Can't believe the ruskiee are such pathetic loser

They should have done it already back in 2014 when Ukraine was shit with no western support and used a much bigger army than what Ukraine has. Seriously what was the Kremlin thinking JFL
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 2130
Himars is a MLRS, not a main battle tank. Things like these make it obvious that you don't know anything.
OMG, COPENBERG started realizing that tanks DO NOT MEAN SHIT in the modern warfare when they can be destroyed by a portable launcher.
Besides, Finland has M270 MLRS, which is better suited to Finland. So no, HIMARS isn't a miracle weapon. It's just an MLRS.
HIMARS IS A MIRACLE WEAPON. If Finland does not have them while fighting Russia, it will be OVER for finland even sooner than it could have been.
 
Dumbass, we were comparing tanks.

So, either show how Leopard survives Javelin, or shut up about "muh russian tanks are inferior to Abrams" shit.
Western tanks have better fire control systems, better mobility, better armor.
 
OMG, COPENBERG started realizing that tanks DO NOT MEAN SHIT in the modern warfare.

HIMARS IS A MIRACLE WEAPON. If Finland does not have them while fighting Russia, it will be OVER for finland even sooner than it could have been.
Finland has M270, which is better suited version of Himars.. Do you even know what is M270? Use google.

Himars isn't a miracle weapon. It's a rocket launcher.
 
  • +1
Reactions: johnsmithcel
Western tanks have better fire control systems, better mobility, better armor.
NOTHING is proven from what you said. NOTHING.

Most probably, this is BULLSHIT.

Russian tanks > NATO TANKS because of T-14. Otherwise, EQUAL.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 14392, johnsmithcel and Deleted member 16474
NOTHING is proven from what you said. NOTHING.

Most probably, this is BULLSHIT.

Russian tanks > NATO TANKS because of T-14. Otherwise, EQUAL.
Nope. There is no reason to belive that T-14 is better than western tanks. Russian equipment has failed time after time. Russia can't even produce T-14 in big numbers.
 
  • +1
Reactions: johnsmithcel
Finland has M270, which is better suited version of Himars.. Do you even know what is M270? Use google.

Himars isn't a miracle weapon. It's a rocket launcher.
Dumbass, Ukraine had M270 in already in June. They DID NOT DO SHIT. Russia was advancing.

Everything changed only when HIMARS arrived.
 
Dumbass, Ukraine had M270 in already in June. They DID NOT DO SHIT. Russia was advancing.

Everything changed only when HIMARS arrived.
Ok, so you don't even know the difference between them. M270 is tracked, which makes it better for forests. HIMARS is wheeled, which makes it faster on roads. M270 can fire 12 rockets, Himars only 6. They are both equally accurate. M270 has better armor. They both fire the same rockets.
 
  • +1
Reactions: johnsmithcel
Russia is winning hard. This war won’t last till 2024
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 14392, johnsmithcel, Deleted member 16474 and 1 other person
Ok, so you don't even know the difference between them. M270 is tracked, which makes it better for forests. HIMARS is wheeled, which makes it faster on roads. M270 can fire 12 rockets, Himars only 6. They are both equally accurate. M270 has better armor. They both fire the same rockets.
Thx for intro, but M270 is a GOOD AIM for any missiles, like Kalibr. This is why it DOES NOT MEAN SHIT.

HIMARS is BREAKTHROUGH because mobile. M270 IS SHIT.

Otherwise, explain WHY ukraine had been fucking loosing with M270 but started winning with HIMARS? YOu CANT?
 
Thx for intro, but M270 is a GOOD AIM for any missiles, like Kalibr. This is why it DOES NOT MEAN SHIT.

HIMARS is BREAKTHROUGH because mobile. M270 IS SHIT.

Otherwise, epxlain WHY ukraine had been fucking loosing tith M270 but started winnig with HIMARS? YOu CANT?
Here's a pic. M270 is better for forests, and HIMARS is better for roads. M270 can fire 12 rockets, and HIMARS 6. M270 has better armor.

HIMARS isn't a miracle weapon. It's an MLRS. Definitely a good system, but it's not a miracle weapon. There aren't miracle weapons. Anyone who has a slightest clue of military matters knows that HIMARS isn't a miracle weapon.
And a lot has changed. A single weapon system won't change the war.


M270A1_IAC_and_M142_HIMARS_are_able_to_fire_a_wide_range_of_rockets_and_missiles_925_001.jpg
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 2130
Leopard 2 is more accurate and has better mobility and armor. It doesn't blow off its turret like Russian tanks.
not all leopards have the advanced like 600mm+ armor but what do they have is reverse speed they can go 30+km/h reverse meanwhile russian tanks go 4km/h so they are a sitting duck

leopards also can blow up the same way like turret like explosion (turkish leopards in syria)

modern anti tank weapons just nullify tanks armor
 
  • +1
Reactions: Wallenberg
not all leopards have the advanced like 600mm+ armor but what do they have is reverse speed they can go 30+km/h reverse meanwhile russian tanks go 4km/h so they are a sitting duck

leopards also can blow up the same way like turret like explosion (turkish leopards in syria)

modern anti tank weapons just nullify tanks armor
Armor matters when the hit is from far away or with not so good weapon. Every hit isn't necessarily deadly to tank crews or the tank itself.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 2130 and Deleted member 16474
Thx for intro, but M270 is a GOOD AIM for any missiles, like Kalibr. This is why it DOES NOT MEAN SHIT.

HIMARS is BREAKTHROUGH because mobile. M270 IS SHIT.

Otherwise, explain WHY ukraine had been fucking loosing with M270 but started winning with HIMARS? YOu CANT?
god bless himars 🥺 , their accuracy is crucial combined with us intelligence they satelite view russian locations and spy drone intelligence gatherings 🙏
 
god bless himars 🥺 , their accuracy is crucial combined with us intelligence they satelite view russian locations and spy drone intelligence gatherings 🙏

The thumbnail of that video is actually showing a Russian Air Force jet crashing into an apartment building lol
You can see the pilot parachuting out in the top right

 
Last edited:
  • Woah
Reactions: Deleted member 16474
Russia has spent tens of billions of dollars on its armed forces, yet they have managed to conquer only a small part of Ukraine. Meanwhile, Ukraine built its military from scratch in the last 9 years. Lol.
They got all of it from the USA and NATO.
 
They got all of it from the USA and NATO.
They've got a lot of important supplies from NATO, but most of their equipment is still old Soviet shit
 
  • +1
Reactions: Wallenberg
They've got a lot of important supplies from NATO, but most of their equipment is still old Soviet shit
They have been given more $$ value in weapons than all of the world's armies but 3 in the last year.

They are in no way getting shit without NATO support.
 
It wont matter its still only a matter of time before whole ukraine is conquered
 
  • JFL
Reactions: johnsmithcel
1 year and couldn't take Ukraine
1 whole year
30k troops 2000 tanks 4000 truck apcs 400 special vehicles destroyed

4 ships destroyed
20 small s
80 helicopters
20 jets
1 trillion damage to the economy
10 Ukraine cities destroy even though the aim was to take Ukraine without much damage

Putin has destroyed Russia
He need the angle punishment from vikings View attachment 2037921
1673725555632
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 14392 and Wallenberg
They have been given more $$ value in weapons than all of the world's armies but 3 in the last year.

They are in no way getting shit without NATO support.
Most of their firearms are Soviet kalashnikovs
Most of their armored vehicles are Soviet BTRs and BMPs
Most of their artillery are Soviet cannons and MLRS
All of their tanks (right now) are Soviet tanks
All of their aircraft are Soviet jets

NATO support is crucial obviously but saying their entire military is built off NATO is incorrect
 
  • +1
Reactions: Wallenberg and Deleted member 16474
Most of their firearms are Soviet kalashnikovs
Most of their armored vehicles are Soviet BTRs and BMPs
Most of their artillery are Soviet cannons and MLRS
All of their tanks (right now) are Soviet tanks
All of their aircraft are Soviet jets

NATO support is crucial obviously but saying their entire military is built off NATO is incorrect
he is a coping subhuman in favour of russia ZZZ

those russian imperial invader supporters should just go to russia and get drafted

Russia needs all the manpower they can get that is why they are desperately trying to mobilize so many men

it maybe could make dota 2 playable again if the russians get drafted and used as a cannon fodder :oops:
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Trilogy
It wont matter its still only a matter of time before whole ukraine is conquered
Just 2 more weeks bro and Russian t-34s will be rolling into Berlin
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 16474

Similar threads

vinn98
Replies
0
Views
14
vinn98
vinn98
F
Replies
1
Views
30
bdizzle1
bdizzle1
tallcel
Replies
7
Views
74
TGUN.
TGUN.
Jatt
Replies
5
Views
72
Shirobon
Shirobon
brazzon
Replies
28
Views
127
brazzon
brazzon

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
Sponsored
Stake.us
America's #1 Social Casino
Slots, Poker & More
Join Now →