Body > face.

pinterest

pinterest

Temp. Banned
Joined
Mar 20, 2024
Posts
3,327
Reputation
3,935
Your body is a lot bigger than your face and there’s not a single part of your body that can’t be unattractive, you could have unattractive, clavicles, hands, neck, chest, abs, hips, back, legs, feet, arms, finger nails, scapula etc. And you could have a good face but be 5’0. I’d take 6’5 with perfect body and LTN face over 5’0 chad with terrible body.
 
  • +1
Reactions: AverageCurryEnjoyer
Your body is a lot bigger than your face and there’s not a single part of your body that can’t be unattractive, you could have unattractive, clavicles, hands, neck, chest, abs, hips, back, legs, feet, arms, finger nails, scapula etc. And you could have a good face but be 5’0. I’d take 6’5 with perfect body and LTN face over 5’0 chad with terrible body.
It's always the subhumans that have ugly bodies. Face is just part of body.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: AverageCurryEnjoyer, DarkAscender, Deleted member 83942 and 2 others
5,0? Nigga what
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 128629
Your body is a lot bigger than your face and there’s not a single part of your body that can’t be unattractive, you could have unattractive, clavicles, hands, neck, chest, abs, hips, back, legs, feet, arms, finger nails, scapula etc. And you could have a good face but be 5’0. I’d take 6’5 with perfect body and LTN face over 5’0 chad with terrible body.
This is true but disingenuous, 5’0 chad lmao what man is 5’0

If you said 6’5 ltn is better than 5’5 chad face that makes more sense
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: pinterest and Dondraper75
This is true but disingenuous, 5’0 chad lmao what man is 5’0

If you said 6’5 ltn is better than 5’5 chad face that makes more sense
they always use extreme examples to make their points being 5ft in western countries is legit so damn rare JFL:lul:
 
  • +1
Reactions: moggerofhumanity, Genghis_Khan, Deleted member 104891 and 2 others
Dondraper75


chads have all
 
  • +1
Reactions: Dondraper75 and WrothEnd
5'0 is a stupid example, 5'7 chad like Tom Cruise has more appeal than 6'2 LTN JackFitness easily
 
  • +1
Reactions: moggerofhumanity and Dondraper75
your face matter at 175 cm, and your height doesnt matter if you arent High MTN in face.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Dondraper75
they always use extreme examples to make their points being 5ft in western countries is legit so damn rare JFL:lul:
I never met anyone who was 5’0 besides a few women
 
Your body is a lot bigger than your face and there’s not a single part of your body that can’t be unattractive, you could have unattractive, clavicles, hands, neck, chest, abs, hips, back, legs, feet, arms, finger nails, scapula etc. And you could have a good face but be 5’0. I’d take 6’5 with perfect body and LTN face over 5’0 chad with terrible body.
a good body that isn't physically huge looks the same as a mid body when covered by clothing. only when you remove the clothing does the good body become apparent.

nobody wears masks these day so your face stands out. skinny/toned chads pull more than jacked mtns.
 
a good body that isn't physically huge looks the same as a mid body when covered by clothing. only when you remove the clothing does the good body become apparent.

nobody wears masks these day so your face stands out. skinny/toned chads pull more than jacked mtns.
Not talking about muscle but iagrrev
 
stupid ass post man wtf
 
1739963486395
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 125065
Realistically, it's better to be MTN at 6ft2 188
Than
HTN at 5ft9 175
 

Similar threads

Zaylo
Replies
4
Views
45
imhereagain
imhereagain
joao2005
Replies
3
Views
28
iwantuinsideme
iwantuinsideme
pentaChad_doomer
Replies
11
Views
52
bobstuckatmtn
bobstuckatmtn
rottenchud01
Replies
1
Views
33
zerohal0
zerohal0
nicopsl
Replies
14
Views
102
160cmcurry
160cmcurry

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top