Attractiveness Calculator (that actually makes sense)

Please correct me if I've added up the wrong score if I chose the wrong category per question, please tell me what to change.

Fit: +10

Broad shoulders + average hips: +12

5'9: +15

Don't know where I'd be, I guess "definitely above average"? Been told I was "attractive" according to this scale. +35
@looksmidder This comfortably put me at chadlite (72)
 
  • +1
Reactions: looksmidder
shit tier charts. with average face ı cannot be chadlite
 
I think this weights body comp/frame too high and facial attractiveness too low. should be 50%face 30%height 10%body comp 10%frame
 
i messaged creator of this thread for my rating

this has few flaws that can be improved but it's 100x better than PSL or whatever u guys use and it should be used to determine the value of someone's attractiveness instead of psl
 
Ngl this was pretty good. Nice high effort thread and very reasonable criteria. Good stuff OP. One thing I will say tho is more weight should be given to face, otherwise this is very very good
 
i've got 51. My results definitely can be around 55+, so i guess im mtn pushing htn. Given my 5'8 height pretty accurate especially in the west ill be considered short. There are some variables thats heavily depended on the area you live in such as phenotype, height, money.
Stongfat(basically fit dad bod) can be better cuz some women like big men especially if doesnt effect the face that significantly.
 
I got 70 with average face.
Im chadlite lol
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Xangsane
Good thread, the problem here is just giving not enough weight for face, that should be more important than all the rest together

I got 66 (chadlit), but I consider myself HTN
 
This is meant as a generic, simplistic way of assessing your attractiveness level. It does not take into account features with a high degree of subjectivity, i.e. colouring, hairstyles, etc.
Likewise, it does not take into account non-physical features, such as fashion, personality, and NT-ness.
This test is merely meant to be a way to quickly calculate the attractiveness of your physical appearance, and nothing else.

The resulting score will range from 0 to 100, and is exceptionally easy to calculate; simply add up the numbers for each of the three sections of the test.

Section 1: Frame

View attachment 2231997
1A: Muscularity & Body Fat %
Auschwitz: +0. (Your final score may not exceed 60/100).
Fat: +0 (Your final score may not exceed 40/100).

Skinnyfat: +1
Chubby: +2
Builtfat: +3
Strongfat: +4
Skinny: +5
Toned: +8
Fit: +10
Built: +12
Athletic: +15

1B: Shoulders and hips
Narrow shoulders + wide hips:
+0 (Your final score may not exceed 75/100)
Average shoulders + wide hips: +2
Narrow shoulders + average hips: +4
Average shoulders + average hips: +6
Average shoulders + narrow hips: +8
Broad shoulders + average hips: +12
Broad shoulders + narrow hips: +15

Section 2: Height

5'0 and below: +0 (Your final score may not exceed 40/100)
5'1: +1 (Your final score may not exceed 40/100)
5'2: +2 (Your final score may not exceed 45/100)
5'3: +3 (Your final score may not exceed 45/100)
5'2: +4(Your final score may not exceed 50/100)
5'3: +5 (Your final score may not exceed 50/100)
5'4: +6 (Your final score may not exceed 55/100)
5'5: +7 (Your final score may not exceed 60/100)
5'6: +9 (Your final score may not exceed 70/100)
5'7: +11 (Your final score may not exceed 80/100)
5'8: +13 (Your final score may not exceed 90/100)
5'9: +15
5'10: +18
5'11: +22
6'0: +25
6'1: +26
6'2: +27
6'3: +28
6'4: +29
6'5 and above: +30

Section 3: Face
Exceptionally ugly
Severe deformities, rare skin diseases, missing facial features.
+0 (Your final score may not exceed 30/100).

Very ugly
Very unfortunate-looking people, with misshapen and/or plain unpleasant faces.
People with repulsive skin problems such as deep cystic acne generally fall here.

+0 (Your final score may not exceed 45/100)

Ugly
Multiple facial defects, many of which severe. Next to no redeeming qualities.
People who are otherwise healthy but undeniably not very nice to look at generally fall here.

+5 (Your final score may not exceed 60/100)

Definitely Below Average
A few facial defects, of which one or two may be severe. Next to no redeeming qualities.
+10

Slightly Below Average
A few facial defects, none of which are severe. Few redeeming qualities.
+18

Average
Some good qualities may be present, but are generally overshadowed by facial defects.
-or-
No really positive features, but no real facial defects either.

+20

Slightly Above Average
Some good qualities are definitely present, but are generally overshadowed by minor facial defects or are not that striking.
"Unconventionally attractive" people generally fall here.

+22

Definitely Above Average
Some good qualities are definitely present, but they are not that striking; facial defects are minimal.
These are people that are generally described as "cute".

+25

Attractive
Undeniably good looking; multiple good qualities, and minimal facial defects.
These are people that the vast majority of the opposite sex would immediately describe as attractive.

+35

Very Attractive
The epitome of attractiveness; multiple excellent qualities, and next to no facial defects.
These people tend to make the opposite sex fall in love with them wherever they go, without much effort at all.

+40


Now, sum up your scores, and check the following chart:
Truecel: 0 to 20
Incel: 20 to 40
Low Tier Normie : 40 to 45
Normie: 45 to 55
High Tier Normie: 55 to 60
Chadlite: 60 to 80
Chad: 80-100​
nice but how did i get 70
 
High Tier Normie: 55 to 60
Bumping. I'm HTN according to this, which I'd say is a little inaccurate. 59 points.

Skinny: +5
Average shoulders + narrow hips: +8
Average
Some good qualities may be present, but are generally overshadowed by facial defects.
-or-
No really positive features, but no real facial defects either.

+20
 

Similar threads

Y
Replies
10
Views
450
mvp2v1
mvp2v1
zeto
Replies
9
Views
975
solansigilknight
solansigilknight
Linus1888
Replies
60
Views
2K
Linus1888
Linus1888

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top