Atheism is cope;here's why.

[Vazelrr]

Morality Without God Is Incoherent

If atheism is true, morality is just human opinion, No action (murder, betrayal, genocide) can be objectively wrong only “socially inconvenient.”

Yet atheists still argue about right and wrong passionately. They live as if morality is real, but their worldview gives them no foundation for it,borrowing morality from God while denying His existence.

Reason Presupposes a Lawgiver

If the brain is just chemicals fizzing randomly, why trust thoughts at all?Logic requires universal laws of truth but where do those come from in a godless universe?Atheists rely on reason daily, but their worldview can’t justify why reason works

using the gift of reason while denying its Giver.

Order Doesn’t Come From Nothing

Atheism claims the universe “just happened.But nothing in human experience suggests that raw chaos produces the fine-tuned laws of physics, life, and consciousness,the atheist answer is: “It’s just random chance.” That’s not an explanation it’s cope dressed intelligence, pretending chance is a substitute for creation

Atheism Collapses in Suffering

In times of deep pain, loss, or injustice, “nothing matters, it’s all random” offers no comfort,even atheists cry out for fairness, justice, and hope beyond the grave.

denying God until reality exposes the need for Him.

"The greatest trick Satan pulled was making people believe he doesn't exist"

 

[Vazelrr]

Is it a coincidence that the universe was formed from nothing,saying the complexity of the cosmos was just a mistake is the same as spitting directly into God's face and calling his work nonsense, is it a coincidence that gravity is perfectly tuned for life? Is it a coincidence that the Sun has the perfect distance away from earth? Any closer it would burn everything any further it would be freezing? Is our very existence a coincidence? Atheism is nihilism but it's a tin foil hat weared by people who claim they're intelligent in reality they're just cowards who are afraid to face the reality that God is real.

 

[Cafu]

Morality Without God Is Incoherent

If atheism is true, morality is just human opinion, No action (murder, betrayal, genocide) can be objectively wrong only “socially inconvenient.”

Yet atheists still argue about right and wrong passionately. They live as if morality is real, but their worldview gives them no foundation for it,borrowing morality from God while denying His existence.

Reason Presupposes a Lawgiver

If the brain is just chemicals fizzing randomly, why trust thoughts at all?Logic requires universal laws of truth but where do those come from in a godless universe?Atheists rely on reason daily, but their worldview can’t justify why reason works

using the gift of reason while denying its Giver.

Order Doesn’t Come From Nothing

Atheism claims the universe “just happened.But nothing in human experience suggests that raw chaos produces the fine-tuned laws of physics, life, and consciousness,the atheist answer is: “It’s just random chance.” That’s not an explanation it’s cope dressed intelligence, pretending chance is a substitute for

Atheism Collapses in Suffering

In times of deep pain, loss, or injustice, “nothing matters, it’s all random” offers no comfort,even atheists cry out for fairness, justice, and hope beyond the grave.

denying God until reality exposes the need for Him.

"The greatest trick Satan pulled was making people believe he doesn't exist"

High iq, atheism has been debunked since the beginning of time

 

[taai]

Wether God itself exists or not denying that what God is thought to be within the collective unconscious is true is for idiots as it is clear it has shaped our history

 

[IraniancelV2]

You can never be sure

 

[Clqs]

Dnr, religion is for sissies who can't cope with the fact that there is nothing after death

 

[Vazelrr]

You can never be sure

You say we can never be 100% sure, and that’s true but that’s exactly why belief matters. If God exists and I believe,I gain everything (eternal life, ultimate meaning). If He doesn’t exist, I lose nothing at worst I lived with purpose. But if I reject Him and I’m wrong, I lose everything. Logically, the risk of atheism is infinite loss, while the risk of belief is minimal. So which position really makes more sense?

 

[Vazelrr]

Dnr, religion is for sissies who can't cope with the fact that there is nothing after death

There's a reason you didn't read it mutt

 

[subhuman1996]

Atheists r top tier dumbest niggas

 

[Clqs]

There's a reason you didn't read it mutt

Have you ever seen a MANLY religious MAN? They're always some no beard soy sissies who need a book that was written thousands of years ago by brown subhumans to tell them how to live their life and what's right and wrong

That's pure faggotry

 

[bottleofwater]

Religion is quite literally a prime example of a coping mechanism, we created god, not him creating us.

 

[Ghoulish]

Have you ever seen a MANLY religious MAN? They're always some no beard soy sissies who need a book that was written thousands of years ago by brown subhumans to tell them how to live their life and what's right and wrong

That's pure faggotry

Most based men throughout history were theists, and most sissies are atheist cucks (the stereotype of an atheist is literally a Redditor to most normies)

 

[PermaBluePilled]

nothing in human experience suggests that raw chaos produces the fine-tuned laws of physics

Atheists don't claim anything is fine-tuned

 

[Vazelrr]

Religion is quite literally a prime example of a coping mechanism, we created god, not him creating us.

Calling something a ‘cope’ is not a refutation.That’s just psychological projection.if you really believe we created God, then show logically how morality, reason, and meaning exist in framework.Simply dismissing faith as emotional cope while dodging the actual argument is emotional cope.

 

[bottleofwater]

Calling something a ‘cope’ is not a refutation.That’s just psychological projection.if you really believe we created God, then show logically how morality, reason, and meaning exist in framework.Simply dismissing faith as emotional cope while dodging the actual argument is emotional cope.

If god can do miracles why cant he do something simple as curing childrens cancer

 

[Vazelrr]

Have you ever seen a MANLY religious MAN? They're always some no beard soy sissies who need a book that was written thousands of years ago by brown subhumans to tell them how to live their life and what's right and wrong

That's pure faggotry

Insults aren’t arguments. The question isn’t whether you think religious men fit your idea of ‘manly,’ the question is whether God exists. Civilization itself was built on religion: law, art, morality, order. If you think that’s all just cope, then your entire way of life today rests on the same cope, at least we admit the foundation atheism just freeloads off it.

 

[User28823]

cope

its all just chemicals in ur brain faggot

its literally just how we evolved, to know right vs wrong

a man who sees another man kill knows its wrong its just evolution nigger

 

[.Cx]

Morality Without God Is Incoherent

If atheism is true, morality is just human opinion, No action (murder, betrayal, genocide) can be objectively wrong only “socially inconvenient.”

Yet atheists still argue about right and wrong passionately. They live as if morality is real, but their worldview gives them no foundation for it,borrowing morality from God while denying His existence.

Reason Presupposes a Lawgiver

If the brain is just chemicals fizzing randomly, why trust thoughts at all?Logic requires universal laws of truth but where do those come from in a godless universe?Atheists rely on reason daily, but their worldview can’t justify why reason works

using the gift of reason while denying its Giver.

Order Doesn’t Come From Nothing

Atheism claims the universe “just happened.But nothing in human experience suggests that raw chaos produces the fine-tuned laws of physics, life, and consciousness,the atheist answer is: “It’s just random chance.” That’s not an explanation it’s cope dressed intelligence, pretending chance is a substitute for creation

Atheism Collapses in Suffering

In times of deep pain, loss, or injustice, “nothing matters, it’s all random” offers no comfort,even atheists cry out for fairness, justice, and hope beyond the grave.

denying God until reality exposes the need for Him.

"The greatest trick Satan pulled was making people believe he doesn't exist"

So your argument is that there's no point of holding moral values if theirs no after life?
jfl @ you god fearing niggas.
I don't need religion to be a good person I'm that way because I want to be

 

[Clqs]

Most based men throughout history were theists, and most sissies are atheist cucks (the stereotype of an atheist is literally a Redditor to most normies)

I know, I exaggerated the manly part for the ragebait, he seems like the typa inkwell that really cares about how manly a man is, most religious cucks do

But you can't tell me a modern man whos really passionate about a god in the sky isn't a sissy

 

[unstable]

nigga hasn't met a "nietzschean, morality denying, god is dead atheist"

 

[Vazelrr]

If god can do miracles why cant he do something simple as curing childrens cancer

If God can perform miracles, why do you assume He owes you your definition of ‘simple’? The same world that allows suffering also gives life, intelligence, love, and the ability to fight disease. Maybe the real question isn’t why pain exists,but why you think your view of justice is the full picture.

 

[Ghoulish]

he seems like the typa inkwell that really cares about how manly a man is, most religious cucks do

You’ve never talked to a religious person if you think thats the case. Unless you mean Mormons or smth.

 

[overtier1011]

You say we can never be 100% sure, and that’s true but that’s exactly why belief matters. If God exists and I believe,I gain everything (eternal life, ultimate meaning). If He doesn’t exist, I lose nothing at worst I lived with purpose. But if I reject Him and I’m wrong, I lose everything. Logically, the risk of atheism is infinite loss, while the risk of belief is minimal. So which position really makes more sense?

I believe in god but don’t follow any religion. Religion is man made and highly altered. It is disrespectful to god.

 

[Vazelrr]

So your argument is that there's no point of holding moral values if theirs no after life?
jfl @ you god fearing niggas.
I don't need religion to be a good person I'm that way because I want to be

You can be ‘good’ without God, sure but why claim it’s objectively good? Without a source, good and evil are just opinions,you act morally because you feel like it, not because it’s actually binding. That’s a subtle form of "cope”

Religion doesn’t force morality it gives it foundation, Without it, you’re borrowing what you pretend to reject.

 

[Vazelrr]

Atheists don't claim anything is fine-tuned

You say atheists don’t claim the universe is fine-tuned — and that’s true. But think about it, their whole worldview assumes this chaotic accident somehow produced exactly the conditions for life, intelligence, and morality. That’s a huge assumption they never mention. Either you admit it’s improbable, or you’re quietly leaning on fine tuning while pretending it doesn’t exist.

 

[Vazelrr]

nigga hasn't met a "nietzschean, morality denying, god is dead atheist"

Sure,some atheists lean Nietzschean and say ‘God is dead,’ but that was metaphorical he meant humans no longer see God as the source of law and morality. The problem? If God’s authority is gone, then morality has no ultimate foundation. Most atheists act like morality still exists anyway, quietly admitting they can’t fully live in the world Nietzsche described without borrowing the very values they reject.

 

[Vazelrr]

I know, I exaggerated the manly part for the ragebait, he seems like the typa inkwell that really cares about how manly a man is, most religious cucks do

But you can't tell me a modern man whos really passionate about a god in the sky isn't a sissy

Insults about manliness don’t touch the truth. Whether someone shaves their beard or reads an ancient book doesn’t determine the validity of their belief. Your definition of ‘manly’ is irrelevant only truth matters.

You’re mad because faith demands courage beyond ego and aesthetics something your worldview struggles to produce

 

[unstable]

Sure,some atheists lean Nietzschean and say ‘God is dead,’ but that was metaphorical he meant humans no longer see God as the source of law and morality. The problem? If God’s authority is gone, then morality has no ultimate foundation. Most atheists act like morality still exists anyway, quietly admitting they can’t fully live in the world Nietzsche described without borrowing the very values they reject.

except nietzsche actually hated morality especially christian morality, he believes in rule of the strong.

 

[Vazelrr]

cope

its all just chemicals in ur brain faggot

its literally just how we evolved, to know right vs wrong

a man who sees another man kill knows its wrong its just evolution nigger

So now you're insulting me, calling belief ‘chemicals’ and evolution excuses, and throwing words like the hard R? That’s the way of cowards,You throw your slurs because you know you have no real argument you can’t face the possibility that something greater than your mind exists. I don’t need to prove God to you in this moment; your own reaction proves the point: belief isn’t weakness, it’s courage. You hide behind ego and noise because the truth demands bravery, and you aren’t ready to see it. History bows to men who build civilizations, create laws, inspire empires not to those who rage at an idea they fear to examine.

 

[Luquier]

Even if you’re atheist, it’s better to pick a religion in case God exists

 

[Vazelrr]

except nietzsche actually hated morality especially christian morality, he believes in rule of the strong.

let’s be clear. When he said ‘God is dead,’ it wasn’t a casual metaphor: he was declaring that Christian morality, the foundation of law and ethics for centuries, no longer holds authority. He didn’t just remove God as lawgiver he rejected morality itself, especially the morality of the weak that glorifies humility, compassion, and self denial, Nietzsche wanted the strong to rule according to their own will, not a borrowed ethical system.Yet here we are: most atheists quoting him still act morally, still condemn evil, still borrow the very ethical standards Nietzsche despised. That’s the ultimate irony they live in a world Nietzsche warned them would collapse without God, quietly leaning on the moral structure they claim is meaningless.

 

[Klasik616]

Morality Without God Is Incoherent

If atheism is true, morality is just human opinion, No action (murder, betrayal, genocide) can be objectively wrong only “socially inconvenient.”

Yet atheists still argue about right and wrong passionately. They live as if morality is real, but their worldview gives them no foundation for it,borrowing morality from God while denying His existence.

Reason Presupposes a Lawgiver

If the brain is just chemicals fizzing randomly, why trust thoughts at all?Logic requires universal laws of truth but where do those come from in a godless universe?Atheists rely on reason daily, but their worldview can’t justify why reason works

using the gift of reason while denying its Giver.

Order Doesn’t Come From Nothing

Atheism claims the universe “just happened.But nothing in human experience suggests that raw chaos produces the fine-tuned laws of physics, life, and consciousness,the atheist answer is: “It’s just random chance.” That’s not an explanation it’s cope dressed intelligence, pretending chance is a substitute for creation

Atheism Collapses in Suffering

In times of deep pain, loss, or injustice, “nothing matters, it’s all random” offers no comfort,even atheists cry out for fairness, justice, and hope beyond the grave.

denying God until reality exposes the need for Him.

"The greatest trick Satan pulled was making people believe he doesn't exist"

Morals aren't founded by convenience

 

[aDifferentPerspect]

Very high IQ thread.

Atheists are retards who think they are smart.

 

[unstable]

let’s be clear. When he said ‘God is dead,’ it wasn’t a casual metaphor: he was declaring that Christian morality, the foundation of law and ethics for centuries, no longer holds authority. He didn’t just remove God as lawgiver he rejected morality itself, especially the morality of the weak that glorifies humility, compassion, and self denial, Nietzsche wanted the strong to rule according to their own will, not a borrowed ethical system.Yet here we are: most atheists quoting him still act morally, still condemn evil, still borrow the very ethical standards Nietzsche despised. That’s the ultimate irony they live in a world Nietzsche warned them would collapse without God, quietly leaning on the moral structure they claim is meaningless.

exactly you haven't met a real "nietzschean atheist" those niggas are the ubermensch. most atheist are soy chugging trannies anyways.

 

[IraniancelV2]

God said the earth is flat btw

 

[Vazelrr]

Morals aren't founded by convenience

Exactly morals aren’t just about convenience. That’s the point. If atheism is true and there’s no God, then morality has no ultimate foundation

Morals aren't founded by convenience

it’s all opinion, preference, or evolution. Yet you act as if right and wrong are real, binding, and universal. That’s the inconsistency you live by laws your worldview can’t justify. Calling belief ‘cope’ doesn’t fix that it just shows how much you secretly rely on the very moral framework you deny.

 

[.Cx]

You can be ‘good’ without God, sure but why claim it’s objectively good? Without a source, good and evil are just opinions,you act morally because you feel like it, not because it’s actually binding. That’s a subtle form of "cope”

Religion doesn’t force morality it gives it foundation, Without it, you’re borrowing what you pretend to reject.

I've formed my values from experience.
When bullied and ridiculed I thought to my self, I don't want to do that to other people.
Thats how morals have been formed
Another example is sharing food because you were once hungry and had none.
Morals did not come from God they came from experiences people had and the acknowledgement that if you do the same bad things to others they will experience the same bad moments you did

 

[Vazelrr]

God said the earth is flat btw

thanks for making me laugh bhai much love

 

[unstable]

I've formed my values from experience.
When bullied and ridiculed I thought to my self, I don't want to do that to other people.
Thats how morals have been formed
Another example is sharing food because you were once hungry and had none.
Morals did not come from God they came from experiences people had and the acknowledgement that if you do the same bad things to others they will experience the same bad moments you did

hmm that is moral relativism, good philosophy but morals we are talking about are the ones that gay atheists wan to impose muh ped0philia bad muh grape bad

 

[Vazelrr]

I've formed my values from experience.
When bullied and ridiculed I thought to my self, I don't want to do that to other people.
Thats how morals have been formed
Another example is sharing food because you were once hungry and had none.
Morals did not come from God they came from experiences people had and the acknowledgement that if you do the same bad things to others they will experience the same bad moments you did

Sure, personal experience can shape behavior, but that only explains how you act, not why it’s actually right. You feel it’s wrong to hurt someone because you experienced pain but in a godless universe, that’s just your preference, not an objective standard. Someone could feel differently, or decide self-interest is supreme, and there’s nothing in your framework that can say they’re wrong. Acting morally because you want to is not the same as acting morally because it is right and that’s exactly what belief in God provides: a foundation for objective, binding morality.

 

[Klasik616]

Exactly morals aren’t just about convenience. That’s the point. If atheism is true and there’s no God, then morality has no ultimate foundation


it’s all opinion, preference, or evolution. Yet you act as if right and wrong are real, binding, and universal. That’s the inconsistency you live by laws your worldview can’t justify. Calling belief ‘cope’ doesn’t fix that it just shows how much you secretly rely on the very moral framework you deny.

You don't know what morality is. Morality only exists between humans not animals even less Gods. It's the study of the actions made between people, what's moral is always a social norm. What's inmoral is out of the social norm. Every society has a different set of morals, there are no ultimate right or wrongs: killing is not always wrong, talking is not always right. The justification of morals are rational, and the motives can be different such as self convience or just for well being of others. The motive is set by the masses, minorities always get behind. Nowadays we live under the human rights morality.

 

[Vazelrr]

exactly you haven't met a real "nietzschean atheist" those niggas are the ubermensch. most atheist are soy chugging trannies anyways.

Atheist are just a bunch of clowns that wanna sound different from people who believe in religion.

 

[looksmaxxed]

morality is just genetic behavior plus post hoc rationalization for said behavior.

the "amorality" of the psychopath is its own form of morality or code.

this is why it makes no sense to align with people on apparent moral values like religion, but rather on genetic closeness, as the behaviors will be far more consistent.

 

[Vazelrr]

.

 

[Debetro]

morality is just genetic behavior plus post hoc rationalization for said behavior.

the "amorality" of the psychopath is its own form of morality or code.

this is why it makes no sense to align with people on apparent moral values like religion, but rather on genetic closeness, as the behaviors will be far more consistent.

Every post of yours is just facts, facts and more facts.

 

[.Cx]

Sure, personal experience can shape behavior, but that only explains how you act, not why it’s actually right. You feel it’s wrong to hurt someone because you experienced pain but in a godless universe, that’s just your preference, not an objective standard. Someone could feel differently, or decide self-interest is supreme, and there’s nothing in your framework that can say they’re wrong. Acting morally because you want to is not the same as acting morally because it is right and that’s exactly what belief in God provides: a foundation for objective, binding morality.

Interesting statement,
Ill consider this next time I think deeply into the subject

 

[Vazelrr]

You don't know what morality is. Morality only exists between humans not animals even less Gods. It's the study of the actions made between people, what's moral is always a social norm. What's inmoral is out of the social norm. Every society has a different set of morals, there are no ultimate right or wrongs: killing is not always wrong, talking is not always right. The justification of morals are rational, and the motives can be different such as self convience or just for well being of others. The motive is set by the masses, minorities always get behind.

So you admit morality is just social convention, yet you still act like right and wrong exist outside opinion. That’s the problem: if morality is only what humans agree on, there’s no reason to call any action objectively wrong — not murder, not betrayal, not genocide. You’re acting like morality is real, while claiming it’s convenience. That’s exactly what I mean when I say godless ethics are unstable: they borrow the very thing they deny.

 

[looksmaxxed]

So you admit morality is just social convention, yet you still act like right and wrong exist outside opinion. That’s the problem: if morality is only what humans agree on, there’s no reason to call any action objectively wrong — not murder, not betrayal, not genocide. You’re acting like morality is real, while claiming it’s convenience. That’s exactly what I mean when I say godless ethics are unstable: they borrow the very thing they deny

this is true, there is no objective universal morality. this is why atheists need to stop coping with morality heh

but i still adhere to my genetically derived values and beliefs, because it's what feels good to me.

 

[taai]

exactly you haven't met a real "nietzschean atheist" those niggas are the ubermensch. most atheist are soy chugging trannies anyways.

Nietzsches ideas nowadays are just teenager tier takes anyway. People are really idiotic to think religion in our societies is just people going to church, believing in the holy Trinity or wearing a hijab. You have to understand entire thought systems have been developed through history from religious bases that have shaped them and present as "atheist". It's just people thinking that history are things that happened.

 

[Vazelrr]

morality is just genetic behavior plus post hoc rationalization for said behavior.

the "amorality" of the psychopath is its own form of morality or code.

this is why it makes no sense to align with people on apparent moral values like religion, but rather on genetic closeness, as the behaviors will be far more consistent.

So morality is just genetics and instinct now? Then why do we condemn psychopaths who follow their own ‘code’? If morality is only genetic behavior, there’s no reason to call murder, betrayal, or cruelty wrong it’s just biology. You’re pretending morality is real while stripping it of any objective foundation. Religion doesn’t impose morality, it reveals it, grounding right and wrong beyond fleeting instincts. Without that, your ‘genetic code’ approach collapses under its own inconsistency.