Body > face.

pinterest

pinterest

Master
Joined
Mar 20, 2024
Posts
1,580
Reputation
1,142
Your body is a lot bigger than your face and there’s not a single part of your body that can’t be unattractive, you could have unattractive, clavicles, hands, neck, chest, abs, hips, back, legs, feet, arms, finger nails, scapula etc. And you could have a good face but be 5’0. I’d take 6’5 with perfect body and LTN face over 5’0 chad with terrible body.
 
  • +1
Reactions: AverageCurryEnjoyer
Your body is a lot bigger than your face and there’s not a single part of your body that can’t be unattractive, you could have unattractive, clavicles, hands, neck, chest, abs, hips, back, legs, feet, arms, finger nails, scapula etc. And you could have a good face but be 5’0. I’d take 6’5 with perfect body and LTN face over 5’0 chad with terrible body.
It's always the subhumans that have ugly bodies. Face is just part of body.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: AverageCurryEnjoyer, darkpiller40, mightbecooked123 and 2 others
5,0? Nigga what
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 128629
Your body is a lot bigger than your face and there’s not a single part of your body that can’t be unattractive, you could have unattractive, clavicles, hands, neck, chest, abs, hips, back, legs, feet, arms, finger nails, scapula etc. And you could have a good face but be 5’0. I’d take 6’5 with perfect body and LTN face over 5’0 chad with terrible body.
This is true but disingenuous, 5’0 chad lmao what man is 5’0

If you said 6’5 ltn is better than 5’5 chad face that makes more sense
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: pinterest and Dondraper75
This is true but disingenuous, 5’0 chad lmao what man is 5’0

If you said 6’5 ltn is better than 5’5 chad face that makes more sense
they always use extreme examples to make their points being 5ft in western countries is legit so damn rare JFL:lul:
 
  • +1
Reactions: moggerofhumanity, Genghis_Khan, I Blame Genetics and 2 others
Dondraper75


chads have all
 
  • +1
Reactions: Dondraper75 and WrothEnd
5'0 is a stupid example, 5'7 chad like Tom Cruise has more appeal than 6'2 LTN JackFitness easily
 
  • +1
Reactions: moggerofhumanity and Dondraper75
your face matter at 175 cm, and your height doesnt matter if you arent High MTN in face.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Dondraper75
they always use extreme examples to make their points being 5ft in western countries is legit so damn rare JFL:lul:
I never met anyone who was 5’0 besides a few women
 
Your body is a lot bigger than your face and there’s not a single part of your body that can’t be unattractive, you could have unattractive, clavicles, hands, neck, chest, abs, hips, back, legs, feet, arms, finger nails, scapula etc. And you could have a good face but be 5’0. I’d take 6’5 with perfect body and LTN face over 5’0 chad with terrible body.
a good body that isn't physically huge looks the same as a mid body when covered by clothing. only when you remove the clothing does the good body become apparent.

nobody wears masks these day so your face stands out. skinny/toned chads pull more than jacked mtns.
 
a good body that isn't physically huge looks the same as a mid body when covered by clothing. only when you remove the clothing does the good body become apparent.

nobody wears masks these day so your face stands out. skinny/toned chads pull more than jacked mtns.
Not talking about muscle but iagrrev
 
stupid ass post man wtf
 
1739963486395
 
  • +1
Reactions: Drugsmaxxer
Realistically, it's better to be MTN at 6ft2 188
Than
HTN at 5ft9 175
 

Similar threads

Alexanderr
Replies
61
Views
3K
Alexanderr
Alexanderr
beniman
Replies
8
Views
766
Everythingislaw
E
gymcel64
Replies
35
Views
1K
minecraftswag4
minecraftswag4
nuttheb
Replies
52
Views
2K
nuttheb
nuttheb

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top