Book of Intelligence - Achieve Changs IQ

[protomogger9873]

dnr books are for scrawny nerds and gays

 

[Rigged]

Im repeating because you wont directly respond to the argument. all you do is post outdated p-hacked studies WITHOUT quotes so idk what to respond to. I responded to your p-hacked studies with newer studies that show that their findings dont replicate

I did respond to the arguements… to absolutely every single one r u slow i make aure specifically to reply to every one, also idc if i didnt quote it thats absolutely ur own problem not mine if ur too retarded to read the studies than thats not my issues i already knew and read in the past most of the studies u sent anyways, also no u didnt u replied to my studies with studies older than mine… and i explained how my studies werent p hacked, ALSO thats an insane fallacy

If my study disagrees with u = automatic p hacked? U folded this is an auto submission at this point

 

[Crusile]

I did respond to the arguements… to absolutely every single one r u slow i make aure specifically to reply to every one, also idc if i didnt quote it thats absolutely ur own problem not mine if ur too retarded to read the studies than thats not my issues i already knew and read in the past most of the studies u sent anyways, also no u didnt u replied to my studies with studies older than mine… and i explained how my studies werent p hacked, ALSO thats an insane fallacy

If my study disagrees with u = automatic p hacked? U folded this is an auto submission at this point

I don't believe in iq's predictive validity of complex task performance. Why does IQ not correlate with objective measures of complex task performance like sales, while having an extremely high correlation with video game ability (low complex task)? Why is the g-loading of seemigly complex military jobs so much lower than simple jobs? You can handwave this by posting a p-hacked study where they subjectively determined what is a complex job and what is a simple job, just as i am doing, but it feels conflicting. Everything points to iq simply being an ok predictor of what iq tests test for; non-complex 1 dimensional task solving ability.

Is that what you should focus your efforts on "improving"? How about, instead, attempting tasks and learning through trial and error