Calling all white HTNs and low-end Chadlites in England: are you happy to accept your fate or not?

[Detona]

Btw, you continued googling. Good. Now show me when Finland - Japan - Thailand is cheaper than a direct flight or connecting flight through Europe or the Middle East. Oh you won't do that, because it's not true. Again, what motivates you to spew nonsense?

Not wasting my time because google is easy and voice controlled.

 

[Wallenberg]

Not wasting my time because google is easy and voice controlled.

Yeah yeah... You were wrong.

I bet next you are going to claim that planes don't actually land but instead passengers use parachutes to get on the ground.

 

[Detona]

Learn to read.

He says it's common in SJU. That's a single airport. They explained the reason: the runway is so short (an airport on a small island) that they can't fuel the plane with all the required fuel because the plane can't take off with such weight on such a short runway. So they have to do a fuel stop at an airport with a longer runway.

This is not the case in 99% of airports.

So no. Fuel stops being common on a single small airport, located on a small island, doesn't mean that they are common everywhere.

You are not only retarded but also illiterate.

Cope.

More pwnage from your favorite website.

Technical Stops/refueling Stops:all The Data - Airliners.net

Due to jetsream, some westbound intercontinental flights require refueling/technical stops. Some eastbound flights also required T stop. I'm curious what routes currently and in the past require technical stop. I need the routing, name of airline and type of aircraft and year or decade of service:

Examples:Full name of city/airport is the technical stop:

PR 744 SFO-Guam-MNL current (frequently if not 100%)

PR 744 LAX-Guam-MNL current (frequently if not 100%)

CX 744 LAX-Taipei-HKG current (infrequently)

CX 744 LAX-Seoul Inchon-HKG current (infrequently)

PR DC8 SFO-HNL-Wake-MNL 1969 (100%)

PR 742 SFO-HNL-Guam-MNL in the 90s (frequently)

SK DC8 (series?) CPH-Sondre Stromfjord-LAX 60s (100%)

RG 707 GIG-LIM-LAX-Anchorage-NRT 80s (100%)

AF 707 HND-Wake-PPT-LIM 70s (100%)

TG DC8 BKK-Tashkent-SVO-CPH 70s

JL DC862 NRT-ANC-JFK-San Juan-VCP 80s SU IL86 SVO-Shannon-Gander-HVN 80s Any other routes?

Thanks for the data.

 

[Wallenberg]

Cope.

More pwnage from your favorite website.

Yeah, and that's from 16 years ago. You know what, planes have a longer range nowadays. Nowadays even single-aisle planes can fly intercontinental routes. That wasn't the case some time ago.

 

[EdouardManlet]

Rice boiler cope never fails to make me laugh

 

[Detona]

Yeah, and that's from 16 years ago. You know what, planes have a longer range nowadays. Nowadays even single-aisle planes can fly intercontinental routes. That wasn't the case some time ago.

Keep fucking coping, puta. Air travel hasn't changed at all in 16 years. Another painful thread from your favorite website... Tell me what year it concerns..

Why does AA not use the B789 on AA293 DEL-JFK to avoid fuel stops? - Airliners.net

As was stated previously AA doesn’t have any 787s at JFK. I don’t think it would be efficient to have one long haul international flight from JFK operated by a 789 while the rest are with the 77E and 77W. I also don’t know how many JFK-based F/A’s are trained on the 787.

 

[Detona]

Yeah yeah... You were wrong.

I bet next you are going to claim that planes don't actually land but instead passengers use parachutes to get on the ground.

Cope. I was never wrong anywhere in this thread. You however are struggling to clean up after yourself. It's been nothing but back to back reaming for you.

 

[Wallenberg]

@Detona Maybe you should travel to Thailand and get a wife from there - or maybe a Thai husband. After all Thai men and women are quite similar. Both have low standards, they will do anything to move to a richer country. Even marry incels. Then you would notice how the flight is a direct, nonstop flight, without any refueling BS.

I'm not going to answer you anymore. You lack life experience. You try to compensate by outright lies. You make pathetic excuses when you are called out. You haven't ever been on an airplane. You don't know the difference between a fuel stop and connecting flights. But if you learned something, at least you learned that Southeast Asia and East Asia are different things. You clearly didn't know it before. It's ok, you probably are too poor to afford a passport.

Even quora beats this forum sometimes. https://www.quora.com/How-often-do-airline-flights-have-to-stop-for-refueling

Learn about the great circle too. The earth isn't flat.

 

[Detona]

@Detona Maybe you should travel to Thailand and get a wife from there - or maybe a Thai husband. After all Thai men and women are quite similar. Both have low standards, they will do anything to move to a richer country. Even marry incels. Then you would notice how the flight is a direct, nonstop flight, without any refueling BS.

Easy for me to say. I'm from the USA where straight-line flights from Los Angeles to Bangkok are a breeze. You on the other hand have to travel in a fucked up trajectory, frequently involving fuel stops unless you catch the rare flight that doesn't.

I'm not going to answer you anymore. You lack life experience. You try to compensate by outright lies. You make pathetic excuses when you are called out. You haven't ever been on an airplane. You don't know the difference between a fuel stop and connecting flights. But if you learned something, at least you learned that Southeast Asia and East Asia are different things. You clearly didn't know it before. It's ok, you probably are too poor to afford a passport.

ROFLMAO! This bitch will be back for another spanking in an hour or less.
She loves punishment.

 

[Detona]

Even quora beats this forum sometimes. https://www.quora.com/How-often-do-airline-flights-have-to-stop-for-refueling

I see you're switching to a Hindu sub-70IQ site now that you've found out that the experts at airliners.net were going to tear you a new asshole.

 

[geezcel]

damn it feels good to be welsh

 

[Wallenberg]

Easy for me to say. I'm from the USA where straight-line flights from Los Angeles to Bangkok are a breeze. You on the other hand have to travel in a fucked up trajectory, frequently involving fuel stops unless you catch the rare flight that doesn't.

The distance from Los Angeles to Bangkok is 13 300 km. The southern route from Finland to Thailand is 8 300 km. The normal route is even shorter, 7 900 km. The flight from Los Angeles to Thailand is 60% longer than from Finland. So yeah, you proved my point... Flights from Los Angeles to Bangkok, which are 13 300 km, don't need fuel stops, so even shorter flights like flights from Finland to Thailand definitely don't need fuel stops. Learn some geography. You were already lost when you started the "Finnair uses the arctic route to fly to SEA" nonsense, which proved that you don't know anything about geography, and now you don't realize that Los Angeles is way further away from Thailand than Finland.

Also, by the way, there aren't direct flights from Los Angeles to Bangkok. But there are direct flights from Finland to Bangkok.

You should go out of your basement. You are a typical American who can't even afford a passport. Maybe for some Americans passports are too expensive (many Americans don't have any papers whatsoever which is truly 3rd world stuff), but that's not the norm in the world. 3% of Finns visit Thailand every year, so it's not rare. Only an American can think that visiting Thailand is too expensive when in reality Thailand is a popular destination for sexpats because of how cheap it is. Even NEETs can afford to sexpat in Thailand, as itsOVER proved. Americans have this tendency of thinking traveling abroad is a luxury that only the rich can afford, but then again, they are the same people that think healthcare and education are expensive luxuries too.

 

[Detona]

I thought you were finished talking to me? This little punk just keeps coming back for more

The distance from Los Angeles to Bangkok is 13 300 km. The southern route from Finland to Thailand is 8 300 km.

Don't care, most planes aren't fueled for a nonstop journey.

The normal route is even shorter, 7 900 km. The flight from Los Angeles to Thailand is 60% longer than from Finland. So yeah, you proved my point... Flights from Los Angeles to Bangkok, which are 13 300 km, don't need fuel stops, so even shorter flights like flights from Finland to Thailand definitely don't need fuel stops. Learn some geography. You were already lost when you started the "Finnair uses the arctic route to fly to SEA" nonsense, which proved that you don't know anything about geography, and now you don't realize that Los Angeles is way further away from Thailand than Finland.

Also, by the way, there aren't direct flights from Los Angeles to Bangkok. But there are direct flights from Finland to Bangkok.

Don't care, because vast majority of flights aren't fueled for nonstop journeys as shown to you repeatedly with multiple sources.

You should go out of your basement. You are a typical American who can't even afford a passport. Maybe for some Americans passports are too expensive (many Americans don't have any papers whatsoever which is truly 3rd world stuff), but that's not the norm in the world.

Cope. I already told you I have a passport. The USA has a higher GDP per capita than your country and higher individual income. Most of the world is far poorer than America.

3% of Finns visit Thailand every year, so it's not rare. Only an American can think that visiting Thailand is too expensive when in reality Thailand is a popular destination for sexpats because of how cheap it is.

3% is incredibly rare you fucking idiot. That's about the percentage of Finns who are rich. Thailand is cheap compared to Japan, but you're still not moving there and living a middle class lifestyle unless you have some sort of free or low-effort income, which the majority of reproductive age males do not.

Those 3% are mostly pensioners

Even NEETs can afford to sexpat in Thailand, as itsOVER proved. Americans have this tendency of thinking traveling abroad is a luxury that only the rich can afford, but then again, they are the same people that think healthcare and education are expensive luxuries too.

itsOVER doesn't prove anything. You can be NEET and still from a privileged background.

.

 

[Detona]

Now make sure you stick to your word this time about responding to me. Don't give me any of this bitch shit about "I'm through taoking to you~!" and then come running back like a battered housewife.

 

[Wallenberg]

Don't care, most planes aren't fueled for a nonstop journey.


Don't care, because vast majority of flights aren't fueled for nonstop journeys as shown to you repeatedly with multiple sources.

Yes, they are. Go ahead and find an example of these flights from Finland to Thailand with fuel stops. And no, connecting flights in Europe or Doha aren't the same as fuel stops. Doing a fuel stop in Europe would be retarded because it makes the flight way longer. Oh and I'm still waiting for that the evidence that Finnair uses Artic route for SEA flights.

Imagine claiming that flights from LA to Bangkok (13 300 km) don't need fuel stops and yet at the same time claiming that flights from Helsinki to Bangkok (7900 or 8300 km) require fuel stops.

And no, it's not rich people who travel to Thailand. It's mostly middle-class folks who do it.

Basically, you have no clue about who common traveling is. You think traveling is something that only rich people do, which is not true at all. Go visit touristy areas in Thailand and you notice they are full of average, middle-class people.

And 3% of the population visiting Thailand every year isn't rare. Many people, myself included, aren't interested in traveling to Thailand - and even if someone wants to travel to Thailand, they don't do it every year. Not everyone is sexpat. How big % of Americans travel to Thailand every year?

 

[Detona]

Yes, they are. Go ahead and find an example of these flights from Finland to Thailand with fuel stops. And no, connecting flights in Europe or Doha aren't the same as fuel stops. Doing a fuel stop in Europe would be retarded because it makes the flight way longer. Oh and I'm still waiting for that the evidence that Finnair uses Artic route for SEA flights.

Imagine claiming that flights from LA to Bangkok (13 300 km) don't need fuel stops and yet at the same time claiming that flights from Helsinki to Bangkok (7900 or 8300 km) require fuel stops.

Planes are fueled according to the number of passengers, frequency of flights, etc. LA to Bangkok is way more traveled by than Helsinki-Bangkok. Wtf do you thi k those flights ar3 stoping in Qatar for you absolute subhuman?

And no, it's not rich people who travel to Thailand. It's mostly middle-class folks who do it.

Basically, you have no clue about who common traveling is. You think traveling is something that only rich people do, which is not true at all. Go visit touristy areas in Thailand and you notice they are full of average, middle-class people.

Never said that you simple minded moron, learn reading comprehension.
"About the same percentage as rich people" =/= all the travelers are rich.
The point is that they are rare.

And 3% of the population visiting Thailand every year isn't rare.

Cope its extremely rare.

Many people, myself included, aren't interested in traveling to Thailand - and even if someone wants to travel to Thailand, they don't do it every year.

I guarantee you more people have thought about becoming billionaires or superheroes but guess what? A persons thoughts dont mean shit.

 

[BugeyeBigNoseCurry]

@Detona
View attachment 1741034View attachment 1741035View attachment 1741036View attachment 1741037View attachment 1741038

5th girl looks like a burn victim ngl

 

[Detona]

@Wallenberg

 

[Wallenberg]

Planes are fueled according to the number of passengers, frequency of flights, etc. LA to Bangkok is way more traveled by than Helsinki-Bangkok. Wtf do you thi k those flights ar3 stoping in Qatar for you absolute subhuman?

There aren't direct flights from LA to Bangkok. There are direct flights from Finland to Bangkok.

When Finnair flies to Bangkok, they don't stop in Qatar... Connecting flight =/= fuel stop. Completely different thing.

It seems that only 0,27% of Americans visit Thailand every year. For Finland the number is 2,7%. That's a huge difference and explains why you think traveling is only for rich people. That's why you have a hard time understanding that middle-class people can travel to Thailand.

 

[Detona]

There aren't direct flights from LA to Bangkok. There are direct flights from Finland to Bangkok.

Wrong, direct flights are extremely rare.

When Finnair flies to Bangkok, they don't stop in Qatar... Connecting flight =/= fuel stop. Completely different thing.

Wrong, it said 1 stop not connecting flight. Plane was the same = fuel stop.

It seems that only 0,27% of Americans visit Thailand every year. For Finland the number is 2,7%. That's a huge difference and explains why you think traveling is only for rich people. That's why you have a hard time understanding that middle-class people can travel to Thailand.

Except Thailand isn't the only place people fly to in America, moron. Compare Americans traveling to Japan, the Bahamas or Brazil.

 

[Detona]

Fewer than 15% of outbound travelers in Finland are young males.
@Wallenberg you're bleeding

Finland: tourism participation by age group 2022| Statista

Travelers from Finland preferred to travel domestic in 2022.

www.statista.com

 

[Wallenberg]

Google flights. Direct flights (=nonstop) from LA to Bangkok and Helsinki to Bangkok. Guess what. There aren't direct flights from LA to BKK. On the other hand, there are direct flights from Helsinki to BKK every day. Same days. @Detona

 

[Detona]

Google flights. Direct flights (=nonstop) from LA to Bangkok and Helsinki to Bangkok. Guess what. There aren't direct flights from LA to BKK. On the other hand, there are direct flights from Helsinki to BKK every day. Same days. @Detona

View attachment 1742298

Wrong, not nonstop.

 

[Wallenberg]

Wrong, not nonstop.

Those are nonstop flights like it says.

Go to flighradar24 and check the altitudes of flights from Helsinki to Bangkok. You will notice that the altitude is only low in Helsinki and Bangkok - so it's a nonstop flight. A359 has a range of 15 000 km. It's more than enough for an 8 300 km trip. It doesn't even have to be fully fueled since the range is way longer than HEL - BKK.

Here is altitude data (the blue line) for Bangkok - Helsinki flight. Notice how altitude is only low at the beginning and end of the flight - so it's a nonstop flight. If it would have fuel stops the altitude would go to 0 somewhere in the middle of the flight, because those planes are fueled on the ground.

 

[Deleted member 16944]

Living in central london I see this sort of pairing a lot and it upsets me. Fortunately there are still lots of HTN and chadlites still dating white girls though. But I am consistently blown away at the amount of WMAF (ugly Asian girls as well) in this city.

As an aside - what would you rate this couple?

E566-CBC7-8871-4-C9-E-A8-E2-18-BED1-AB2-BC1

Image E566-CBC7-8871-4-C9-E-A8-E2-18-BED1-AB2-BC1 hosted in ImgBB

ibb.co

 

[Detona]

Those are nonstop flights like it says.

Cope, extremely rare.

Go to flighradar24 and check the altitudes of flights from Helsinki to Bangkok. You will notice that the altitude is only low in Helsinki and Bangkok - so it's a nonstop flight. A359 has a range of 15 000 km. It's more than enough for an 8 300 km trip. It doesn't even have to be fully fueled since the range is way longer than HEL - BKK.

Cope, extremely rare.

Here is altitude data (the blue line) for Bangkok - Helsinki flight. Notice how altitude is only low at the beginning and end of the flight - so it's a nonstop flight. If it would have fuel stops the altitude would go to 0 somewhere in the middle of the flight, because those planes are fueled on the ground.

View attachment 1742312

Cope, one flight, not the norm.

 

[Wallenberg]

Let's take other examples. This time longer flights than Helsinki - Bangkok.

Helsinki - Singapore. Longer flight than to Bangkok: 9272 km vs 7900 km to Bangkok. No fuel stops. The blue line (altitude) shows that the plane was on the ground only in Helsinki and Singapore, so it was a nonstop flight.

Helsinki - Los Angeles. Longer flight than to Bangkok: 9035 km versus 7900 km to Bangkok. Again, no fuel stops.

So yeah. Fuel stops aren't needed on Finnair's flights. It's not a surprise really, because Airbus A359 has a range of 15 000 km, and all Finnair routes are shorter than that. Flight to Bangkok (7900 km according to Flighradar) is only half of the range (15 000). They could almost fly the whole round trip Helsinki - Bangkok - Helsinki without fueling. The world is getting smaller with modern planes.

 

[Deleted member 20131]

No. I'm leaving this shithole forever and only ever returning to see old friends and fam. Fuck everything about this place.

 

[Detona]

Let's take other examples. This time longer flights than Helsinki - Bangkok.

Helsinki - Singapore. Longer flight than to Bangkok: 9272 km vs 7900 km to Bangkok. No fuel stops. The blue line (altitude) shows that the plane was on the ground only in Helsinki and Singapore, so it was a nonstop flight.

Helsinki - Los Angeles. Longer flight than to Bangkok: 9035 km versus 7900 km to Bangkok. Again, no fuel stops.

Cope, extremely rare, not fueled equally.

So yeah. Fuel stops aren't needed on Finnair's flights. It's not a surprise really, because Airbus A359 has a range of 15 000 km, and all Finnair routes are shorter than that. Flight to Bangkok (7900 km according to Flighradar) is only half of the range (15 000). They could almost fly the whole round trip Helsinki - Bangkok - Helsinki without fueling. The world is getting smaller with modern planes.

View attachment 1742345

Cope, extremely rare, not fueled equally.

 

[Wallenberg]

Cope, extremely rare, not fueled equally.

Since you claim that direct flights are extremely rare (no, they aren't, nowadays fuel stops are extremely rare), go ahead and show me several Finnair flights that had fuel stops. Fuels stops show on the altitude graph. You can use Flightradar24 which tracks every flight.

The fact is that at this point you know that you are wrong and just don't have enough self-respect to admit it. If you disagree, go ahead and show me 5 flights where they had to to a fuel stop. Mind you that Finnair flies every day to Bangkok and frequently to Singapore and Los Angeles (longer flights than to Bangkok), so if fuel stops happen regularly, then it should be easy to find 5 flights where they did a fuel stop. Yet you don't find a single Finnair flight that had to do a fuel stop, let alone 5. It doesn't matter whether they are flights to Bangkok, Singapore or Los Angeles, all of them are direct flights. And they are the longest flights that Finnair flies.

 

[Xangsane]

damn it feels good to be welsh

Why?

 

[Bvnny.]

Imagine living in the UK in 2022

 

[Xangsane]

Living in central london I see this sort of pairing a lot and it upsets me. Fortunately there are still lots of HTN and chadlites still dating white girls though. But I am consistently blown away at the amount of WMAF (ugly Asian girls as well) in this city.

As an aside - what would you rate this couple?

E566-CBC7-8871-4-C9-E-A8-E2-18-BED1-AB2-BC1

Image E566-CBC7-8871-4-C9-E-A8-E2-18-BED1-AB2-BC1 hosted in ImgBB

ibb.co

What looks levels of white foids?
In what way does it upset you to see GL white men with noodles?
I've noticed on my trips to London that noodles tend to go for those who have more of a prettyboy or nerdy look, whites go for a love island or investment banker sort of look. What did you observe?

Borderline HTN-MTN

 

[Xangsane]

Im curious who white women are with.

Oofy doofys and soys if northern European, curries if slav.

 

[Detona]

Since you claim that direct flights are extremely rare (no, they aren't, nowadays fuel stops are extremely rare),

incorrect as shown by myltiple airliners.net threads posted earlier

go ahead and show me several Finnair flights that had fuel stops. Fuels stops show on the altitude graph. You can use Flightradar24 which tracks every flight.

The fact is that at this point you know that you are wrong and just don't have enough self-respect to admit it. If you disagree, go ahead and show me 5 flights where they had to to a fuel stop. Mind you that Finnair flies every day to Bangkok and frequently to Singapore and Los Angeles (longer flights than to Bangkok), so if fuel stops happen regularly, then it should be easy to find 5 flights where they did a fuel stop. Yet you don't find a single Finnair flight that had to do a fuel stop, let alone 5. It doesn't matter whether they are flights to Bangkok, Singapore or Los Angeles, all of them are direct flights. And they are the longest flights that Finnair flies.

 

[Wallenberg]

Yeah, those flights are connecting flights. Not refuels. Do you see that they are Qatar Airways? Qatar Airways doesn't fly Helsinki to Bangkok. Qatar flies Helsinki - Doha - Bangkok, because it's Qatar airlines, duh. Do you know that Doha is in Qatar?

You don't know the difference between connecting flight and refueling. It doesn't take 20 hours to refuel a plane.

Finnair flies nonstop Helsinki - Bangkok.

Go ahead. Show me a single Finnair flight from Helsinki to Bangkok that isn't a nonstop flight. You can't do that, because there isn't such flights despite Finnair flying to Thailand every single day.

They don't switch planes on refueling. Look at the right side of the picture and you see that planes switch from Boeing to Airbus and then from 777 to 787. That's not refueling: that's connecting flight. Fuel stop would mean that you would travel on the same plane but just stop for refueling...

 

[Detona]

Yeah, those flights are connecting flights. Not refuels. Do you see that they are Qatar Airways? Qatar Airways doesn't fly Helsinki to Bangkok. Qatar flies Helsinki - Doha - Bangkok, because it's Qatar airlines, duh. Do you know that Doha is in Qatar?

Wrong, the entire flight is Qatar airways from Helsinki to Finland the plane is still refueled and would not have been able to make the journey all the way to Bangkok.

You don't know the difference between connecting flight and refueling. It doesn't take 20 hours to refuel a plane.

The stop is not just for fuel + a connecting flight is not a nonstop flight. The plane also unloads parcel, gets a new pilot, etc.

Finnair flies nonstop Helsinki - Bangkok.

Rarely, but usually stops.

Go ahead. Show me a single Finnair flight from Helsinki to Bangkok that isn't a nonstop flight.

DepartureWed 00:15 Helsinki Vantaa (HEL), Helsinki
Terminal 2
AY131
Operated by Finnair
Airbus A350-900
13 h 5 min
ArrivalWed 18:20 Singapore Changi (SIN), Singapore
Terminal 1


Overnight transfer
Change planes
Transfer time 5 h 45 min
Note:The connecting flight departs the next day.



DepartureThu 00:05 Singapore Changi (SIN), Singapore
Terminal 1
MH610
Operated by Malaysia Airlines
Boeing 737-800
1 h 0 min
ArrivalThu 01:05 Kuala Lumpur International Airport (KUL), Kuala Lumpur
Terminal M

Transfer
Change planes
Transfer time 7 h 55 min
Note:Long wait



DepartureThu 09:00 Kuala Lumpur International Airport (KUL), Kuala Lumpur
Terminal M
MH784
Operated by Malaysia Airlines
Boeing 737-800
2 h 15 min
ArrivalThu 10:15 Bangkok Suvarnabhumi International Airport (BKK), Bangkok

 

[Wallenberg]

Wrong, the entire flight is Qatar airways from Helsinki to Finland the plane is still refueled and would not have been able to make the journey all the way to Bangkok.

Nope. The planes change in Doha. Look at the picture. The right side shows the planes (Airbus and Boeing). That's a connecting flight. A fuel stop would mean that the plane would be the same for the whole trip. That's not clearly the case, there are actually 3 different plane models...

So let me explain this since you have problems understanding this.

Connecting flight: you travel to one airport, get out of the plane and get into another flight.

A fuel stop: the plane stops at the airport for refueling, but you continue your trip with the same plane.

Also, Malaysian airlines connecting flights is different. Finnair flies directly to Bangkok. You can use connection if you want, but that's not necessary and it's not refueling.

Finnair flies to Bangkok directly every single day. That's not rare - especially since there are places like Los Angeles where you can't fly from Bangkok directly at all.

 

[6ft4]

White women are dropping the ball
Narcy HTN/Low Chadlites need to feel worshipped and Asians are most likely to provide that
I should be celebrating this as it would men less Chadlites to compete with for white women but then I remembered that white women with nice personalities and cute looks are LTN only

 

[Xangsane]

White women are dropping the ball
Narcy HTN/Low Chadlites need to feel worshipped and Asians are most likely to provide that
I should be celebrating this as it would men less Chadlites to compete with for white women but then I remembered that white women with nice personalities and cute looks are LTN only

That's because those white women keep getting pumped and dumped by the same HTNs/Chadlites/Chads they want, so they settle for an oofy doofy or soy nigga. If Slavic, she goes with a currycel.

@Br0sk1 @Zer0/∞

 

[Deleted member 19610]

The big thing that drives this kind of relationship is the SELF HATE of the ethnic, particularly asian women. This is why life is brutal for hapa males. It's very difficult when you look at your own mother and realise that she hates you for things that are just inherent and you had no choice over. It should be the opposite. I think the asians only end up having kids because the guy wants kids. If she was extremely lucky she would get a guy that can't have kids and they can adopt a pure white kid from some poor EE country. Anyway, you have to understand that self hate drives these things and is really huge. Most ethnic women of all political persuasions carry extreme self hate.

 

[Detona]

That's because those white women keep getting pumped and dumped by the same HTNs/Chadlites/Chads they want, so they settle for an oofy doofy or soy nigga. If Slavic, she goes with a currycel.

@Br0sk1 @Zer0/∞

Cope. White women don't get Chads and really don't even want chads. They are intimidated by chads. White women settle for the scraps of society.

 

[Detona]

The big thing that drives this kind of relationship is the SELF HATE of the ethnic, particularly asian women. This is why life is brutal for hapa males. It's very difficult when you look at your own mother and realise that she hates you for things that are just inherent and you had no choice over. It should be the opposite. I think the asians only end up having kids because the guy wants kids. If she was extremely lucky she would get a guy that can't have kids and they can adopt a pure white kid from some poor EE country. Anyway, you have to understand that self hate drives these things and is really huge. Most ethnic women of all political persuasions carry extreme self hate.

Wrong. What drives these relationships is male preference for Asian women, who are the most feminine and desirable and attractive on Earth.

 

[Detona]

Nope. The planes change in Doha. Look at the picture. The right side shows the planes (Airbus and Boeing). That's a connecting flight. A fuel stop would mean that the plane would be the same for the whole trip. That's not clearly the case, there are actually 3 different plane models...l

Again you are failing to understand that the plane would need to stop for refueling regardless. The plane still gets refueled regardless of who is on it, because Finnair rarely fuels planes to capacity for nonstop flights to BKK.

So let me explain this since you have problems understanding this.

Connecting flight: you travel to one airport, get out of the plane and get into another flight.

A fuel stop: the plane stops at the airport for refueling, but you continue your trip with the same plane.

More simple minded stupidity. The plane still needs refueling after it stops and changes passengers.

Also, Malaysian airlines connecting flights is different. Finnair flies directly to Bangkok. You can use connection if you want, but that's not necessary and it's not refueling.

Dead wrong, in most cases it is.

Finnair flies to Bangkok directly every single day. That's not rare - especially since there are places like Los Angeles where you can't fly from Bangkok directly at all.

Flying every day =/= all the flights every day are like this.

 

[Detona]

Daily reminder what the driver of these relationships is:

 

[Deleted member 19610]

Wrong. What drives these relationships is male preference for Asian women, who are the most feminine and desirable and attractive on Earth.

Most guys who have true genetic worth to high quality white women are not going to choose an Asian, lets be real here. It's a second choice for incels who can't get white women. I mean there are also going to be legit cases where a liberal type guy just meets an asian by happenstance and gets with her without really understanding the racial dynamic and the self hate of the asian that is fuelling the relationship. It's low percentage though and the majority are like I said, low genetic worth whites who have given up on trying to get a white woman. Chad or Chadlite are living life on easy mode and not really thinking deeply about race. They get along with everyone and wish the best for everyone since they know their own lives are amazing. In that example of the lib guy getting with the asian and not really understanding the self hate of the girl, the sad thing is that his kids will understand all this no doubt. If they don't, other kids will let them know. You can give the Asian woman a pass for having a lack of integrity here regarding the kids due to the self hate and female nature but you can't really forgive the guy if he is a racially aware right winger. It just shows a complete lack of integrity and scummy behaviour. You could never ever trust a guy like that.

Also, RIP Wilkes McDermid. Anyone disagreeing with me should look up his posts and blog.

 

[Wallenberg]

@Detona Here are the flight histories of recent Helsinki - Bangkok flights. As you can see Finnair flies that route every single day. Thailand is a quite common destination for sexpats after all. Click play and then click the altitude curve... Guess what. Every single one of them is a direct flight. The same applies to return flights (Bangkok - Helsinki).

So no, direct flights aren't rare. They are the norm. Sometimes people choose connecting flights, but it's not because of any refueling BS, but because of cheaper tickets or another reason like that. Modern widebodies can easily fly 7900 km without refueling - as evidenced by Finnair's daily Helsinki - Bangkok - Helsinki flights.

But I will add a couple more flight histories. The second link is Helsinki - Singapore, which is a longer flight than Helsinki - Bangkok. Again, all flights are nonstop without fuel stops. The last link is Helsinki - Chicago, which is quite a long trip too. And guess what, yep, no fuel stops: these too are nonstop flights.

Now that I have shown you how you can use Flightradar to check flights' altitude graphs, go ahead and show me these Finnair's fuel stops. Should be easy since you claimed that fuel stops are common - especially since Finnair flies to Bangkok every single day. If fuel stops are common you should easily find several examples of those. But no, you won't find those fuel stops. They would show on altitude graphs, but altitude graphs show that those flights are nonstop - takeoff in Helsinki and land in Bangkok without stops on the way.

I guess for people who haven't been on an airplane (like you) this can feel marvelous and weird: "you can fly nonstop to another continent? Really? I can't believe that because I have never left my hometown!" But yes, that's true.

because Finnair rarely fuels planes to capacity for nonstop flights to BKK.

Finnair flies nonstop to BKK every single day. See the first link.

You are simply making up stuff trying to compensate for your ignorance. You didn't know how far modern planes can fly without refueling. It shows that you really haven't traveled.

Live Flight Tracker - Real-Time Flight Tracker Map | Flightradar24

The world’s most popular flight tracker. Track planes in real-time on our flight tracker map and get up-to-date flight status & airport information.

www.flightradar24.com

Live Flight Tracker - Real-Time Flight Tracker Map | Flightradar24

The world’s most popular flight tracker. Track planes in real-time on our flight tracker map and get up-to-date flight status & airport information.

www.flightradar24.com

Live Flight Tracker - Real-Time Flight Tracker Map | Flightradar24

The world’s most popular flight tracker. Track planes in real-time on our flight tracker map and get up-to-date flight status & airport information.

www.flightradar24.com

 

[Deleted member 16944]

What looks levels of white foids?
In what way does it upset you to see GL white men with noodles?
I've noticed on my trips to London that noodles tend to go for those who have more of a prettyboy or nerdy look, whites go for a love island or investment banker sort of look. What did you observe?

Borderline HTN-MTN

Yeah that's basically right but I don't really care what Asian women go for. I'm not really attracted to them.

You're rating the guy HTN or MTN or the girl? Or both of them?

 

[Detona]

@Detona Here are the flight histories of recent Helsinki - Bangkok flights. As you can see Finnair flies that route every single day. Thailand is a quite common destination for sexpats after all. Click play and then click the altitude curve... Guess what. Every single one of them is a direct flight. The same applies to return flights (Bangkok - Helsinki).

So no, direct flights aren't rare. They are the norm. Sometimes people choose connecting flights, but it's not because of any refueling BS, but because of cheaper tickets or another reason like that. Modern widebodies can easily fly 7900 km without refueling - as evidenced by Finnair's daily Helsinki - Bangkok - Helsinki flights.

But I will add a couple more flight histories. The second link is Helsinki - Singapore, which is a longer flight than Helsinki - Bangkok. Again, all flights are nonstop without fuel stops. The last link is Helsinki - Chicago, which is quite a long trip too. And guess what, yep, no fuel stops: these too are nonstop flights.

Now that I have shown you how you can use Flightradar to check flights' altitude graphs, go ahead and show me these Finnair's fuel stops. Should be easy since you claimed that fuel stops are common - especially since Finnair flies to Bangkok every single day. If fuel stops are common you should easily find several examples of those. But no, you won't find those fuel stops. They would show on altitude graphs, but altitude graphs show that those flights are nonstop - takeoff in Helsinki and land in Bangkok without stops on the way.

I guess for people who haven't been on an airplane (like you) this can feel marvelous and weird: "you can fly nonstop to another continent? Really? I can't believe that because I have never left my hometown!" But yes, that's true.


Finnair flies nonstop to BKK every single day. See the first link.

You are simply making up stuff trying to compensate for your ignorance. You didn't know how far modern planes can fly without refueling. It shows that you really haven't traveled.

Live Flight Tracker - Real-Time Flight Tracker Map | Flightradar24

The world’s most popular flight tracker. Track planes in real-time on our flight tracker map and get up-to-date flight status & airport information.

www.flightradar24.com

Live Flight Tracker - Real-Time Flight Tracker Map | Flightradar24

The world’s most popular flight tracker. Track planes in real-time on our flight tracker map and get up-to-date flight status & airport information.

www.flightradar24.com

Live Flight Tracker - Real-Time Flight Tracker Map | Flightradar24

The world’s most popular flight tracker. Track planes in real-time on our flight tracker map and get up-to-date flight status & airport information.

www.flightradar24.com

Cope, cherry selected rare flights. Multiple airliners.net forum posts show you thst modern airplanes rarely negotiate these distances without refueling, particularly from countries like Finland where fuel is so expensive.


Keep working hard for me, bot.

 

[Detona]

Most guys who have true genetic worth to high quality white women are not going to choose an Asian, lets be real here.

wrong


Daily reminder what the driver of these relationships is:

It's a second choice for incels who can't get white women.

Nope. WMAF is rated more attractive than WMWF.


"Compared with intraracial daters, interracial daters reported that their partners saw them more positively on attractiveness, cerebral, and relational attributes (Study 1), rated their partners more positively on attractiveness and cerebral attributes (Study 2), and were rated by independent coders as more physically attractive (Study 3). Implications are discussed."

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/274233268_The_sweetness_of_forbidden_fruit_Interracial_daters_are_more_attractive_than_intraracial_daters

I mean there are also going to be legit cases where a liberal type guy just meets an asian by happenstance and gets with her without really understanding the racial dynamic and the self hate of the asian that is fuelling the relationship. It's low percentage though and the majority are like I said, low genetic worth whites who have given up on trying to get a white woman. Chad or Chadlite are living life on easy mode and not really thinking deeply about race. They get along with everyone and wish the best for everyone since they know their own lives are amazing. In that example of the lib guy getting with the asian and not really understanding the self hate of the girl, the sad thing is that his kids will understand all this no doubt. If they don't, other kids will let them know. You can give the Asian woman a pass for having a lack of integrity here regarding the kids due to the self hate and female nature but you can't really forgive the guy if he is a racially aware right winger. It just shows a complete lack of integrity and scummy behaviour. You could never ever trust a guy like that.

Also, RIP Wilkes McDermid. Anyone disagreeing with me should look up his posts and blog.

White women are consistently rated less attractive and desirable than Asian women.