Beauty is “objective “cope

william2605

william2605

Luminary
Joined
Mar 16, 2023
Posts
8,553
Reputation
6,362
Still no one can put what makes chico better looking than already another better looking person
IMG 1218

If beauty is sjubective past htn then this proves my point .
 
  • +1
Reactions: iblameloweffort, bhsoda_destroyer, Jason5000 and 1 other person
If you admit that comparing Chico to another model is entirely subjective, you are admitting that beauty itself is subjective. You are just confusing a high statistical consensus of subjective opinions with objectivity.

Your entire rating scale is built on subjective preferences.
 
  • +1
Reactions: tarkdriad33 and socio
@tarkdriad33 @iblameloweffort
 
  • +1
Reactions: iblameloweffort
Saying beauty is objective is the same as saying it's possible to prove an apple looks better than a banana
 
  • +1
Reactions: enchanted_elixir, iwishicouldbediff and william2605
If beauty is subjective then which one is better looking?

1784733550178
1784733600305
 
  • +1
Reactions: iwishicouldbediff
In that case yes Bc is extreme
What about 2 good looking ppl? Like htn vs adam, ?

Plus, you also seemed to have difficulty fully explaining what Chico actually mogs Shami lol
i mean its pretty obvious that if you have 2 good looking people its gonna be more subjective than 1 good looking guy and 1 ugly guy
 
  • +1
Reactions: iblameloweffort and william2605
i mean its pretty obvious that if you have 2 good looking people its gonna be more subjective than 1 good looking guy and 1 ugly guy
Then chico isnt better than shami
Since both are good looking
 
  • +1
Reactions: iblameloweffort
List only the things thats chico mogs vs shami
The objective things
wider and more balanced craniofacial structure, stronger cheekbone to jaw integration, more ideal eye spacing, a more proportionate midface, better facial thirds, higher facial width-to-height ratio, stronger temporal width, and greater overall facial harmony
 
  • +1
Reactions: william2605
wider and more balanced craniofacial structure, stronger cheekbone to jaw integration, more ideal eye spacing, a more proportionate midface, better facial thirds, higher facial width-to-height ratio, stronger temporal width, and greater overall facial harmony
Ok, then beauty is objective or subjective ?
 
  • +1
Reactions: iblameloweffort
wider and more balanced craniofacial structure, stronger cheekbone to jaw integration, more ideal eye spacing, a more proportionate midface, better facial thirds, higher facial width-to-height ratio, stronger temporal width, and greater overall facial harmony
@tarkdriad33
 
  • +1
Reactions: tarkdriad33
beauty is subjective, ugliness is objective
 
“Chico mogs “seems objective ,how ? Sìnce after 7 is subjective ?
Still heavily objective but some ppl can still disagree
So chico mogs is still true
 
  • +1
Reactions: william2605
I think girls will choose shami idk why , honwstly i think thats beauty is subjective idk why
Ever asked girls Abt whom they find attractive btw these twos
 
  • +1
Reactions: william2605

Similar threads

william2605
Replies
1
Views
14
realestpatriot
realestpatriot
william2605
Replies
27
Views
94
ICL
ICL
william2605
Replies
71
Views
312
william2605
william2605
tertaf
Replies
10
Views
135
Iamspace
Iamspace

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
Sponsored
Stake.us
America's #1 Social Casino
Slots, Poker & More
Join Now →