atheists that don't know anything about religion shouldn't talk about it

xye

xye

pass out my little romeo
Joined
Mar 7, 2026
Posts
3,429
Reputation
4,458
realistically if you're calling people goycattle for being religious you have a severe misunderstanding of religion
the first christians were heavily persecuted for their beliefs, they were practically the exact opposite of goycattle
christian theology can be thoroughly justified and explained
 
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: blinkers, Bipolar2Cel, hollowed and 1 other person
realistically if you're calling people goycattle for being religious you have a severe misunderstanding of religion
the first christians were heavily persecuted for their beliefs, they were practically the exact opposite of goycattle
christian theology can be thoroughly justified and explained
Believing in something based on faith without evidence means taking some desert dwellers word for it from the iron age

It's as sheepish as it gets, gullible mfs
 
  • Hmm...
  • +1
Reactions: jalin, Bipolar2Cel, wt8zz and 1 other person
i respect them as long as they dont use their religion as an excuse to flood the west with infinity immigrants. those are the goycattle.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Tenres, Bipolar2Cel and xye
Believing in something based on faith without evidence means taking some desert dwellers word for it from the iron age

It's as sheepish as it gets, gullible mfs
there is evidence;
the bible is composed of real writings by the real apostles that were deemed historical documents prior to the compilation of the bible
the bible itself has no contradictions and there are many arguments for the existence of god that logically require you to at least be a deist
 
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: Bipolar2Cel and Jason5000
any belief but agnosticism is cope
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Bipolar2Cel and xye
If any religion can only backed up assertions then it is useless to argue as followers always tend to resort to these assertions. Key point, Muslims amd Christians always come back to the argument "But the Bible/Quran is true because God made it" and "God is truth because Bible/Quran says so". Pointless to argue with such assertions
 
  • +1
Reactions: xye
there is evidence;
the bible is composed of real writings by the real apostles that were deemed historical documents prior to the compilation of the bible
the bible itself has no contradictions and there are many arguments for the existence of god that logically require you to at least be a deist
Your "evidence" is based on hearsay and anecdotes both of which are notoriously unreliable.

As for the point you make about deism- this can not be completely ruled out although there's not much reason to believe in that either

Makes more sense to assume reality stretches back infinitely thereby discarding the need for a creator to set the cogs into motion

Occam's razor supports this, the fewest assumptions is that the natural world is self sustaining and is the only thing proven to exist so why would you add a God to the equation which raises even more questions than answers

Reality is infinitely more vast and complex than you or any God could possibly come up with

Which ever way you look at it you have to assume it's infinite, and if something always existed then it doesn't need to be created
 
  • +1
Reactions: xye
realistically if you're calling people goycattle for being religious you have a severe misunderstanding of religion
the first christians were heavily persecuted for their beliefs, they were practically the exact opposite of goycattle
christian theology can be thoroughly justified and explained
most retards think they can debunk 2000 years worth of philosophy and classical theism because they cant understand metaphors in religious text , historically religion and atheism was very philosophically inclined and academic , unfortunately these past few hundred years its become full of diluted arguments from both sides
 
  • +1
Reactions: Bipolar2Cel and xye
Your "evidence" is based on hearsay and anecdotes both of which are notoriously unreliable.

As for the point you make about deism- this can not be completely ruled out although there's not much reason to believe in that either

Makes more sense to assume reality stretches back infinitely thereby discarding the need for a creator to set the cogs into motion

Occam's razor supports this, the fewest assumptions is that the natural world is self sustaining and is the only thing proven to exist so why would you add a God to the equation which raises even more questions than answers

Reality is infinitely more vast and complex than you or any God could possibly come up with

Which ever way you look at it you have to assume it's infinite, and if something always existed then it doesn't need to be created
occams razor just states that if you can prove something well you dont need to add an entity , but this doesnt really work here as we've accepted the fact that the universe pretty much did have a beginning , most accepted theory is the "big bang" (which ironically was thought of by a catholic priest before mocked by atheists and than being accepted as a rational theory to the beginning of the universe) occams razor doesnt really support this at all because we still need a "necessary being" for the beginning of the universe because it is contingent and that being we call God , all respect ofc to your opinion
 
  • +1
Reactions: Bipolar2Cel
occams razor just states that if you can prove something well you dont need to add an entity , but this doesnt really work here as we've accepted the fact that the universe pretty much did have a beginning , most accepted theory is the "big bang" (which ironically was thought of by a catholic priest before mocked by atheists and than being accepted as a rational theory to the beginning of the universe) occams razor doesnt really support this at all because we still need a "necessary being" for the beginning of the universe because it is contingent and that being we call God , all respect ofc to your opinion
The big bang was just the origin of our universe, it would be extremely naive and would underestimate the true scale of reality if you took the model on face value as being the absolute starting point of all existence

It's not, it's just the starting point of out particular pocket universe in a sea of infinite universes stretching back infinitely into the past

We just can't see beyond that horizon because we lack a theory of everything- we don't have a theory that reconciles quantum mechanics and gravity but once we do these questions will be answered and I'll be proven right. This seems to be the general consensus in cosmology but atm it's extremely difficult to prove. But the main thing is that it's plausible, your God on the other hand is not a plausible explanation to anything, it just complicates the issue with what is essentially magic
 
@Turkic Albanian @mistermogsalot It is not the consensus among cosmologists today (in fact it's the opposite) that the Big bang was the beginning of the universe. Most just take it to be a dense hot space with unusually low entropy
 
religious cope....
 
Atheists can cope all they want, I have had multiple experiences that can only be explained by there being a higher power or I just keep running into one in a billion scenarios. That alone is proof for me, I don't just need to listen to or read books lol. I used to be an edgy atheist too but realize Christianity makes perfect sense, the Bible is also a very blackpilled book kind of everything in it is based and explains the world and human condition perfectly. Also would have roped if I didn't believe in anything and found life pointless lol.

i respect them as long as they dont use their religion as an excuse to flood the west with infinity immigrants. those are the goycattle.
Yeah that shit is disgusting, tons of Christians are blue pilled dumb cattle as fuck. Tons are beta cuck feminists too. Most churches suck ass too.
 
Last edited:
@Turkic Albanian @mistermogsalot It is not the consensus among cosmologists today (in fact it's the opposite) that the Big bang was the beginning of the universe. Most just take it to be a dense hot space with unusually low entropy
That's right
 
  • +1
Reactions: Tenres
Exactly, most people are high uneducated in religion and philosophy and debate like there life’s depend on with absolute no evidence or real reason or proof, it because of there own personal ego and beliefs. No one would like to admit there wrong
 
  • +1
Reactions: mistermogsalot, Bipolar2Cel and Tenres
Religion was built for men like me to stop spreading their seed
 

Similar threads

Rick_bozo
Replies
6
Views
86
AbnormalAfrican
AbnormalAfrican
Genetics
Replies
3
Views
58
Bipolar2Cel
Bipolar2Cel
poster
Replies
10
Views
93
Oopity
Oopity
Mansur
Replies
4
Views
39
vamptear
vamptear
taylorhillshusband
Replies
1
Views
33
BronzeAlligator1
BronzeAlligator1

Users who are viewing this thread

  • Turkic Albanian
  • GZod
  • LeanByDecemer
  • Bipolar2Cel
  • roperrorist
  • loneiqlet
  • zombi3
  • jalin
  • milkshake_addict
  • domi1357
  • ndslth8r
  • Foreverbrad
  • Jason5000
  • xye
  • erome
  • therandomorg83
  • ntlarper420
  • AristotlesChild
  • wt8zz
  • Shadow72
  • HaileyWelshMogs
Back
Top