Beauty is subjective

[william2605]

There are too many different formulas that contradict one another. If beauty were truly objective, there would only be one formula.





People here are completely confused. Beauty isn’t objective.

 

[DrRodger]

Ok

 

[william2605]

Bump

 

[asuframe]

Cope you are either attractive or you aren’t

 

[browgi27]

There are too many different formulas that contradict one another. If beauty were truly objective, there would only be one formula.





People here are completely confused. Beauty isn’t objective.

Cope niggerrr

 

[william2605]

Cope you are either attractive or you aren’t

Cope niggerrr

You're all geniuses, so explain to me how to evaluate a face objectively. Even if a face is attractive, how do you objectively determine how attractive it is?

 

[asuframe]

You're all geniuses, so explain to me how to evaluate a face objectively. Even if a face is attractive, how do you objectively determine how attractive it is?

With my eyes

 

[browgi27]

You're all geniuses, so explain to me how to evaluate a face objectively. Even if a face is attractive, how do you objectively determine how attractive it is?

If your htn+ almost 95% of people will find u attractive wyd

 

[william2605]

If your htn+ almost 95% of people will find u attractive wyd

Htn vs adam

 

[william2605]

With my eyes

Proving my point cope

 

[browgi27]

Htn vs adam

What?

 

[Darth Revan]

There are too many different formulas that contradict one another. If beauty were truly objective, there would only be one formula.





People here are completely confused. Beauty isn’t objective.

Holy cope

 

[Darth Revan]

 

[william2605]

What?

If you're saying that everything beyond HTN is subjective, then beauty isn't truly objective.

On the other hand, if you can explain why an Adam-tier face is objectively better than an HTN face, then that's different.

But you still haven't told me how objective beauty is actually evaluated, lol.

 

[william2605]

Holy cope

so explain to me how to evaluate a face objectively. Even if a face is attractive, how do you objectively determine how attractive it is?

 

[william2605]

Bump

 

[browgi27]

If you're saying that everything beyond HTN is subjective, then beauty isn't truly objective.

On the other hand, if you can explain why an Adam-tier face is objectively better than an HTN face, then that's different.

But you still haven't told me how objective beauty is actually evaluated, lol.

Ok l tell u for example chico htn is pretty attractive and many people will find him attractive but not everyone will find him attractive cuz he lacks dimo and has flaws in the other hands as you said adam someone like hexum bomer hernan almost everyone would find them attractive

 

[Darth Revan]

so explain to me how to evaluate a face objectively. Even if a face is attractive, how do you objectively determine how attractive it is?

math son

 

[Van]

There are too many different formulas that contradict one another. If beauty were truly objective, there would only be one formula.





People here are completely confused. Beauty isn’t objective.

true that, but you're objectively hideous nigger

 

[boostlock]

my shitty personality that came from my shitty genetics stop me from getting a girlfriend

 

[iblameloweffort]

so explain to me how to evaluate a face objectively. Even if a face is attractive, how do you objectively determine how attractive it is?

Leave all of these
Now tell me top 5 attractive men acc to u

 

[william2605]

Leave all of these
Now tell me top 5 attractive men acc to u

If you're saying that everything beyond HTN is subjective, then beauty isn't truly objective.

On the other hand, if you can explain why an Adam-tier face is objectively better than an HTN face, then that's different.

But you still haven't told me how objective beauty is actually evaluated, lol.

so explain to me how to evaluate a face objectively. Even if a face is attractive, how do you objectively determine how attractive it is?

 

[william2605]

Ok l tell u for example chico htn is pretty attractive and many people will find him attractive but not everyone will find him attractive cuz he lacks dimo and has flaws in the other hands as you said adam someone like hexum bomer hernan almost everyone would find them attractive

Cope
According the forum chico has tecnically no flaws

 

[Daddy's Home]

so explain to me how to evaluate a face objectively. Even if a face is attractive, how do you objectively determine how attractive it is?

Harmony, meaning distances between features + individual elements on the face that are as ideal as possible

In this case, Tyler and Nora have the closest possible faces to perfection, objectively speaking..

 

[PeenoResurrected]

Except when it comes to gooks, they are all objectively subhuman as ugly as fuck

 

[browgi27]

Cope
According the forum chico has tecnically no flaws

Reccesed maxxila lacks dimo+ brown eyes wyd no flaws

 

[iblameloweffort]

Cope
According the forum chico has tecnically no flaws

Mf u urself don't agree when someone says that chico mogs the other guy or has no flaws

 

[william2605]

Harmony, meaning distances between features + individual elements on the face that are as ideal as possible

In this case, Tyler and Nora have the closest possible faces to perfection, objectively speaking..

Great and objectively where you judge thats (exemple )chico is better than already another top tier man?

 

[william2605]

Mf u urself don't agree when someone says that chico mogs the other guy or has no flaws

I agree
I've always agreed with you, but since you avoided my objective question yesterday—why do you consider Chico's zygos to be more prominent and better projected, even though K Shami has that level of definition too?

So my question is: how do you determine that Chico is objectively superior to another top-tier man? Do you look at which features are closer to perfection? Please explain.

 

[iblameloweffort]

I agree
I've always agreed with you, but since you avoided my objective question yesterday—why do you consider Chico's zygos to be more prominent and better projected, even though K Shami has that level of definition too?

So my question is: how do you determine that Chico is objectively superior to another top-tier man? Do you look at which features are closer to perfection? Please explain.

Let's say they both have the same zygo prominence but facial ratios are things too mane

 

[browgi27]

I agree
I've always agreed with you, but since you avoided my objective question yesterday—why do you consider Chico's zygos to be more prominent and better projected, even though K Shami has that level of definition too?

So my question is: how do you determine that Chico is objectively superior to another top-tier man? Do you look at which features are closer to perfection? Please explain.

Get chico past bojack first nigga

 

[william2605]

Let's say they both have the same zygo prominence but facial ratios are things too mane

You said thats chico zygos are more projected and more prominent btw

 

[iblameloweffort]

I agree
I've always agreed with you, but since you avoided my objective question yesterday—why do you consider Chico's zygos to be more prominent and better projected, even though K Shami has that level of definition too?

So my question is: how do you determine that Chico is objectively superior to another top-tier man? Do you look at which features are closer to perfection? Please explain.

I'm wondering who do u think the most attractive man in ur scale

 

[iblameloweffort]

You said thats chico zygos are more projected and more prominent btw

It is slightly prominent tho

 

[william2605]

I'm wondering who do u think the most attractive man in ur scale

“Your scale” proves my point too, unconsciously.

I'm asking you: tell me what an objectively perfect face is based on. What criteria does it have to meet?

 

[zerosmv]

in some cases true

 

[Alexg_lover]

If beauty were truly objective, there would only be one formula.

There is. People are just too retarded to figure it out.

"If climate change was real, then everyone would agree!"

I mean, obviously we don't have it perfectly figured out yet, but the four pillars seems to predict it most accurately. A perfect formula would likely be a lot more complicated than what we currently have though.

 

[william2605]

It is slightly prominent tho

Everything you listed about Chico vs K Shami wasn't completely objective, right?

 

[iblameloweffort]

“Your scale” proves my point too, unconsciously.

I'm asking you: tell me what an objectively perfect face is based on. What criteria does it have to meet?

Well I have said that bcz u were saying that attractiveness is not objective that's why I used " ur scale"

 

[william2605]

There is. People are just too retarded to figure it out.

"If climate change was real, then everyone would agree!"

I mean, obviously we don't have it perfectly figured out yet, but the four pillars seems to predict it most accurately. A perfect formula would likely be a lot more complicated than what we currently have though.

so explain to me how to evaluate a face objectively. Even if a face is attractive, how do you objectively determine how attractive it is?

Considering what separates a 9.5 from an 8.5/9, even though both are already top-tier in terms of beauty.

 

[william2605]

Well I have said that bcz u were saying that attractiveness is not objective that's why I used " ur scale"

So let's take the example from yesterday.

Objectively, according to the “objective” criteria, can you list what Chico has that makes him better-looking than K Shami?

 

[Grievous]

Beauty is subjective partly but mostly objective

People will have their preferences based mainly on phenotype and familiar looking faces hence why some girls dont find certain models like Oprey attractive since he has a sharp look

But there's still universal features that make someone attractive

 

[iblameloweffort]

So let's take the example from yesterday.

Objectively, according to the “objective” criteria, can you list what Chico has that makes him better-looking than K Shami?

more ideal eye spacing, a more proportionate midface, better facial thirds, higher fwhr, stronger temporal width, and greater overall facial harmony

 

[william2605]

more ideal eye spacing, a more proportionate midface, better facial thirds, higher fwhr, stronger temporal width, and greater overall facial harmony

Ok but no better features in chico then

 

[iblameloweffort]

Ok but no better features in chico then

Other than tall skull I agree
His ratios and averageness is carrying him

 

[william2605]

Other than tall skull I agree
His ratios and averageness is carrying him

Features wise you said better zygos jaw and eyes .

 

[iblameloweffort]

Features wise you said better zygos jaw and eyes .

What made u think shami has better zygos and eye area ???

 

[william2605]

What made u think shami has better zygos and eye area ???

Actually, I asked the question just to understand better. I don't have any personal opinion on it.

I asked you: if they are better, can you explain why? Nothing more than that.

Go back and reread yesterday's question, bro.

 

[iblameloweffort]

Actually, I asked the question just to understand better. I don't have any personal opinion on it.

I asked you: if they are better, can you explain why? Nothing more than that.

Go back and reread yesterday's question, bro.

Ok
Why do u compare every other htn+ with chico

 

[william2605]

Ok
Why do u compare every other htn+ with chico

Can you finish first the answer what chico has better than the “htn”?
If chico got only ratios Whats the point ?