Are you hypergamous


  • Total voters
    28
D

Deleted member 297070

#1 ranked MTB slayer
Joined
Dec 18, 2025
Posts
4,756
Reputation
7,917
Are you attracted to your looksmatch, and would you happily settle down with them?
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: sadcel, chitarine, Coping Truecel and 4 others
Everyone is hypergamous by nature. It’s built in to get with the most attractive person possible.
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Diyorldar, chitarine, d0wnpour_ and 1 other person
Everyone is hypergamous by nature. It’s built in to get with the most attractive person possible.
In a sense
But are you attracted to your looksmatch? Thats really what I’m asking. A lot of LTNs-MTNs here would call their looksmatches chopped
 
  • Hmm...
  • +1
Reactions: TiktokUser and Deleted member 257282
Are you attracted to your looksmatch, and would you happily settle down with them?
Im not going below mtb tho
Since im mtn-hmtn
 
  • +1
Reactions: King.epstein, Histy and Deleted member 297070
i like women above my looks level so yeah. i need a stayclite to feel less insecure
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 297070
i like women above my looks level so yeah. i need a stayclite to feel less insecure
Are you delusional enough to believe this is remotely feasible?
 
  • +1
  • So Sad
Reactions: chitarine, TiktokUser and NoExit
Are you delusional enough to believe this is remotely feasible?
even fucking my looksmatch isnt remotely feasible lol
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 297070
even fucking my looksmatch isnt remotely feasible lol
brutal stuff
do you have any potential at all or are you hardcapped at LTN
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 297070
brutal stuff
do you have any potential at all or are you hardcapped at LTN
harcapped at LTN due to skull shape
 
  • So Sad
Reactions: Deleted member 297070
Do you consider female hypergamy understandable or shameful
I think it's weird for them bcos it actively lowers their smv and wastes their prime, for man it's different imo
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Deleted member 297070
I think it's weird for them bcos it actively lowers their smv and wastes their prime, for man it's different imo
But is it wasting their prime to not settle down with a man they’re not attracted to? Why would they want to reproduce with a man whose genes they see as suboptimal? It would be a waste of their prime to settle for their looksmatch when hypergamy can get them a guy a whole level above them, or a statusmaxxed/moneymaxxed guy if they play their cards right

Are YOU not wasting your prime not settling down with your looksmatch and chasing a HTB or something instead?
 
  • +1
Reactions: liekalike and Coping Truecel
Are you attracted to your looksmatch, and would you happily settle down with them?
I wouldn't mind getting married to my looksmatch tbh
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 297070
But is it wasting their prime to not settle down with a man they’re not attracted to? Why would they want to reproduce with a man whose genes they see as suboptimal? It would be a waste of their prime to settle for their looksmatch when hypergamy can get them a guy a whole level above them, or a statusmaxxed/moneymaxxed guy if they play their cards right

Are YOU not wasting your prime not settling down with your looksmatch and chasing a HTB or something instead?
Bcos if they get chad kids best they will find after that is man who is willing to settle for women with kids, most desperate, ugly etc man, even ppl here don't go down that low and will have to spend majority of their life with a man they absolutely despise

My ex of 5 yrs was HMTB+, while I'm ltn, so I'm glad I never lowered my standards back then and won't do now.
 
Mind you this thread is not me defending female hypergamy but rather pointing out hypocrisy
Men are handicapped in todays market you’d be lucky to get your looksmatch. If you spend your days gooning to HTB+s you’ll never be happy with a woman. Your habits subconsciously affect your standards
 
  • +1
Reactions: try2beme
I don’t actively seek women who are out of my league, I filter who I like out of who likes me

But it’s ridiculous to pretend Id reject a supermodel if one ever farted near my direction
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 297070
Mind you this thread is not me defending female hypergamy but rather pointing out hypocrisy
Men are handicapped in todays market you’d be lucky to get your looksmatch. If you spend your days gooning to HTB+s you’ll never be happy with a woman. Your habits subconsciously affect your standards
Men and women are both hypergamous af
 
Are you attracted to your looksmatch, and would you happily settle down with them?
I'm lonely as fuck I'd accept my looksmatch anyday
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 297070
Bcos if they get chad kids best they will find after that is man who is willing to settle for women with kids, most desperate, ugly etc man, even ppl here don't go down that low and will have to spend majority of their life with a man they absolutely despise

My ex of 5 yrs was HMTB+, while I'm ltn, so I'm glad I never lowered my standards back then and won't do now.
They’d despise being with some subhuman/LTN man more than begging for chad’s attention and being a single mother

And I’m sorry but emphasis on EX girlfriend there
You cannot sustain a relationship with a woman much above your looksmatch unless you’re money/statusmaxxed or something because she’ll eventually want better
 
  • +1
Reactions: liekalike
I don’t actively seek women who are out of my league, I filter who I like out of who likes me

But it’s ridiculous to pretend Id reject a supermodel if one ever farted near my direction
Oh obviously, everyone would PREFER the most attractive woman they could get there is nothing wrong with that
The question is are you attracted to your looksmatch and would they be enough for you
 
  • +1
Reactions: try2beme
Are you attracted to your looksmatch, and would you happily settle down with them?
I’m HLTN-LMTN and I’d probably only be happy with a HMTB+ so I guess not
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 297070
I wanna say yes. But logically i honestly do not believe i am
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 297070
Oh obviously, everyone would PREFER the most attractive woman they could get there is nothing wrong with that
The question is are you attracted to your looksmatch and would they be enough for you
Id be more than happy as long as she’s not ran thru and classless
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 297070
They’d despise being with some subhuman/LTN man more than begging for chad’s attention and being a single mother
Maybe, that's not something I would do personally. Being single mother is attrocious

And I’m sorry but emphasis on EX girlfriend
I dumped her first, then we reconnected and she dumped me. All things considered she was more invested in relationship and stuff. I feel like you can always find unicorn and since women don't pump and dump ltns you are pretty much set on this point
 
im subhuman
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 297070
Are you attracted to your looksmatch, and would you happily settle down with them?
I am a MMTN-HMTN (according to faceiq rating) I would kill to settle down with my looksmatch but here we are
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 297070
Im attracted to my looksmatch but i am a VIP Person so i need a paper wor
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Deleted member 297070
a little bit yeah
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 297070
I want a MTB, LTBs are disgusting
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 297070
i want to put my balls in a models mouth at least once
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 297070

Similar threads

fmfcl
Replies
17
Views
133
mid234
mid234
shandingo
Replies
11
Views
87
hitmancrewzz
hitmancrewzz
OsamaFr33Balling
Replies
6
Views
69
Ihatezexuus
Ihatezexuus
Blue Pleidian
Replies
1
Views
27
Blue Pleidian
Blue Pleidian

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
Sponsored
Stake.us
America's #1 Social Casino
Slots, Poker & More
Join Now →