Collective IQ will always trump Individual IQ

[WOMENAREQUEENSNOT]

Here we have the infamous 1+1=3 situation, now some of you might say, well why does it equal 3? You're a dumbass, 1+1 is always 2, well you're in for a surprise and I'm about to destroy your muh IQ cope, cooperation is worth more than just addition, we're talking two CPUs instead of one, the good thing about life is that you can stack them infinetly obviously within bounds of supply and demand, you individualists would never understand, that muh IQ and why can't I do everything alone is the biggest cope you could ever delude yourself with, this is not to say that you can't be manipulative, you can, just don't isolate yourself thinking you're so smart, you're lying to yourself, infact you're yourself worst enemy, isolation is only for taking time to reflect on your past actions, and dwelve deeply in thought, boredom generates the ability to enjoy anything so I'd say only go for it when you feel worn out but never prolong isolation thinking you're too smart.

 

[LooksOrDeath]

schizo ^

 

[Deleted member 5892]

 

[WOMENAREQUEENSNOT]

schizo ^

You listen to After Dark

 

[Lux]

Suggesting people can actually cooperate properly & are smart to begin with.

 

[Deleted member 15854]

You listen to After Dark

its rlly good song when u need motivation tho ngl

 

[Gonthar]

 

[LooksOrDeath]

You listen to After Dark

I do.

 

[jaw_is_law]

cope

most of the people that change the world are part of 00.000001% of the population

literally one person can affect the lives of 99.99% of people but its not really about IQ more about luck and IQ

 

[WOMENAREQUEENSNOT]

I do.

You're literally an embodiment to what I wrote.

 

[WOMENAREQUEENSNOT]

cope

most of the people that change the world are part of 00.000001% of the population

literally one person can affect the lives of 99.99% of people but its not really about IQ more about luck and IQ

00.000001% in terms of what?
Wealth? In terms of what exactly? I bet you skip credits on every movie/game you ever watched/played.
Most of your billionaire copes would amount to nothing without dedicated team/staff that they helped create, so no although they take credit, they wouldn't have reached shit without collective collaboration, only because they're paid/recognized more than their workers you're here spewing this bullshit crap, name one billionaire who changed the world without relying on anyone.
Nicolas Tesla is smart asf but where did that get him? He couldn't collaborate effectively and was used to further someone else own image, oh who created light? very few would tell you it's Tesla and not Eddison, Eddison was smart but he knew that alone he would amount to nothing, he understood the value of collective IQ unlike Tesla.

 

[LooksOrDeath]

You're literally an embodiment to what I wrote.

I am.

 

[WOMENAREQUEENSNOT]

Luck is also a MEGACOPE, the only reason you say that is because you don't have a team, a squad that helps you push through the frontline to mainstream media, and market properly, as a result you will live a sad, lonely life blaming it on concepts such as luck.

 

[Stopping@Nothing19]

isn't it obvious that 2 brains is better than 1?

 

[WOMENAREQUEENSNOT]

isn't it obvious that 2 brains is better than 1?

It should be, but niggas out here unironically promoting copes such as luck, me alone and my big brain better than you like life is some one on one fair and square game, the point is even if you're big brain as you claim, that shit amounts to nothing if you don't click up with some other niggas regardless whether they're as big brains or not, you're literally wasting your cognitive ability by playing lone wolf.

That shit doesn't work, has never worked and internet has you believe like it does.
The biggest streamers who some you mfs watch that 'seem' like the product of one person effort has literally a whole production staff behind it, some of mfs here are beyond help in their isolated delusional world.

 

[Lihito]

legit clown world at this point

 

[fuggg]

this is the only case when n > 0.5, otherwise a collective will always go for worse choices than a single high iq individual.

look up "condorcet-jury-theorem"

 

[WOMENAREQUEENSNOT]

this is the only case when n > 0.5, otherwise a collective will always go for worse choices than a single high iq individual.

look up "condorcet-jury-theorem"

I like your post to reputation ration, perfectly balanced as all things should be.

Thanks, I'll look it up.