Sikkunt23
Retired , here to look better. No affiliations
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2019
- Posts
- 10,202
- Reputation
- 17,716
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Yes Pitt mogs this trannyPitt Pitt Pitt
@Swolepenisman @Kingkellz @itsOVER @karbo
Pitt mogs hard@looxmakser49 @Introvertednarc who mogs ?
'descent' he is just bloated, which he can fix in a week. Meanwhile you need lefort 898 and a quadruple jaw surgery to closely resemble a human being.
Brad Pitt at 55 . Classically handsome old manBrad Pitt at 39:
View attachment 528526
Jordan Bloatrat at 23:
View attachment 528527
View attachment 528528
another week, another hard beatings for tranny
Angelina mandible mog him do hard
Scientology ne
Cope he still mog you into oblivion
he's 5'7Cope he still mog you into oblivion
Cruise mandible looks so recessed and mouthbreather tier here
jfl narcy cunt if you think you mog Tom Cruisehe's 5'7
its his best side profile shot of him gigamoggging iceman its just his competetion is too goodCruise mandible looks so recessed and mouthbreather tier here
Bro I was gonna make a post like this rn.
Jordan barret ( 5 11”-6.0”)
Male model high FHWR slayer
View attachment 528459View attachment 528462View attachment 528461View attachment 528463View attachment 528460View attachment 528464View attachment 528465View attachment 528466View attachment 528467View attachment 528468
Brad Pitt ( 5 11”????)
maesthetic actor slayer
View attachment 528479View attachment 528481View attachment 528473View attachment 528474View attachment 528475View attachment 528476View attachment 528477View attachment 528480View attachment 528482View attachment 528483View attachment 528484
@Kingkellz @MakinItHappen @Vidyacoper @inceletto @Chadeep @aestheticallypleasin @Patrick Baitman @ArvidGustavsson
View attachment 528492 View attachment 528493
Honestly brother, this forum is so washed. People here used to decide on who mogs based on their facial features like maxilla development, eye area etc. You cannot be serious when you look at these two pics and tell me that Pitt mogsBro I was gonna make a post like this rn.
These comparisons by the new users are so foolish.
You can clearly see for yourself how PSL is rapidly dying in 2020. due to such degeneracy.
People would be arguing about whether Barrett or O'Pry mogs back on lookism.
Now the Aussie, lion faced Barrett is being compared to people like Pitt who get mogged to oblivion by him aesthetically.
I can't believe the retarded normies of this forum vote for Brad due to this subconscious Hollywood status halo in the back of their subhuman skulls.
I'm legit about to cry to see such a based community be obliterated by ignorant newbies... ugh. @OwlGod was so right. It's so over.
They come up with the "muh lack of sex appeal cause no facial hair, no muscles " or the "Barrett has a small ramus" argument.Honestly brother, this forum is so washed. People here used to decide on who mogs based on their facial features like maxilla development, eye area etc. You cannot be serious when you look at these two pics and tell me that Pitt mogs
View attachment 528702View attachment 528703
Literally every feature Barrett has is miles better.
This is honestly one of the most true and sad things I've read in a while. This place right now is no different than subreddits like truerateme, where nobody has a clue about facial aesthetics and just judges based on personal preference Too many subhumans here can't cope with the fact they will never look like O'Pry, Barrett, Gandy and throw in these random gymcelled shitskins in argumentsThey come up with the "muh lack of sex appeal cause no facial hair, no muscles " or the "Barrett has a small ramus" argument.
They fail to realize that Barrett has a small ramus because he has excessively great maxillary forward growth. Plus the angle on it's own isn't repulsive at all. Barrett's lower third is better imo because it is balanced, the jaw line is much more visible and the massetters aren't overly trained like Brad's masseters which are weird and repulsive.
You make a good point about how people used to judge by features and dimorphism back before these days on PSL, especially on rating subforums. This is what made PSL unique from other subcultures. I agree, Barrett literally has every feature better than Pitt. He even has better collagen than Pitt... even after knowing the fact that he smokes and drinks (there are a few gifs and videos about this, i hope you know about those).
All the good users have left, plus there is nothing in my opinion, that is still left to be discussed and discovered in terms of facial aesthetics.
I only see people always people crying about Tinder results and unsuccess (when they aren't even competitive enough to even sign up XD), softmaxxing and claiming to have 1+ PSL points increase (lmao), race baiting and......... ethnics trying to introduce and fit in new, yet unknown shitskins into PSL because "Hey! they can slay women too ".
You can also see many who can't rate properly in PSL and use the 'out of 10' rating system too .
I blame all the newbies of 2020 for the pathetic downfall of this forum and the mighty PSL community.
this is copy and pasted tbh'descent' he is just bloated, which he can fix in a week. Meanwhile you need lefort 898 and a quadruple jaw surgery to closely resemble a human being.
it is and he knows itthis is copy and pasted tbh
View attachment 528763
Jordan who?
Because his facial development makes him look like a final fantasy character, which normies would find oddHonestly, I know where you’re coming from, and it makes sense that in order to be consistent with PSL, we have to evaluate based off what are considered good features by PSL. However, I would argue PSL is mostly pointless if girls aren’t actually attracted to people that do really well by PSL. Why does Barrett not do very well with girls. A lot of them say he looks weird. They aren’t coping, go on YouTube comments for classically handsome people like Cavill, or Chico etc. There is universal acclaim for them. Why then is Barrett more polarizing?
O’pry is more masculine/hunk than Barret and therefore has higher smv. Plus O’pry has ideal colouring for a white man too. Blonde is not attractive unless it’s dark blonde like Pitt.Sean O Pry has just as good facial development and there more universal acclaim towards him (though still a bit more polarizing than Cavill.) It doesn’t matter why they’d find it odd, if they find him less attractive as a consequence, I’d rather be Pitt. It’s like the roided up IFBB bodybuilders. Let’s assume their bodies are actually more impressive than anyone elses. Does it ultimately matter if they’re considered less attractive as a result?
Peak pitt is truly unmoggableIt bewilders me how people could choose Barrett