Bonesmashing with a massage gun

kantlie

kantlie

Prince of Persia
Joined
Jul 25, 2023
Posts
82
Reputation
50
If you're not bonesmashing with a massage gun then what the fuck are you doing?

>same induced swelling
>same induction of myofibrosis
>safe, won't concuss you or fuck you up
>swelling is distributed and symmetric

If you're not bonesmashing with a massage gun it's over for you and you're an IQlet.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: erf!e_chel
If you're not bonesmashing with a massage gun then what the fuck are you doing?

>same induced swelling
>same induction of myofibrosis
>safe, won't concuss you or fuck you up
>swelling is distributed and symmetric

If you're not bonesmashing without a massage gun it's over for you and you're an IQlet.
Bonesmashing doesn't work
 
  • +1
Reactions: SEA FIT
If you're not bonesmashing with a massage gun then what the fuck are you doing?

>same induced swelling
>same induction of myofibrosis
>safe, won't concuss you or fuck you up
>swelling is distributed and symmetric

If you're not bonesmashing with a massage gun it's over for you and you're an IQlet.
no, do it with your own fist so you dont hurt yourself. your welcome
 
  • +1
Reactions: Rylie
Bone smashing doesn’t literally work dude your bones are just gonna go back to normal
 
Bone smashing doesn’t literally work dude your bones are just gonna go back to normal
It's not about the bones dude it's about the skin; the swelling is literally the indication of the true process by which the projected growth that people report actually happens. I don't buy into the wolfs law bullshit. It's not bone growth but rather scar tissue growth, and it doesn't matter that it's not bone growth because to the naked eye there is no distinction that can be made really.

The same way that MMA fighters get bigger knuckles by consistent bruising and swelling of the skin in that area which induces myofibrosis when consistently done over time, zygos and other parts of the body can also compensate for collagen damage by inducing myofibrosis and resulting in permanent scar tissue.
 
  • +1
Reactions: erf!e_chel
It's not about the bones dude it's about the skin, the swelling is literally the indication of the truw process by which the projected growth that people report actually happens. I don't buy into the wolfs law bullshit. It's not bone growth but rather scar tissue growth, and it doesn't matter that it's not bone growth because to the baked eye there is no distinction that can be made really.

The same way that MMA fighters get bigger knuckles by consistent bruising and swelling of the skin in that area which induces my fibrosis when consistently done over time, zygos and other parts of the body can also compensate for collagen damage by inducing myofibrosis and resulting in permanent scar tissue.
If that’s your answer I can’t argue with you
 
  • +1
Reactions: tipforfacialbonemas
If that’s your answer I can’t argue with you
Idk if this is a concession or you're implicitly saying that I'm wrong.

You do agree that when skin is consistently damaged from swelling then scar tissue builds over time, no? I think that's pretty intuitive and also scientifically justifiable.
 
  • +1
Reactions: tipforfacialbonemas
Bonesmashing is cope
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Rylie
Bonesmashing is cope
It's not about the bones it's about the skin; the swelling is literally the indication of the true process by which the projected growth that people report actually happens. I don't buy into the wolfs law bullshit. It's not bone growth but rather scar tissue growth, and it doesn't matter that it's not bone growth because to the naked eye there is no distinction that can be made really.

The same way that MMA fighters get bigger knuckles by consistent bruising and swelling of the skin in that area which induces myofibrosis when consistently done over time, zygos and other parts of the body can also compensate for collagen damage by inducing myofibrosis and resulting in permanent scar tissue.
 
  • +1
Reactions: stacyworshipper
It's not about the bones it's about the skin; the swelling is literally the indication of the true process by which the projected growth that people report actually happens. I don't buy into the wolfs law bullshit. It's not bone growth but rather scar tissue growth, and it doesn't matter that it's not bone growth because to the naked eye there is no distinction that can be made really.

The same way that MMA fighters get bigger knuckles by consistent bruising and swelling of the skin in that area which induces myofibrosis when consistently done over time, zygos and other parts of the body can also compensate for collagen damage by inducing myofibrosis and resulting in permanent scar tissue.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: karmacitathugmaxx, Rylie and kantlie
If you're not bonesmashing with a massage gun then what the fuck are you doing?

>same induced swelling
>same induction of myofibrosis
>safe, won't concuss you or fuck you up
>swelling is distributed and symmetric

If you're not bonesmashing with a massage gun it's over for you and you're an IQlet.
Fuckass temu massage
 
It's not about the bones dude it's about the skin; the swelling is literally the indication of the true process by which the projected growth that people report actually happens. I don't buy into the wolfs law bullshit. It's not bone growth but rather scar tissue growth, and it doesn't matter that it's not bone growth because to the naked eye there is no distinction that can be made really.

The same way that MMA fighters get bigger knuckles by consistent bruising and swelling of the skin in that area which induces myofibrosis when consistently done over time, zygos and other parts of the body can also compensate for collagen damage by inducing myofibrosis and resulting in permanent scar tissue.
Then that's not bonesmashing retard
 
Then that's not bonesmashing retard
You're still targeting the bone, it's just that the projection doesn't come from the damage exerted on the bone.

Can your raped skull not conceive of the possibility that a concept can have a different effect than the perceived explanation for what the explanation is based off of?

Should it be called "skin-smashing" you rock-chewing faggot?

Take my cock out your mouth and put the rocks back in where they belong you up-syndrome rape-baby.
 
Last edited:
Then that's not bonesmashing retard
It's almost like the problem is that retards like you that didn't even know that's the mechanism by which the thing you perceive results from actually works and render it a misnomer. :feelsuhh:

Actual IQlet. Maybe instead of rocks you should chew a logic 101 book.
 
If you're not bonesmashing with a massage gun then what the fuck are you doing?

>same induced swelling
>same induction of myofibrosis
>safe, won't concuss you or fuck you up
>swelling is distributed and symmetric

If you're not bonesmashing with a massage gun it's over for you and you're an IQlet.
I bs close to the infras since its much less likely to fuck me up I know its a low iq reply but lowkey i feel that the infra protrudes around 0.5mm more than it did and the undereye crease feels deeper, I have bulging eyes (1mm outward my underdeveloped brow ridge) and by doing the finger test i would only feel my eye and brow ridge but no infras, now i feel the infras
 

Similar threads

erf!e_chel
Replies
2
Views
131
erf!e_chel
erf!e_chel
crypted
Replies
4
Views
72
avenox
avenox
fi93
Replies
7
Views
105
fi93
fi93
BlackChadOfPersia
Replies
13
Views
234
Assymetry
Assymetry
xvnny
Replies
8
Views
66
xvnny
xvnny

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top