reputation
Aroace
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2022
- Posts
- 1,469
- Reputation
- 759
Arguments for:
- extreme majority of women prefer men not shorter than them which indicates that they have a heavy preference for tall genes. They only praise tall height genetics. Other genetic traits like faces are praised, but they are praised separately.
- tall males are far more likely to get women according to statistics
- shorter males for example Tom Holland are ridiculed for being shorter than their female partners despite not being ugly and having cool personality and status
- short males are automatically excluded by many females on dating apps if they are below 6 foot or below 5'8
- females want to receive best possible protection and tall males have longer limbs and heavier weight which helps a lot. Even those who do not want still expect males like white knights to be tall so they can exact revenge or protect other females from aggressive males so females heavily rely on male power (source: twitter females asking for vendetta on incel aggression or non incel aggression of females) This point is a bit nuanced because person's overall power is affected by various factors such as skill, fitness and weight and the last one can be gained by bulking.
Arguments against:
- hot males can easily get dates with females especially if they use dating apps which are heavily looks focused. Dating is ultra competitive which means that short males can still have some redeeming qualities that help them outcompete tall or normal-height males including the hot and tall ones
- women with good looks and status sometimes happen to date short males, there are cases when taller females date shorter males for example Zendaya with previously mentioned Tom
- shorter males are more suited for regular interactions and more than that because they are closer to female height, this is a relevant argument. There are many females who are very short or 5'7 etc, which makes sense for them to match their height with short males
- extreme majority of women prefer men not shorter than them which indicates that they have a heavy preference for tall genes. They only praise tall height genetics. Other genetic traits like faces are praised, but they are praised separately.
- tall males are far more likely to get women according to statistics
- shorter males for example Tom Holland are ridiculed for being shorter than their female partners despite not being ugly and having cool personality and status
- short males are automatically excluded by many females on dating apps if they are below 6 foot or below 5'8
- females want to receive best possible protection and tall males have longer limbs and heavier weight which helps a lot. Even those who do not want still expect males like white knights to be tall so they can exact revenge or protect other females from aggressive males so females heavily rely on male power (source: twitter females asking for vendetta on incel aggression or non incel aggression of females) This point is a bit nuanced because person's overall power is affected by various factors such as skill, fitness and weight and the last one can be gained by bulking.
Arguments against:
- hot males can easily get dates with females especially if they use dating apps which are heavily looks focused. Dating is ultra competitive which means that short males can still have some redeeming qualities that help them outcompete tall or normal-height males including the hot and tall ones
- women with good looks and status sometimes happen to date short males, there are cases when taller females date shorter males for example Zendaya with previously mentioned Tom
- shorter males are more suited for regular interactions and more than that because they are closer to female height, this is a relevant argument. There are many females who are very short or 5'7 etc, which makes sense for them to match their height with short males
Last edited:
