Book of Intelligence - Achieve Changs IQ

[Crusile]

Ur so wrong its embarrasing, the PNAS studys only testing in academic contexts, when even then its scope is small


Also again ur absolutely wrong ur denying that tests, test crystal intelligence and not fluid when ur 1 google search away from knowing most besides WAISE test FI


I mean its embarrasing how u could be this blatantly wrong, especially thinking IQ has no correlation to learning speed, when its the exact opposite

Human Intelligence

This book is a comprehensive survey of our scientific knowledge about human intelligence, written by a researcher who has spent more than 30 years studying the field, receiving a Lifetime Contribution award from the International Society for Intelligence. Human Intelligence takes a...

books.google.com

Intelligence and educational achievement

www.research.ed.ac.uk

Source on learning speed specifically. Ie time spent learning increasing learning speed linearly dependent on iq or not

 

[Crusile]

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1041608019300159

Iq doesn't effect 2ndlanguage learning speed

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0361476X23000553#f0015 learning speed is linear

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S104160800700012X?fr=RR-2&ref=pdf_download&rr=8ff45315bb5dac33

"In neither task was fluid or crystallized intelligence associated with learning. Although there were moderate correlations among the level parameters across the verbal and spatial tasks, the learning parameters were not significantly correlated with one another across task modalities. These results are inconsistent with the existence of a general (e.g., material-independent) learning ability."

 

[Rigged]

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1041608019300159

Iq doesn't effect 2ndlanguage learning speed

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0361476X23000553#f0015 learning speed is linear

U really didnt read this huh, that study only examines L2 which is a domain specific skill

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S104160800700012X?fr=RR-2&ref=pdf_download&rr=8ff45315bb5dac33

Only linear for rote memorization or repetitive tasks, for harder tasks ppl with higher FI always have a faster learning curve, also the real world follows the power-law curve

"In neither task was fluid or crystallized intelligence associated with learning. Although there were moderate correlations among the level parameters across the verbal and spatial tasks, the learning parameters were not significantly correlated with one another across task modalities. These results are inconsistent with the existence of a general (e.g., material-independent) learning ability."

Tasks specific results dont generalize, and it only focuses on verbal and spatial tasks

 

[StupidHedonist_INTP]

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1041608019300159

Iq doesn't effect 2ndlanguage learning speed

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0361476X23000553#f0015 learning speed is linear

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S104160800700012X?fr=RR-2&ref=pdf_download&rr=8ff45315bb5dac33

"In neither task was fluid or crystallized intelligence associated with learning. Although there were moderate correlations among the level parameters across the verbal and spatial tasks, the learning parameters were not significantly correlated with one another across task modalities. These results are inconsistent with the existence of a general (e.g., material-independent) learning ability."

I mean whatever, but for sure an average human learns faster than an animal and it probably just has to be because of the iq difference which proves that higher iq increases learning speed.

 

[StupidHedonist_INTP]

*just has to do

 

[Crusile]

I mean whatever, but for sure an average human learns faster than an animal and it probably just has to be because of the iq difference which proves that higher iq increases learning speed.

IQ is a measure of social class not intelligence. It estimates a persons exposure to iq test question knowledge.

 

[Crusile]

U really didnt read this huh, that study only examines L2 which is a domain specific skill

Only linear for rote memorization or repetitive tasks, for harder tasks ppl with higher FI always have a faster learning curve, also the real world follows the power-law curve

Tasks specific results dont generalize, and it only focuses on verbal and spatial tasks

What do you mean by harder tasks? IQ test questions are non-complex 1 dimensional problems.

 

[Crusile]

simple gamified jobs like machine gunner are most g-loaded while the most complex jobs like air traffic control is least g-loaded. The job with the most g-loaded job performance is probably something repetitive and simple like Toyota factory assembly line worker