RidgewayLasher
Greycel
- Joined
- Nov 9, 2022
- Posts
- 63
- Reputation
- 65
Look up Dominant vs. Recessive genetic traits.Can someone explain to me why light colouring is seen as feminine, and dark colouring is seen as masculine
View attachment 1928612
The top highlighted section, North europe (where the lightest skin, hair, and eyes, people exist)
Are statistically, the tallest, highest strength, highest testosterone, biggest dicks, richest, widest bodies, (have studies to prove all of this if you need it but dotn want to be brutal to my fellow currybros)
And the bottom highlighted section, south america, north africa, middle east, india, east asia and south east asia.(have studies to prove all of this if you need it but dont want to be brutal to my fellow currybros)
Are the people with the darkest skin, darkest hair, and darkest eyes.
And they statistically are the shortest, lowest strength, lowest testoerone, poorest, smallest dicks, most framecel bodies
So why in any sane dimension, would darker be associated with more masculine, and lighter be associated with more feminine?
So without picking the weakest boned nordic and comparing it to the strongest boned ethnic.
Can someone give me a good reason?
@Detona